國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係

The Relationships between Junior High School Students' Multiple Goals and Self-Regulation Learning

10.6251/BEP.20030711

侯玫如(Mei-Ju Hou)；程炳林(Biing-Lin Cheng)；于富雲(Fu-Yun Yu)

多重目標導向 ； 認知 ； 動機 ； 情感 ； 學習行為 ； multiple goals ； cognition ； motivation ； affect ； learning behavior

教育心理學報

35卷3期（2004 / 03 / 01）

221 - 247

繁體中文

本研究試圖整合新近的修正目標理論及趨向－逃避動機論，主要的研究目的有三：㈠探討持不同精熟／趨向表現目標及趨表現／逃避表現目標的國中生的認知、動機、情感與學習行為等自我調整學習成份上的差異情形。㈡分析國中生在上述自我調整學習成份上隨著時間而改變的情形。㈢探討前述多重目標與測量階段在國中生認知、動機、情感與學習行爲等自我調整學習成份上之交互作用。爲完成研究目的，本研究採縱貫研究，抽取310名國中年級學生為研究樣本進行施測，並於間隔半年後，實施追蹤測量。研究工具包括目標導向最表、認知量表、動機量表、情感量表和學習行爲量表等。本研究所蒐集的資料以4(多重目標）×2（測量階段）二因子混合設計共變數分析進行攷驗。研究結果顯示：㈠持不同精熟／趨向表現目標與不同趨向表現／逃避表現目標的國中生在訊息處理策略、後設認知策略、能力信念、期望成功、工作價值、正向情感、負向情感、自我障礙、工具性尋求協助、執行性尋求協助和努力等自我調整學習變項上有差異。㈡國中生在後設認知策略、能力信念、期望成功及努力等變項上隨著時間的發展有顯著的下降趨勢，但在自我障礙與執行性尋求協助上則隨著時間的發展而有顯著的上升趨勢。㈢國中生的精熟／趨向表現目標組與測量階段在後設認知策略與工作價值上有交互作用存在，而國中生的趨向／逃避表現目標與測量階段則在訊息處理策略、能力信念、工作價值及自我障礙上有交互作用存在。本研究根據研究結果進行討論，並提出學校教育與未來研究上之建議。

This study aims to integrate resent researches on revised goal theory and approach-avoidance theory, and its purposes are to (a) explore the effects of junior high school students' mastery approach performance goals and approach performance avoidance performance goals on cognition, motivation, affect and learning behavior, (b) analyze the changes of students' cognition, motivation, affect and learning behavior with the overall main effect of time; and (c) investigate the interactive effects of multiple goals by measuring time in junior high school students' cognition, motivation, affect and learning behavior. The acquired data mainly come from 310 seventh-grade students with a half year study. The instruments used in this study include Goal Orientations Scale, Cognitive Strategies Inventory, Motivation Inventory, Affect Inventory, and Learning Behavior Inventory. The statistical methods used to analyze the data are 4 (multiple goals)×2 (measuring time) two-way mixed design ANCOVA. The results indicates that (a) there are differences between students of mastery approach performance goals and approach performance avoidance performance goals in their using information-processing strategy, metacognitive strategy, ability belief, expectancy for success, positive effect, negative effect, self-handicapping and effort, (b) the development trends have a significant decline with time in students' metacognitive strategy, ability belief, expectancy for success and effort, but there is a significant increase of developmental trend with time in students' self-handicapping and executive help-seeking; and (c) mastery approach performance goals by measuring time have significant interactive effects on students' metacognitive strategy and task value, and approach performance avoidance performance goals by measuring time have significant interactive effects on students' information-processing strategy, ability belief, task value and self-handicapping. Implications of the results and suggestions for school personnel and further research are also proposed in this study.

1. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46，67-92。
   連結：
2. 程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心裡學報，33(2)，79-102。
   連結：
3. 程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報：教育類，47(1)，39-58。
   連結：
4. Ames, C.(1992).Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,261-271.
5. Bembenutty, B. H.(1999).Sustaining motivation and academic goals: The role of academic delay of gratification.Learning & Individual Differences,11,1-25.
6. Boekaerts, M.(1987).Individual differences in the appraisal of learning tasks: An integrative view on emotion and cognition.Communication & Cognition,20(2/3),207-224.
7. Boekaerts, M.(1997).Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students.Learning and Instruction,7(2),161-186.
8. Bouffard, T.,Boisvert, J.,Vezeau, C.,Larouche, C.(1995).The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students.British Journal of Educational Psychology,65,317-329.
9. Covington, M. V.(1992).Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
10. Covington, M. V.,Müeller, K. J.(2001).Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation.Educational Psychology Review,13(2),156-176.
11. Dweck, C, S.,Leggett, E. L.(1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review,95,256-273.
12. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
13. Elliot, A. J.,Church, M.(1997).A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,218-232.
14. Elliot, A. J.,Covington, M.(2001).Approach and avoidance motivation.Educational Psychology Review,13(2),73-92.
15. Elliot, A. J.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(1996).Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70,416-475.
16. Elliot, A. J.,M. L. Maehr,P. R. Pintrich (Eds.)(1997).Advances in motivation and achievement.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
17. Elliot, A. J.,Thrash, T. M.(2002).Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82(5),804-818.
18. Harackiewicz, J. M.,Barron, K. E.,Tauer, J. M.,Elliot, A. J.(2002).Predicting success in college: a longitudinal study of achievement goal and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation.Journal of Educational Psychology,94,562-575.
19. Harackiewicz, J. M.,Barron, K. E.,Tauer, J. M.,Elliot, A. J.(1998).Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why?.Educational Psychologist,33,1-21.
20. Kaplan, A.,Midgley, C.(1997).The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference?.Contemporary Educational Psychology,22,415-435.
21. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
22. McGregor, H. A.,Elliot, A. J.(2002).Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement.Journal of Educational Psychology,94,381-395.
23. Meece, J. L.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Hoyle, R. H.(1988).Students` goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),514-523.
24. Middleton, M.,Midgley, C.(1997).Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory.Journal of Educational Psychology,89,710-718.
25. Midgley, C.,Arunkumar, R.,Urdan, T.(1996)."If I don`t do well tomorrow, there`s a reason": Predictors of adolescents` use of academic self-handicapping strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology,88,423-434.
26. Midgley, C.,Kaplan, A.,Middleton, M.,Maehr, M. L.,Urdan, T.,Anderman, L. H.,Anderman, E.,Roser, R.(1998).The development and validation of scales assessing students` achievement goal orientations.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23,113-131.
27. Midgley, C.,M. L. Maehr,P. R. Pintrich (Eds.)(1993).Advances in motivation and achievement.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
28. Midgley, C.,Urdan, T.(2001).Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26,61-75.
29. Nelson-Le Gall. S.,Resnick, L.,S. A. Karabenick (Eds)(1998).Strategic help seeking implications for learning and teaching.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Nicholls, J. G.,Patashnick, M.,Nolen, S. B.(1985).Adolescent`s theories of education.Journal of Educational Psychology,77,683-692.
31. Pajares, F.,Graham, L.(1999).Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,24,124-139.
32. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,92,544-555.
33. Pintrich, P. R.(1999).The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning.International Journal of Educational Research,31,459-470.
34. Pintrich, P. R.(Eds.),Garcia, T.,M. L. Maehr(1991).Advanced in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
35. Pintrich, P. R.,M. Boekaerts,M. Zeidner (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
36. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(1996).Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Merrill.
37. Shih, S.,Alexander, J. M.(2000).Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other- referenced feedback on children`s development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,92,536-543.
38. Skaalvik, E.(1997).Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task avoidance orientatio, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety.Journal of Educational Psychology,89,71-81.
39. Smith, L.,Sinclair, K. E.,Chapman, E. S.(2002).Students` goals, self-efficacy, self-handicapping, and negative affective responses: An Australian senior school student study.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27,471-485.
40. Snow, R. E.,Corno, L.,Jackson, D.,M. Boekaerts,P. R. Pintrich (Eds.)(1996).Handbook of Educational Psychology.New York:Macmillan.
41. Urdan, T. C.,M. Maehr,P. Pintrich (Eds.)(1997).Advances in motivation and achievement.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
42. Vermunt, J. D. H. M.(1989).The interplay between internal and external regulation of learning, and the design of process-oriented instruction.Paper presented at the 3rd EARLI Conference,Madris, Spain:
43. Volet, S. E.(1997).Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students` goals.Learning and Instruction,7(3),235-254.
44. Weinstein, C. E.,Mayer, R. E.,M. Wittrock (Ed)(1986).Handbook of research on teaching.New York:Macmillan.
45. Wentzel, K. R.(2002).What is it that I`m trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,105-115.
46. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
47. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.,Yoon, K. S.,Harold, R, D.,Arbreton, A. J. A.,Doan, C. F.,Blumenfeld, P. C.(1997).Change in children`s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study.Journal of Educational Psychology,89,451-469.
48. Wolters, C. A.(1998).Self-regulation learning and college students` regulation.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(2),224-235.
49. Ziegler, A.,Heller, K. A.(2000).Approach and avoidance motivation as predictors of achievement behavior in physics instructions among mildly and highly gifted eighth-grade students.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,23,343-359.
50. Zimmerman, B. J.,D. H. Schunk (Eds)(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice.New York:Springer Verlag.
51. Zimmerman, B. J.,M. Boekaerts,P. R. Pintrich,M. Zeidner (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
52. 毛國楠、程炳林(1993)。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報，26，85-106。
53. 向天屏(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所。
54. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1993)。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報，66，13-40。
55. 林邦傑(1995)。我國國小、國中、高中學生學習及讀書策略之比較分析。測驗年刊，42，349-370。
56. 林清山、程炳林(1996)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報，28，15-58。
57. 陳嘉成(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育系。
58. 陳嘉成(2001)。中學生之成就目標導向、動機氣候知覺與學習行爲組型之關係。教育與心理研究，24，167-190。
59. 程炳林(1998)。國科會專案研究報告國科會專案研究報告,未出版
60. 程炳林、林清山(2000)。國科會專案研究報告國科會專案研究報告,未出版
61. 楊淑晴(1997)。高中學生英文學習策略與英文性向之相關研究。人文及社會學科教學通訊，45，119-140。
62. 鄭芬蘭、林清山(1997)。目標導向因果模式之驗證。教育心理學報，29，215-232。
63. 蕭素玲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所。

1. 陳淑雅、吳孟玲(2015)。主管與部屬之動機特質對賦閒受害之影響。績效與策略研究，12(1)，117-134。
2. 陳芸珊、梁雲霞(2013)。國中小學生學習策略使用之分析。教育研究與發展期刊，9(2)，33-64。
3. 程炳林(2006)。主觀能力與逃避策略之關係。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，1-24。
4. 程炳林、李玫蓉(2005)。趨向表現目標的類別及其與適應性學習組型之關係。教育心理學報，37(1)，61-78。
5. 程炳林、林易慧(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果。教育心理學報，37(3)，231-255。
6. 許崇憲(2013)。目標結構知覺對成就目標取向、學業表現、及學習策略的預測力：期刊文獻的後設分析研究。教育心理學報，45(1)，63-82。
7. 黃佳君、吳昭容(2017)。趨向精熟目標與趨向表現目標在提取引發遺忘現象上的角色。教育科學研究期刊，62(2)，153-178。
8. 簡嘉菱、程炳林(2013)。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報，44(3)，713-734。
9. 李宜玫(2012)。數學低成就學習動機之類型與區別分析：中小學弱勢學生與一般學生之比較。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，39-71。
10. 劉玉玲、沈淑芬(2015)。數學自我概念、數學學習策略、數學學業情緒與數學學業成就之研究－自我提升模式觀點。教育心理學報，46(4)，491-516。
11. 劉政宏(2012)。雙核心動機模式測量指標的建立及跨年級的檢驗。教育心理學報，43(3)，633-656。
12. 彭淑玲、林宏泰、王佩琪(2017)。你求助嗎？個人目標導向與適應／非適應課業求助／避助行為之關係。教育心理學報，49(2)，267-293。
13. 彭淑玲、林宴瑛(2015)。以多重目標觀點探討課室目標結構對國中生自我調整學習策略的影響：課室教學實驗研究。教育心理學報，47(2)，159-178。
14. 蘇嘉鈴、劉政宏、黃博聖、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。「國中小學習動機量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊，57(3)，371-402。
15. 吳永清、毛國楠(2012)。國中學生目標導向與社會比較關聯性之實徵研究。輔導與諮商學報，34(2)，45-67。
16. 吳中勤(2014)。六向度數學成就目標之驗證。臺北市立大學學報，45(1)，21-41。
17. 楊雅婷、陳奕樺(2013)。競賽數位遊戲結合學生出題運用於國小電磁教學之研究。數位學習科技期刊，5(4)，1-25。
18. (2011)。TEPS資料庫中學業成就與相關影響因素之縱貫性研究。教育政策論壇，14(3)，119-154。
19. (2014)。成就目標理論模式再概念化及其目標組型之探析。教育研究學報，48(2)，27-48。