系統性樂悲觀之建構及其在身心適應之功能

周芸安; 陳坤虎

doi:10.3966/172851862017080049005

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P113 - 145

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.7082/CJGC

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

系统性乐悲观之建构及其在身心适应之功能

The Construction and Function of Systematic Optimism/Pessimism in Mental Adjustment

周芸安(Yun-An Chou) ；陈坤虎(Kun-Hu Chen)

中华辅导与谘商学报； 49 期 (2017 / 08 / 01) ， P113 - 145

繁体中文 DOI： 10.3966/172851862017080049005

心理适应；功能性乐观；防卫性悲观；乐观； Defensive pessimism ； functional optimism ； mental adjustment ； optimism

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (71) │ 被引用文献 (3) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Optimists are individuals who expect good things to happen to them; pessimists are individuals who expect bad things to happen to them. Optimists and pessimists differ in several ways that have varying degrees of impact on their lives and adaptations. They differ in how they perceive stressed they encounter, and they differ in the manner with which they cope with life's difficulties. Past research generally considered optimism a character that brings individuals better physical and mental health, and more active coping strategies. For example, optimists differ from pessimists in the subjective well-being they enjoy when experiencing various kinds of adversity and difficulties. Optimists usually perceive lower stress and have better physical and mental health than pessimists (Chang & Farrehi, 2001; Iwanaga, Yokoyama, & Seiwa, 2004). Optimists also have lower degree of depressed and anxious levels while encounter life's difficulties. Besides, optimists more adopted active and proactive coping strategies than pessimists (Brissette, Scheier, & Carver, 2002). In other words, optimists are faster to accept the reality of a challenge to their current lives. They appear to engage in more focused, active coping when such efforts are likely to be productive. They are less likely to show signs of disengagement or giving up pursuit of their goals (Carver & Scheier, 2003). There is also evidence that optimism was related to better physical and mental health outcomes in certain circumstances (Carver & Scheier, 2001; Wrosch & Scheier, 2003). However, researchers still doubt about the perspectives of ＂whether optimism is beneficial to mental adjustment＂ (Norem & Chang, 2002) and ＂whether pessimism is not beneficial to mental adjustment＂ (Schwarzer, 1994; Wallston, 1994). For example, Schwarzer (1994) indicated that ＂defensive optimism＂ might bring individuals physical and psychological harms. Cantor et al. (1987) considered ＂defensive pessimism＂ as contributing to negative expectations, yet bring action to avoid potential risk. This study suggested that elucidating characters of optimism and pessimism should include the positive/negative expectations and the types of coping simultaneously. Different combinations of expectations and coping would demonstrate different working mechanisms in mental adjustment. However, past researchers although provide different concepts of optimism/pessimism (e.g., defensive optimism and defensive pessimism), lack of measuring tools to tackle with these concepts. Therefore, the goal of the study adopted ＂positive/negative expectations＂ as well as ＂engagement /disengagement＂ as two dimensions to distinguish optimism and pessimism to ＂functional optimism＂, ＂dysfunctional optimism＂, ＂functional pessimism＂ and ＂dysfunctional pessimism.＂ This study further investigated the functions of mental adjustment with these four optimistic and pessimistic types. The data was collected from a total of 134 college students (Female = 60.4%; Male = 39.6%) and the researchers of this study conducted item analysis, exploratory/confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, criterion-related validity to examine the scale’s reliability and validity. The results showed four optimistic and pessimistic types (i.e., functional optimism, dysfunctional optimism, functional pessimism, ＂dysfunctional pessimism) have good reliability and validity. In addition, the study found that each type played different roles in metal adjustment. In the hierarchical analysis, functional optimism and dysfunctional optimism positively predicted to satisfaction of life, functional pessimism negatively predicted to satisfaction of life. Among them, functional optimism was the best predictor to satisfaction of life. Functional optimism positively predicted to depressed symptoms, functional pessimism negatively predicted to depressed symptoms. Among them, functional pessimism was the best predictor to depressed symptoms. Functional pessimism was the only and positive predictor to anxious symptoms. Dysfunctional optimism was the only and positive predictor to procrastination. In summary, the results of the study helps to clarify the issues of ＂optimism is beneficial to mental adjustment＂ and ＂pessimism is not beneficial to mental adjustment.＂

参考文献 ( 71 ) 〈TOP〉

(1995).Procrastination and Task Avoidance.Springer US.
Austin, J. T.,Vancouver, J. B.(1996).Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.Psychological Bulletin,120(3),338-375.
Bandura, A.(1977).A self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,84(2),191-215.
Benyamini, Y.(2005).Can high optimism and high pessimism co-exist? Findings from arthritis patients coping with pain.Personality and Individual Differences,38(2),1463-1473.
Billings, A. G.,Moos, R. H.(1984).Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46(4),877-891.

被引用文献 ( 3 ) 〈TOP〉

张映芬(2019)。行动导向、数学解题情绪控制策略与数学考试焦虑关系之研究。教育研究与发展期刊，15(4)，1-34。
赵素仪,陈坤虎(2020)。以集群分析探讨乐悲观双向度模式与心理适应之关系。中华辅导与谘商学报，58，85-125。
(2018)。大学生缘观信念对其性格主动程度与因应弹性的调节效果。教育与心理研究，41(4)，61-86。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址