執行自我控制活動與自我控制特質交互作用對聚斂性與擴散性思考的效果

邱發忠

doi:10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0006

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P901 - 921

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

执行自我控制活动与自我控制特质交互作用对聚敛性与扩散性思考的效果

Effects of Interaction between Exercising Self-Control and Trait Self-Control on Convergent and Divergent Thinking

邱发忠(Fa-Chung Chiu)

教育心理学报； 53 卷 4 期 (2022 / 06 / 01) ， P901 - 921

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0006

自我控制特质；执行自我控制活动；聚敛性思考；扩散性思考； trait self-control (TSC) ； exercising self-control ； convergent thinking ； divergent thinking

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (96) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Researchers have investigated the influence of exercising self-control on an individual's convergent and divergent thinking, discovering that participants demonstrate poor convergent thinking after exercising self-control (Baumeister et al., 1998; Schmeichel et al., 2003). However, Chiu (2014) and Chiu et al. (2017) observed that after exercising self-control, participants demonstrated improved divergent thinking, indicating that exercising self-control resulted in contrasting effects on convergent and divergent thinking. Although studies have indicated that exercising self-control reduced convergent thinking performance, they have also found that exercising self-control enhanced divergent thinking performance. However, the effects of the interaction between exercising self-control (e.g., active self-control ) and trait self-control (TSC) and convergent-divergent thinking have yet to be investigated. In one study, convergent and divergent thinking performance were negatively correlated (r = -.54; Chiu, 2010), and hence, we would expect different moderating effects on convergent and divergent thinking when participants with high or low TSC exercise self-control. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of the interaction between exercising self-control and TSC on convergent and divergent thinking. TSC can be defined as general and cross-domain self-control capacity (Imhoff et al., 2014), which includes the regulation of thoughts, emotions, impulses, and performance (Baumeister et al., 1994). TSC is a personality trait, thus distinguishing it from the state of exercising self-control . In researching how the interaction between TSC and the state of self-control (i.e., exercising self-control) influence subsequent thinking performance, some researchers have proposed that high-TSC participants should be less vulnerable to self-control depletion because they have relatively more mental resources to draw from and can avoid reaching the point of depletion (e.g., Dvorak & Simons, 2009). Imhoff et al. (2014), however, suggested that in contrast to low-TSC participants, high-TSC participants consumed more candies after manipulations were applied to deplete their self-control . DeWall et al. (2007), by contrast, determined that compared with low-TSC participants, high-TSC participants rarely inhibit their impulses actively and therefore less frequently engage in the effortful inhibition of impulses. The active suppression of desires in everyday life enables individuals to develop increased resistance to temptations (Baumeister et al., 1998; Gailliot et al., 2007), but high-TSC individuals typically avoid tempting situations in everyday life, and consequently, actively resisting temptation becomes increasingly difficult for them. When forced to exercise self-control against temptations, high-TSC individuals tend to show a comparatively weak ability. The preceding discussion demonstrates that it is necessary to clarify how exercising self-control interacts with TSC and then affects convergent and divergent thinking. Therefore, this study investigated the influences of the interaction of exercising self-control and TSC on convergent and divergent thinking. In Study 1, 92 participants were randomly assigned to either the exercising self-control condition or the control condition. Under the exercising self-control condition, participants were prohibited from using Chinese characters containing the radicals ＂イ＂ or ＂口＂ while writing. Next, they were asked to complete a critical thinking test (i.e., to test convergent thinking). The results showed that exercising self-control did not reduce convergent thinking, and participants with low TSC demonstrated higher performance in critical thinking under the exercising self-control condition than did participants with high TSC. However, under the control condition, both low- and high-TSC participants exhibited similar levels of critical thinking. Study 2 enrolled 77 participants. Except for the dependent variable, which was changed to divergent thinking, the procedures of Study 2 were identical to those of Study 1. The results indicated that participants with high TSC demonstrated superior originality under the exercising self-control condition to the participants with low TSC. However, under the control condition, both the low- and high-TSC participants exhibited similar levels of originality. These findings suggest that TSC moderates the effects of exercising self-control on convergent and divergent thinking. Participants with low TSC significantly improved their performance in convergent thinking after exercising self-control. However, participants with high TSC performed significantly better than did those with low TSC in terms of the originality of divergent thinking after exercising self-control. In regard to the moderating effect of TSC on the association between exercising self-control and convergent thinking, we found that participants with low TSC improved their convergent thinking performance after exercising self-control. This finding accords with the negative effect found by Imhoff et al. (2014) rather than the proposition that high TSC would have a positive effect in the exercising self-control condition. In terms of the positive effects of high TSC, we proposed that the convergent thinking of participants with high TSC would not be affected by TSC after exercising self-control and that due to the negative effect of high TSC (Imhoff et al., 2014), the participants with high TSC would exhibit significantly lower performance on convergent thinking after exercising self-control. However, in this study, the participants with low TSC exhibited a significant increase in convergent thinking performance after exercising self-control. Additionally, the participants with high TSC demonstrated lower performance in convergent thinking after exercising self-control compared with the control group. Thus, under the exercising self-control condition, the results tended to support the negative effect of high TSC on convergent thinking. Exercising self-control had a significant effect on the participants' performance in fluency, flexibility, and originality; however, the interaction between exercising self-control and TSC was found to only influence originality. In addition, it was mainly the participants with high TSC who exhibited increased originality after exercising self-control, whereas participants with low TSC were not affected. Moreover, the interaction between exercising self-control and TSC did not affect the number of ideas produced or the variability of ideas produced. However, it did influence the novelty of ideas and encouraged more distant associations (Mednick, 1962). This might be because participants with TSC had reduced self-control inhibition after exercising self-control (Schmeichel et al., 2010), making them more receptive to novel and more distant ideas, thereby increasing only originality but not fluency (more ideas) or variability (more types of ideas). This accords with previous research indicating that participants with higher inhibition demonstrated lower creativity (Carson et al., 2003). In summary, under the exercising self-control condition, the negative effect of TSC on convergent thinking was clearly supported; therefore, this study's findings are consistent with those of Imhoff et al. (2014). However, the positive effect of TSC (DeWall et al., 2007; Gailliot et al., 2006) was not supported. Notably, the results of this study indicated that while both the participants with high and low TSC exercised self-control, those with high TSC demonstrated increased originality but decreased convergent thinking. These results indicated that whether exercising self-control affects convergent or divergent thinking depends on the level of TSC; moreover, compared with people with low TSC, people with high TSC exhibited lower convergent thinking and higher divergent thinking after exercising self-control. Hence, high TSC was associated with a negative effect on convergent thinking and a positive effect on the originality of divergent thinking after exercising self-control.

参考文献 ( 96 ) 〈TOP〉

宋玉英, Y.-Y.,高振耀, C.-Y.(2019)。探索五位理工科女性世界中的创造力：她们对创造力的诠释以及理工背景对其创造力的影响。教育科学研究期刊，64(3)，55-84。
连结：
邱发忠, F.-C.(2010)。词汇概念联结测验：创造潜能测量工具的发展。测验学刊，57，295-324。
连结：
邱发忠, F.-C.,徐芝君, C.-C.,张雨霖, Y.-L.,林耀南, Y.-N.,陈学志, H.-C.(2018)。顿悟性问题解决规则教导与效果评估。教育心理学报，50，219-241。
连结：
许家骅, C.-H.(2021)。国小低年级学生多元解题自我调节量表之编制发展与实测研究。教育心理学报，52，829-856。
连结：
刘珈妤, C.-Y.,林纬伦, W.-L.,蔡秉勳, P.-H.(2016)。对的风格遇上对的人，谓之创意－人格特质、认知风格与两类创造力之关系探讨。教育心理学报，48，211-228。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址