美國數位著作保護的法理論述

Recent Jurisprudential Thinking on Digital Copyright Protection in the United States

10.6199/NTULJ.2007.36.02.04

陳起行(Chi-Shing Chen)

數位著作權 ； 公開進用 ； 分配平等 ； 想像自由 ； 公共領域 ； 財產權 ； 著作性 ； 線上爭議解決 ； digital copyright ； Copyleft ； open access ； distributive equality ； freedom of imagination ； public domain ； property right ； authorship ； online dispute resolution

臺大法學論叢

36卷2期（2007 / 06 / 30）

131 - 164

繁體中文

數位著作保護是極具爭議的法律課題。社會上，認爲數位著作保護不足以及認爲數位著作保護過度的主張，均十分強烈。此一辯論不僅影響著作權法未來的發展，也主導網路時代每個人自我認識及形成公共意見的資訊基礎，值得及早深入研究。本文就近年美國數位著作保護的法理論述，分別就數位著作保護的對象，以及著作權法益平衡上涉及的分配平等，財產權保障，及著作性等前瞻性主張，逐一闡明，供國內法學界參考。文末提出進一步提升此一課題的社會對話以及學理探討之道。

Digital copyright issues are extremely controversial nowadays. Copyright and Copyleft represent two equally strong and uncompromising positions in the society. Not only the future development of the copyright law, the information sources critical to individual self-recognition and the formation of public opinion are also at stake in an internet world. This paper examines the jurisprudential arguments in the United States related to the digital copyright protection. Illuminating thesis related to issues such as who ought to be protected, distributive equality, property control balancing and digital authorship are elaborated. And this paper suggests a needed procedural mechanism to promote social dialog and scholarly exchanges in the end.

1. Chen, Chi Shing(2006).The New Legal Paradigm of Jean Cohen and Its Implication for Public Online Dispute Resolution.The Law and Society Association
   連結：
2. 陳起行(2003)。由Reno v. ACLU案論法院與網際網路之規範。歐美研究，33(3)，599-628。
   連結：
3. Balkin, Jack(2004).Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society.New York University Law Review,79,1.
4. Bechtold, Stefan(2004).Digital Rights Management in the United States and Europe.American Journal of Comparative Law,52,323.
5. Chen, Chi Shing.Toward a Discursive Public Reason in the Internet World.
6. Depoorter,Parsi(2002).Fair Use and Copyright Protection: A Price Theory Explanation.International Review of Law and Economics,21,453.
7. Dusollier, Severine(2003).Open Source and Copyleft: Authorship Reconsidered?.Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,26,281.
8. Fiss, Owen(1995).Emerging Media Technology and the First Amendment: In Search of a New Paradigm.Yale L. J.,104,1613.
9. Foucault, Michel,Josue Harari (ed.)(1979).What is An Author, Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism.
10. Frischmann, Brett(2005).An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management.Minnesota Law Review,89,917.
11. Garon, Jon(2003).Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework of Copyright Philosophy and Ethics.Cornell Law Review,88,1278-1291.
12. Ginsburg, Jane(2002).How Copyright Got a Bad Name for Itself.The Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts,26,61.
13. Ginsburg, Jane(2001).Copyright and Control over New Technologies of Dissemination.Columbia Law Review,101,1613.
14. Ginsburg, Jane(1997).Authors and Users in Copyright.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,45,1.
15. Goldstein, Paul(1990).Copyright, Patent Trademark and Related State Doctrines.
16. Gordon, Wendy(1993).A Property Right in Self-Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property.Yale Law Journal,102,1533.
17. Gordon, Wendy(1982).Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors.Columbia Law Review,82,1600.
18. Hardin, Garrett(1968).The Tragedy of the Commons.Science,162,1243.
19. Heller, Michael(1998).The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets.Harvard Law Review,111,621.
20. Hilty Reto(2006).Five Lessons about Copyright in the Information Society: Reaction of the Scientific Community to Over-Protection and What Policy Makers Should Learn.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,53,103.
21. Houweling, Molly Shaffer Van(2005).Distributive Values in Copyright.Texas Law Review,83,1535-1540.
22. Hunter, Dan(2003).Cyberspace as Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anticommons.California Law Review,91,439.
23. Katyal, Sonia(2003).The New Surveillance.Case Western Reserve Law Review,54,297.
24. Ku, Raymond(2002).The Creative Destruction of Copyright: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology.University of Chicago Law Review,69,263.
25. Kuhn, Thomas(1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago:
26. Lange, David(2003).The Public Domain: Reimagining the Public Domain.Law and Contemporary Problems,66,463-466.
27. Lemley,Reese(2005).A Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Peer-to-Peer Copyright Disputes.Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal,23,1.
28. Lessig, Lawrence(2005).Reply: Re-making the Progress in Frischmann.Minnesota Law Review,89,1031.
29. Leval, Pierre(1990).Commentary: Toward a Fair Use Standard.Harvard Law Review,103,1105.
30. Litman, Jessica(2004).Sharing and Stealing.Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal,27,1.
31. Lobel, Orly(2004).The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought.Minnesota Law Review,89,342.
32. Maxey, Stuart(2003).That CARP is No Keeper: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels-Change is Needed, Here is Why, and How.Journal of Intellectual Property Law,10,385.
33. Rubenfeld, Jed(2002).The Freedom of Imagination: Copyright`s Constitutionality.Yale Law Journal,112,1.
34. Zittrain, Jonathan(2000).What the Publisher Can Teach the Patient: Intellectual Property and Privacy in an Era of Trusted Privication.Stanford Law Review,52,1201.
35. 法治斌(1985)。憲法專論（一）。
36. 陳起行(2001)。資訊隱私權法理探討－以美國法爲中心。政大法學評論，64，297-341。

1. 陳起行(2009)。由富勒人際交往的法理學論MGM v. Grokster案。臺大法學論叢，38(1)，217-252。
2. 林利芝(2020)。論文字資料探勘行為涉及的資料庫保護爭議－以科技保護措施為中心。東吳法律學報，31(3)，161-209。
3. 沈宗倫(2009)。論科技保護措施之保護於著作權法下之定性及其合理解釋適用：以檢討我國著作權法第80條之2為中心。臺大法學論叢，38(2)，293-369。
4. 蕭宏宜(2008)。P2P 業者的刑事責任問題— ezPeer 與Kuro案判決評析。法令月刊，59(9)，69-85。
5. (2008)。從司法院法學資料庫隱私權問題看政府資訊委外的發展與問題。月旦法學雜誌，154，5-20。
6. (2019)。論文字資料探勘行為涉及的資料庫保護爭議――以授權契約限制條款為中心。智慧財產權月刊，245，71-91。