题名

大專院校體育教師課程實施休閒教育目標認知之研究

并列篇名

A Cognitive Study on the Implmentation of Leisure Education Goals in a College Physical Education Curriculum

DOI

10.5297/ser.200306_5(1).0000

作者

張孝銘(Hsiao-Ming Chang);周宏室(Hung-Shin Chou)

关键词

體育課程 ; 休閒教育 ; 課程實施 ; 認知 ; physical education curriculum ; leisure education ; implementation ; cognitive

期刊名称

大專體育學刊

卷期/出版年月

5卷1期(2003 / 06 / 30)

页次

1 - 10

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主要目的旨在了解大專院校體育教師,對於體育課程中實施休閒教育的認知程度,驗證其認知之實施模式與認知上的差異情形。研究以大專院校體育專任教師為對象,採問卷調查的方式,共回收有效問卷527份。經統計分析後本研究發現:1.有90.5%大專院校體育教師認為在大專院校之體育課程目標中應實施休閒教育;此外有88%的教師同意可融入在體育課實施。2.本研究根據相關文獻整理出8個體育課休閒教育實施目標,經驗證性因素分析後,發現具有良好之適合度。3.不同性別、教育程度與不同年資之體育教師在實施目標認知上有顯著差異情形存在。基於上述發現,研究者建議教育主管單位或大專院校應舉辦相關休閒教育研討會或講習,來提升大專院校體育教師對於休閒教育實施目標之認知與理解;此外並建議未來研究者可參考此模式,應用與發展不同的休閒教育實施模式。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study aimed to understand the situation and differences of implementation leisure education (LE) of physical education curriculum (PEC) in the teachers at the college. The research was designed to establish and confirm implementation goals of LE in PEC. This questionnaire was adopted from teachers in schools, random sampling method was adopted, and 527 effective questionnaires were collected. After statistics analysis the results were as follows: a. 90.5% agrees the LE can be adopted in the school, and 88% agrees the LE should be integrated into physical education curricula: b. The confirmatory analysis found that cognitive of LE model showed a goodness of fit. c. There was significant difference of sex, degree and service years on the cognitive of LE implementation goals. Based on the above finding, recommendation was given for education authorities and colleges to hold leisure education conference and lectures to improve cognition and comprehension of PE teachers in LE implementation goals. It is also suggested that future researchers should develop different model of leisure education through this research.

主题分类 社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. Bullock, C. C.,Mahon, M. J.(1997).Introduction to recreation services for people with disabilities: A person-centered approach.Champaign, IL:Sagamore.
  2. Coakley, J.(2001).Sport in society: Issues & controversies.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  3. Cohen, E.(1991).Benefits of Leisure.State College, PA:Venture Publishing Inc..
  4. Dattilo, J.(1999).Leisure education program planning: A systematic approach.State College, PA:Venture Publishing, Inc..
  5. Dattilo, J.,Murphy, W. D.(1991).Leisure education program planning: A systematic approach.State College, PA:Venture Publishing, Inc..
  6. Dattilo, J.,St. Peter, S.(1991).A model for including leisure education in transition services for young adults with mental retardation.Education and Training in Mental Retardation,26,420-432.
  7. Driver, B.L.,Brown, P. J.,Peterson, G. L.(1991).Benefit of leisure.Stage College, PA:Venture Publishing.
  8. Ellis, G.,Witt, P. A.(1984).The measurement of perceived freedom in leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,16(2),110-123.
  9. Howe-Murphy, R.,Charboneau, B. G.(1987).Therapeutic recreation intervention: An ecological perspective.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  10. Jewett, A. E.,Bain, L. L.,Ennis, C. D.(1995).The curriculum process in physical education.Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown.
  11. Kelly, J. R.(1981).Handbook of social science of sport.Champaign, IL:Stipes Publishing Copany.
  12. Kelly, J. R.(1996).Leisure.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  13. Kelly, J. R.,Godby, G.(1992).The sociology of leisure.State College, PA:Venture.
  14. Mannell, R. C.(1980).Social psychology perspectives on leisure and recreation.Springfield:Charles C. Thomas.
  15. Mull, R. F.,Bayless, K. G.,Ross, C. M.,Jamieson, L. M.(1997).Recreational sport management.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  16. Mundy, J.(1998).Leisure education: Theory and practice.Champaign, IL:Sagamore Publishing.
  17. Neulinger, J.(1974).The psychology of leisure.Springfield:Charles C. Thomas.
  18. Peterson, C. A.,Gunn, S. C.(1984).Therapeutic recreation program design.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  19. Ruskin, H.,Sivan, A.(1995).Leisure education: Towards the 21st century.Prove, UT:Department of esearch Management and Young Leadership, Brigham Young University.
  20. Searle, M.S.(1993).Leisure service in Canada: An introduction.State College, PA:Venture.
  21. Sivan, A.(1997).Research development in leisure education research and implementation.World Leisure and Recreation,39(2),39-40.
  22. Tinsley, E. A.,Tinsley, D. J.(1986).A theory of the attributes, benefits, and causes of leisure experience.Leisure Sciences,8(1),1-45.
  23. Wall, M. E.,Dattilo, J.(1995).Creating option-rich learning environments: Facilitating self-determination.Journal of Special Education,29(3),276-294.
  24. 內政部(2001)。中華民國八十九年社會發展趨勢調查報告。台北:內政部主計處。
  25. 內政部(1997)。中華民國臺灣地區國民生活狀況調查報告。台北:內政部統計處。
  26. 余嬪(2000)。休閒教育的實施與發展。大葉學報,9(2),1-13。
  27. 呂建政(1999)。休閒教育的課程內涵與實施。公民訓育學報,8,181-196。
  28. 呂銀益、呂謙、許宏哲(2001)。台灣地區大學院校體育課程管理現況探討。大專體育學刊,3(1),159-175。
  29. 宋幸惠(1999)。。
  30. 高俊雄(1996)。休閒概念面面觀。國立體育學院論叢,6(1),69-78。
  31. 高俊雄(1995)。休閒利益三因素模式。戶外遊憩研究,8(1),15-28。
  32. 張孝銘(2001)。休閒參與型式、休閒需求與休閒阻礙間之相關研究-以彰化市居民為實證。台北:高立圖書。
  33. 黃賢堅(2000)。大學院校體育教學可由競技式活動振興。大專體育,49,6-10。
  34. 劉衡江(2000)。千禧新氣象-新思維的學校體育。大專體育,47,1-2。
  35. 顏妙桂(1999)。現代公民的休閒生活教育-論學校休閒教育之實施。人文及社會學科教學通訊,9(2),21-36。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡芬卿、周宏室(2007)。大專興趣選項體育課學生流暢體驗與學習滿意度之相關研究。體育學報,40(4),37-49。
  2. 蔡瑋娟、黃孟立、陳慧英(2012)。大學生休閒態度、休閒需求對體育成就動機的影響。輔仁大學體育學刊,11,104-117。
  3. 陳南琦、許弘毅、張珈瑛(2016)。大學生休閒教育認知與休閒因應之相關研究。中原體育學報,8,81-89。
  4. 許義忠、莊麗君(2007)。以增進復原力為目標之BBM模式進行休閒教育之實驗。中華輔導學報,21,71-98。
  5. 黃宗誠、李泳龍、吳濟民、白宗易(2010)。國內大學休閒相關學系課程規劃結構特性之研究。嘉南學報(人文類),36,601-613。
  6. 黃宗誠、林上鷁、李泳龍(2013)。大學專業學系教育目標評價分析─以休閒類別為例。戶外遊憩研究,26(2),31-73。
  7. 翁玉貞,林本源,李志仁(2022)。國立金門大學體育課程興趣選項與教學滿意度之研究。國立金門大學學報,11(1),1-16。
  8. (2004)。青少年休閒教育推廣之探討。成大體育,37(2),53-64。