國小學習障礙學生與一般學生自我效能、家長支持以及心理健康之縱貫研究

Longitudinal Study of the Self-Efficacy, Parental Support, and Mental Health of Students with and without Learning Disabilities

10.6251/BEP.202309_55(1).0006

張萬烽(Wan-Feng Chang)

心理健康 ； 自我效能 ； 家長支持 ； 潛在成長模式 ； 學習障礙 ； mental health ； self-efficacy ； parental support ； latent growth curve modeling ； learning disabilities

教育心理學報

55卷1期（2023 / 09 / 01）

125 - 151

繁體中文;英文

以往認為學障學生因學習的困難與挫折，容易使其心理健康低落，他們能否和一般學生一樣，透過家長支持和自我效能，提升心理健康，仍待瞭解。本研究在106到107學年間進行三次調查，探討學障學生家長支持、自我效能與心理健康等因素長時間下的發展關係，利用一般學生為參照群體，瞭解兩個群體發展軌跡是否不同，採用潛在成長模式進行資料分析，納入國小一般學生459名和學障學生205名。結果顯示，一般學生自我效能一直都高於學障學生，兩個群體家長支持未隨時間有明顯差異，心理健康在一開始時，一般學生高於學障學生，最後反而學障學生為佳。發展關係上，都可見一般學生與學障學生的自我效能不僅在一開始會影響心理健康，成長速率之間也呈現正相關，但一開始有較高自我效能的一般學生，後續心理健康則越顯負向；兩個群體一開始的家長支持與同時間的心理健康能有效預測，學障學生家長支持與心理健康間的後續發展成正相關，而一般學生一開始家長支持對於後續心理健康呈現負相關。三者間的關係上，學障學生一開始的家長支持透過自我效能對個體心理健康產生影響，這與一般學生不同；學障學生家長支持與自我效能之間的發展變化則息息相關。最後依據研究結果，提出未來研究與實務上之建議。

Students with learning disabilities (LDs) are at high risk of experiencing social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties. However, protective factors, such as parental support and self-efficacy, can mitigate the negative effects of LDs on their mental health. In this field of research, literature findings are limited by a narrow focus on school-related factors, a lack of longitudinal examinations, and a poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying these factors. Furthermore, few studies have investigated students with LDs. This study employed latent growth modeling to explore the developmental trajectories and relationships among self-efficacy, parental support, and mental health over an extended period to clarify the psychological and social changes experienced by students with LDs. Students without LDs were used as a basis for clarifying whether students with and without LDs differ in terms of the aforementioned factors. Specifically, this study (1) determined the initial status of and changes in individual factors (i.e., self-efficacy, parental support, and mental health) among students with and without LDs; (2) determined whether significant differences exist between students with and without LDs in terms of their parental support, self-efficacy, and mental health; and (3) determined whether the initial status of and changes in parental support and self-efficacy among students with and without LDs influence the initial status of and changes in their mental health. To form the control group, that is, the group comprising students without LDs, 280 fourth-grade students and 280 fifth-grade students without LDs were sampled from elementary schools in Kaohsiung City; these schools were classified into four urbanization levels, and sampling proportional to the population distribution across urbanization levels was performed. After parental consent was obtained, 529 students without LDs were enrolled in this study; they comprised 268 fourth graders and 261 fifth graders from 13 elementary schools. To form the experimental group comprising students with LDs, 140 fourth-grade students and 140 fifth-grade students with LDs were selected from the general population , and the same form of proportional sampling was conducted. After parental consent was obtained, 257 students were enrolled in this study; they comprised 131 fourth graders and 126 fifth graders from 55 elementary school resource classes. If a participating student without LDs withdrew from this study because of a school transfer or if a participating student with an LD withdrew because of a school transfer, reclassification as an individual without an LD, or other reasons, then their survey response was excluded from subsequent analysis. The analysis included only students who completed the survey thrice. In total, 459 students without LDs and 205 students with LDs met this criterion. For data collection, the students without LDs were surveyed by regular classroom teachers during early morning self-study sessions, whereas the students with LDs were surveyed by resource teachers during resource classes. If a student experienced difficulty with reading, the surveying teacher would read the questions of the survey to them. This study developed and used its own assessment tools (i.e., a self-efficacy scale, parental support scale, and mental health scale) rather than used an existing tool. These tools, which have a low number of items, were developed on the basis of the literature definitions for self-efficacy, parental support, and mental health, and they were developed primarily to reduce the testing time and minimize the effect of repeated testing on the learning experience of the students. The self-efficacy scale comprised four items for measuring an individual's belief in their ability to perform the tasks required to attain various achievements; the items' reliability ranged from .69 to .73, and the Cronbach's α was .87. The parental support scale comprised four items with a reliability range of .83 to .85 and had a Cronbach's α of .95. The mental health scale comprised three items for measuring the degree to which students did not experience emotional or psychological problems; the items' reliability ranged from .60 to .67, and the Cronbach's α was .78. The items of all three scales were rated on a 4-point Likert scale with endpoints ranging from 4 to 1 (4 points, strongly agree; 3 points, agree; 2 points, disagree; and 1 point, strongly disagree). A higher score indicated superior performance. The researcher mailed the scales to the schools, and regular and resource teachers separately administered the scales to the students without and with LDs, respectively. To ensure the consistency and validity of the results, the researcher provided clear instructions for administering the scales. If a student with an LD experienced difficulty with reading the questions, their resource teacher assisted by reading the questions. The testing duration was 20 min. This study employed a longitudinal design and collected data thrice over 2 years. The first round of data collection was conducted between November and December 2017 (first semester of the 2017/2018 academic year), the second round was conducted between November and December 2018 (first semester of the 2018/2019 academic year), and the third round was conducted between May and June 2019 (second semester of the 2018/2019 academic year). To address the research questions, three types of latent growth model were used, namely univariate, conditional, and multivariate models. These models were used to analyze the developmental trajectories of self-efficacy, parental support, and mental health in both the general and LD student populations (i.e., control and experimental groups) and to identify the differences between these two populations in terms of these variables. The univariate model was used to describe the developmental trajectory of each group. The conditional model was used to identify differences between the two groups with respect to changes in their self-efficacy, parental support, and mental health. Finally, the multivariate model was used to investigate the interrelationships among these three variables over time. The study revealed that the self-efficacy of the students with LDs gradually increased over time; however, individual differences were also identified. The initial state of self-efficacy was revealed to be negatively correlated with the rate of improvement in self-efficacy; that is, those with a high initial level of self-efficacy tended to experience a slower increase in self-efficacy. By contrast, the self-efficacy of the students with LDs did not change significantly over time, and both groups exhibited individual differences in self-efficacy, with a negative correlation being noted between their initial state and rate of change. During the initial stage, the students without LDs exhibited a higher level of self-efficacy relative to those with LDs, and this difference persisted over time, with both groups exhibiting similar growth trajectories. The parental support received by the students without LDs gradually decreased over time. Although individual differences in the initial level of parental support received were identified among the students in this group, these differences diminished over time. The initial state of parental support was not significantly correlated with the rate of improvement in parental support. The parental support received by the students with LDs did not change significantly during the 2-year study period. Although significant individual differences in the initial state of parental support were identified among the students with LDs, these differences diminished over time; similarly, no significant correlation between the initial state of parental support and the rate of improvement in parental support was identified in this group. Finally, the two groups did not differ significantly in terms of the rate of improvement in parental support during the study period. For mental health, the participant students without LDs experienced a gradual decline in mental health over time, and individual differences were identified. Furthermore, a negative correlation was identified between the initial state of mental health and the subsequent rate of change in mental health. By contrast, the mental health of the students with LDs continued to improve over time. Although persistent individual differences in mental health were identified among these students, no correlation between their initial state of mental health and their subsequent rate of change in mental health was identified. A comparison of the mental health growth trajectories of the two groups revealed that the students without LDs initially exhibited better mental health relative to those with LDs but were subsequently overtaken by them over time. A negative correlation between self-efficacy and mental health was identified in both the students with and those without LDs. For the students without LDs, a high initial level of self-efficacy had a positive effect on their mental health, and the rate of change in self-efficacy was positively correlated with the rate of change in mental health. For the students with LDs, their initial level of self-efficacy predicted their initial mental health status, and the rates of change of both variables was positively correlated. The findings regarding the relationship between parental support and mental health are as follows. For the students without LDs, their initial level of parental support positively and negatively predicted their initial state of mental health and the rate of change in their mental health, respectively. For the students with LDs, their initial level of parental support was positively correlated with their initial mental health status, and the rates of change of both variables were positively correlated. In summary, this study revealed that for the students without LDs, their initial level of parental support was direct correlated with their self-efficacy and mental health and subsequently enhanced their self-efficacy, which improved their mental health. However, for the students with LDs, their initial level of parental support affected their self-efficacy, which in turn affected their mental health. In addition, for the students without LDs, their initial level of parental support was negatively correlated with their subsequent improvement in self-efficacy but positively correlated with the growth relationship between their parental support and self-efficacy. However, for the students with LDs, the growth relationship between their parental support and self-efficacy was the only observed phenomenon. Although the two groups differed in terms of psychological and social mechanisms, for both, parental support had an effect on student self-efficacy during learning.

1. 吳齊殷, C.-I.,黃鈺婷, Y.-T.(2010)。青少年初期身心健康變化及其動態影響變因之討論。中華心理衛生學刊，23，535-562。
   連結：
2. 張萬烽, W.-F.(2017)。學習障礙學生自我概念與學校適應之縱貫研究。特殊教育研究學刊，42(3)，1-32。
   連結：
3. 張萬烽, W.-F.(2021)。學習障礙與一般學生學業自我概念與學業成就之比較：內外參照架構模式。特殊教育研究學刊，46(3)，57-86。
   連結：
4. 張萬烽, W.-F.(2022)。復原力對國小學習障礙學生與一般學生在心理健康上的影響：個人與變項取向。教育心理學報，54，57-84。
   連結：
5. 郭靜晃, J.-H.,邱貴玲, K.-L.,賴宏昇, H.-S.(2021)。青少年家庭功能、自我堅毅力與心理健康之關係研究。臺灣社會福利學刊，17(1)，1-50。
   連結：
6. 黃鈺婷, Y.-T.(2011)。個人、家庭與學校脈絡中的影響變因與青少年身心健康發展軌跡之討論。中華輔導與諮商學報，29，161-181。
   連結：
7. 趙善如, S.-R.,王仕圖, S.-T.,許坋妃, F.-F.,李慧玲, H.-L.(2012)。與政府的合作─親屬寄養照顧者的照顧經驗。臺灣社會福利學刊，10(2)，37-91。
   連結：
8. 蕭佳純, C.-C.,董旭英, Y.-Y.(2011)。TEPS 資料庫中國中生心理健康情形之縱貫性分析。諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，23，75-97。
   連結：
9. 賴英娟, Y.-C.,巫博瀚, P.-H.(2022)。國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響。教育心理學報，53，543-564。
   連結：
10. Al-Yagon, M.(2015).Fathers and mothers of children with learning disabilities: Links between emotional and coping resources.Learning Disability Quarterly,38(2),112-128.
11. Al-Yagon, M.(2016).Perceived close relationships with parents, teachers, and peers: Predictors of social, emotional, and behavioral features in adolescents with LD or comorbid LD and ADHD.Journal of Learning Disabilities,49(6),597-615.
12. Al-Yagon, M.(2011).Adolescents’ subtypes of attachment security with fathers and mothers and self-perceptions of socioemotional adjustment.Psychology,2(4),291-299.
13. Al‐Yagon, M.(2010).Maternal emotional resources and socio‐emotional well‐being of children with and without learning disabilities.Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Science,59(2),152-169.
14. Bagwell, C. L.,Newcomb, A. F.,Bukowski, W. M.(1998).Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment.Child Development,69(1),140-153.
15. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Company.
16. Bandura, A.,Locke, E. A.(2003).Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(1),87-99.
17. Benight, C. C.,Bandura, A.(2004).Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy.Behaviour Research and Therapy,42(10),1129-1148.
18. Bokhorst, C. L.,Sumter, S. R.,Westenberg, P. M.(2010).Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: Who is perceived as most supportive?.Social Development,19(2),417-426.
19. Branje, S. J. T.,van Lieshout, C. F. M.,van Aken, M. A. G.,Haselager, G. J. T.(2004).Perceived support in sibling relationships and adolescent adjustment.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(8),1385-1396.
20. Burger, K.,Samuel, R.(2017).The role of perceived stress and self-efficacy in young people’s life satisfaction: A longitudinal study.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,46(1),78-90.
21. Chan, D. W.(2002).Stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological distress among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong.Educational Psychology,22(5),557-569.
22. Cheung, H. S.,Sim, T. N.(2017).Social support from parents and friends for Chinese adolescents in Singapore.Youth & Society,49(4),548-564.
23. Chu, P. S.,Saucier, D. A.,Hafner, E.(2010).Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,29(6),624-645.
24. Cohen, S.,Wills, T. A.(1985).Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin,98(2),310-357.
25. Cowen, E. L.,Wyman, P. A.,Work, W. C.,Kim, J. Y.,Fagen, D. B.,Magnus, K. B.(1997).Follow up study of young stress-affected and stress-resilient urban children.Development and Psychopathology,9(3),565-577.
26. Davis-Kean, P. E.,Huesmann, L. R.,Jager, J.,Collins, W. A.,Bates, J. E.,Lansford, J. E.(2008).Changes in the relation of self-efficacy beliefs and behaviors across development.Child Development,79(5),1257-1269.
27. Dishman, R. K.,Saunders, R. P.,Motl, R. W.,Dowda, M.,Pate, R. R.(2009).Self-efficacy moderates the relation between declines in physical activity and perceived social support in high school girls.Journal of Pediatric Psychology,34(4),441-451.
28. Donahue, M. L.,Pearl, R.(2003).Studying social development and learning disabilities is not for the faint‐hearted: Comments on the risk/resilience framework.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(2),90-93.
29. Gallagher, M. W.,Long, L. J.,Phillips, C. A.(2020).Hope, optimism, self‐efficacy, and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta‐analytic review of the protective effects of positive expectancies.Journal of Clinical Psychology,76(3),329-355.
30. Gerber, P. J.,Schnieders, C. A.,Paradise, L. V.,Reiff, H. B.,Ginsberg, R. J.,Popp, P. A.(1990).Persisting problems of adults with learning disabilities: Self-reported comparisons from their school age and adult years.Journal of Learning Disabilities,23(9),570-573.
31. Goldstein, S.(Ed.),Brooks, R. B.(Ed.)(2005).Handbook of resilience in children.Springer Science+ Business Media.
32. Gregg, N.(2007).Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,22(4),219-228.
33. Hafen, C. A.,Laursen, B.(2009).More problems and less support: Early adolescent adjustment forecasts changes in perceived support from parents.Journal of Family Psychology,23(2),193-202.
34. Hampton, N. Z.,Mason, E.(2003).Learning disabilities, gender, sources of efficacy, self-efficacy beliefs, and academic achievement in high school students.Journal of School Psychology,41(2),101-112.
35. Harðardóttir, S.,Júlíusdóttir, S.,Guðmundsson, H. S.(2015).Understanding resilience in learning difficulties: Unheard voices of secondary school students.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal,32(4),351-358.
36. Helsen, M.,Vollebergh, W.,Meeus, W.(2000).Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,29(3),319-335.
37. Holden, G.,Moncher, M. S.,Schinke, S. P.,Barker, K. M.(1990).Self-efficacy of children and adolescents: A meta-analysis.Psychological Reports,66(31),1044-1046.
38. Hombrados-Mendieta, M. I.,Gomez-Jacinto, L.,Domingues-Fuentes, J. M.,Garcia-Leiva, P.,Castro-Travé, M.(2012).Types of social support provided by parents, teachers, and classmates during adolescence.Journal of Community Psychology,40(6),645-664.
39. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55.
40. Huang, R.,Wang, K.,Hu, J.(2016).Effect of probiotics on depression: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.Nutrients,8(8),483.
41. Iacobucci, D.(2009).Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask.Journal of Consumer Psychology,19(4),673-680.
42. Kistner, J.,Osborne, M.(1987).A longitudinal study of LD children’s self-evaluations.Learning Disability Quarterly,10(4),258-266.
43. Klassen, R.(2002).A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly,25(2),88-102.
44. Klassen, R. M.,Chiu, M. M.(2010).Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress.Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3),741-756.
45. Klassen, R. M.,Lynch, S. L.(2007).Self-efficacy from the perspective of adolescents with LD and their specialist teachers.Journal of Learning Disabilities,40(6),494-507.
46. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.The Guilford Press.
47. Lackaye, T.,Margalit, M.,Ziv, O.,Ziman, T.(2006).Comparisons of self-efficacy, mood, effort, and hope between students with learning disabilities and their non-LD-matched peers.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,21(2),111-121.
48. Lawrence, B. C.,Harrison, G. L.,Milford, T. M.(2019).Effects of positive parenting on mental health in adolescents with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal,17(2),223-244.
49. Maag, J. W.,Reid, R.(2006).Depression among students with learning disabilities: Assessing the risk.Journal of Learning Disabilities,39(1),3-10.
50. Majorano, M.,Brondino, M.,Morelli, M.,Maes, M.(2017).Quality of relationship with parents and emotional autonomy as predictors of self concept and loneliness in adolescents with learning disabilities: The moderating role of the relationship with teachers.Journal of Child and Family Studies,26(3),690-700.
51. Margalit, M.(2004).Second‐generation research on resilience: Social-emotional aspects of children with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,19(1),45-48.
52. Margalit, M.(2003).Resilience model among individuals with learning disabilities: Proximal and distal influences.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(2),82-86.
53. Multon, K. D.,Brown, S. D.,Lent, R. W.(1991).Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation.Journal of Counseling Psychology,38(1),30-38.
54. Nelson, J. M.,Harwood, H.(2011).Learning disabilities and anxiety: A meta-analysis.Journal of Learning Disabilities,44(1),3-17.
55. Phan, H. P.(2013).Examination of self-efficacy and hope: A developmental approach using latent growth modeling.The Journal of Educational Research,106(2),93-104.
56. Phan, H. P.,Ngu, B. H.(2016).Sources of self-efficacy in academic contexts: A longitudinal perspective.School Psychology Quarterly,31(4),548-564.
57. Richardson, M.,Abraham, C.,Bond, R.(2012).Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin,138(2),353-387.
58. Rueger, S.,Malecki, C.,Pyun, Y.,Aycock, C.,Coyle, S.(2016).A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence.Psychological Bulletin,142(10),1017-1067.
59. Saltzman, K. M.,Holahan, C. J.(2002).Social support, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms: An integrative model.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,21,309-322.
60. Schönfeld, P.,Brailovskaia, J.,Zhang, X. C.,Margraf, J.(2019).Self-efficacy as a mechanism linking daily stress to mental health in students: A three-wave cross-lagged study.Psychological Reports,122(6),2074-2095.
61. Seyed, S.,Salmani, M.,Nezhad, F. M.,Noruzi, R.(2017).Self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and academic progress of students with learning disabilities: A comparison with typical students.Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health,4(2),e44558.
62. Sheeran, P.,Maki, A.,Montanaro, E.,Avishai-Yitshak, A.,Bryan, A.,Klein, W. M. P.,Miles, E.,Rothman, A. J.(2016).The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis.Health Psychology,35(11),1178-1188.
63. Sorensen, L.,Forbes, P. W.,Bernstein, J. H.,Weiler, M. D.,Mitchell, W. M.,Waber, D. P.(2003).Psychosocial adjustment over a two–year period in children referred for learning problems: Risk, resilience, and adaptation.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(1),10-24.
64. Stewart, T.,Suldo, S.(2011).Relationships between social support sources and early adolescents’ mental health: The moderating effect of student achievement level.Psychology in the Schools,48(10),1016-1033.
65. Stice, E.,Ragan, J.,Randall, P.(2004).Prospective relations between social support and depression: Differential direction of effects for parent and peer support?.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,113(1),155-159.
66. Strom, R.,Bernard, H.,Strom, S.(1987).Human development and learning.Human Sciences.
67. Vieno, A.,Santinello, M.,Pastore, M.,Perkins, D. D.(2007).Social support, sense of community in school, and self-efficacy as resources during early adolescence: An integrative model.American Journal of Community Psychology,39(1-2),177-190.
68. Wang, Z.,Kouvonen, A.,Satka, M.,Julkunen, I.(2019).Parental social support and adolescent well-being: A cross-sectional study in China.Child Indicators Research,12(1),299-317.
69. Wickrama, K. A. S.,Lorenz, F. O.,Conger, R. D.(1997).Parental support and adolescent physical health status: A latent growth-curve analysis.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,38(2),149-163.
70. Wilson, A. M.,Armstrong, C. D.,Furrie, A.,Walcot, E.(2008).The mental health of Canadians with self-reported learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,42(1),24-40.
71. World Health Organization(2004).Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice: Summary report.
72. Yeo, G.,Neal, A.(2006).An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity.Journal of Applied Psychology,91(5),1088-1101.
73. Young, J. F.,Berenson, K.,Cohen, P.,Garcia, J.(2005).The role of parent and peer support in predicting adolescent depression: A longitudinal community study.Journal of Research on Adolescence,15(4),407-423.
74. Zimmerman, B. J.(2000).Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),82-91.
75. 江守峻, S.-C.,陳婉真, W.-C.(2018)。在家靠父母，出外靠朋友？不同社經地位青少年的父母支持、同儕支持與心理健康之關係。教育學報，46(2)，21-41。
76. 何美瑩, M.-Y.(2014)。國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
77. 吳明隆, M.-L.(2013).結構方程模式：潛在成長曲線分析.五南=Wu-Nan.
78. 李靜吟, C.-Y.(2013)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
79. 教育部（2020）：《特殊教育 109 年統計年報》。[Ministry of Education. (2020). 2020 yearbook of special education statistics.]
80. 陳渝蓁, Y.-C.(2017)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
81. 陳寶婷, P.-T.(2011)。國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
82. 廖名顗, M.-Y.(2014)。國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
83. 劉宗幸, T.-H.,江守峻, S.-C.(2020)。家庭與學校依附脈絡因子對臺灣青少年憂鬱症狀發展之縱貫研究。教育學報，48，135-155。

1. (2024).Effects of Academic Achievement and Academic Self-Concept on the Self-Efficacy and Mental Health of Students with Learning Disabilities.教育心理學報,56(1),101-125.
2. (2024)。正向心理健康BMI（友善—情緒—認同）團體輔導之種子師資培訓課程成效研究。教育心理學報，55(4)，819-845。