题名

多元制度邏輯的共生之道－以甘樂文創為例

并列篇名

The Symbiosis Strategies among Multiple Institutional Logics: A Case Study of ＂CAN Culture Art and Nature＂

DOI

10.6504/JMBR.202112_38(4).0008

作者

陳蕙芬(Hui-Fen Chen)；張瑜倩(Yu-Chien Chang)

关键词

制度邏輯 ； 制度複雜性 ； 策略性回應 ； 社會企業 ； 質性個案研究 ； institutional logic ； institutional complexity ； strategic response ； social enterprise ； qualitative case study

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

38卷4期（2021 / 12 / 01）

页次

613 - 640

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

現代組織面臨多元制度邏輯環境已勢不可免，社會企業具解決社會問題與企業永續的複合色彩，如何回應多制度邏輯間的衝突為其重要實務議題。制度邏輯文獻對此議題的探討，以探求回應策略來化解制度邏輯衝突為主；然而，如何讓制度邏輯衝突的解方具有存續動能是研究缺口。本研究選取甘樂文創為個案，以質性研究法進入組織搜集訪談、觀察與文件資料，以紮根途徑分析之。研究發現甘樂文創對多元制度邏輯產生的衝突展現出三種兼容並蓄之道，包括「人員培力、接力循環」、「設計顯形、彰顯價值」，與「管理融合、資源串流」三種策略，創造人力的循環、設計的循環與資源的循環，各自帶來接力、價值與正當性的效果。本研究提出社會企業回應制度邏輯衝突的解方－「共生」策略，能使解方本身具有存續動能。本研究發現對制度邏輯文獻與社會企業及非營利組織有所啟示。
英文摘要

It is inevitable for modern organizations to deal with multiple institutional logics in their daily operations. Social enterprises have a dual focus on solving social problems and being financially sustainable; as a result, it has become crucial for them to respond to these social conflicts rooted in multiple institutional logics. The relevant extant literature pays more attention to resolving institutional logic conflicts while there is a need to discuss and examine how multiple institutional logics interact with each other. A representative social enterprise in Taiwan, CAN Culture Art and Nature, was selected as the case study. Qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews with stakeholders, participant observations inside the organization as well as second-hand data examination, are undertook to collect data. The inductive approach based on the grounded theory is employed for data analysis. Our research findings show that CAN uses three strategies in response to multiple institutional logics, in order to create a cycle which embraces a variety of resources in practice. In addition, this research proposes the ＂symbiosis＂ strategy to respond conflicts among multiple institutional logics for social enterprises. The managerial implications to social enterprises and non-profit organizations are also proposed in this paper.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 翁晶晶, J.,謝英哲, Y. C.(2019)。績效薪資改革的盲點：制度邏輯的新視角。中山管理評論，27(1)，139-178。
    連結：
  2. 涂敏芬, M. F.,洪世章, S. C.(2016)。建構服務創新的制度工作。臺大管理論叢，27(1)，129-154。
    連結：
  3. 陳蕙芬, H. F.(2015)。柔韌設計：化機構阻力為創新助力。中山管理評論，23(1)，13-55。
    連結：
  4. 陳蕙芬, H. F.(2019)。以物易悟：以柔韌設計化解機構阻力。組織與管理，12(2)，167-227。
    連結：
  5. 劉佳怡, C. Y.,蕭志同, C.-T.,劉仲戌, C. S.(2017)。社會企業之永續經營模式：以里仁公司為例。管理與系統，24(3)，455-476。
    連結：
  6. 蔡依倫, I. L.(2016)。新自由主義的兩張面孔：分析社會福利民營化政策的脫鉤與接合對身心障礙者運動的影響。組織與管理，9(2)，155-201。
    連結：
  7. Alvesson, M.,Spicer, A.(2019).Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis?.Organization Studies,40(2),199-218.
  8. Andersson, T.,Liff, R.(2018).Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare.Journal of Professions and Organization,5(2),71-87.
  9. Apostolopoulos, N.(Ed.),Al-Dajani, H.(Ed.),Holt, D.(Ed.),Jones, P.(Ed.),Newbery, R.(Ed.)(2018).Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals.Bingley, UK:Emerald.
  10. Baldassarre, B.,Schepers, M.,Bocken, N.,Cuppen, E.,Korevaar, G.,Calabretta, G.(2019).Industrial Symbiosis: Towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives.Journal of Cleaner Production,216,446-460.
  11. Battilana, J.,Besharov, M.,Mitzinneck, B.(2017).On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research.The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism,London:
  12. Battilana, J.,Dorado, S.(2010).Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations.Academy of Management Journal,53(6),1419-1440.
  13. Besharov, M. L.(2014).The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values.Academy of Management Journal,57(5),1485-1512.
  14. Besharov, M. L.,Smith, W. K.(2014).Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications.Academy of Management Review,39(3),364-381.
  15. Binder, A.(2007).For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics.Theory and Society,36(6),547-571.
  16. Borzaga, C.,Defourny, J.(2001).The emergence of social enterprise.London:Routledge.
  17. Bryman, A.(2004).Social research methods.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  18. Carroll, G. R.,Hannan, M. T.(2000).Why corporate demography matters: Policy implications of organizational diversity.California Management Review,42(3),148-163.
  19. Corley, K. G.,Gioia, D. A.(2004).Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off.Administrative Science Quarterly,49(2),173-208.
  20. Cornelissen, J. P.,Akemu, O.,Jonkman, J. G. F.,Werner, M. D.(2021).Building character: The formation of organizational identity in a social enterprise.Journal of Management Studies,58(5),1294-1330.
  21. Department of Trade and Industry(2002).Social enterprise: A strategy for success.London:Department of Trade and Industry.
  22. Dey, I.(1993).Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists.New York, NY:Routledge.
  23. DiMaggio, P.,Powell, W. W.(1983).The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160.
  24. Doherty, B.,Haugh, H.,Lyon, F.(2014).Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Review,16(4),417-436.
  25. Dunn, M. B.,Jones, C.(2010).Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005.Administrative Science Quarterly,55(1),114-149.
  26. Fitzgerald, T.,Shepherd, D.(2018).Emerging structures for social enterprises within nonprofits: An institutional logics perspective.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,47(3),474-492.
  27. Gehman, J.,Glaser, V. L.,Eisenhardt, K. M.,Gioia, D.,Langley, A.,Corley, K. G.(2018).Finding theory-method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building.Journal of Management Inquiry,27(3),284-300.
  28. Gioia, D. A.,Corley, K. G.,Hamilton, A. L.(2012).Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology.Organizational Research Methods,16(1),15-31.
  29. Glaser, B. G.,Strauss, A. L.(1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago, IL:Aldine.
  30. Greenwood, R.,Raynard, M.,Kodeih, F.,Micelotta, E. R.,Lounsbury, M.(2011).Institutional complexity and organizational responses.Academy of Management Annals,5(1),317-371.
  31. Holm, P.(1995).The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries.Administrative Science Quarterly,40(3),398-422.
  32. Jay, J.(2013).Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations.Academy of Management Journal,56(1),137-159.
  33. Jones, C.,Maoret, M.,Massa, F. G.,Svejenova, S.(2012).Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category "modern architecture", 1870-1975.Organization Science,23(6),1523-1545.
  34. Kelman, S.,Friedman, J. N.(2009).Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: An empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,19(4),917-946.
  35. King, A. A.,Lenox, M. J.(2000).Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program.Academy of Management Journal,43(4),698-716.
  36. Kraatz, M. S.,Block, E. S.(2008).Organizational implications of institutional pluralism.The Sage handbook of organizational instiutionalism,London:
  37. Locke, K. D.(2003).Grounded theory in management research.London, UK:Sage.
  38. Lounsbury, M.(2002).Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance.Academy of Management Journal,45(1),255-266.
  39. Lounsbury, M.,Crumley, E. T.(2007).New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation.Organization Studies,28(7),993-1012.
  40. Maibom, C.,Smith, P.(2016).Symbiosis across institutional logics in a social enterprise.Social Enterprise Journal,12(3),260-280.
  41. March, J. G.,Olsen, J. P.(1998).The institutional dynamics of international political orders.International Organization,52(4),943-969.
  42. May, T.(2011).Social research: Issues, methods and research.Berkshire:Open University Press.
  43. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  44. Ocasio, W.(1997).Towards an attention‐based view of the firm.Strategic Management Journal,18(S1),187-206.
  45. Ocasio, W.,Thornton, P. H.,Lounsbury, M.(2017).Advances to the institutional logics perspective.The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism,London:
  46. Okano, M. T.(2019).Social enterprise in the current context: A systematic review of the last 10 years.Journal on Innovation and Sustainability,10(2),109-122.
  47. Pache, A. C.,Santos, F.(2013).Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics.Academy of Management Journal,56(4),972-1001.
  48. Pache, A. C.,Santos, F.(2010).When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands.Academy of Management Review,35(3),455-476.
  49. Pahnke, E. C.,Katila, R.,Eisenhardt, K. M.(2015).Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms.Administrative Science Quarterly,60(4),596-633.
  50. Powell, W. W.(Ed.),DiMaggio, P. J.(Ed.)(1991).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  51. Qastharin, A. R.(2016).Business model canvas for social enterprise.Journal of Business and Economics,7(4),627-637.
  52. Reay, T.,Hinings, C. R.(2009).Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics.Organization Studies,30(6),629-652.
  53. Reficco, E.,Layrisse, F.,Barrios, A.(2021).From donation-based NPO to social enterprise: A journey of transformation through business-model innovation.Journal of Business Research,125,720-732.
  54. Santos, F. M.(2012).A positive theory of social entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Ethics,111(3),335-351.
  55. Scott, S. M.(1995).Institutions and organizations.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
  56. Searle, J. R.(2005).What is an institution.Journal of Institutional Economics,1(1),1-22.
  57. Silverman, D.(2006).Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction.London:Sage.
  58. Smets, M.,Aristidou, A.,Whittington, R.(2017).Towards a practice-driven institutionalism.The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism,London:
  59. Smets, M.,Jarzabkowski, P.,Burke, G. T.,Spee, P.(2015).Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice.Academy of Management Journal,58(3),932-970.
  60. Smith,W. K.,Besharov, M. L.,Wessels, A. K.,Chertok, M.(2012).A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands.Academy of Management Learning and Education,11(3),463-478.
  61. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  62. Suddaby, R.,Greenwood, R.(2005).Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(1),35-67.
  63. Thornton, P. H.(2004).Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing.Redwood City, CA:Stanford University Press.
  64. Thornton, P. H.,Ocasio, W.(2008).Institutional logics.The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism,London:
  65. Thornton, P. H.,Ocasio, W.(1999).Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990.American Journal of Sociology,105(3),801-843.
  66. Thornton, P. H.,Ocasio, W.,Lounsbury, M.(2012).The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  67. Townley, B.(2002).The role of competing rationalities in institutional change.Academy of Management Journal,45(1),163-179.
  68. Tracey, P.,Phillips, N.,Jarvis, O.(2011).Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model.Organization Science,22(1),60-80.
  69. Vickers, I.,Lyon, F.,Sepulveda, L.,McMullin, C.(2017).Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing.Research Policy,46(10),1755-1768.
  70. Voronov, M.,de Clercq, D.,Hinings, C. R.(2013).Institutional complexity and logic engagement: An investigation of Ontario fine wine.Human Relations,66(12),1563-1596.
  71. Zucker, L. G.(Ed.)(1988).Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment.Cambridge, MA:Ballinger Publishing.
  72. 高明瑞, M. R.,蔡依倫, I. L.(2009)。鑲嵌的社會創業歷程：制度革新觀點。創業管理研究，4(4)，107-134。
被引用次数
  1. 黃元鶴,李夢筑(2022)。社會企業創業者之資訊行為與知識交流探索研究。國家圖書館館刊，111(1)，1-32。
  2. (2023)。不完全契約下的公私夥伴關係－制度邏輯的分析視角。東吳政治學報，41(2)，67-130。
print cancel