题名

英國脫歐對其多元法律體系之影響

并列篇名

Brexit and Its Impact on the UK's Plural Legal System

DOI

10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.SP.01

作者

洪德欽(Der-Chin Horng)

关键词

英國脫歐 ； 歐盟 ； 多元法律體系 ； 歐盟現行法律 ； 《歐洲聯盟條約》第50條 ； 《歐盟運作條約》 ； 國會主權 ； 1972年《歐洲共同體法》 ； 《脫歐法案》 ； Miller案 ； Brexit ； European Union ； plural legal system ； acquis communautaire ； Treaty on European Union (TEU) ； Article 50 ； Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) ； Parliamentary sovereignty ； 1972 European Community Act (ECA 1972) ； EU Withdrawal Bill ； Miller case

期刊名称

臺大法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

46卷S期（2017 / 11 / 01）

页次

1017 - 1114

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

英國於2016年6月23日舉行脫歐公投，脫歐陣營以51.9%得票率勝出，震驚世界。《里斯本條約》於2009年12月1日生效後，《歐洲聯盟條約》第50條已明文規定「會員國得依據其本國憲法規定及條件，脫離歐盟。」《歐洲聯盟條約》第50條規定主要是讓會員國得以「有秩序」脫歐，以維持會員國及歐盟之政經與社會穩定，並藉機架構一項新的雙邊合作關係。英國加入歐盟必須接受歐盟現行法律，大大豐富了其法律內涵。英國加入歐盟是以1972年《歐洲共同體法》（ECA 1972），解決英國法與歐盟法之關係，確立了歐盟法對英國法具有直接適用及優先效力。英國脫歐乃是為了取回主權及法律控制權。英國脫歐對其多元法律體系將帶來重大影響，乃是一項具有政治敏感性及憲政重要性的議題。英國於2017年3月29日通知歐盟高峰會其脫歐意願，正式啟動脫歐程序。原則上，英國與歐盟應於2年內達成一項脫歐協定。英國脫歐已衍生許多問題及不確定性，並涉及複雜的法律問題，尤其英國脫歐通知是否必須事先經由國會立法授權？脫歐引發的Miller案有那些主要法律爭議，又如何解決英國脫歐內部程序問題？英國與歐盟如何進行《歐洲聯盟條約》第50條脫歐談判？第50條程序涉及哪些法律議題、談判程序及問題？英國與歐盟如何架構雙邊未來關係？英國脫歐後歐盟法律在英國之效力如何界定，又如何延續適用？英國脫歐對人民既得權利有何影響？英國計畫訂定一項《脫歐法案》以廢除ECA 1972，取回英國法律控制權，並因應脫歐後，英國面對的法律挑戰。《脫歐法案》有哪些重要內容？又如何解決脫歐後英國與歐盟的法律關係？英國脫歐對英國與歐盟多元法律體系有何意涵與影響？凡此種種，在在對英國的國會主權、憲政運作、多元法律體系之變遷與調適，以及英歐未來關係，構成重大挑戰，值得研究。
英文摘要

On the 23^(rd) of June 2016 the United Kingdom held a referendum on exiting the European Union. The Leave side won, with 51.9% of the votes, to the surprise of international onlookers. With the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on the 1st of December 2009, Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, sets out clearly the terms for withdrawal from the Union: ＂Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.＂ Article 50 underlines the importance of a Member State's ＂orderly＂ exit from the Union, in order to maintain the political, economic and social stability of the Member State and of the European Union, and Article 50 also refers to the establishment of cooperative relations anew between the two parties. When the UK joined the EU it had to accept the EU acquis and this greatly enriched UK law. The UK adopted the 1972 ECA to resolve the relationship between UK law and EU law, and to confirm the direct applicability and supremacy of EU law in the UK's legal system. The withdrawal of the UK from the EU will have a significant impact on the UK's pluralist legal system. The Brexit is therefore a politically sensitive subject as well as a constitutionally important one. The UK formally notified the European Council on 29 March 2017 of its intention to withdraw from the EU. In principle, the UK and the EU shall conclude a withdrawal agreement in the two years following the notification. Britain's departure from the EU has already given rise to many problems and to uncertainty. It involves complex legal problems; in particular, whether or not the notification to leave the EU has to be given prior authorization through legislation. What are the main legal issues involved in the Miller case triggered by Brexit? And how to solve the UK's internal procedural problems for the Brexit notification? But also: how will the UK and the EU conduct the Article 50 negotiations? Which areas of law will be affected by the Article 50 process? How are the UK and EU going to conduct the negotiations pertaining to their future relationship? What procedures will they use and which questions will they tackle? What scope will EU law have within the UK after it withdraws from the Union? What impact will the withdrawal from the Union have on the acquired rights of British citizens? The UK will introduce a European Union (Withdrawal) Bill to repeal the ECA 1972, to take back legal control from the EU and to respond to the legal challenges after Brexit. What are the main contents of the EU Withdrawal Bill? And how to deal with the UK-EU legal relationship after the UK's exit from the EU? All these questions require a thorough study because they pose enormous impacts on the future relationship between the UK and the EU and also to the British pluralistic legal system, in terms of the changes and adjustments required.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 洪德欽(2017)。英國脫歐與英歐貿易關係之未來。政治學報，63，33-61。
    連結：
  2. 洪德欽(2004)。歐盟對外貿易與發展協定之人權條款：規定與實踐。歐美研究，34(1)，143-202。
    連結：
  3. 洪德欽(2017)。英國脫歐對歐盟之影響。問題與研究，56(2)，155-157。
    連結：
  4. 洪德欽(2012)。歐盟新一代自由貿易協定政策之研究。歐美研究，42(4)，673-752。
    連結：
  5. 廖福特(2001)。人權宣言？人權法典？：「歐洲聯盟基本權利憲章」之分析。歐美研究，31(4)，689-751。
    連結：
  6. 藍玉春(2005)。歐盟多層次治理：論點與現象。政治科學論叢，24，49-75。
    連結：
  7. UK Cabinet Office and Scotland Office (2013). Devolution settlement: Scotland, GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/devolution-settlement-scotland
  8. European Commission (1983). Status of Greenland. Commission opinion. Commission communication presented to the Council on 2 February 1983, COM (83) 66 final, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 1/83, 22 February 1983.
  9. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (UK) (2017). Judicial Review. Retrieved from https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/you-and-the-judiciary/judicial-review/
  10. Masters, J. (2016, November 4). Gina Miller: The Woman behind the Brexit Bombshell, CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/03/europe/gina-miller-brexit-article-50/index.html
  11. Laws, J. (The Rt Hon. Lord Justice Laws) (2013). Lecture III: The Common Law and Europe, Hamlyn Lectures 2013, 27 November 2013. Retrieved from https://www.globalgovernancewatch.org/docLib/20140213_laws-lj-speechhamlyn-lecture-2013.pdf
  12. The Electoral Committee (2016). Official Result of the EU Referendum Is Declared by Electoral Commission in Manchester, 24 June 2016. Retrieved from https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-referendums/official-result-of-the-eu-referendum-is-declared-by-electoral-commission-in-manchester.
  13. European Council (2016). European Commission - Enlargement - Acquis. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/policy/glossary/terms/acquis_en
  14. UK Parliament (2017). How Laws Are Made. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/education/about-your-parliament/how-laws-aremade/
  15. House of Lords (1967). Lords Sitting of 8 May 1967: The European Economic Community, Series 5, Vol. 282, C1203, 8 May 1967..
  16. European Council (2016). Remarks by President Donald Tusk after the Informal Meeting of 27 EU Heads of State or Government, Statement and Remarks, 396/16, Brussels, 29 June 2016..
  17. House of Commons(2017). Oral Evidence: UK's Negotiating Objectives for Withdrawal from EU, HC 1072, 2 March 2017. Retrieved from http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/exiting-the-european-union-committee/the-uks-negotiating-objectives-for-its-withdrawal-from-the-eu/oral/48387.pdf
  18. UK Parliament (2017). Henry VIII clauses. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/henry-viii-clauses/
  19. European Council (2016). European Council Meeting (18 and 19 February 2016)-Conclusions, EUCO 1/16, Brussels, 19 February 2016..
  20. European Council (2015). European Council Meeting (17 and 18 December 2015)- Conclusions, EUCO 28/15, Brussels, 18 December 2015..
  21. House of Commons (2016). Oral Evidence: The UK's Negotiating Objectives for Its Withdrawal from EU, HC 815, 14 December 2016. Retrieved from http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/exiting-the-european-union-committee/the-uks-negotiating-objectives-for-its-withdrawal-from-the-eu/oral/44457.pdf
  22. European Union (2017). Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Retrieved from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice_en
  23. Lamassoure, A. (2002). The European Union: Four Possible Models, CONV 235/02, Brussels, 3 September 2002..
  24. Prime Minister's Office (2016). Speech: PM Statement Following Cabinet Meeting on EU Settlement: 20 February 2016, 20 February 2016, GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-statement-following-cabinet-meeting-on-eu-settlement-20-february-2016
  25. UK Parliament (2017). Parliamentary sovereignty. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/role/sovereignty/
  26. European Council (2017). Special Meeting of the European Council (Art. 50), EUCO XT20004/17, Brussels, 29 April 2017..
  27. The Smith Commission (2014). Report of the Smith Commission for Future Devolution of Powers to the Scottish Parliament. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151202171017/http://www.smith-commission.scot/
  28. UK Parliament (2017). European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19: Progress of the Bill. Retrieved from http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/europeanunionwithdrawal.html
  29. UK Cabinet Office, Northern Ireland Office, Office of the Secretary of State for Wales and Scotland Office (2013). Devolution of powers to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/devolution-of-powers-to-scotland-wales-andnorthern-ireland#relations-between-administrations
  30. Dicey, A. V. (1915). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (8th ed.). London, UK: Macmillan.
  31. European Council (2016). Statement by the EU Leaders and the Netherlands Presidency on the Outcome of the UK Referendum, Statements and Remarks, 381/16, Brussels, 24 June 2016..
  32. Ahmed, F.,Perry, A.(2017).Constitutional Statutes.Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,37(1),461-481.
  33. Allan, T. R. S.(2013).The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  34. Allan, T. R. S.(1997).Parliamentary Sovereignty: Law, Politics and Revolution.Law Quarterly Review,113,443-452.
  35. Allen, M.,Thompson, B.(2011).Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  36. Alston, P.(Ed.)(1999).The EU and Human Rights.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  37. Anthony, G.(2002).UK Public Law & European Law: The Dynamics of Legal Integration.Oxford, UK:Hart Pub.
  38. Athanassiou, P.(2009).Withdrawal and Expulsion from the EU and EMU: Some Reflections.Frankfurt a.M., Germany:ECB.
  39. Aust, A.(2013).Modern Treaty Law and Practice.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  40. Axline, W. A.(1968).Legal Integration through Judicial Fiat.Journal of Common Market Studies,7(3),217-242.
  41. Bamforth, N.(Ed.),Leyland, P.(Ed.)(2003).Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution.Oxford, UK:Hart Pub.
  42. Barber, N. W.(2008).Against a Written Constitution.Public Law,11(1),11-18.
  43. Barber, N. W.(2006).Legal Pluralism and the European Union.European Law Journal,12(3),306-329.
  44. Barendt, E.(1998).An Introduction to Constitutional Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  45. Barker, A.(2017).The€60 Billion Brexit Bill: How to Disentangle Britain from the EU Budget.London, UK:Centre for European Reform.
  46. Barnett, H.(2011).Constitutional and Administrative Law.London, UK:Routledge.
  47. Berman, P. S.(2012).Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  48. Biondi, A.(Ed.),Eeckhout, P.(Ed.),Ripley, S.(Ed.)(2012).EU Law after Lisbon.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  49. Birdge, J. W.(Ed.)(2000).UK Law for the Millennium.London, UK:United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law.
  50. Birkinshaw, P. J.(Ed.),Biondi, A.(Ed.)(2016).Britain Alone! The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU.Frederick, MD:Wolters Kluwer.
  51. Bogdanor, V.(1999).Devolution in the United Kingdom.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  52. Bogdanor, V.(2016).Brexit, the Constitution and the Alternatives.King's Law Journal,27(3),314-322.
  53. Bogdanor, V.(Ed.)(2003).The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  54. Boyron, S.(2002).In the Name of European Law: The Metric Martyrs Case.European Law Review,27(6),771-779.
  55. Braddey, A. W.,Ewing, K. W.(2007).Constitutional and Administrative Law.Essex, UK:Pearson.
  56. Brown, L. N.,Jacobs, F. G.(1983).The Court of Justice of European Communities.London, UK:Sweet & Maxwell.
  57. Burley, A.-M.,Matti, W.(1993).European Before Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.International Organization,47(1),41-76.
  58. Caird, J. S.(2017).Legislating for Brexit: The Great Repeal Bill.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,7793
  59. Caird, J. S.,Miller, V.,Lang, A.(2017).European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,8079
  60. Cane, P.(Ed.),Kritzer, H. M.(Ed.)(2010).The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  61. Cardwell, P. J.(2016).The Hokey, Cokey Approach to EU Membership: Legal Options for the UK and EU.Journal of European Public Policy,23(9),1285-1293.
  62. Carroll, A.(2017).Constitutional and Administrative Law.London, UK:Pearson.
  63. Closa, C.(1995).Citizenship of the Union and Nationality of Member States.Common Market Law Review,32(2),487-518.
  64. Collins, L.(1990).European Community Law in the United Kingdom.London, UK:Butterworths.
  65. Craig, P.(2013).The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  66. Craig, P.,De Bûrca, G.(1996).EC Law: Text, Cases, & Materials.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  67. Craig, R.(2016).Casting Aside Clanking Medieval Chains: Prerogative, Statute and Article 50 after the EU Referendum.The Modern Law Review,79(6),1041-1063.
  68. Dashwood, A.(1977).The Principle of Direct Effect in European Community Law.Journal of Common Market Studies,16(3),229-245.
  69. Department for Exiting the European Union(2017).Legislating for the United Kingdom's Withdrawal from the European Union (The Great Repeal Bill: White Paper).
  70. Dickinson, A.(2016).Back to the Future: The UK's EU Exit and the Conflict of Laws.Journal of Private International Law,12(2),195-210.
  71. Dickson, J.(2001).Evolution and Legal Theory.Oxford, UK:Hart Pub..
  72. Editorial Comments(2017).A Way to Win Back Support for the European Project?.Common Market Law Review,54(1),1-10.
  73. Editorial Comments(2016).Withdrawing from the Ever Closer Union?.Common Market Law Review,53(6),1491-1500.
  74. Editorial Comments(2017).EU Law as a Way of Life.Common Market Law Review,54(2),357-367.
  75. Eeckhout, P.,Frantziou, E.(2017).Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading.Common Market Law Review,54(3),695-734.
  76. Elliott, M.(2014).University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research PaperUniversity of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper,未出版
  77. Elliott, M.(2017).The Supreme Court's Judgement in Miller: In Search of Constitutional Principle.Cambridge Law Journal,76(2),257-288.
  78. Elliott, M.(2014).University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research PaperUniversity of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper,未出版
  79. European Council(2017).White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU 27 by 2025, COM (2017) 2025.Brussels:
  80. Farmer, L.(Ed.),Veich, S.(Ed.)(2001).The State of Scots Law.London, UK:Butterworths.
  81. Feldman, D.(2013).The Nature and Significance of "Constitutional" Legislation.Law Quarterly Review,129(3),343-358.
  82. Ford, M.(2016).The Effect of Brexit on Workers' Rights.King's Law Journal,27(3),398-415.
  83. Friel, R. J.(2004).Providing a Constitutional Framework for Withdrawal from the EU: Article 59 of the Draft European Constitution.International and Comparative Law Quarterly,53(2),407-428.
  84. Garrett, G.(1995).The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union.Integration Organization,49(1),171-181.
  85. George, S.(1998).An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  86. George, S.(1991).Britain and European Integration since 1945.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
  87. Glencross, A.(2015).Why a British Referendum on EU Membership Will not Solve the Europe Question.International Affairs,91(2),303-317.
  88. Goldsworthy, J.(2010).Parliamentary Sovereignty.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  89. Gordon, M.(2016).Brexit: A Challenge for the UK Costitution, of the UK Constitution?.European Constitutional Law Review,12(3),409-444.
  90. Griffiths, J.(1986).What is Legal Pluralism?.Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law,18(24),1-55.
  91. H. M. Government(1971).The United Kingdom and the European Communities, Cmnd. 4715.London, UK:Her Majesty Stationery Office.
  92. H. M. Government(2017).The United Kingdom's Exit from and New Partnership with the European Union, Cm. 9417.
  93. H. M. Government(2016).HM Treasury Analysis: The Immediate Economic Impact of Leaving the EU, Cm. 9292.
  94. Habermas, J.(2015).Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy is Necessary and How It is Possible.European Law Journal,21(4),546-557.
  95. Hart, H. L. A.(1994).The Concept of Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  96. Hartley, T. C.(2004).European Union Law in a Global Context: Text, Cases and Materials.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  97. Hartley, T. C.(2014).The Foundations of European Community Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  98. Himsworth, C. M. G.,Munro, C. R.(2000).The Scotland Act 1998.Edinburg, UK:Green/Sweet & Maxwell.
  99. Himsworth, C. M. G.,O'Neill, C. M.(2009).Scotland's Constitution: Law and Practice.West Sussex, UK:Bloomsburg Professional.
  100. Horsley, T.(2013).Reflection on the Role of the Court of Justice as the 'Motor' of European Integration: Legal Limits to Judicial Lawmaking.Common Market Law Review,50(4),931-964.
  101. House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee(2010).The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
  102. House of Lords(2017).Brexit: UK-EU Movement of People, 14th Report of Session 2016-17.
  103. House of Lords(2017).Brexit and the EU Budget, 15th Report of Session 2016-17.
  104. House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution(2017).The 'Great Repeal Bill' and Delegated Powers, 9th report 2016-17.
  105. Irwin, G.(2015).Brexit: The Impact on the UK and the EU.London, UK:Global Counsel.
  106. Jaklic, K.(2014).Constitutional Pluralism in the EU.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  107. Jenkins, D.(2009).Common Law Declarations of Unconstitutionality.International Journal of Constitutional Law,7(2),183-214.
  108. Jennings, I.(1959).The Law of the Constitution.London, UK:University of London Press.
  109. Jowell, J.(Ed.),Oliver, D.(Ed.)(2004).The Changing Constitution.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  110. Jowell, J.(Ed.),Oliver, D.(Ed.)(2011).The Changing Constitution.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  111. Kaczorowska, A.(2013).European Union Law.London, UK:Routledge.
  112. Kelly, R.(2016).Statutory Instruments.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,06509
  113. King, A.(2007).The British Constitution.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  114. Koskenniemi, M.(Ed.)(1998).International Law Aspects of the European Union.The Hague, Netherlands:Kluwer Law International.
  115. Kumm, M.(2005).The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty.European Law Journal,11(3),262-307.
  116. Lang, A.(2017).Parliament's Role in Ratifying Treaties.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,5855
  117. Leal-Arcas, R.(2010).The European Union's Trade and Investment Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon.The Journal of World Investment & Trade,11(4),463-514.
  118. Leyland, P.(2016).The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis.Portland, OR:Hart Publishing.
  119. Lord Chancellor's Department(1967).Legal and Constitutional Implications of United Kingdom Membership of the European Communities, Cmnd. 3301.
  120. Loveland, I.(2015).Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  121. MacCormick, N.(1993).Beyond the Sovereign State.Modern Law Review,56(1),1-18.
  122. Macmillan, H.(1971).Riding the Storm: 1956-1959.London, UK:Macmillan.
  123. Markham, J. W., Jr.(2009).The Supreme Court's New Implied Repeal Doctrine: Expanding Judicial Power to Rewrite Legislation under the Ballooning Conception of "Plain Repugnancy".Gonzaga Law Review,45(2),437-478.
  124. Marshall, G.(2002).Metric Martyrs and Martyrdom by Henry VIII Clause.Law Quarterly Review,118,493-502.
  125. McCorkinale, C.(2016).Scotland and Brexit: The State of the Union and the Union State.King's Law Journal,27(3),345-365.
  126. McNair, L.(1961).The Law of Treaties.Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press.
  127. Miller, V.(2016).Brexit: Impacts across Policy Areas.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,07213
  128. Miller, V.(2017).Legislating for Brexit: Directly Applicable EU Law.House of Commons Library Briefing Paper,7863
  129. Milward, A. S.(1984).The Reconstruction of Western European 1945-51.Oakland, CA:University of California Press.
  130. Muir, E.(2014).The Fundamental Rights Implications of EU Legislation: Some Constitutional Challenges.Common Market Law Review,51(1),219-245.
  131. Munro, C. R.(2003).Thoughts on the Sewel Convention.Scots Law Times,194-196.
  132. Nicol, D.(2001).EC Membership and the Judicialization of British Politics.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  133. Ortega, L.(2005).Fundamental Rights in the European Constitution.European Public Law,11(3),363-373.
  134. Page, A.(2015).Constitutional Law of Scotland.Edinburg, UK:W. Green.
  135. Page, A.,Reid, C.,Ross, A.(1999).A Guide to the Scotland Act 1998.London, UK:Butterworths.
  136. Palmer, V. V.(2001).Mixed Jurisdiction Worldwide: The Third Legal Family.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  137. Piris, J.-C.(2015).Should the UK Withdraw from the EU: Legal Aspects and Effects of Possible Options.European Issues,355
  138. Piris, J.-C.(2010).The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  139. Ryan, M.,Foster, S.(2013).Unlocking Constitutional & Administrative Law.New York, NY:Routledge.
  140. Scharpf, F. W.(2014).MPlfG Discussion PaperMPlfG Discussion Paper,Cologne, Germany:Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  141. Scharpf, F. W.(2015).After the Crash: A Perspective on Multilevel European Democracy.European Law Journal,21(3),384-405.
  142. Semmelmann, C.(2013).General Principles in EU Law between a Compensatory Role and an Intrinsic Value.European Law Journal,19(4),457-487.
  143. Slaughter, A. M.(Ed.),Sweet, A. S.(Ed.),Weiler, J. H. H.(Ed.)(1998).The European Court & National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context.Oxford, UK:Hart Pub.
  144. Smith, T. B.(1962).Studies Critical and Comparative.Edinburgh, UK:W. Green & Son.
  145. Snyder, F.(1999).Governing Global Legal Economic Globalization: Pluralism and European Union Law.European Law Journal,5(4),334-374.
  146. Sweet, A. S.(2009).Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, International Regimes.Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,16(2),621-645.
  147. The Economist(2017).The Long Arm of European Law: Why Britain Cannot Entirely Escape from the European Court of Justice.The Economist,424(9055),46.
  148. The Public Law Project(2013).An Introduction to Judicial Review.London, UK:Public Law Project.
  149. The Scottish Parliament(2016).The EU Referendum Result and Its Implications for Scotland: Initial Evidence.
  150. Tierney, S.(2013).Legal Issues Surrounding the Referendum on Independence for Scotland.European Constitutional Law Review,9(3),359-390.
  151. Tomás, A. F.,Garrido, D. L.(2017).,Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
  152. Tridimas, T.(1996).The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism.European Law Review,21,199-210.
  153. Tridimas, T.(1999).The General Principle of EC Law.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  154. Tridimas, T.(2016).Brexit Means Brexit. Article 50: An Endgame Without an End?.King's Law Journal,27(3),297-313.
  155. Twining, W.(2000).Globalisation and Legal Theory.London, UK:Butterworths.
  156. Twining, W.(2009).General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  157. Vile, M. J. C.(1967).Constitutionaliam and Separation of Powers.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  158. Von Bogdandy, A.(2016).European Law Beyond 'Ever Closer Union' Repositioning the Concept, Its Trust and the ECJ's Comparative Methodology.European Law Journal,22(4),519-538.
  159. Wade, H. W. R.(1996).Sovereignty-Evolution or Revolution?.Law Quarterly Review,112,568-575.
  160. Walker, N.(2002).The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism.Modern Law Review,65(3),317-359.
  161. Wall, S.(2008).A Stranger in Europe: Britain in the EU from Thatcher to Blair.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  162. Weiler, J. H. H.(1993).Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Area of Political Integration.Journal of Common Market Studies,31(4),417-446.
  163. Weiler, J. H. H.(2011).The Political and Legal Culture of European Integration: An Exploratory Essay.International Journal of Constitutional Law,9(3-4),678-694.
  164. Weiler, J. H. H.(1999).The Constitution of Europe.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  165. Weiler, J. H. H.(Ed.),Wind, M.(Ed.)(2003).European Constitutionalism Beyond the State.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  166. 丁純(2016)。英國退歐和歐洲的前途。歐洲研究，2016(4)，17-25。
  167. 王志文(2016)。英國脫歐所引發之法律衝突問題。中華國際法與超國界法評論，12(2)，211-248。
  168. 王志文(2015)。國際公法論集。臺北:瑞興圖書。
  169. 王泰銓(2008)。歐洲聯盟法總論。臺北:臺灣智庫。
  170. 丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。臺北:三民。
  171. 尼爾斯•楊森、羅瀏虎譯(2016)。歐洲法律多元格局：國別法、歐洲法以及民間法典編纂。求是學刊，43(1)，1-12。
  172. 吳冠軍(2016)。從英國脫歐公投看現代民主的雙重結構性困局。當代世界與社會主義，2016(6)，26-34。
  173. 沈玄池編、洪德欽編(1998)。歐洲聯盟：理論與政策。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  174. 沈宗靈(2002)。比較憲法：對八國憲法的比較研究。北京:北京大學出版社。
  175. 洪德欽(2014)。歐洲聯盟法的法源。華岡法粹，57，1-42。
  176. 洪德欽(2017)。WTO 法律與政策專題研究。臺北:新學林。
  177. 洪德欽編(2007)。歐盟憲法。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  178. 洪德欽編(2006)。歐洲聯盟人權保障。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  179. 洪德欽編、陳淳文編(2015)。歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展。臺北:臺大出版中心。
  180. 曾令良(2003)。論歐共體法與成員國法的關係。法學論壇，18(1)，79-87。
  181. 程衛東(2016)。多元法律秩序與歐盟法治的局限性。歐洲研究，2016(1)，1-15。
  182. 雷飛龍(2010)。英國政府與政治。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
  183. 劉兆興(2006)。論歐盟法律與其成員國法律之間的關係。環球法律評論，2006(3)，318-326。
  184. 謝紅星(2010)。多元法律文化的混合：論英國普通法的「混合性」特徵及其啟示。政法學刊，27(1)，16-21。
  185. 龔祥瑞(2003)。比較憲法與行政法。北京:法律出版社。
被引用次数
  1. 洪偉勝(2019)。難分難合？－從蘇格蘭獨立公投及英國脫歐公投談公民投票之可能及侷限。臺灣國際研究季刊，15(2)，123-144。
  2. 李貴英(2022)。歐洲聯盟強化外資控管之新架構：外國補貼併購交易之審查新制。問題與研究，61(1)，1-42。
  3. 林人一(2020)。從歐洲整合觀點論歐盟條約第50條之歐盟退出權。華岡法粹，69，55-95。
  4. (2018)。船東互保協會法制之研究─以英國發展為核心。興大法學，24，205-261。
  5. (2018)。英國脫歐談判之現況與前瞻。月旦法學雜誌，281，78-91。
print cancel