運用門檻回歸模型探討台灣股市指數走勢及交易訊息－信用交易指標應用

Using Threshold Autoregression Model to Discuss Time Trends of Taiwan Stock Index and Trading Information-The Application of Credit Trading Indexes

10.6735/JAFD.201403_7(1).0004

林家樑(Chia-Liang Lin)

個人投資者（散戶） ； 交易訊息 ； 信用交易 ； 門檻回歸模型 ； Domestic Individual Investors ； Trading Information ； Credit Trading ； Threshold Autoregression Model

會計與財金研究

7卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

61 - 76

繁體中文

台灣股市交易中散戶投資者扮演著不可忽略的角色，因此探討散戶交易行為一直是可以深入討論的議題。為此，本研究以信用工具作為散戶交易行為之代理觀察變數，並且運用門檻回歸模型，探討不同信用工具交易餘額下台灣市場指數走勢關係。本研究期間為2005年1月3日至2013年8月9日，共計2116個交易日，以每日融資、融券及資券比與每日市場加權指數作為研究樣本。由門檻回歸實證結果發現在不同信用交易餘額下市場指數會對應出不同市場指數趨勢關係。研究結果顯示出較高信用交易工具餘額下產生了不同市場訊息。當融券餘額或融資餘額過高時，市場往往會產生反轉的訊息。最後，資券比指標結果也驗證相同結論，同時在較高資券比率水準下，市場指數波動程度跟著增加，隱含著市場融資相對過高情況下，市場風險產生了擴大現象。

In Taiwan stock market domestic individual investors dominated daily trade volume. Due to the critical role, the research of information of domestic individual investor trading is always an interesting topic in the investment field. For this distinctive and interesting phenomenon and the gaps in previous study, this study uses three prevalent indexes as observed variables, outstanding of margin purchase, outstanding of short sale, and margin-short ratio. Based on the threshold autoregression model, furthermore, this study aims to discuss the probable trends of Taiwan stock market under different threshold values of the observed indexes. This study collected daily data of margin, short, margin-short ratio from January 3rd, 2005 to August 9th, 2013. Based on these 2116 daily data, the empirical results of the threshold regression model indicate that corresponding different estimating threshold values of observed variables, Taiwan market index could exhibit different time trend patterns. Hence, these results would infer that the credit trading indexes could convey the different contents of information depending on the values, especially the higher values, of the observed variables.

1. 丁誌魰、曾富敏(2005)。以向量自我回規模是探討台灣股價、成交量、融資融券與法人進出的關聯性。真理財金學報，13，43-74。
   連結：
2. 曾昭玲、林政緯(2005)。調整股市信用交易條件對股價報酬率與波動性影響之探討。風險管理學報，7(1)，53-77。
   連結：
3. Asquith, P. & Meulbroek, L. K. (1995). An empirical investigation of short interest. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, U.S.A.
4. Aitken, M. J.,Frino, A.,McCorry, M. S.,Swan, P. L.(1988).Short sales are almost instantaneously bad news: evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange.The Journal of finance,53,2205-2223.
5. Brent, A.,Morse, D.,Stice, E. K.(1990).Short interest: Explanations and tests.Journal of Financial and Quantitative,25,273-289.
6. Chen, H.,Singal, V.(2003).Role of speculative short sales in price formation: The case of the weekend effect.The Journal of Finance,58,685-706.
7. Ferris, S. P.,Chance, D. M.(1988).Margin requirements and stock market volatility.Economics Letter,28,251-264.
8. Ferson, W. E.,Harvey, C. R.(1999).Conditioning Variables and the cross-section of stock returns.Journal of Finance,54,1325-1360.
9. Grube, R. C.,Joy, O. M.,Panton, D. B.(1979).Market responses to Federal Reserve changes in the initial margin requirement.The Journal of Finance,34(3),659-674.
10. Hansen, B. E.(1999).Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference.Journal of Econometrics,93,345-368.
11. Hardouvelis, G. A.(1988).Margin requirements, volatility and the transitory component of stock price.The American Economic Review,80,736-762.
12. Hardouvelis, G. A.(1990).Margin requirements and stock market volatility.Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review,13,80-89.
13. Hardouvelis, G. A.,Peristiani, S.(1992).Margin requirements, speculative trading and stock price fluctuations: The case of Japan.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,107,1333-1371.
14. Hemang, D.,Ramesh, K.,Thiagarajan, S. R.,Balachandran, B. V.(2002).An investigation of the informational role of short interest in the NASDAQ market.Journal of Finance,57,2263-2287.
15. Hsieh, D. A.,Miller, M. H.(1990).Margin regulation and stock market volatility.Journal of Finance,45,3-29.
16. Hsu, Y.(1996).Margin requirements and stock market volatility: Another look at the case of Taiwan.Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,14,409-419.
17. Ko, K.,Lim, T.(2006).Short selling and stock prices with regime switching in the absence of market makers: the case of Japan.Japan and the World Economy,18,528-544.
18. Kumar, R.,Ferris, S. P.,Chance, D. M.(1991).The different impact of Federal reserve margin requirement on stock return volatility.Financial Review,26,343-366.
19. Lee, S.,Yoo, T. Y.(1993).Margin regulation and stock market response: Further evidence from the U.S. and some Pacific countries.Review of Economics and Statistics,47,13-37.
20. Luckett, D. G.(1982).On the effectiveness of the Federal Reserve's margin requirement.The Journal of Finance,37,783-799.
21. McDonal, J.,Baron, D.(1973).Risk and return on short positions in common stocks.The Journal of Finance,28,97-107.
22. Sentana, E.,Wadhwani, S. W.(1992).Feedback traders and stock return autocorrelations : Evidence from a century of daily data.The Economic Journal,102,415-425.
23. Woolridege, J. R.,Dickinson, A.(1994).Short selling and common stock prices.Financial analysts Journal,50,20-28.
24. 方文碩、孫穎慶(2000)。融資、融券與股票市場關聯性探討。台灣銀行季刊，51(3)，216-239。
25. 林珊玟(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學國際經濟研究所。
26. 張哲章(1998)。融資融券餘額、成交量與股價指數之關聯性研究。證券金融，56，67-94。
27. 鄭漢亮(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北大學經濟研究所。

1. 王彩羨(2016)。三大法人、信用交易與台灣加權股價指數關係之研究。淡江大學財務金融學系碩士在職專班學位論文。2016。1-68。