廣告訊息之理解與說服效果：捷思式－系統式訊息處理觀點

凌儀玲; 劉宜芬

doi:10.6504/JOM.2008.25.05.02

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P487 - 503

社会科学 > 管理学

DOI： 10.6504/JOM

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

广告讯息之理解与说服效果：捷思式－系统式讯息处理观点

Comprehension and Persuasion on Advertising Message: Heuristic-Systematic Model Approach

凌仪玲(I-Ling Ling) ；刘宜芬(Yi-Fen Liu)

管理学报； 25 卷 5 期 (2008 / 10 / 01) ， P487 - 503

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6504/JOM.2008.25.05.02

来源可信度；视觉化；捷思式－系统式讯息处理；理解；方法目的链； Source Credibility ； Visualization ； Heuristic-systematic Model ； Comprehension ； Mean-end Chain

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (36) │ 被引用文献 (6) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

For a long history, firms abundantly use different kinds of endorser in advertisements as an information cue or a signal of quality, But still very few researches have been devoted to understand how source credibility can influence the way consumers comprehend advertising messages and evaluate advertised product. It is also not clear whether the persuasion effect of celebrity endorser is always belier than non-famous endorser, and in what condition firms can use cheaper non-famous endorser but generate comparable communication effect. In order to answer those questions, this article, through the lens of the heuristic-systematic dual-processing model (HSM), is aimed to research how source credibility and visualization can impact consumer's comprehension and persuasion of advertising messages, as well as to examine whether the structure of comprehension conforms to the means-end chain (MEC) theory which postulated an ”attribute-consequence-value” sequential chain in comprehension of product message.
MEC was developed by Gutman in 1982 with the intension to explain how consumers link product attributes to the consumption consequence and then to the value they desired during the process of comprehending adverting message. This theory provided a good tool to measure the communication effect on message comprehension. And Hovland, Janis, and Kelly (1953) assumed that persuasion variables (e.g., source expertise) can influence persuasion by their impact on the causally prior processes of attention and comprehension of message content. So they proposed that comprehension mediates persuasion. On the other hand, the HSM is a persuasion-based model that examines information processing as an antecedent to attitude formation in social judgment (Chaiken Liberman, and Eagly 1989). When processing information heuristically, message perceivers are said to employ comparably little effort, typically relying on easily accessible information, such as the source's identity or other non-content cues, in deciding whether or nor to accept a message's conclusion (Chaiken 1980). This type of processing is more likely to occur with low involvement, low perceived capacity to process information, or when an individual does not perceive more in-depth processing to be of much consequence. On the contrary, systematic processing is defined by effortful exploration and comparison of information. When processing information systematically, perceivers actively attempt to comprehend and evaluate a message's arguments (Chaiken and Eagly 1983). We can thus infer that the impact of source credibility will be different between heuristic and systematic processing amid will be much salient when customers process information heuristically. But how can we induce consumers to engage systematic processing and therefore the impact of source credibility can be weakened? What Mitchell (1986) argued may give us some ideas. Mitchell (1986) demonstrated that the visual component in ads may affect the evaluation of product attributes. Photographs (pictures) often play a major role in persuasion and are evaluated positively, creating more favorable attitudes toward ads and brands. In line with this rationale, we assume that consumers use source credibility as a heuristic cue to comprehend an advertised product's message, and the ”attribute-consequence-value” chain does exist in the message comprehension process which mediates their attitude toward the ads and the brand. Additionally, based on Morchell's argument, we proposed that visualization of message may activate the systematic processing in which the persuasion effect of celebrity endorser may be diluted.
This research is consisted of 2 experimental studies in which a series of TV type advertisements was created as the stimulus materials, and a credit card of fictitious brand was used as the product. We included undergraduate students from a large university in Taiwan as subjects in both studies and subjects were randomly assigned to one of the experimental conditions. Study 1 was to investigate the structure of comprehension and the effect of source credibility on comprehension and persuasion. We proposed that consumers use source credibility as a heuristic cue to activate their heuristic processing. A one-factor 4-level (source credibility: celebrity/expert/student/employee) between-subjects experiment was conducted. After watching the ads, each participant was asked to report their perception of comprehension and persuasion by answering the questions in a booklet. The intent of Study 2 was to further invest the effect of visualization on comprehension and persuasion. The hypothesis is that the moderating effect of visualization can provide important information for consumers who are motivated to use heuristic-systematic dual-processing to develop accurate comprehension and attitudes. We used a 4×2 factorial between-subjects design. The two factors were source credibility (celebrity/expert/student/employee) and message type (verbalization/visualization). Before watching the ads, participants were asked to report their product knowledge of credit card. The purpose was to activate systematic processing, since it can elicit individuals' considerably greater cognitive effort and make them focus on specific information.
Findings of Study 1 reveal that consumers rely on source credibility in heuristic processing to comprehend a product's attributes, consequences, and value. And the structure of comprehension indeed consists with what means-end chain theory postulated. But it failed to confirm the mediating role of comprehension on persuasion. Findings of Study 2 show that heuristic and systematic processing can co-occur. When an advertising message is presented by verbalization, consumers are more likely to engage in heuristic processing, relying on source credibility as a heuristic cue to arrive at a judgment. However, when information is presented by visualization, the influence of systematic processing tends to dominate over heuristic processing, and as a result, the effect of source credibility was diluted. These two replicated experiments offer important implications for advertisers. In the case of a tangible and familiar product for the target (e.g., a credit card,), it could be essential to provide product-attribute messages to counteract the effects of source credibility heuristic cues. In other words, when the message type is provided for more visual condition, compared with a high-credibility endorser (e.g., a celebrity), a low-credibility endorser (e.g., an employee) may produce commensurate communication effect. Moreover, it could be dramatically cost saving for a company to adopt its own employee or a typical consumer as an endorser.

参考文献 ( 36 ) 〈TOP〉

杨朝明、林品章(2007)。隐喻修辞的视觉图像与标题对广告效果的影响。设计学报，12(1)，19-35。
连结：
Appiah, Osei(2007).The Effectiveness of "Typical-User" Testimonial Advertisements on Black and White Browsers` Evaluations of Products on Commercial Websites: Do They Really Work?.Journal of Advertising Research,47(1),254-268.
Atkin, Charles,Martin Block(1983).Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers.Journal of Advertising Research,23(1),57-61.
Baron, Reuben M.,David A. Kenny(1986).The Moderator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
Berry, Leonard L.,Terry Clark(1986).Four Ways to Make Services More Tangible.Business,36(4),53-54.

被引用文献 ( 6 ) 〈TOP〉

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址