手足重要？同儕重要？獨生與有手足幼兒社會能力成長軌跡與其同儕影響分析

Shu-Man Huang; Li-Tuan Chou; Tsung-Jen Wu; Ming Fun Yip

doi:10.6251/BEP.202303_54(3).0005

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P609 - 635

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

手足重要？同侪重要？独生与有手足幼儿社会能力成长轨迹与其同侪影响分析

Influence of Peers on the Growth Trajectory of the Social Competence of Only Children and Children with Siblings

黄淑满(Shu-Man Huang) ；周丽端(Li-Tuan Chou) ；吴宗仁(Tsung-Jen Wu) ；叶明芬(Ming Fun Yip)

教育心理学报； 54 卷 3 期 (2023 / 03 / 01) ， P609 - 635

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202303_54(3).0005

手足；同侪；社会能力；独生； siblings ； peers ； social competence ； only children

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (48) │ 被引用文献 (1) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Having siblings in early childhood contributes to the development of social competence, including the development of peer relationships, but the following questions must be asked: How does the development of the social competence of only children occur with age, and how does this differ from that of children with siblings? Can having peers replace the effects of having siblings on young children? In Taiwan, few studies exist on the influence of having peers on the social competence of only children and children with siblings, and even fewer exist regarding these influences among preschool children. This study investigated the effect of "years with peers" on the social development trajectory of preschool only children and children with siblings. The research questions were as follows: (1) What was the trajectory of children's social competence development with age? (2) What was the impact of having or not having siblings on the development trajectory of social competence? (3) What was the impact of "years with peers" on the development trajectory of social competence of only children and children with siblings? This study used the Kids in Taiwan: National Longitudinal Study of Child Development and Care (KIT) database, a longitudinal study of 36-month-old (T1), 48-month-old (T2), and 60-month-old (T3) children from April 2016 to April 2017. The T1 sample included 2,164 children. Among the enrollees, 660 were only children and 1,497 had siblings. To clarify the influence of having or not having siblings on the development of social competence, this study extracted data on T1, T2, and T3 children, a total of 1,590 only children or children with siblings. Among them, 1215 were children with siblings at T1; 375 remained only children at T3. This study used the data collected from the KIT panel study sample to analyze and explore the impact of changes in sibling and peer factors on changes in children's social development abilities. The KIT database divides the social competence scale for children aged 2–6 years into four dimensions: Independence, assertiveness, sociability, and compliance. The reliability and validity of the scale are high. This study used Mplus version 8.6 to conduct the following three analyses: (1) The unconditional latent growth model (LGM) was used to understand the changes in preschool children's social competence between T1, T2, and T3. (2) If the initial level or growth rate of individual children's social competence differed significantly in the unconditional LGM, this study applied the conditional LGM to further clarify the influence of having siblings and "years with peers" on the changes in the children's social competence. (3) In the conditional LGM, if the changes in children's social competence of "only children or not" or of "years with peers" significantly differed, multiple group analysis was applied to understand the similarities and differences between the only children and children with siblings groups in the conditional LGM to clarify the influence of "years with peers" on the development of social competence among only children and children with siblings. The following three main results were observed: (1) The four social competence dimensions, namely independence, assertiveness, sociability, and compliance, increased with age. At T1, the initial level of each child's social competence differed significantly. Both T2 and T3 surveys of each child's social competence demonstrated significant growth, and growth rates also differed significantly by individual. (2) In the conditional LGM analysis with the covariate of having siblings or not, only the growth rate of compliance of children with siblings was significantly higher than that of only children. The initial values of the four dimensions of social competence did not differ significantly, and the growth rate of the children's independence, assertiveness, and sociability did not differ significantly. In addition, in the conditional LGM analysis with "years with peers" as a covariate, "years with peers" at T1, T2, or T3 exerted significant positive effects on the children's independence, assertiveness, and sociability, but it did not influence compliance. Under the influence of covariates, the initial values and growth rates of the four dimensions also differed significantly. (3) This study further compared the children with siblings and only children in groups to demonstrate the influence of "years with peers" on the growth of social competence in these groups of children. The initial levels of the four dimensions of social competence of only children were higher than those of children with siblings, but the growth rates of the four dimensions of social competence of children with siblings were higher than those of only children. Peers positively affected the development of children's independence, assertiveness, and sociability, but as children grow older, the influence of "years with peers" on their social competence in these three dimensions decreased. Moreover, social competence in these three dimensions was more positively affected by "years with peers" in only children than in children with siblings. The study provides the following recommendations: (1) Siblings and other peers contribute to the development of children's independence, assertiveness, and sociability. Under the joint influence of siblings and other peers, children with siblings progressed from an initial developmental level lower than that of only children to a level higher than or equal to that of only children within 2 years. This type of results are difficult to observe using cross-sectional research of a single point in time. Therefore, tracking the social competence development of only children and children with siblings using panel study databases such as KIT is necessary. (2) This study proposes research questions that can only be answered using panel studies. Examples of such questions are as follows: Does the impact of having siblings and peers on children increase gradually as they grow older, and does the gap between them and only children with peers also grow? As the literature indicates, from toddler to teenage years, do only children and children with siblings exhibit no significant differences in either positive social skills or negative aggression? Therefore, this study suggests that panel study databases of the social competence of only children and children with siblings should be maintained with information that extends to adolescence. (3) Siblings are important for the development of children's social competence. For only children without siblings, peers become important. The effect of peers on the development of the social competence of young children can be observed in the only children who had peers before T1. Having peers in this study referred to children having attended kindergarten (nursery) on average every day at the time of the survey, regardless of the average attendance duration. Thus, if only children are sent to kindergarten or nursery school, the development of their social competence is enhanced, regardless of the duration of their attendance. Therefore, this study suggests that only children should attend school early in their lives, regardless of the duration of their attendance.

参考文献 ( 48 ) 〈TOP〉

王荣, R.,佟月华, Y.-H.,孙英红, Y.-H.(2021)。台湾青少年社会关系认知特点：多情境、多维度探讨。教育心理学报，52，489-518。
连结：
林家如, C.-J.,王慧婷, H.-T.,吕翠华, T.-H.(2019)。社会技巧促进系统提升国小低年级学童社会技巧表现之研究。特殊教育研究学刊，44(3)，63-92。
连结：
陈怡君, Y.-C.,锺志从, J.-T.(2012)。幼儿园中受忽视与争议幼儿的社会能力探讨。人类发展与家庭学报，14，68-94。
连结：
杨佩荣, P.-J.(2018)。高中学校经验与青少年公民态度的关联性。公民教育与活动领导学报，25，1-41。
连结：
蔡明富, M.-F.,吴裕益, Y.-Y.,庄涵皓, H.-H.(2014)。「学前儿童社会行为评量系统」编制之研究。特殊教育研究学刊，39(2)，1-31。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 1 ) 〈TOP〉

(2023)。影响儿童社会能力因素之解释力比较：SOCIAL模型取向。教育心理学报，55(2)，373-400。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址