學校行政人員對注意力缺陷過動症訊息之知覺研究

蔡明富

doi:10.30074/FJMH.200703_20(1).0004

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P75 - 104

社会科学 > 心理学

DOI： 10.30074/FJMH

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

学校行政人员对注意力缺陷过动症讯息之知觉研究

A Study on the Perception of School Administrator to ADHD Information

蔡明富(Ming-Fu Tsai)

中华心理卫生学刊； 20 卷 1 期 (2007 / 03 / 01) ， P75 - 104

繁体中文 DOI： 10.30074/FJMH.200703_20(1).0004

学校行政人员；注意力缺陷过动症；标记；知觉； school administrator ； ADHD ； label ； perception

2 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (65) │ 被引用文献 (5) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Purpose: That the application of disability labels to children could affect their performance had been widely claimed by labeling critics but not clearly demonstrated. Considerable concern had been expressed regarding the potential negative impact of diagnostic on children. Some critics of labeling had suggested that once a label had been applied to a child, all subsequent interactions with the child would be altered by the presence of that label. Although several investigators had indicated using labels might help establish classification, diagnostic, and treatment sequences, provide a foundation for research on etiology and prevention, and call public attention to a problem, most of the literature had focused on more negative consequences. The impact of labels on school administrators was especially important because of the pivotal role these educators play in dealing with children with special needs. Not only might they be directly influenced by institutional procedures and diagnostic labels, but their attitudes and actions might also influence others. Most authorities estimated the prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) at 3 to 5% of the school-aged population, making it one of the most common disorders of children and youth and putting it among the most common reasons for referral. The main purpose of the study were to (a) investigate the effects of different labels and behavioral information of school administrators' perceptions on prediction students' school adjustment and their social distance, (b) explore the effects of different labels and behavioral information from different background of school administrators, (c) examine the relationship between school adjustment prediction and social distance from school administrators toward their ADHD students. Methods: To explore the impact of labeling on school administrators, 270 elementary & junior high school administrators were recruited from Kaohsiung city and county. All participants were given a questionnaire that consisted of a cover letter describing the purpose of the study, a case vignette, a 16-item school adjustment prediction, a 15-item social distance, and a participant information sheet. The vignette described three different labels encompassed ADHD, energetic and normal, and three different behavioral information were described as ADHD, normal, and no description. It was also ensured that all nine vignettes were of comparable length. The School Adjustment Prediction Scales explored predictions about the students' learning, behavioral, interpersonal adjustment. The semantic differential was employed as the measure of school adjustment prediction towards student. The total of 16 bi-polar adjectives were printed in random order, and the positive or negative ends of the scale were alternated to control for systematic response biases. The Social Distance Scales explored perceptions about the students' social distance. The Social Distnace Scale were rated on a scale from 1 to 7, with ”1” meaning extremely unlikely and ”7” meaning extremely likely. Questionnaires were handed out randomly to the subjects. No verbal instruction were given other than asking the subjects to read the instructions on the front of the questionnaire carefully. In addition, the school administrators were asked to work individually and not discuss the questionnaire until they had finished. When the questionnaires had been completed, they were handed in and the subjects thanked. No debriefing was given unless the subjects specifically asked for information or explanations. The scores were then calculated for subject, and these scores were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, three-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation. Results: The results showed that (1) There was a main effect for different labels and behavioral information on the school adjustment prediction. However, the social distance was not significantly different. There were no significant two-way interaction between different labels and behavioral information on school administrators' perceptions to school adjustment prediction and social distance. The ADHD label or ADHD behavior had a negative results of school administrators' prediction on ADHD students' school adjustment. The evidence suggested that school administrators were much more influenced by ADHD label. The school administrators were relatively immune to the ADHD behavior when evaluating the social distance. (2) There were no significant effects of different labels, behavioral information, or different special education background on the school adjustment prediction and social distance variable, and there were no interaction among those independent variables. There were no significant effects of different labels, behavioral information, or different contact experience on the school adjustment prediction and social distance variable, and there were no interaction among those independent variables. The results revealed that different special education background and contact experience had no significant effects on the perceptions of school administrators. It was apparent that the different special education background and contact experience had virtually no effect on the ratings of the school administrators. (3) There were not significantly correlated between school adjustment prediction and social distance on school administrators' perception of ADHD student. Conclusions: The ADHD label appears to have a negative effect on school administrators' perception of school adjustment. The school administrators' prediction of school adjustment were found to be unrelated to social distance for ADHD students.

参考文献 ( 65 ) 〈TOP〉

蔡明富、洪俪瑜(2005)。不同标记与行为讯息对国小学生之知觉影响―以ADHD为例。高雄师大学报教育与社会科学类，18，1-22。
连结：
Antonak, P. F.(1981).Prediction of attitudes toward disabled persons. A multivariate analysis.The Journal of General Psychology,104,119-123.
Clausen, J.(1981).Stigma and mental disorder: Phenomena and terminology.Psychiatry,44,287-296.
Cornett-Ruiz, S.,Hendricks, B.(1993).Effects of labeling and ADHD behaviors on peer and teacher judgments.Journal of Educational Research,86(6),349-355.
Cromack, S.,Furnham, A.(1998).Psychiatric labelling, sex roles stereotypes and beliefs about the mentally ill.International Journal of Social Psychiatry,44(4),235-247.

被引用文献 ( 5 ) 〈TOP〉

蔡明富(2008)。性别、标记及行爲讯息对国小学生知觉的影响—以注意力缺陷过动症爲例。特殊教育学报，28，123-153。
蔡明富(2013)。ADHD 资优标记与行为严重度相关讯息对国中学生知觉之影响。高雄师大学报：教育与社会科学类，35，65-90。
蔡明富(2015)。国小普通班学生对双重特殊标记讯息之知觉研究：以ADHD资优学生为例。特殊教育与复健学报，31，1-30。
黄惠玲、黄惠玲(2008)。注意力缺陷过动疾患研究回顾。应用心理研究，40，197-219。
(2009)。注意力缺陷过动症资优生干扰行为辅导实务。资优教育，112，20-28。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址