發展遲緩兒幼兒園活動參與研究

謝中君

doi:10.6172/BSE.201807_43(2).0002

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P31 - 64

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6172/BSE

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

发展迟缓儿幼儿园活动参与研究

Participation of Children with Developmental Delay in Preschool Activities

谢中君(Jung-jiun Shie)

特殊教育研究学刊； 43 卷 2 期 (2018 / 07 / 31) ， P31 - 64

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6172/BSE.201807_43(2).0002

活动参与；发展迟缓儿；验证性因素分析； confirmatory factory analysis ； developmental delay ； participation

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (77) │ 被引用文献 (1) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Purpose: This study was twofold. First, the study developed an assessment tool called the Preschool Activity Participation Scale (PAPS) to help professionals observe and evaluate children's participation in preschool activities; the reliability and validity of the PAPS were also established. Second, the study evaluated the performance of the participation of the children with and without developmental delay. Methods: The PAPS was designed to establish the shared constructs of participation within the most common contexts in preschool activities. The test items were designed for each of the following four preschool activities: circle time, drawing, games, and free play. The validation process was as follows. (1) Test items were designed according to the context of each activity and examined and revised separately through an exploratory factor analysis. (2) After the analysis, four shared constructs were identified, namely attention, response, adequate behavior, and interaction. (3) A second-order confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to examine the fitness of the three shared constructs, namely attention, response, and adequate behavior. The test items for the four activities in each shared construct were used as the observation variables and analyzed through a second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Results/Findings: The results indicated that the fitness of the following shared construct patterns was adequate: attention, response, and adequate behavior. The construct pattern of interaction tested through the confirmatory factory analysis was satisfactory. A total of 153 children with normal development and 16 with developmental delay (DD) participated in the process of the confirmatory factor analysis. (4) The concurrent validity of the PAPS was also examined through the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS). The results showed the concurrent validity between the PAPS and VABS to be adequate. Notably, the interrater reliability was 0.8. The participation of the 30 pairs of children with and without DD was assessed by the PAPS. Conclusions/Implications: The results indicated that children with DD had significantly lower scores than their peers on the construct of attention in the circle time, group games, and free play activities; on the construct of response in all four activities; and on the construct of interaction in the free play activity. Notably, the children from both groups demonstrated similar performance levels on the construct of adequate behavior. Additionally, children with DD performed better in the activities of drawing, games, and free play than in the activity of circle time in terms of the construct of response. Children with DD performed similarly on the constructs of attention and adequate behavior in all four activities.

参考文献 ( 77 ) 〈TOP〉

陈介宇、蔡昆瀛(2009)。「幼儿情绪与行为问题检核表」编制之研究。测验年刊，56(2)，235-268。
连结：
赵丽华、王天苗(2013)。「学前儿童社会行为量表」编制之研究。测验学刊，60，741-766。
连结：
蔡明富、吴裕益、庄涵皓(2014)。「学前儿童社会行为评量系统」编制之研究。特殊教育研究学刊，39(2)，1-31。
连结：
特殊教育法（2014）：中华民国一百零三年六月十八日总统华总一义字第10300093311 号令公布。[The Special Education Act (2014). The Presidential Order No. Hua-Zong-Yi-Yi-Zi 10300093311 promulgated June 18, 2014.]
Bailey, D.(Ed.),Wolery, M.(Ed.)(1992).Teaching infants and preschooles with disability.New York, NY:MacMillan.

被引用文献 ( 1 ) 〈TOP〉

李颖安(2021)。自闭症与注意力缺陷过动症儿童之口语叙事表现。特殊教育季刊，158，37-48。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址