台灣諮商輔導倫理研究之回顧與展望

洪莉竹

doi:10.3966/172851862018100053006

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P151 - 189

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.7082/CJGC

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

台湾谘商辅导伦理研究之回顾与展望

A Review Study of Counseling Ethics Research between 1986 - 2017 in Taiwan

洪莉竹(Li-Chu Hung)

中华辅导与谘商学报； 53 期 (2018 / 10 / 01) ， P151 - 189

繁体中文 DOI： 10.3966/172851862018100053006

回顾研究；辅导伦理；谘商伦理；谘商伦理研究；整合研究； Counseling ethics ； counseling ethics research ； integration study ； review study ； school counselor

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (78) │ 被引用文献 (8) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

There were 51 studies on counselling ethics in Taiwan from 1986 to 2017. Descriptive statistic was used to analyze the number of research papers, research methods, research topics and development trends, and analyze the research results of each paper. The results indicate: (1) The number of counselling ethics researches in Taiwan showedan increasing trend. The number of papers in 2011-2017 accounted for 58.8% of the total number of papers. Master's and Doctoral thesis accounted for 64.7% of the total research volume. The advisor of thesis and the authors of journal focused on specific scholars. The counseling ethics research of Taiwan began with the discussion of the ethical judgment of the school counselors. However, the proportion of papers with the school counselors gradually decreased. (2) Research methods were mostly qualitative research and the numbers of quantitative studies was less than the qualitative studies. Very few studies were mixed designs. There was only one qualitative study in 1997. The number of qualitative studies in 2001-2010 is more than quantitative research. Qualitative research in 2011-2017 accounted for 73.3% of the numbers of papers in the same period. (3) Most of the studies targeted at ＂ethical cognition and ethical behavior＂, followed by the studies of ＂ethical dilemmas and coping＂ and ＂experiences in dealing with ethical issues＂, and then followed by ＂ethical thinking and decision-making＂. The studies of ＂ethical practice ＂ and ＂ethical education＂ were the least. From 1986 to 2000, research topics focused on ＂ethical cognition and ethical behavior＂. After 2001, the studies of ＂ethical dilemmas and coping＂, ＂ experiences in dealing with ethical issues ＂ and ＂ethical thinking and decision-making＂ has increased significantly. The studies of Taiwan's counseling ethics, which accounted for 33.3% of research on specific ethical issues. The remaining research topics were divided into two categories: (a) The overall discussion of the ethical cognition and ethical behavior of practitioners; (b) The ethical issues involved in some practical situation or specific form of service. (4) Analysis of the results of the researches revealed several important phenomena: (a) There were different results about ethical judgments and ethical beliefs. (b) There were inconsistencies between ethical cognition and ethical behavior. (c) Practitioners took into account multiple contexts, took into account the needs of multiple parties, and developed strategies that respond flexibly when they faced with ethical issues. (d) Practitioners reflected on the applicability and limitations of the ethical code, and paid more attention to the core spirit of professional ethics and counseling. They believed that the process of dealing with ethical issues required continuous dialogue and evaluation. Based on research results, six suggestions for the future development of Taiwan’s counseling ethics researches were proposed: (1) The research and publication of Taiwan's counseling ethics requires more researchers to invest. (2) The ethical issues and ethical practical experience faced by school counselors need to continue to pay attention. (3) Both qualitative and quantitative research have their own contributions and limitations. The research method of counseling ethics should be combined with the advantages of qualitative research and quantitative research to balance development. (4) On the research topic, more studies focused and in-depth exploring can be made on specific ethical issues involved in specific practical situations and diverse service forms. (5) The content and connotation of professional ethics education curriculum and support program needs to be expanded, taking into account the professional ethics and individual cultivation. Researchers actively develop diverse professional ethics education courses and ethical support programs, and explore their effectiveness. (6) Researchers collaborate with practitioners to conduct situational research. Researchers depict the ethical practical experience of Taiwanese practitioners in-depth and develop ethical decision and practice models with a cultural perspective.

参考文献 ( 78 ) 〈TOP〉

文美华、王智弘、陈庆福(2009)。网路谘商机构实施电子邮件谘商服务之实务经验与伦理行为探讨。教育心理学报，40(3)，419-438。
连结：
王韦琇、陈姝蓉、王智弘(2015)。委外式员工协助方案心理师之专业伦理困境与其因应策略。教育心理学报，47(2)，199-216。
连结：
王智弘、刘淑慧、张匀铭、邓志平、杨淳斐(2014)。心理谘商研究伦理守则建置之意见调查研究。教育心理学报，46(1)，51-72。
连结：
王丽斐、林淑君(2010)。国内谘商与心理治疗质性研究之研究方法与研究题材之初步性整合分析。教育心理学报，41(4)，799-822。
连结：
李佳儒、张匀铭、王智弘(2010)。未成年人团体谘商之伦理困境与因应策略。中华心理卫生学刊，23(4)，613-637。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 8 ) 〈TOP〉

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址