知覺歧視對同志伴侶關係適應的影響：拒絕敏感度的中介效果

Yu-Sheng Wang; Yen-Chun Liu

doi:10.6251/BEP.202406_55(4).0006

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P767 - 793

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

知觉歧视对同志伴侣关系适应的影响：拒绝敏感度的中介效果

Mediating Effect of Rejection Sensitivity on the Correlation between Perceived Discrimination and Relationship Adjustment in Same-Sex Couples

王郁盛(Yu-Sheng Wang) ；刘彦君(Yen-Chun Liu)

教育心理学报； 55 卷 4 期 (2024 / 06 / 01) ， P767 - 793

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202406_55(4).0006

知觉歧视；拒绝敏感度；关系适应；同志伴侣； perceived discrimination ； rejection sensitivity ； relationship adjustment ； same-sex couple

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (108) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

The lesbian gay bisexual (LGB) community continues to face various forms of discrimination in daily life. Meyer's (2003) minority stress model and Hatzenbuehler's (2009) psychological mediation framework suggest that societal oppression exposes this community to persistent stressors, increasing awareness and sensitivity on discrimination and threat. This phenomenon raises concerns regarding personal effects and potential harm, which may deteriorate the mental and physical health of LGB individuals. Consequently, these individuals deliberately conceal their sexual orientation for self-protection, further internalizing homophobia. Throughout their development, LGB individuals often face rejection and neglect, which leads to rigid and irrational patterns of interpersonal interactions. Such experiences also increase the rejection sensitivity of LGB individuals (Downey & Feldman, 1996), making them prone to perceiving others as harboring malicious intentions. This perception triggers intense emotional and behavioral responses that negatively affect interpersonal relationships (Rohner, 2004). Furthermore, excessive self-monitoring, heightened sensitivity to stigma, increased social anxiety, and fear of evaluation are prevalent in this community (Feinstein, 2020; Mendoza-Denton et al., 2002; Pachankis et al., 2008; Safren & Pantalone, 2006). Although rejection sensitivity can prompt vigilance against threats, constant vigilance may obscure other safety signals, thereby affecting the mental and emotional health of LGB individuals (Romero-Canyas et al., 2010). External pressure and high rejection sensitivity cause LGB individuals to fear criticism and judgment. In romantic relationships, reluctance to disclose sexual orientation or acknowledge relationships may impair trust and commitment (Mohr & Fassinger, 2006; Rostosky & Riggle, 2017). Moreover, the focus on external threats often leads to disproportionate negative interactions and attitudes compared with the efforts invested (Feinstein et al., 2018; Li et al., 2021; Pepping et al., 2019). Fear of abandonment or rejection in conflicts can result in self-silencing, emotional withdrawal, or intimate partner violence, escalating disputes and undermining relationship adjustment (Norona & Welsh, 2016; Volz & Kerig, 2010). Because of their high sensitivity to physiological responses and changes in romantic relationships, women may be more susceptible than men to the negative effects of stress (Cao et al., 2017). When stigmatized persistently, LGB individuals may develop an anticipatory expectation of rejection in social interactions. This increases their rejection sensitivity, reducing their self-worth and emotional regulation abilities (Bungert et al., 2015; Göncü & Sümer, 2011; Pachankis et al., 2015). In romantic relationships, high rejection sensitivity can exacerbate stress, depression, and anxiety in the face of external discrimination, adversely affecting the relationship through spillover effects and poor self-regulation abilities. In this study, we tested the following hypotheses: H_1: Perceived discrimination and rejection sensitivity in the LGB community are significantly positively correlated; H_2: Perceived discrimination in the LGB community has a significantly negative correlation with relationship adjustment; H_3: Rejection sensitivity in the LGB community has a significantly negative correlation with relationship adjustment; and H_4: Rejection sensitivity in the LGB community has a mediating effect between perceived discrimination and relationship adjustment. In this study, a survey conducted among Taiwanese LGB individuals (aged ≥ 20 years) who had been in same-sex relationships for > 3 months yielded 293 valid responses. The study sample comprised 117 male individuals (101 gay and 16 bisexual) and 176 female individuals (92 lesbian and 84 bisexual). The mean age was 28.1 ± 5.53 years, and the average relationship duration was 42.1 (men: 42.2; women: 42.0) months. The following instruments were used: A basic information form, the Perceived Discrimination Scale, the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Given that the Perceived Discrimination Scale was newly developed for this study and that the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire and Dyadic Adjustment Scale had not been previously applied to the Taiwanese LGB community, we conducted preliminary tests, item analyses, and reliability and validity assessments for these scales. All scales exhibited good reliability and validity. This study yielded four main findings. First, the male participants more frequently experienced discrimination in daily life than did the female participants. Furthermore, the female participants outperformed the male participants in relationship adjustment. This discrepancy is attributed to stricter societal expectations and greater scrutiny of gender expression in male individuals than in female individuals; these factors contribute to elevated levels of perceived discrimination in male individuals (Moskowitz et al., 2010). Regarding relationship adjustment, gender dynamics in romantic relationships yielded distinct interaction patterns. Specifically, compared with the female participants, the male participants required more time to repair relationships and tended to be more likely to withdraw or avoid conflict resolution behaviors (Khaddouma et al., 2015). This explains the improved relationship adjustment among female same-sex couples. Second, a positive correlation was noted between perceived discrimination and rejection sensitivity across genders. This finding suggests that discrimination-related experiences are gradually integrated into individuals' internal working models, prompting individuals to activate their self-protective mechanisms in general interactions. This integration leads to heightened anxiety and a predisposition to anticipate rejection, ultimately increasing rejection sensitivity (Dyar et al., 2018). Third, among the female participants, lower levels of perceived discrimination and rejection sensitivity were associated with better relationship adjustment. However, no such association was noted among the male participants. This discrepancy may be attributable to female individuals' increased sensitivity to changes in romantic relationships, their high susceptibility to stress on mental and physical well-being, and their tendency to exhibit self-silence or withdrawal behaviors, which can make relationships challenging to maintain and negatively affect relationship adjustment (Richter & Schoebi, 2021). The correlations between perceived discrimination, rejection sensitivity, and relationship adjustment may vary depending on factors such as between-partner trust levels, relationship patterns, attitudes toward relationships, and conflict resolution strategies (Ayduk et al., 2008, as cited in Romero-Canyas et al., 2010; Daoultzis & Kordoutis, 2023; Kamen et al., 2011; Song et al., 2022). Finally, in the female participants, rejection sensitivity mediated the correlation between perceived discrimination and relationship adjustment. This mediation effect was not observed in the male participants. This discrepancy may be attributable to the dual pressures of heterosexual dominance and patriarchy, which can make female LGB individuals, particularly those with high levels of rejection sensitivity, feel undervalued. In cases involving rejection or conflict, female LGB individuals may resort to silent endurance or sacrifice and be reluctant to express themselves, complicating communication and interaction and compromising relationship quality (Szymanski et al., 2016; Trettin et al., 2006). Although we did not investigate discrimination experiences in individuals stratified by gender, the effect of heteronormativity on the LGB community is apparent. The detrimental effect of patriarchy on female LGB individuals warrants further investigation. This study has several limitations. For example, we could not assess the experiences of LGB individuals who conceal their sexual orientation because of a fear of discrimination. Furthermore, life experiences of LGB individuals, states of interaction, or internalization of homophobia may influence evaluations and attitudes of individuals in romantic relationships. Therefore, future studies should include dyadic analyses to clarify the interaction processes and factors influencing same-sex relationships. In conclusion, practitioners working with the LGB community should incorporate rejection sensitivity into their frameworks in counseling and education. This integration may help comprehend the community's heightened vigilance toward external stimuli and support LGB individuals in recognizing societal oppression. Furthermore, an environment that celebrates diversity should be created for these individuals. Achieving this goal necessitates concerted societal efforts.

参考文献 ( 108 ) 〈TOP〉

张德胜, T.-S.,游家盛, C.-S.,王采薇, T.-W.(2013)。大学生对男同志和女同志人际关系态度之调查研究。教育心理学报，44，411-432。
连结：
乔虹, H.,廖述扬, S.-Y.,邱苡家, Y.-C.,林匀婷, Y.-T.,陈诗颖, S.-Y.(2022)。亲爱的同学，我其实是⋯⋯：同志教师出柜抉择及其教学经验之探讨。教育心理学报，53，617-642。
连结：
黄军义, J.-Y.,许得洋, T.-Y.(2020)。遭遇性侵害经验、强暴迷思、与性别偏见对男同志做出性侵害行为的影响。教育心理学报，52，337-364。
连结：
黄曦, X.,谢文宜, W.-Y.,曾秀云, H.-Y.(2018)。女同志伴侣情境因素对承诺维持的影响：比较 T ／非 T 与同居状态的差异。台湾性学学刊，24(1)，1-25。
连结：
谢文宜, W.-Y.,萧英玲, Y.-L.,曾秀云, H.-Y.(2009)。台湾同志伴侣与夫妻关系品质之比较研究。辅导与谘商学报，31(2)，1-21。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址