ARCS動機模式及專題導向學習應用於社會心理學通識課程及學生學習動機與學習成效之探討

Exploring the Application of ARCS Motivation Model and Project-based Learning in General Education Course of Social Psychology and Students' Learning Motivation and Learning Outcomes

10.6870/JTPRHE.202306_7(1).0002

錢芷萍(Tzu-Ping Chien)

ARCS動機模式 ； 專題導向學習 ； 通識教育 ； 學習動機 ； 學習成效 ； ARCS model of motivation ； project-based learning ； general education ； learning motivation ； learning outcome

大學教學實務與研究學刊

7卷1期（2023 / 06 / 30）

49 - 90

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在探討社會心理學通識課程應用ARCS（attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction）動機模式與專題導向學習所發展之教學策略，對學生學習動機及學習成效之影響。課程運用ARCS動機模式之策略包含：內容連結生活經驗、課堂活動型態多樣化、實驗專題步驟清楚具體、專題評分明確一致，及教師大量且正向回饋學生。專題導向學習策略分為八階段，實施於全學期。研究結果如下，藉由ARCS動機模式設計之教學策略，學生自陳對課程感興趣，認為知識熟悉實用且與切身相關，並有學習信心；透過專題導向學習歷程，學生亦能習得及應用知識，增進核心能力，知覺自我成長與建立信心；課程教學策略之引導，學生皆獲得滿足與成就感，顯示本課程應用之教學策略對學生學習動機及學習成效有助益。

This study aimed to explore the teaching strategies developed using the ARCS (attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction) motivation model and project-based learning in a general education course in social psychology and their influences on students' learning motivation and learning outcomes. The teaching strategies designed using the ARCS motivational model include knowledge content linking students' life experiences, various classroom activities, specific experimental steps, clear and consistent assessments, and positive encouragement from the teacher. The project-based learning strategy was divided into eight stages and implemented throughout the semester. The results were as follows. Using the teaching strategies designed by the ARCS motivation model, students self-reported that they were interested in the course. They found knowledge to be familiar, practical, and relevant, and had confidence in learning. Through the project-based learning process, they acquired and applied knowledge, and their core competencies increased. They experienced self-improvement and built confidence in themselves. Guided by the teaching strategies, they achieved both satisfaction and success. This indicates that the teaching strategies applied in the course were beneficial for the students' learning motivation and learning outcomes.

1. 王維君(2019)。起心動念齊樂樂－以ARCS動機模式探討音樂劇場通識課程設計及大學生的學習成效。大學教學實務與研究學刊，3(2)，31-70。
   連結：
2. 吳清山,王令宜(2017)。公立大學通識教育課程架構內涵分析與改進之研究。課程與教學，20(1)，1-23。
   連結：
3. 張芳慈,陳淑瑜(2016)。國小高年級學生的學習適應與學習動機關係之試探性研究－以新竹市一所國小為例。清華教育學報，34(1)，105-161。
   連結：
4. 張春興(2000).教育心理學.東華.
   連結：
5. 黃俊傑(2017)。21世紀大學理念的激盪與通識教育的展望。通識教育學刊，20，11-38。
   連結：
6. 賴淑蘭,吳佳虹(2020)。社會關懷課程設計暨不同期末評量方式呈現評量結果之探究：以中興大學通識課程為例。通識學刊：理念與實務，8(2)，71-105。
   連結：
7. Atkinson, J. W.(1964).An introduction to motivation.Van Nostrand.
8. Baron, R. A.(2001).Psychology.Pearson Education.
9. Brophy, J.(2004).Motivating students to learn.Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cole, M.,Field, H.,Harris, S.(2004).Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class.Academy of Management Learning and Education,3(1),64-85.
11. Grant, M. M.,Branch, R. M.(2005).Project-based learning in a middle school: Tracing abilities through the artifacts of learning.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(1),65-98.
12. Hodges, C. B.,Kim, C.(2013).Improving college students’ attitudes toward mathematics.Tech Trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning,57(4),59-66.
13. Kates, L. G.,Chards, S. C.(1989).Engaging children’s minds: The project approach.Ablex.
14. Keller, J. M.(1987).The systematic process of motivational design.Performance and Instruction,26(9-10),1-8.
15. Keller, J. M.(1987).Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn.Performance & Instruction,26(8),1-7.
16. Krajcik, J. S.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Marx, R. W.,Soloway, E.(1994).A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction.The Elementary School Journal,94(5),483-497.
17. Moursund, D.(1999).Project-based learning using information technology.International Society for Technology in Education Books and Courseware Department.
18. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(2002).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applicationss.Prentice Hall.
19. Polman, J. L.(1998).Activity structures for project-based teaching & learning: Design and adaptation of cultural tools.Annual Meeting of AREA
20. Reigeluth, C. M.(Ed.)(1983).Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status.Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Schunk, D. H.(1990).Introduction to the special section on motivation and efficacy.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),3-6.
22. Shaw, K. E.(Ed.)(1984).Aspects of educational technology: Staff development and career updating.Kogan Page.
23. Thomas, J. W.,Mergendoller, J. R.,Michaelson, A.(1999).Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers.The Buck Institute for Education.
24. Visser, J.,Keller, J. M.(1990).The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design.Instruction Science,19(6),467-500.
25. Weiner, B.(1974).Achievement motivation and attribution theory.Morristown:General Learning Press.
26. 田孟心(2020)。「打破學業工具論」張忠謀：通識課是可以帶走、影響一生的盛宴。天下雜誌，710
27. 朱敬先(1997).教育心理學：教學取向.五南.
28. 吳清山(2009)。我國大學通識教育評鑑：挑戰、對策與展望。教育研究月刊，178，5-23。
29. 李文瑞(1990)。介紹激發學習動機的ARCS模型（阿課思）教學策略。臺灣教育，479，22-24。
30. 李桂芳(2020)。促進學生主動學習日語會話溝通之教學策略：問題導向學習、專題導向學習與評量尺規的整合。高大人文學報，5，121-153。
31. 李咏吟,單文經(1997).教學原理.遠流.
32. 郝光中(2021)。專題導向學習、ARCS學習動機理論與競賽導向式學習在課程上學習動機及成效之研究：以網頁設計課程為例。人文社會科學研究，教育類，15(2)，75-108。
33. 張春興(1996).教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐.東華.
34. 曹嘉秀,陳少芬(2015)。自律學習及專題導向數位學習對大專技職生英文課程之參與度及學習成效之影響。輔英通識教育學刊，2，61-94。
35. 莊盛宇(2018)。國立嘉義大學。
36. 許淑玫(1998)。ARCS動機設計模式在教學上之應用。國教輔導，38(2)，16-23。
37. 黃政傑,林進材(2015).精進教師課堂教學的藝術與想像：教學與學習的寧靜革命.五南.
38. 劉安之（編）,黃俊傑（編）(1999).大學理念與實踐.中華民國通識教育學會.
39. 劉笑敢(2007)。大學教育，目標何在。大學通識報，2，199-206。
40. 劉毓芬(2013)。PBL應用於通識課程問題設計研究－以資訊素養與倫理課程為例。通識學刊：理念與實務，2(2)，225-240。
41. 鍾張涵（2020）。成為有能力反思的獨立思想家張忠謀：我投通識教育一票。天下雜誌，天下Web only。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102680
42. 魏鈺螢(2021)。國立臺北教育大學。