委外式員工協助方案心理師之專業倫理困境與其因應策略

The Professional Ethical Dilemmas for Psychologists in Outsourcing Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and Their Coping Strategies

10.6251/BEP.20150107

王韋琇(Wei-Hsiu Wan)；陳姝蓉(Daisy Chen)；王智弘(Chih-Hung Wang)

心理師 ； 因應策略 ； 委外式員工協助方案 ； 專業倫理 ； corresponding strategy ； counseling psychologists ； the external model of EAP ； professional ethics

教育心理學報

47卷2期（2015 / 12 / 01）

199 - 216

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討委外式員工協助方案心理師遭逢之專業倫理困境與因應策略。對五名心理師採個別深度訪談，以內容分析法行質性資料分析。研究結果之助人專業倫理困境有：（1）心理師處在以誰利益為優先之為難；（2）心理師感知企業在導入諮商專業時的測試舉動；（3）心理師處在企業講求成本控制的壓力；（4）心理師擔心個案免受傷害權遭到威脅；（5）心理師卡在個案無求助意願，但有受助需要之間的掙扎；（6）心理師處在個案福祉與機構要求之間的衝突。其因應策略為：（1）心理師向企業傳達助人價值理念，化解利益衝突的為難；（2）心理師以關懷、勇氣的助人特質，化解企業的防備心；（3）心理師以具體可行策略，走出企業講求成本控制的困境；（4）心理師調整諮商風格，維護個案的免受傷害權；（5）心理師實踐諮商的助人取向，化解個案無求助意願的困境；（6）心理師發揮合作精神，消除在個案福祉與機構要求間的衝突。最後，依據研究結果提出參考建議。

This study is aimedatdiscussing the professional ethical dilemmas that psychologists encounter in outsourcingemployee assistance programs and their coping strategies. We have individual in-depth interviews with five psychologistsand analyzed the data by qualitative content analysis. The resultsshow the professional ethical dilemmas as following: (1) psychologists are in the embarrassing situation that whose interests should take the priority; (2) psychologists perceive challenges against enterprises introducing professional consultation; (3) psychologists face the pressure thatenterprises are cost-controllingoriented; (4) psychologists worry that the right of doing no harm in individual cases will be jeopardized; (5) psychologists are stuck when individual cases are not willing to seek help but really need help; (6) psychologists face conflicts because of the welfare of individual cases and demands of institutions.The coping strategies are as following: (1) psychologists convey the value of helping others to enterprises and solve the difficulty of interest conflicts; (2) psychologists utilize the characteristics of caringness and encouragement to help others, then dissolve the defense of enterprise; (3) psychologistsutilize specific and feasible strategies to step out of the dilemma that enterprises are cost-controlling oriented; (4) psychologists adjust their counseling style todeal with unaccomplished matters that fail to safeguard the rights of the cases; (5) psychologists practice consultation to help people and resolve predicaments where individual cases are not willing to seek help; (6) psychologists develop a spirit of cooperation in order to eliminate conflicts from the welfare of individual cases and demands of institutions.Finally, we will propose the recommendations based on the findings of this study.

1. 洪瑞斌(2012)。再思職場諮商師的價值兩難問題：以組織多重真實觀為解決之道。輔導季刊，48(1)，30-39。
   連結：
2. 陳家聲、吳就君、張德聰、張素凰、楊蓓(2004)。職場心理健康促進系統模型的建構。人力資源管理學報，4(1)，29-47。
   連結：
3. 考選部（2011）：各項國家考試應考資格查詢【專門職業及技術人員高等考試心理師考試】。取自考選部網站： http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamQual/wfrmExamQualap.aspx?kind=2&menu_id=1490&examqual_id=780，2011 年5 月6 日。[Ministry of Examination (2011). The national examination eligibility query[Professional and technical special senior examination for psychologists.]. Retrieved from http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamQual/wfrmExamQualMap.aspx? Kind = 2&menu_id = 1490 &examqual_id = 780].
4. Employee Assistance Professionals Association. (2009). EAPa code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.eapassn.org/files/public/EAPAcodeofethics0809.pdf.
5. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. 台灣輔導與諮商學會（2001）：台灣輔導與諮商學會諮商專業倫理守則。取自台灣輔導與諮商學會網站：http://www.guidance.org.tw/ethic_001.html，2014 年11 月24 日。[Taiwan Guidance and Counseling Association (2001). The professional ethics of Taiwan Guidance and Counseling Association. Retrieved from http://www.guidance.org.tw/ethic_001.html.]
7. Buon, T.,Taylor, J.(2007).,未出版
8. Carroll, M.(1996).Workplace counseling: A system approach to employee care.London, England:Sage.
9. Carroll, M.(Ed.),Walton, M.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of counseling in organizations.London, England:Sage.
10. Corey, G.,Corey, M. S.,Callanan, P.(2011).Issues and ethics in the helping professions.Monterey, CA:Cengage Learning.
11. Doherty, W. J.(1995).Soul searching: Why psychotherapy must promote moral responsibility.New York, NY:Basic Books.
12. Federal Register(2010).Treatment can be provided by EAP, but EAP can't be a "gatekeeper".Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly,22(9),7.
13. Johnson, J. D.(2008).Employee assistance programs: Sources of assistance relations to inputs and outcomes.Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health,23,263-282.
14. Lee, M. Y.,Paul, E.(2000).Insider outsider perspectives of guanxi.Business Horizons,43(1),25-30.
15. McLeod, J.,McLeod, J.(2001).How effective is workplace counseling? A review of research literature.Counseling Psychotherapy Research,1,184-191.
16. McWhirter, E. H.,Linzer, M.(1994).The provision of critical incident stress debriefing services by EAPs: A case study.Journal of Mental Health Counseling,16,403-414.
17. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
18. Richard, M. A.,Emener, W. G.,Hutchison, W. S.(2009).Employee assistance programs: Wellness /enhancement programming.Springfield, LA:Charles C Thomas.
19. Roman, P.(1981).From employee alcoholism to employee assistance: An analysis of the de-emphasis on prevention and alcohol problems in work-based programs.Journal of Studies on Alcohol,42,244-272.
20. Roman, P.,Blum, T.(1987).Ethics in worksite health programming: Who is served?.Health Education Quarterly,14(1),57-70.
21. Schonberg, S. E.,Lee, S. S.(1996).Identifying the real EAP client: Ensuing ethical dilemmas.Ethics & Behavior,6(3),203-213.
22. Spetch, A.,Howland, A.,Lowman, R. L.(2011).EAP utilization patterns and employee absenteeism: Results of an empirical 3 year longitudinal study in a national Canadian retail corporation.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research,63(2),110-128.
23. 牛格正、王智弘(2008)。助人專業倫理。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:心靈工坊=PsyGarden。
24. 王智弘(2013)。HR 變身幸福推手8 方式拼幸福員工So Happy。能力雜誌，687，104-109。
25. 王智弘(2013)。借鏡美國發展台灣特色聯合服務模式EAPs 讓員工「足甘心」。能力雜誌，683，76-82。
26. 周雪璉(2012)。企業諮商師面對諮商專業倫理的挑戰與準備。輔導季刊，48(2)，53-59。
27. 周雪璉(2011)。Taipei, Taiwan.]，國立台北教育大學心理與諮商學系=Department of Psychology and Counseling, National Taipei University of Education。
28. 林桂碧(2008)。台灣地區企業員工協助方案的現況與展望。環保資訊月刊，118
29. 郭豐慶(2010)。企業諮商對員工工作效率影響機制初探。諮商與輔導，299，2-5。
30. 鈕文英(2012)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉=Yeh Yeh。
31. 楊明磊(2003)。幫忙還是幫倒忙？員工協助方案中諮商師的定位衝突與因應。輔導季刊，39(2)，62-68。
32. 楊明磊(2009)。職場健康心理學與企業員工諮商。輔導季刊，45(3)，7-18。
33. 趙然(2011)。員工協助方案專業人員手冊。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:張老師=Teacher Chang。

1. 曾淑如,徐西森,吳典衡(2023)。臺灣地區企業員工諮商與心理健康之文獻回顧分析。臺灣諮商心理學報，11(1)，90-115。
2. 陳源滄、施丁仁、王智弘(2017)。員工協助方案提供企業諮商服務過程中涉及雙重關係倫理議題之探討。輔導與諮商學報，39(2)，55-77。
3. 程雅妤,莊謹鳳,張素惠,王智弘(2021)。企業諮商中面臨企業與員工利益衝突之倫理判斷歷程研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，62，117-151。
4. 洪莉竹(2016)。實務工作者面對倫理挑戰的考量與經驗－台灣諮商輔導倫理議題研究之探討。臺灣諮商心理學報，4(1)，1-16。
5. 洪莉竹(2018)。台灣諮商輔導倫理研究之回顧與展望。中華輔導與諮商學報，53，151-189。
6. 徐妍榛、王精文、王智弘(2017)。員工協助方案模式之探索：以聯合服務模式推動台灣科學園區員工協助方案之經驗。輔導與諮商學報，39(2)，1-28。
7. 莊謹鳳,張素惠,王智弘(2019)。員工協助方案人員面對保密議題之倫理判斷歷程研究。教育心理學報，51(2)，231-255。