Ideas, Difficulties and Breakthrough of Maintaining Taiwan Indigenous People

Jwu-Shang Chen; Jen-Chin Lin; Yeou-Jyh Hwang

doi:10.29910/TJIS.201306_6(2).0001

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P1 - 31

人文学 > 人类学及族群研究

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

Ideas, Difficulties and Breakthrough of Maintaining Taiwan Indigenous People's Biodiversity Knowledge: Take the Accused Cases of "Thieving Forest By-product" as Example

维护台湾原住民族生物多样性知识之理念、困境与突破：以采集活动遭起诉「窃取森林副产物」之个案为例

陈竹上(Jwu-Shang Chen) ；林振钦(Jen-Chin Lin) ；黄有志(Yeou-Jyh Hwang)

台湾原住民族研究季刊； 6 卷 2 期 (2013 / 06 / 01) ， P1 - 31

英文 DOI： 10.29910/TJIS.201306_6(2).0001

台湾原住民族；采集；原住民保留地；森林法；森林副产物； Taiwan indigenous people ； gathering practices ； Lands Reserved for Indigenous People ； The Forestry Act ； forest by-product

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (15) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

To protect indigenous people's fundamental rights, promote their subsistence and development and build inter-ethnic relations based on co-existence and prosperity; ”The Indigenous People Basic Law” was implemented in February, 2005. The Article 13 is: ”The government shall protect indigenous people's traditional biological diversity knowledge and intellectual creations, and promote the development thereof.” For those indigenous people who live in the forest, collecting products in the forest and making them for food, medicament, daily supplies and sculptures are usually the solid practice of biological diversity knowledge and intellectual creations. Passing down the biological diversity knowledge with lasting traditional lifestyle in the forest, the precious value Taiwanese indigenous people, has gradually become the consensus. In this article, we analyzed the location and then presented considerable overlaps between Indigenous Reserved Land and the areas of biological diversity in Taiwan to further conform the value. However, since being accused and sentenced of ”stealing forest product” have become worries for the practicing of biological diversity knowledge and passing down the intellectual creations by lasting Taiwan indigenous people's traditional lifestyles, to show the gap between the doctrines of Indigenous Basic Law and the constraints in judicatory implementation, we systematically chose and analyzed the data collected from the cases of indigenous people's being accused and sentenced of ”stealing forest product” and appealing to Supreme Court. These cases include the collection of Yushania Niitakayamensis, Bird's-nest fern and materials of medicinal uses. Furthermore, we raised some questions and discussions: (1) The vague definition of categorizing forest products; (2) Why permission is required for the actions of collecting the forest products; and (3) A stigma on the traditional life. We hope to make some contributions by presenting the truth of the events, judicatory identification, culture gap, and the dilemma between law declarations and judicatory implementation and eventually become one of the references of ”the special court for indigenous people”, which has been established in Taiwan on January 1st , 2013.

参考文献 ( 15 ) 〈TOP〉

Berkes, Fikret,Colding, Johan,Folke, Carl(2000).Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge As Adaptive Management.Ecological Applications,10(5),1251-1262.
Bormann, F. H.(ed.),Kellert, S. K.(ed.)(1993).Ecology, economics, ethics: The Broken Circle.Yale University Press.
Cane, Peter(Ed.),Kritzer, Herbert(Ed.)(2010).The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research.Oxford University Press.
Chen, Jwu-Shang(2012).A Bumpy Road for Returning Back to Forests: A Research Investigates from Smagus Beech Event, Rukai Driftwood Event and the Right of the Status of Natural Resources in National Jurisdiction.Cultural Studies Bimonthly,132,17-43.
Chen, Zi-Qing,Yang, Wen-Tsann,Chou, Tien-Yin,Chen, Cin-Yun(2009).A Study on the Issues of Land Use beyond the Designated Capability Limits for Indigenous People's Reservation Lands in the Bailan Watershed of Hsinchu County.Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation,40(3),287-296.

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址