雙核心動機模式測量指標的建立及跨年級的檢驗

Establishment of Indicators and Cross-grade Comparison for the Dual-Core Motivation Model

10.6251/BEP.20101222

劉政宏(Cheng-Hong Liu)

學習行為 ； 學習動機 ； 雙核心動機模式 ； leamlng behavior ； learning motivation ； the Dual-Core Motivation Model (DCM)

教育心理學報

43卷3期（2012 / 03 / 01）

633 - 656

繁體中文

劉政宏（2009）提出雙核心動機模式（dual-core motivation model，簡稱DCM）來說明學習動機包含的成分，及其對學習行為的影路徑，其中認為學習動機包含價值、預期、情感與執行意志四個不同成分，但其中僅有情感與執行意志兩個核心成分對學習行為有直接影響力，價值與預期等成分則是經由雙核心成分的中介，間接對學習行為產生影響。先前研究顯示DCM在概念架構與檢驗證據上仍有改善空間，因此本研究目的在進一步闡述與確定DCM中各動機成分的概念與測量指標，並以1203位小六至國三學生資料針對修正後的DCM進行檢驗跨年級比較。使用的工具包含「國中學習動機量表」與「國中小學習型微量表」，資料則透過LISREL進行結構方程模式分析。分析結果發現，相較於先前結果，修正後的DCM獲得觀察資料的支持，其整體適配度與內在品質皆大幅提昇，同時不同年級的中小學在DCM大多數結構係數上並未有差異。本研究根據研究結果在理論與實務上的涵義進行討論，並提出結果應用及未來研究的建議。

The Dual-Core Motivation Model (DCM) proposed by Liu (2009) suggests that there are four different motivation components of value, expectation, affect, and executive volition. Or the four components, only affect and executive volition which are supposed to be core motivation components influence learning behavior directly. However, the effects of the value and expectation component on learning behavior are indirect and mediated by the two core components. Previous findings showed the DCM could be improved in terms of theoretical structure and supportive evidence. Thus, this study aimed to confirm the subcomponents and indicators for the four motivation components, and test and make cross-grade comparison on the revised DCM. A total of 1203 validated sixth-grade and junior high school students in Taiwan were involved in this study and instruments employed were the ”Learning Motivation Scale” and ”Learning Behavior Scale” for primary and junior high school students. Data collected were analyzed by structural equation modeling using the LISREL computer program. Results showed that the fit indices of overall model and internal structure of the revised DCM improved obviously. Besides, as to most of the structure coefficients, there were no significant differences among sixth to ninth grade students. Based on the findings, possible implications for educators and suggestions for future research are discussed.

1. 侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004)。國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報，35，221-248。
   連結：
2. 施淑慎、曾瓊慧、蔡雅如(2007)。國小學童之成就目標、動機與情感中介歷程以及學業成就間路徑模式之檢驗。測驗學刊，54，31-57。
   連結：
3. 程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報，33，79-102。
   連結：
4. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構與驗證。師大學報：教育類，46，67-92。
   連結：
5. 程炳林(2000)。認知／意動成分與學習表現之相關研究。師大學報：教育類，45，43-59。
   連結：
6. 程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊，48，1-41。
   連結：
7. 程炳林、林清山(2002)。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34，43-60。
   連結：
8. 劉政宏(2009)。對學習行為最有影響力的動機成分？雙核心動機模式之初探。教育心理學報，41，361-384。
   連結：
9. 劉政宏、張文哲、陳學志、黃博聖(2008)。你贊成或反對立場對立者的論點？立場對立情境之論點贊否模式（CSAAM）。中華心理學刊，50，327-346。
   連結：
10. 劉政宏、張景媛、許鼎延、張瓊文(2005)。國小學生學習動機成分之分析及其對學習行為之影響。教育心理學報，37，173-196。
    連結：
11. 劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。國中小學習動機量表之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊，57，371-402。
    連結：
12. Ainley, M.(2006).Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes.Educational Psychology Review,18,391-405.
13. Ames, C.(Ed.),Ames, R.(Ed.)(1989).Research on motivation in education.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
14. Ames, C.(Ed.),Maehr, M. L.(Ed.)(1989).Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
15. Atkinson, J. W.(1964).An introduction to motivation.Princeton, NJ:Van Nostrand.
16. Atkinson, R. C.,Shiffrin, R. M.(1971).The control of short-term memory.Scientific American,225,82-90.
17. Baddeley, A. D.(1996).Exploring the central executive.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49,5-28.
18. Baddeley, A. D.(1986).Working memory.London, UK:Oxford University Press.
19. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
20. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37,122-147.
21. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
22. Baumann, N.,Kuhl, J.(2005).How to resist temptation: The effects of external control versus autonomy support on self-regulatory dynamics.Journal of Personality,73,443-471.
23. Bouffard, T.,Boisvert, J.,Vezeau, C.,Larouche, C.(1995).The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students.British Journal of Educational Psychology,65,317-329.
24. Bower, G. H.(1981).Mood and memory.American Psychologist,36,129-148.
25. Corno, L.(1993).The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research.Educational Researcher,22(2),14-22.
26. Covington, M. V(1984).The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications.Elementary School Learning,85,5-20.
27. Crandall, V. C.(1963).Reinforcement effects of adult actions and nonreactions on children's achievement expectations.Children development,34,335-354.
28. Crandall, V. C.,Good, S.,Crandall, V. J.(1964).The reinforcement effects of adult actions and nonreactions on children's achievement expectations: A replication study.Children development,35,485-497.
29. Edwards, W.(1954).The theory of decision-making.Psychological Bulletin,51,380-417.
30. Eysenck, M. W.,Keane, M. T.(2000).Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook.Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
31. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
32. Gagné, E. D.,Yekovich, C. W.,Yekovich, F. R.(1993).The cognitive psychology of school learning.New York, NY:HarperCollins.
33. Garcia, T.,McCann, E. J.,Turner, J. E.,Roska, L.(1998).Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23,392-418.
34. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
35. Jacobson, R. R.,Harris, S. M.(2008).Does the type of campus influence self-regulated learning as measured by the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ).Education,128,412-431.
36. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
37. Kloosterman, P.,Cougan, M. C.(1994).Students' beliefs about learning school mathematics.The Elementary School Journal,94(4),375-388.
38. Kruglanski, A. W.(1975).The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory.Psychological Review,82,387-406.
39. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action control: From cognition to behavior.New York, NY:Springer-Verlag.
40. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1994).Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation.Seattle, WA:Hogrefre & Huber.
41. Leinhart, S.(Ed.)(1982).Sociological methodology 1982.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
42. Little, T. D.,Cunningham, W. A.,Shahar, G.,Widaman, K. F.(2002).To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits.Structural Equation Modeling,9,151-173.
43. Madden, T. J.,Ellen, P. S.,Ajzen, I.(1992).A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,18,3-9.
44. Maher, B. A.(Ed.),Maher, W. B.(Ed.)(1984).Progress in experimental personality research: Normal personality processes.New York, NY:Academic Press.
45. Maslow, A. H.(1970).Motivation and personality.New York, NY:Harper and Row.
46. McClelland, D. C.,Atkinson, J. W.,Clark, R. A.,Lowell, E. L.(1953).The achievement motive.New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
47. McCollum, D. L.,Kajs, L. T.(2009).Examining the relationship between school administrators' efficacy and goal orientations.Educational Research Quarterly,32(3),29-46.
48. Meyer, D. K.,Turner, J. C.(2002).Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),107-114.
49. Mussen, P. H.(Series Ed.),Heatherington, E. M.(Vol. Ed.)(1983).Handbook of child psychology: Vol 4. Socialization, personality, and social development.New York:Wiley.
50. Piaget, J.(1950).The psychology of intelligence.New York, NY:International Universities Press.
51. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(2002).Motivation in education: Theory research, and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Merrill.
52. Reynolds, W. M.(Ed.),Miller, G. E.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
53. Taylor, S. E.,Peplau, A. L.,Sears, D. O.(2006).Social Psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
54. Weiner, B.(1972).Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition.Chicago, WA:Markham.
55. Wentzel, K. R.(Ed.),Wigfield, A.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of motivation at school.New York, NY:Routledge.
56. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
57. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刋，39，59-78。
58. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2003)。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。台北:五南。
59. 劉政宏(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。

1. 蕭佳純(2017)。學生學習動機與學業成就關聯之研究：教師創意教學的多層次調節式中介效果。特殊教育研究學刊，42(1)，79-112。
2. 蕭佳純(2021)。創造力教學對學生學習行為、學習動機影響之研究：兼論教師信任、參與專業學習社群對創造力教學之影響。教育科學期刊，20(2)，69-94。
3. 蕭佳純(2022)。國小教師參與專業學習社群對學生學習動機與學習行為影響之研究。清華教育學報，39(1)，37-72。
4. (2023)。五專學生知覺學習動機、學習策略與自我導向學習成效關係之研究——以彈性學習課程為例。教育行政與評鑑學刊，34，39-72。