BFI五大人格量表簡版的發展

The Development of a Shortened Version of BFI Big Five Personality Scale

鍾芯瑜

BFI人格量表 ； 簡式版本 ； 信效度檢驗 ； Big Five Inventory ； Short measures ； Reliability ； Validity ； Test construction

中山醫學大學心理學系碩士班學位論文

2018年

碩士

李仁豪

繁體中文

為了讓受試者在有限的時間內完成多種測驗，簡式版量表的需求逐年升高。而本研究也因應此需求，根據John等人（1991）所發展的BFI 人格量表44題版本，進行簡式版的發展，收集兩套樣本，以第一套樣本進行選題作業，第二套樣本用來驗證結果，並提供（1）建構效度（2）效標關聯效度（3）聚合效度（4）內部一致性信度等證據。此BFI簡式版利用結構方程式模型的測量模型進行分析選題，每一個人格向度都包含3題，共15題，簡稱BFI-15。結果方面，（1）模型適配度佳，兩套樣本之因素負荷量皆高於 .56（2）BFI-15與效標的相關結果大多與文獻相似，且相關型態與原BFI 人格量表44題版本相似，使用的效標有生活滿意度、心理幸福感、正負向情緒量表及自尊量表（3）BFI-15與原 BFI 人格量表44題版本及 TDA 五大人格問卷的相關高，聚合效度佳（4）兩套樣本之α 信度係數皆高於 .69，組合信度在水準之上。而雖BFI-15在信效度證據尚不及原 BFI 人格量表44題版本，但可兼得簡式量表的需求及具一定信效度標準。

When researcher want to let the subjects finish many different instruments, the need of brief measure rise. To meet the need for a brief measure, according to John et al （1991）Big Five Inventory 44items（BFI-44）, we collected two sample data and developed a short form. The first sample data was meant to analyzed and chosen for shortened version items, the second one was to verify the findings. The findings include（1）construct validity（2）criterion-related validity（3）convergent validity（4）internal consistency. The items of the BFI shortened version were analyzed and chosen by measurement model of structural equation modeling. The results show that a 15-item shortened version of Big Five personality, named BFI-15, was developed, and its each personality included 3 items. The result show BFI-15（1）has good model-fits and factor loadings all above .56（2）its criterion-related validity findings was similar to past studies, and the correlation pattern also familiar to BFI-44. The validity established by correlations with the satisfaction with life scale, psychological well-being scale, affect balance scale and the self-esteem scale.（3）its correlation with BFI-44 and TDA was high, show the convergent validity（4）two sample data Cronbach's α all above .69, composite reliability also qualify. Although that BFI-15 somewhat inferior to standard multi-item instruments, the full BFI-44, but still sufficient for research settings with limited time constraints and reached adequate levels.

1. 朱錦鳳. (2001). 正反向試題敘述對人格測驗的探討. 測驗年刊, 48(1), 105-118.
   連結：
2. 李仁豪、余民寧. (2014). 臺灣中老年人外向性及神經質人格, 社會支持與主觀幸福感關係之模型建構及其結構係數比較. 教育心理學報, 45(4), 455-474.
   連結：
3. 李仁豪、余民寧. (2016). 心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性: 以大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題. 中華輔導與諮商學報(46), 127-154.
   連結：
4. 張詩音. (2007). 人際關係中的情緒表現. 臺灣大學心理學研究所學位論文, 1-89.
   連結：
5. 陳依芬、黃金蘭、林以正. (2011). 忍的情緒調控策略與心理適應之關聯. 本土心理學研究(35), 3-56.
   連結：
6. 鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜. (2011). " International English Big-Five Mini-Markers" 之繁體中文版量表發展. 管理學報, 28(6), 579-615.
   連結：
7. Allport. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 24(5), 284.
   連結：
8. Allport. (1998). What units shall we employ? Personality, 89.
   連結：
9. Allport, & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i.
   連結：
10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
    連結：
11. Barnette. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3), 361-370.
    連結：
12. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
    連結：
13. Bentler. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400.
    連結：
14. Bentler, Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1971). Identification of content and style: a two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76(3), 186.
    連結：
15. Bleidorn, W., Schönbrodt, F., Gebauer, J. E., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). To live among like-minded others: Exploring the links between person-city personality fit and self-esteem. Psychological science, 27(3), 419-427.
    連結：
16. Borkenau, P. (1988). The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 337-352.
    連結：
17. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford. Browne, MW, & Cudeck, R.(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model t. KA Bollen & JS Long.
    連結：
18. Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39(3), 214.
    連結：
19. Carlo, G., Okun, M. A., Knight, G. P., & de Guzman, M. R. T. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and individual differences, 38(6), 1293-1305.
    連結：
20. Chiang, F., Adachi, J., Anastasi, R., & Beatty, J. (1982). Subjective laser speckle method and its application to solid mechanics problems. Optical Engineering, 21(3), 213379-213379-.
    連結：
21. Costa, & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(4), 668.
    連結：
22. Costa, & McCrae, R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of personality, 55(2), 299-316.
    連結：
23. Costa, & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5.
    連結：
24. Costa, McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 12(9), 887-898.
    連結：
25. Digman, J. M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of personality, 57(2), 195-214.
    連結：
26. DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural equation modeling, 13(3), 440-464.
    連結：
27. Donnellan, & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples. Psychology and aging, 23(3), 558.
    連結：
28. Donnellan, Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological assessment, 18(2), 192.
    連結：
29. Emmons, R. A., & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1040.
    連結：
30. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329.
    連結：
31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
    連結：
32. Goldberg. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
    連結：
33. Goldberg. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216.
    連結：
34. Goldberg. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26.
    連結：
35. Goldberg, & Saucier, G. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10(1), 61-77.
    連結：
36. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528.
    連結：
37. Gutierrez, Jimenez, B. M., Hernández, E. G., & Pcn, C. (2005). Personality and subjective well-being: Big five correlates and demographic variables. Personality and individual differences, 38(7), 1561-1569.
    連結：
38. Hahn, E., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality–Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355-359.
    連結：
39. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    連結：
40. Jensen-Campbell, Rosselli, M., Workman, K. A., Santisi, M., Rios, J. D., & Bojan, D. (2002). Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and effortful control processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(5), 476-489.
    連結：
41. John. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In Personality psychology (pp. 261-271): Springer.
    連結：
42. John, Donahue, E., & Kentle, R. (1990). ‘The ‘‘Big Five. Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires.’’In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John, 66-100.
    連結：
43. John, Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (1991). The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(3), 348.
    連結：
44. Jonge, & Slaets, J. P. (2005). Response sets in self-report data and their associations with personality traits. The European Journal of Psychiatry, 19(4), 209-214.
    連結：
45. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
    連結：
46. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: Guilford Press.
    連結：
47. McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of personality, 63(3), 365-396.
    連結：
48. McCrae, & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman's" adequacy taxonomy": Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 710.
    連結：
49. McCrae, & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81.
    連結：
50. McCrae, & Costa, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847): Elsevier.
    連結：
51. McCrae, & Costa, P. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 1, 273-294.
    連結：
52. McCrae, & Terracciano, A. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: aggregate personality traits. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(3), 407.
    連結：
53. Motl, R. W., & DiStefano, C. (2002). Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural equation modeling, 9(4), 562-578.
    連結：
54. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574.
    連結：
55. Quevedo, R. J. M., & Abella, M. C. (2011). Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and individual differences, 50(2), 206-211.
    連結：
56. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212.
    連結：
57. Robins, Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 27(2), 151-161.
    連結：
58. Ryff. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28.
    連結：
59. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of personality assessment, 63(3), 506-516.
    連結：
60. Schimmack, Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 30(8), 1062-1075.
    連結：
61. Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(3), 549.
    連結：
62. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84-90.
    連結：
63. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138.
    連結：
64. Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg's self‐esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 84-98.
    連結：
65. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Retrieved from
    連結：
66. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767-793): Elsevier.
    連結：
67. Werts, C. E., Joreskog, K. G., & Linn, R. L. (1973). Identification and estimation in path analysis with unmeasured variables. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1469-1484.
    連結：
68. 李仁豪. (2013). BFI人格量表中文化及相關五大人格特質量表信效度研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 102-2410-H-040-009-SSS），未出版。
69. 邱皓政. (2011a). 結構方程模式: LISREL 的理論, 技術與應用: 雙葉書廊.
70. Allport. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality.
71. Barenbaum, N. B., & David, G. (2008). Winter. 2008. History of modern personality theory and research. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd ed, ed. Oliver P. John, Richard W. Robins, and Lawrence A. Pervin, 3-26.
72. Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF): In clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
73. Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2012). 性格心理學: 理論與研究: 雙葉書廊.
74. Costa, & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological assessment resources.
75. Costa, & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Neo PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological assessment resources, 396, 653-665.
76. Gerlitz, J.-Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 2005.
77. Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. Handbook of personality psychology, 18(2), 185-213.
78. Guildford, J. (1959). Personality. New York, Mc. Grow HillBook Co. In: Inc.
79. Hair Jr, J. (2006). Black, WC, Babin, BJ Anderson, RE & Tatham, RL (2006). Multivariate data analysis, 6.
80. John, Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory—versions 4a and 54. In: Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
81. John, Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (2010). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research: Guilford Press.
82. John, & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102-138.
83. Kluckhohn, C. E., Murray, H. A., & Schneider, D. M. (1953). Personality in nature, society, and culture.
84. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. In: New York: McGraw-Hill.
85. Robins, Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(4), 463-482.
86. Srivastava, S. K. (2005). Organizational behaviour and management: Sarup & Sons.