跆拳道裁判執法判決知覺技能視覺資訊系統建置

Development and Application of Visual Discrimination System in Perceptual Skill for Taekwondo Referee's Executive Judgment

10.29897/DNSJ.201106.0003

陳進發(Chin-Fa Chen)；周桂名(Kuei-Ming Chou)

評估 ； 訓練 ； 作業系統 ； 程式設計 ； evaluation ； training ； operating system ； programming

興大體育學刊

11期（2011 / 06 / 01）

25 - 33

繁體中文

跆拳道裁判執法判決之正確性對競技運動的發展極其重要。對於跆拳道裁判培育過程，除了透過講習及判例經驗歷練來協助成長，如能配合電腦資訊的科技整合，將過去賽會實際比賽情境資料，研發建置裁判知覺技能輔助系統，幫助裁判在正式比賽臨場執法之前有更多實況模擬的比賽情境操作，對於日後擔任比賽裁判執法判決時將多所助益。本視覺資訊系統研發建置可分為兩個階段，第一階段為蒐錄跆拳道正式比賽之各種不同比賽情境判例，剪輯不同情境判例搭配電腦程式設計，建立跆拳道裁判執法判決電腦輔助視覺資訊評估系統；第二階段為建立跆拳道裁判執法判決電腦輔助視覺資訊訓練系統，強化裁判執法經驗不足之缺失。透過本評估系統可在賽前了解跆拳道裁判的執法技術水準做為聘任與否之參考，也可藉助訓練系統之操作讓裁判更能熟悉比賽情境判例增進判決之穩定及正確性。

The validity of tae kwon do referees' executive judgment is crucial to the development of competitive sports. During the process of cultivating a taekwondo referee, in addition to providing assistance through the workshop and passing on precedent experience, along with the integration of computer science technology, the information of previous competition spectacles could be used to develop the referees' perceptual skill supporting system and provide more simulations of real competition spectacles, and it would be beneficial for referees who are more familiar with the actual competition situation to enforce the judgment. This visual discrimination system can be divided into two stages. The first stage is to collect and videotape various situations of official taekwondo competitions and their judgments, and edit video clips of different situations by programming to set up the computer-based visual discrimination and evaluation system for taekwondo referee's executive judgment. The second stage is to establish the computer supporting visual discrimination and evaluation system for taekwondo referee's executive judgment, and to enhance referees' experience of actual execution. With the assistance of this evaluation system, taekwondo referees' executive skills can be recognized as a reference of employment; as well as to improve the reliability and validity of executive judgment for the referees through operating the training system.

1. 陳明達,何全進,陳鵬仁,陳進發(2009)。籃球裁判執法判決能力電腦輔助系統之開發研究。運動教練科學，15，53-71。
   連結：
2. 陳明達,陳進發,陳鵬仁,黃建松(2008)。排球裁判執法判決電腦輔助評估系統之研發。體育學報，41(2)，83-95。
   連結：
3. Adolphe, R. M.,Vickers, J. N.,Laplante, G.(1997).The effects of training visual attention on gaze behavior and accuracy: A pilot study.International Journal of Sport Vision,4,28-33.
4. Franks, J. M.,Hanvey, T.(1997).Cur for goalkeepers: High-tech methods used to measure penalty shot response.Soccer Journal,May/June,30-38.
5. Tayler, M. A.,Burwitz, L,Davids, K.(1994).Coaching perceptural strategy in badminton.Journal of Sport Science,12,213.
6. World Taekwondo Faderation(2009).World Taekwondo Faderation. (2009). WTF competition rules..
7. 陳進發,廖主民,王耀聰(2005)。運動裁判員知覺技能評估及訓練系統之研究─以排球裁判為例。大專體育學術研討會專刊，94年度，467-473。