學校選修課程發展因素研究－以藝術選修課程分析

陳育祥

doi:10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0010

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P291 - 318

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6209/JORIES

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

学校选修课程发展因素研究－以艺术选修课程分析

Inquiries Into School-level Factors Influencing the Development of Art Elective Courses

陈育祥(Yu-Hsiang Chen)

教育科学研究期刊； 67 卷 1 期 (2022 / 03 / 01) ， P291 - 318

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0010

课程发展；学校本位课程；学校层级因素；艺术教育；艺术选修课程； curriculum development ； school-based curriculum ； school-level factors ； art education ； art elective courses

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (64) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Background and Motivation: Art education facilitates individuals to understand the meaning and practice of aesthetic experiences, which is essential to a well-rounded education. However, art elective courses in secondary schools are in fact in decline and marginalized in recent years. The National Society for Education in Art and Design (NSEAD) investigated the number of students taking at least one art course for the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) during 2015-16 in the UK and found that the percentage had fallen to 53.5% (BBC News, 2018; NSEAD, 2016). By the same token, researchers from the different countries also worried about the development and availability of art courses in school in the face of marginalization due to school location, school size, shortage of art teachers, and the lack of equipment (Chapman et al., 2018; Fitzpatrick, 2012; Meyer, 2005). Owing to the complexity of the operational level of curriculum decision-making (Goodlad, 1979; Marsh et al., 1990), school-focused curriculum development often results in multi-faceted factors influencing art education. Some research has indicated that art curricula in development at school levels have been negatively influenced by school size and the lack of full-time art teachers (Chapman et al., 2018; Elpus, 2020). The discrepancy between art education in public and private schools has also been an argument of the current study, with results showing that art courses in American public high schools significantly provided more art courses than those in private ones (Elpus, 2020). Furthermore, given that the practice of school curricula requires the support of material contexts, including space and other resources for teachers' discussion and practice, funds, and equipment are especially needed for art courses (Chapman et al., 2018; Fitzpatrick, 2012). With these factors worth exploring, the study aims to address the influence of school-level factors on the development of art elective courses in senior high schools in Taiwan. The research questions are: (1) What is the relationship between the school-level factors and the development of art elective courses? (2) How do art teachers view the school-level factors' influence on art elective courses? Method: A mixed-methods design was adopted in this study. The questionnaire survey was first sent to collect the data of high school background factors and the development of art elective courses in Taiwan, followed by stratified sampling for in-depth interviews with art teachers on their perception and participation in school art electives courses development. The Chi-square test of independence was applied for the data analysis of the questionnaire to examine the correlation between school-level factors and the offering of art elective courses. Interviews were transcribed and gradually categorized with the meaningful data from open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Evidence was examined to form the conclusions and recommendations. Result and Discussion: Descriptive analysis indicated that the ratio of schools not offering art elective courses was higher than the offering ones. In addition, the ratio of schools offering art enrichment and expanded elective courses exceeded the ones offering art elective courses. With the use of Chi-square test of independence, the results showed that the offering of art enrichment and expanded elective courses correlated to the availability of art talent class within the school, whereas the offering of art elective courses was respectively associated with the factors of school size, public/private school system, and the existence of art talent class in school. Overall, it revealed heterogeneity factors among schools is worth heeding. In particular, the offering of art elective courses in schools of small size accounts for a significantly lower ratio, reflecting the influence of the shortage of art teachers and the pressure of maintaining faculty stability on the development of art elective courses. Therefore, the positive correlation between the existence of art talent classes and the development of art elective courses within a school results from art teachers' diverse professions and the sufficiency of the fundamental art equipment. Schools with at least an art talent class offer more art enrichment and expanded elective courses or art elective courses than those without, which shows that in addition to art courses per se, the development of art courses also has the specific need of teaching resources and equipment. Furthermore, past studies have shown similar results that art elective courses offered in public schools significantly outnumbered those in private schools, the interview data illustrate that due to social context factors in Taiwan, schools are in the face of challenges from sub-replacement fertility and pressure of high competitiveness. During the curriculum development, that the school administrative adopting strategies beneficial for students' college enrollment or transferring school resources to emphasize school features has highlighted the criticality of developing school features as well as the role art elective courses play in school positioning. Conclusion and Suggestions: The research finding indicate the development of school-level art elective courses is affected by the common factors of the social environment concerning students' career development and higher education enrollment rates. The development of the art multiple elective courses is more related to the school size, equipment, and developing features and other heterogeneous factors of each school. Art teachers focus on professional enhancement and enrichment of related equipment, clarify the positioning of the school in the exam success-oriented environment and establish the role and value of art elective courses. Based on the research results, considering the relatively high quantity and density of colleges in Taiwan, it is suggested that schools collaborate with neighboring schools and connect to the local community for art resources so as to enhance the availability of resources and instructors needed for art elective courses. In addition, as the development of art elective courses encompasses the skill-specific feature and diverse, cross-disciplinary learning content, when meeting the learner competence-based educational trend and clarifying the role of art elective courses in school, value of art elective courses will thus be accentuated. This research addresses the relationship between school-level factors and the development of art elective courses. However, owning to the complexity of school factors, it is suggested that relevant research in the future further analyze the development of art elective courses in schools through multilevel analysis method, or continue to inquire the cases of the development of art elective courses in school in-depth.

参考文献 ( 64 ) 〈TOP〉

宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的运用。教育科学研究期刊，55（4），97-130。https://doi.org/10.3966/2073753X2010125504004 【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. https://doi.org/10.3966/2073753X2010125504004】
连结：
洪咏善（2013）。台湾後期中等教育阶段学校发展特色课程之问题与展望。教育研究月刊，225，102-117。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013010225007 【Hong, Y.-S. (2013). Problems and prospects of developing featured curriculum in oost-secondary schools for Taiwan 12-year basic education. Journal of Education Research, 225, 102-117. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063 602013010225007】
连结：
侯一欣、高新建（2018）。课程实施在推广中的意涵与革新体现：课程史观点。教育科学研究期刊，63（2），219-250。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009 【Hou, Y.-H., & Gau, S.-J. (2018). Curriculum implementation implies the meanings of the dissemination and innovation: The viewpoint of curriculum history. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(2), 219-250. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0009】
连结：
姜添辉（2002）。九年一贯课程政策影响教师专业自主权之研究。教育研究集刊，48（2），157-　197。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200206_(48-2).0005 【Chiang, T.-H. (2002). A study of the influence of the nine-year-integrated-curriculum policy on teachers’ professional autonomy. Bulletin of Educational Research, 48(2), 157-197. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200206_ (48-2).0005】
连结：
张芬芬、陈丽华、杨国扬（2010）。台湾九年一贯课程转化之议题与因应。教科书研究，3（1），1-40。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201006.0001 【Chang, F.-F., Chen, L.-H., & Yang, K.-Y. (2010). Transformational issues of grades 1-9 curriculum reform in Taiwan. Journal of Textbook Research, 3(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201006.0001】
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址