题名

高中職學生的父母親情感支持、情緒智力與主觀幸福感之關係：中介效果的分析

并列篇名

Relationships among Parental Emotional Support, Emotional Intelligence, and Subjective Well-Being of High School Students: A Mediating Effect Analysis

DOI

10.6251/BEP.202203_53(3).0003

作者

陳紅蓮(Hong-Lien Chen)；吳和堂(Ho-Tang Wu)

关键词

父母親情感支持 ； 主觀幸福感 ； 情緒智力 ； parental emotional support ； subjective well-being ； emotional intelligence

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

53卷3期（2022 / 03 / 01）

页次

565 - 585

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

父母的情感支持、情緒智力與主觀幸福感三者是影響個體身心發展的重要因素，對高中職學生亦然。而從文獻分析結果，本研究提出「情緒智力在情感支持與主觀幸福感之間具有中介效果」的假設。為驗證假設，本研究修改之前所發表的相關問卷，採驗證性因素分析，結果顯示父母的情感支持、情緒智力與主觀幸福感等三份問卷的具有符合標準的組合信度、平均變異萃取量與區別效度。因此，對918位高中職學生施測。問卷回收後，採結構方程模式，分析情緒智力在父親與母親的情感支持與主觀幸福感之間的中介效果。本研究先以Amos軟體分析，然其整體適切指標的數據顯示模式不適切，而常態性評估的多變量達顯著，表示所蒐集的資料非常態分配，因此以不受常態分配限制且用於發展論的Smart PLS 3.0統計軟體處理之。結果顯示，所提的中介模式的測量與結構模式都適切。且結果顯示：父親或母親的情感支持與高中職學生主觀幸福感、情緒智力之徑路係數達顯著正向相關。再者，高中職學生情緒智力與主觀幸福感之徑路係數也有顯著正相關。最後，高中職學生的情緒智力，在父或母親的情感支持與主觀幸福感間都具有中介效果之假設也獲得支持。就此發現，提出父母親應多採用情感支持，以增進孩子的情緒智力與主觀幸福感；高中職生也應培養自己的情緒智力等建議，同時未來研究與研究限制也一併討論。
英文摘要

Parental emotional support, emotional intelligence, and subjective well-being are critical factors that affect the physical and mental development of high school students. Parenting style can determine adaptability, and affectionate parenting is conducive to emotional development. Children are more likely to develop high levels of emotional intelligence if their family members can satisfy their psychological needs and provide sufficient emotional support. Emotional intelligence is not innate; rather, it is an intrapersonal skill that can be cultivated. Furthermore, the literature has revealed that parental emotional support influences the emotional intelligence of children, which affects their subjective well-being. Thus, emotional intelligence can mediate the relationship between parental emotional support and subjective well-being. The researchers searched for the keywords ＂parental emotional support,＂ ＂emotional intelligence,＂ and ＂subjective well-being＂ in Chinese-language literature databases, such as Airiti Library and Chinese language version of Google Scholar. The results indicated that no studies had analyzed the aforementioned mediating effect of emotional intelligence. The following hypothesis was proposed: The emotional intelligence of high school students would mediate the relationship between parental emotional support and subjective well-being. The purpose of this study was to verify the mediating effect of emotional intelligence and to address research gaps. To verify the aforementioned hypothesis, we developed three scales to conduct a questionnaire survey. We revised the Emotional Support Subscale (seven items) from the short-form Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran Scale developed by Arrindell et al. (1999), and the revised form was used to measure parental emotional support. The original scale was proposed in 1999, and its participants were secondary school students and adults in Sweden; this relatively old scale targeting individuals from a different culture may be unsuitable for Taiwanese students. Therefore, a pretest was performed. An Emotional Intelligence Inventory was designed according to the Emotional Intelligence Scale proposed by Chiang (2001). The original scale was proposed over a decade ago and consists of 60 items; thus, we developed a condensed version to prevent participants from becoming bored and tired, which could have affected the accuracy of survey results. The shortened version was subjected to a pretest. A Subjective Well-being Inventory was developed based on two scales. The first was the Emotional Well-beings＂ Subscale of the Teacher's Subjective Well-being Scale proposed by Yu et al. (2011). This scale has two dimensions: the commonly accepted notion of happiness and perceived life satisfaction. The other scale used to develop the Subjective Wellbeing Inventory was the Chinese Happiness Inventory developed by Lu (1998). This scale targeted adults aged 18-65 years in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The scale of Yu et al. was designed for teachers, whereas that of Lu was designed for the general public. Therefore, we selected items with high universal representativeness and that were suitable for high school students. The three inventories were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale with scores of 1 (strongly disagree), 2 (partly agree), 3 (agree), 4 (mostly agree), and 5 (strongly agree). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results indicated that the Inventories of Parental Emotional Support, Emotional Intelligence, and Subjective Well-being exhibited desirable composite reliability, average variance extracted, and discriminant validity. These inventories were employed to conduct a survey involving 918 Taiwanese vocational high school and senior high school students. The participants were mainly female (52.50%; 482 individuals), and first-, second-, and third-grade students accounted for 41.29% (397), 29.41% (270), and 27.34% (251) of the total sample, respectively. Survey responses were collected and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), and a model was constructed in which emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between a father and mother's emotional support and a student's subjective well-being. At first, Amos (covariance-based SEM software) , manufactured by International Business Machines Corporation, New York, USA, was adopted for SEM, but the model fit indices indicated a poor fit. Moreover, the multivariate normality test result was significant, which suggested that the collected data had a non-normal distribution. Therefore, the researchers used Smart PLS 3.0, a variance-based SEM software program that is not limited by normal distribution. In addition, common method variance (CMV), a common problem in questionnaire surveys, had to be controlled. CMV is the bias caused by a research method in which the correlation between two variables is inflated or deflated. To avoid CMV, we designed a marker variable as the control variable. Theoretically, a marker variable should not be uncorrelated with the variables of interest; The latent variable ＂interpersonal understanding＂ was designated as the CMV variable.The mediating effect process was analyzed with reference to the method of Hair Jr et al. (2016) using three steps. Step 1: The researchers verified whether the path coefficient of the independent variable that predicts the dependent variable was significant. Step 2: The researchers confirmed that the path coefficients of the independent variable that predicted the mediator and those of the mediator that predicted the dependent variable were significant. Step 3: The researchers analyzed the mediation model only when the variables in Steps 1 and 2 were confirmed to be significantly correlated. In the present study, the variables in Steps 1 and 2 were significantly correlated; thus, the mediation model could be analyzed. Before a mediation model analysis was conducted, the model fit was verified. The results indicated that the factor loading, composited reliability, average variance extracted, and discriminant validity all satisfied relevant criteria and showed that the measurement model (called ＂outer model＂ in PLS-SEM) was appropriate. Second, values for collinearity, R^2, f^2, and Q^2 all conformed to the standard structural model (called ＂inner model＂ in PLS-SEM); that is, the structural pattern was appropriate. All the paths reached significance, and the mediating effect was then measured using the variance accounted for (VAF), which was calculated by dividing the indirect effect by the total effect. According to Hair Jr et al. (2016), percentage VAF of ＞ 80%, 20%, -80%, and ＜ 20% represent full mediation, partial mediation, and no mediation, respectively. Accordingly, our research results demonstrated that emotional intelligence partially mediated the relationship between parental emotional support (both from a father and a mother) and subjective well-being. The researchers then verified whether this partial mediating effect was significant. The built-in bootstrapping function of Smart PLS was employed for this task, with the number of bootstrap samples set at 5,000. The results indicated that emotional intelligence significantly mediated the relationship between a father and mother's emotional support and a student's subjective well-being. The mediation model analysis revealed that the path coefficients of both a father and mother's emotional support on the subjective well-being and emotional intelligence of (vocational) high school students indicated significant and positive correlations. Furthermore, the path coefficient between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being indicated a significant and positive correlation between the two. Therefore, the proposed hypothesis (i.e., the emotional intelligence of high school students would mediate the relationship between parental emotional support and subjective well-being) was supported. According to these findings, we propose that parents should provide emotional support to their children more often, which would help children develop emotional intelligence and improve their subjective well-being. High school students should actively attempt to develop their emotional intelligence. Suggestions for future research and research limitations are discussed herein.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 余民寧, M.-N.,陳柏霖, P.-L.,陳玉樺, Y.-H.(2018)。巔峰型教師的樣貌：圓滿幸福、知覺工作壓力、靈性幸福感及心理健康之關係。教育心理學報，50，1-30。
    連結：
  2. 余民寧, M.-N.,謝進昌, J. C.,林士郁, S.-Y.,陳柏霖, P.-L.,曾筱婕, H.-C.(2011)。教師主觀幸福感模式建構與驗證之研究。測驗學刊，58，55-85。
    連結：
  3. 吳相儀, H.-Y.,辛昱融, Y.-Z.,陳琬云, W.-Y.,簡晉龍, C.-L.,鍾昆原, K.-Y.(2017)。感恩課程對大學生感恩、幸福感與復原力影響之研究。教育心理學報，49，23-41。
    連結：
  4. 呂朝賢, C.-H.,呂慧玲, H.-L.(2014)。教養方式與學童幸福感。人文社會科學研究，8(3)，79-101。
    連結：
  5. 陳李綢, L.-C.(2008)。中學生情緒智慧測量與適應性指標研究。教育心理學報，39(S)，61-81。
    連結：
  6. 曾文志, W.-C.(2007)。大學生對美好生活的常識概念與主觀幸福感之研究。教育心理學報，38，417-441。
    連結：
  7. 葉玉珠, Y.-C.(2000)。「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。教育心理學報，32，95-122。
    連結：
  8. 羅品欣, P.-H.,陳李綢, L.-C.(2005)。國小學童的家庭結構、親子互動關係、情緒智力與同儕互動關係之研究。教育心理學報，36，221-240。
    連結：
  9. Arrindell, W. A.,Sanavio, E.,Aguilar, G.,Sica, C.,Hatzichristou, C.,Eisemann, M.,Recinos, L. A.,Gaszner, P.,Peter, M.,Battagliese, G.,Kállai, J.,van Der Ende, J.(1999).The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy.Personality and Individual Differences,27,613-628.
  10. Averill, J. R.(1999).Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates.Journal of Personality,67,331-371.
  11. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
  12. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Prentice Hall.
  13. Bar-On, R.(1997).The emotional intelligence inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual.Multi-Health Systems.
  14. Bar-On, R.(2006).The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI).Psicothema,18,13-25.
  15. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.
  16. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1979).The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Harvard University Press.
  18. Burton-Jones, A.(2009).Minimizing method bias through programmatic research.MIS Quarterly,33,445-471.
  19. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  20. Diener, E.(2009).Subjective well-being.The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener
  21. Diener, E.(1984).Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin,95,542-575.
  22. Diener, E.,Emmons, R. A.(1984).The independence of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47,1105-1117.
  23. Diener, E.,Lucas, R. E.,Oishi, S.(2002).Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction.Handbook of positive psychology
  24. Diener, E.,Lucas, R. E.,Oishi, S.(2018).Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being.Collabra: Psychology,4(1),Article 15.
  25. Diener, E.,Suh, E.,Oishi, S.(1997).Recent findings on subjective well-being.Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology,24(1),25-41.
  26. Doucet, A.(2013).Gender roles and fathering.Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives
  27. Durbin, D. L.,Darling, N.,Steinberg, L.,Brown, B. B.(1993).Parenting style and peer group membership among European-American adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence,3,87-100.
  28. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.Journal of Marketing Research,18,382-388.
  29. Frewen, A. R.,Chew, E.,Carter, M.,Chunn, J.,Jotanovic, D.(2015).A cross-cultural exploration of parental involvement and child-rearing beliefs in Asian cultures.Early Years,35,36-49.
  30. Hair, J. F., Jr,Hult, G. T. M.,Ringle, C.,Sarstedt, M.(2016).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).SAGE Publications.
  31. Hair, J. F.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2011).PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet.Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,19,139-152.
  32. Hatfield, E.,Cacioppo, J. T.,Rapson, R. L.(1994).Emotional contagion.Cambridge University Press.
  33. Jaffe, M. L.(1991).Understanding parenting.Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
  34. James, C.,Bore, M.,Zito, S.(2012).Emotional intelligence and personality as predictors of psychological well-being.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,30,425-438.
  35. Keyes, C. L. M.(1998).Social well-being.Social Psychology Quarterly,61,121-140.
  36. Keyes, C. L. M.,Magyar-Moe, J. L.(2003).The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being.Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures
  37. Lieberman, A. F.,Ippen, C. G.,Dimmler, M. H.(2018).Child-parent psychotherapy.Assessing and treating youth exposed to traumatic stress
  38. Mayer, J. D.,Roberts, R. D.,Barsade, S. G.(2008).Human abilities: Emotional intelligence.Annual Review of Psychology,59,507-536.
  39. Mayer, J. D.,Salovey, P.(1997).What is emotional intelligence?.Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications, for educators
  40. Mayer, J. D.,Salovey, P.,Caruso, D. R.,Sitaraneos, G.(2001).Emotional Intelligence as a standard intelligence.Emotion,1,232-242.
  41. McMunn, A.,Martin, P.,Kelly, Y.,Sacker, A.(2017).Fathers’ involvement: Correlates and consequences for child socioemotional behavior in the United Kingdom.Journal of Family Issues,38,1109-1131.
  42. Noller, P.,Callan, V.(1991).The adolescent in the family.Routledge.
  43. Nurhaeni, H.,Dinarti,Priharti, D.(2016).The family parenting influenced adolescent brawls behavior.International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education,5(2),126-134.
  44. Parkes, A.,Riddell, J.,Wight, D.,Buston, K.(2017).Growing up In Scotland: Father-child relationships and child socio-emotional wellbeing.Scottish Government.
  45. Payne, W. L.(1985).The Union for Experimenting Colleges and University.
  46. Perris, C.,Jacobson, L.,Lindstrom, H.,Von Knorring, L.,Perris, H.(1980).Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,61,265-274.
  47. Pratama, A. T.,Corebima, A. D.(2016).Contributions emotional intelligence on cognitive learning result of biology of senior high school students in Medan, Indonesia.International Journal of Environmental and Science Education,11,8077-8087.
  48. Ryff, C. D.,Keyes, C. L. M.(1995).The structure of psychological well-being revisited.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69,719-727.
  49. Salovey, P.,Mayer, J. D.(1990).Emotional intelligence.Imagination, Cognition and Personality,9,185-211.
  50. Seligman, M. E. P.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Positive psychology: An introduction.American Psychologist,55,5-14.
  51. Shapiro, L. E.(1997).How to raise a child with a high EQ: A parentʼs guide to emotional intelligence.HarperCollins Publishers.
  52. Siriparp, T.,Traiwichitkhun, D.,Kanjanawasee, S.(2012).Using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis to study student well-being in Thailand.Journal of International Education Research,8,367-372.
  53. Steinberg, L.,Lamborn, S. D.,Darling, N.,Mounts, N. S.,Dornbusch, S. M.(1994).Over‐time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families.Child Development,65,754-770.
  54. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.,Ullman, J. B.(2007).Using multivariate statistics.Pearson.
  55. Ylitalo, J.(2009).,Helsinki University of Technology.
  56. 王玉梅, Y.-M.(2010)。大學生主觀幸福感與生活事件：情緒智力的作用。中國健康心理學雜誌，18，1264-1266。
  57. 王楓, F.,陳建萍, J.-P.,龐肖夢, X.-M.(2015)。高職新生生活事件、情緒智力與主觀幸福感的關係研究。衛生職業教育，12，108-110。
  58. 江文慈, W.-T.(2001)。青少年情緒智力發展之研究。世新大學學報，11，51-82。
  59. 何曉燕, X.-Y.,裴秀芳, X.-F.(2015)。大學生主觀幸福感與父母教養方式的調查研究。教育理論與實踐，35(3)，43-45。
  60. 吳明隆, M.-L.(2003).SPSS 統計應用實務.松崗=Sung Gang.
  61. 吳武典, W.-T.,林繼盛, C.-S.(1985)。加強家庭聯繫對兒童學習效果與家庭氣氛的影響。教育心理學報，18，97-116。
  62. 邢占軍, Z.-J.(2005)。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究，24，301-323。
  63. 高曼, D.,張美惠（譯）, M.-H.(Trans.)(2006).EQ.時報出版=China Times Publishing.
  64. 許遠理, Y.-L.,熊承清, C.-Q.(2009)。大學生情緒智力對主觀幸福感的預測效應分析。心理研究，4，77-81。
  65. 陳順宇, S.-Y.(2007).結構方程模式：Amos 操作.心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
  66. 陸洛, L.(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8，115-137。
  67. 楊冠軍, G.-J.(2010)。父母教養方式對中學生主觀幸福感的影響。無錫職業技術學院學報，9(1)，93-96。
  68. 蔡典謨, D.-M.(1994)。幫助孩子成功的教養態度與方法。資優教育季刊，53，19-23。
被引用次数
  1. 劉書瑜,黃宗堅,張晨光(2023)。親職化與心理健康結果相關性之三層級後設分析。教育心理學報，55(1)，75-102。
  2. 熊師瑤,余民寧(2023)。To Stay or Not to Stay？軍校生恆毅力影響與預測效果分析。教育心理學報，54(4)，917-944。
  3. 顏姿吟,鄭曉楓,連廷嘉(2023)。父母親韌力與韌性－以照顧青少年時期中途致殘子女為例。教育心理學報，54(4)，973-996。
  4. (2024)。正向心理健康BMI（友善—情緒—認同）團體輔導之種子師資培訓課程成效研究。教育心理學報，55(4)，819-845。
print cancel