大學生的社會情緒學習素養與其對嘲弄的正向感知之關係－以情緒調節策略為中介變項

Hsun-Chih Huang

doi:10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0002

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P241 - 268

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

大学生的社会情绪学习素养与其对嘲弄的正向感知之关系－以情绪调节策略为中介变项

Relationship between Social and Emotional Learning Competencies and the Positive Perceptions of Teasing in College Students: Mediating Effects of Emotion Regulation Strategies

黄绚质(Hsun-Chih Huang)

教育心理学报； 55 卷 2 期 (2023 / 12 / 01) ， P241 - 268

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0002

社会情绪学习素养；情绪调节策略；对嘲弄的正向感知； social and emotional learning competencies ； emotion regulation strategies ； positive perceptions of teasing

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (111) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Teasing is prevalent among late adolescents and young adults (Beck et al., 2007). Adults with mature cognitive abilities and verbal skills can recognize the subtle implications of irony and puns in conversations (Steinberg, 2014), leading to their enjoyment of teasing. Consequently, teasing can promote bonding in peer relationships (Eckert et al., 2020; Shapiro et al., 1991). However, research has seldom explored the link between mental competencies and positive perceptions of teasing. Notably, social and emotional learning (SEL) competencies, which are indicators of psychosocial adjustment (Durlak & Mahoney, 2019; Jones & Bouffard, 2012), influence how people perceive teasing (Jones & Bouffard, 2012). Additionally, SEL competencies influence emotional regulation strategies (CASEL, 2020a, 2020b), which are associated with perceptions of teasing (Myers et al., 2013). To address the aforementioned research gaps, the present study explored whether college students' emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between SEL competencies and positive perceptions of teasing. Specifically, the aims of this study were to (1) assess the direct effect of SEL competencies on positive perceptions of teasing; (2) evaluate how SEL competencies affect general and specific emotion regulation strategies; (3) test the direct effects of these strategies on perceptions of teasing when SEL competencies are controlled for; and (4) explore the indirect effects of SEL competencies on positive perceptions of teasing through general and specific emotion regulation strategies. A pilot study was conducted to develop three assessment scales, and the study included 441 college students (boys: 33%, girls: 66%, prefer not to answer: 1%) recruited from universities in southern Taiwan. After the pilot study, the formal study, conducted using the finalized scales, was conducted; the formal study included 1,207 college students (boys: 36%, girls: 64%) recruited from different universities in Taiwan. In this study, three assessment scales were developed and validated. The first scale, called Scale of College Students' SEL Competencies, was developed to evaluate SEL competencies on a 5-point scale; the scale comprises 21 items. The scale includes five subscales: "self-management" (accounting for 14.63% of the variance), "self-awareness" (accounting for 13.63% of the variance); "interpersonal tolerance and basic interpersonal operation " (accounting for 13.23% of the variance), "altruism" (accounting for 10.97% of the variance), and "interpersonal coping skills" (accounting for 10.91% of the variance). Collectively, these factors explained 63.37% of the variance. The reliability of the overall scale, as measured by Cronbach's α, was .93. Regarding the reliability of the subscales, the Cronbach's α value was .83 for "self-management," .84 for "self-awareness," .84 for "interpersonal tolerance and basic interpersonal operation," .79 for "altruism," and .73 for "interpersonal coping skills." The second scale, called Scale of College Students' Emotion Regulation Strategies, was developed to assess emotion regulation strategies on a 5-point scale; the scale comprises 15 items. It includes four factors: "taking positive perspectives" (accounting for 25.60% of the variance), "avoidance" (account for 15.81% of the variance), "suppression" (accounting for 14.03% of the variance), and "problem-solving" (accounting for 12.19% of the variance). Overall, these factors explained 67.63% of the variance. The reliability of the overall scale, as measured by Cronbach's α, was .89. Regarding the reliability of the subscales, the Cronbach's α was .91 for "taking positive perspectives," .80 for "avoidance," .83 for "suppression," and .67 for "problem-solving." The third scale, called Scale of College Students' Positive Perceptions of Teasing, was developed to measure perceptions of teasing on a 5-point scale; the scale comprises nine items. It includes two factors: "getting close with each other" (accounting for 39.42% of the variance) and "expressing positive emotion" (accounting for 32.33% of the variance). Collectively, these factors explained 71.75% of the variance. The reliability of the overall scale, as measured by Cronbach's α, was .93. Regarding the reliability of the subscale, the Cronbach's α value was .90 for "getting close with each other" and .86 for "expressing positive emotion." Preliminary analyses of this study yielded several findings: (1) Significant differences in the SEL competencies were observed among college students from different schools. However, post hoc analysis results revealed no significant differences across school types. (2) Significant sex-based differences in emotion regulation strategies were observed; specifically, male students employed more emotion regulation strategies than did female students.(3) Significant school- and sex-based differences in positive perceptions of teasing were observed, although post hoc analysis results indicated no significant differences between school types. Male students were more likely to perceive teasing positively when compared with female students. Furthermore, the study observed a positive association between the students' SEL competencies, emotion regulation strategies, and positive perceptions of teasing. These findings are in agreement with those of previous studies that have revealed associations between these factors and mental health (CASEL, 2020a, 2020b). Mediation analyses addressing the main objectives of this study revealed the following: (1) College students' SEL competencies had a direct effect on their positive perceptions of teasing. (2) College students' SEL competencies directly influenced both general and specific emotion regulation strategies. (3) When students' SEL competencies were controlled for, general and specific emotion regulation strategies had direct effects on students' positive perceptions of teasing. (4) College students' SEL competencies indirectly influenced their positive perceptions of teasing through general and specific emotion regulation strategies. Notably, the mediation analysis results provide essential insights. The results demonstrate that the general strategy for regulating emotions fully mediated the association between college students' SEL competencies and their positive perceptions of teasing. Moreover, an exploratory factor analysis of specific emotion regulation strategies-namely "taking positive perspectives," "problem-solving," "avoidance," and "suppression"-revealed that "taking positive perspectives" emerged as a full mediator in the aforementioned association. However, "problem-solving," "avoidance" and "suppression" were partial mediators in this relationship. These findings highlight the importance of emotion regulation in the association between the SEL competencies of college students and their positive perceptions of teasing. Effective emotion regulation could be a protective factor enabling college students to interpret social behaviors positively and maintain positive social connections. Overall, the study demonstrated that when the participants adequately used emotion regulation strategies-especially positive reappraisal-greater SEL competencies were associated with more positive perceptions of their teasing experiences. Moreover, even strategies such as problem-solving or the less adaptive approaches of avoidance and suppression could partially enhance positive perceptions of teasing, provided that the students possessed strong SEL competencies. Overall, this study contributes to the relevant literature on SEL, emotion regulation, and peer teasing among late adolescents and young adults. Its findings can inform university student guidance centers in their efforts to cultivate SEL skills and emotion regulation strategies, which can ultimately aid students in positively interpreting common teasing interactions in peer relationships.

参考文献 ( 111 ) 〈TOP〉

Wu, W.-C.,Chen, F.-L.,Yen, L.-L.,Chiang, Y.-C.(2016).Reactions to teasing and their relationship with adolescent mental health.Bulletin of Educational Psychology,47,629-649.
连结：
王樱芬, Y.-F.(2012)。情绪调节在青少年人际依附与心理困扰之中介角色分析研究。教育心理学报，44，273-294。
连结：
江文慈, W.-T.(2004)。大学生的情绪调整历程与发展特徵。教育心理学报，35，249-268。
连结：
吴志文, C.-W.,叶光辉, K.-H.,何文泽,, W.-T(2019)。知觉父母冲突沟通模式对青少年生活适应的影响：探讨冲突情绪调控策略的中介效果。人类发展与家庭学报，20，24-63。
连结：
陈依芬, I.-F.,黄金兰, C.-L.,林以正, Y.-C.(2011)。忍的情绪调控策略与心理适应之关联。本土心理学研究，35，3-56。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址