團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響一個多層次研究

黃家齊; 黃荷婷

doi:10.6504/JOM.2006.23.03.03

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P327 - 346

社会科学 > 管理学

DOI： 10.6504/JOM

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

团队成员目标导向对於自我与集体效能及创新之影响一个多层次研究

The Effect of Team Member Goal Orientation on Self-efficacy, Collective Efficacy and Innovation: A Multilevel Study

黄家齐(Jia-Chi Huang) ；黄荷婷(Her-Ting Huang)

管理学报； 23 卷 3 期 (2006 / 06 / 01) ， P327 - 346

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6504/JOM.2006.23.03.03

目标导向；自我效能；集体效能；创新行为；创新绩效；多层次研究； goal orientation ； self-efficacy ； collective efficacy ； innovative behavior innovation performance ； multilevel study

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (81) │ 被引用文献 (13) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Goal orientation theory originated in the educational psychology and child development literature. It conceptualized the broader goals pursued by individuals as a personality dimension and proposed that individuals have goal orientations preferences in achievement situation. Though previous studies had proved the proposition of goal orientation has important impact on individual performance. Hat' goal orientation affects innovative behavior is still unclear Moreover if we consider the team work situation, the impact of team member goal orientation on individual innovative behavior and team innovation performance is an unexplored issue especially. This is also the theoretical gap the present study hope to contribute.
In this study, we explored the effect of goal orientation trait under team work situations. We developed and testified a multilevel model. At individual level, we examined the relationship between individual goal orientation and innovative behavior and the mediating role of self-efficacy. At group level, we also examined the relationship between team goal orientation and innovation performance, and the mediating role of collective efficacy.
70 R & D teams from 36 firms were recruited to participate in the study. To be included in the final sample, at least 2/3 employees in the R & D team had to complete α survey and their supervisor had to complete another survey. 70 sets (including 490 employees) were distributed and 56 sets (including 228 employees) were collected. However 3 sets were excluded as α result of its response rate under 2/3, compared with the number of the team members. Thus, 53 R & D teams (including 218 employees) were included in the data analysis.
We used LISREL to analyze data and examined our hypotheses. The results showed that individual level analysis were consistent with previous researches. Learning orientation was positively related to innovative behavior and self-efficacy mediated this relationship, whereas performance orientation showed no significant relationship with self-efficacy and innovative behavior Results of group level analysis were different. Team learning orientation had no significant relationships with either collective efficacy or innovation performance, whereas team performance orientation had significantly negative relationships with collective efficacy and innovation performance. These results implied learning orientation dominated the impact on self-efficacy and innovative behavior at individual level, whereas team performance orientation dominated the impact on collective-efficacy and innovation performance at team level. These findings highlighted the necessity of study on team goal orientation and multilevel model. The implication of these findings for theory and research on goal orientation in teams and team staffing are also discussed.

参考文献 ( 81 ) 〈TOP〉

Huang, Jia-Chi,Ya-Ting Hsu, in press(2006).The Effects of Team Personality Composition on Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Performance: Individual and Team Level Analysis.Journal of Management.
连结：
Aguliar, A. A.(1996).Personality and Creativity.Personality and Individual Differences.
Ames, C.,J. Archer(1988).Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Student's Learning Strategies and Motivational Processes.Journal of Educational Psychology.
Ancona, D. G.,J. K. Murningham(1993).The Classics and the Contemporary: A New Blend OD Small Group Research.Social Psychology in Organizations,225-243.
Anderson, J. C.,D. W. Gerbing(1988).Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach.Psychological Bulletin.

被引用文献 ( 13 ) 〈TOP〉

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址