The Doha Investment Negotiations: Whither or Wither

W. A. Dymond; Michael Hart

doi:10.30392/TJWTOS.200608_(4).0002

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/01/21~2025/03/31

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P57 - 89

社会科学 > 经济学

DOI： 10.30392/TJWTOS

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

The Doha Investment Negotiations: Whither or Wither

杜哈投资协商：往何处？式微乎？

戴蒙德(W. A. Dymond) ；哈特(Michael Hart)

Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies ； 4 期 (2006 / 08 / 01) ， P57 - 89

英文 DOI： 10.30392/TJWTOS.200608_(4).0002

加拿大；世界贸易组织；投资；杜哈回合；双边投资协议； Canada ； WTO investment ； Doha Round ； BITS

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (15) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

High drama attended the issue of foreign direct investment (FDI) at the last two ministerial meetings of the World Trade Organization (WTO). At the 2001 meeting in Doha, the inclusion of investment in the mandate for the new round of multilateral trade negotiations became a make-or-break issue. The result was a decision to delay launching investment negotiations until the 2003 ministerial meeting, subject to an explicit consensus on the modalities of negotiations. The scope of the intended negotiations was limited to a narrow range of issues and heavily laden with references to the special development and financial needs of developing countries. At Cancun, investment was treated together with three other issues, trade and competition policy, trade facilitation, and transparency in government procurement, collectively known as the Singapore issues. At Cancun, the Chairman proposed only a modest step on investment-that the Working Group be mandated to elaborate the negotiating modalities for adoption at a later date. Although the European Union, the principal supporter of WTO investment negotiations, offered to withdraw the proposal, Japan and Korea insisted that at a minimum the Chairman's text be accepted. Developing countries, on the other hand, refused to accept any of the Chairman's proposals on the Singapore issues and, on that point, the meeting terminated.
From the outset of investment discussions in the WTO, it has been assumed that the principles of the multilateral trade system can inform the erection of a multilateral investment agreement. Three major issues arise from such an assumption and require examination if the WTO debate is to be joined on a basis likely to yield a coherent result. The first is the architecture of lodging rules designed to foster the expansion of global investment flows within an architecture designed to foster the expansion of global trade in goods. The second is the need to reconcile any WTO investment agreement with existing bilateral and regional investment agreements. The third is the implication of implementing special and differential treatment in favour of developing countries. In short, there are some large gaps in the intellectual capital necessary to launch negotiations.

参考文献 ( 15 ) 〈TOP〉

Centre for International Trade Economics and Environment(2002).Multilateral or Bilateral Investment Negotiations: Where can Developing Countries Make Themselves Heard?.
Dymond, W. A.,Fen Hampson,Michael Hart,Martin Rudner (eds.)(1999).A Big League Player? Canada among Nations 1999.Toronto:Oxford University Press.
Dymond, William,Michael Hart(2000).Post-Modem Trade Policy: Reflections on the Challenges to Multilateral Trade Negotiations after Seattle.Journal of World Trade,34(3)
Hallward-Driemeier, Mary.(2003).World Bank StudyWorld Bank Study,未出版
Hart, Michael.(1995).Also Present at the Creation: Dana Wilgress and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment at Havana.Ottawa:Centre for Trade Policy and Law.

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址