資訊素養融入國小一年級「校園生物大搜索」主題探究：以Super3模式爲例

Integrating Information Literacy into First-Grade Inquiry Learning: An Example of Creature Investigation on Campus Using the Super3 Model

10.6120/JoEMLS.201106_48(4).0399.RS.CM

林菁(Ching Chen Lin)

自然與生活科領域 ； 探究學習 ； 資訊素養 ； Super3模式 ； Science ； Inquiry learning ； Information literacy ； Super3

教育資料與圖書館學

48卷4期（2011 / 06 / 01）

539 - 570

繁體中文

本研究旨在利用Super3模式將資訊素養融入國小一年級生活領域中的「校園生物大搜索」課程，以探討學生的資訊素養學習表現，以及在此融入課程中學科內容的低層次與高層次學習表現；此外，本研究也統整授課老師對於此課程的看法。此融入課程是依照Super3資訊素養模式設計，從計畫階段的問題定義開始，進入找尋資料的執行階段，最後以自我評量反省為終了。整個研究進行一個月，以參與觀察、訪談、測驗與文件分析等多元方法蒐集資料。研究結果發現經由Supr3模式可將資訊素養融入相關課程中，學生在提問、海報創作與反省上均表現不錯，但在口頭報告上則仍待改進。學生在自然與生活科技學習單元的低層次與高層次學習表現皆有顯著進步，老師則對此課程表達了兩項意見。最後本研究提出四項仍待釐清的議題，包括Super3模式的調整、提問性質的影響、評量規準的執行，及體驗反省單的設計等。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the students' performance of information literacy and subject contents on an integrated information literacy instruction in the first-grade science curriculum. The curriculum was designed based on the Super3 model which includes plan, do and review phases. The study lasted for one month, and data was gathered through participant observation, interviews, test, and document analysis. The results showed that information literacy could be integrated into lower-grade science curriculum using the Super3 model. The students performed well on posing questions, creating posters, and reflection; however, oral presentation needed to be improved. First-grade students' science learning both on memory and comprehension was significantly different through inquiry learning. The teachers expressed two opinions about this instruction. At last, a couple of issues were posed for further clarification, such as revision of the Super3 model, types of posing questions, execution of rubrics, and design of reflection worksheets.

1. 林菁(2010)。應用辯論於國小六年級社會學習領域教學：為提升學生的資訊素養。教育資料與圖書館學，47(4)，499-530。
   連結：
2. 林菁、洪美齡、李秉蓉、彭雅雯(2007)。「台灣老照片數位博物館」融入國小歷史教學之歷程與結果。教育實踐與研究，20(2)，29-64。
   連結：
3. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Retrieved August 6, 2010, from http://www.p21.org/route21/images/stories/epapers/skills_foundations_final.pdf
4. 陳文典[Chen, Wen-Den]（2003）。「自然與生活科技」學習領域之課程及其實施[“Ziran yu shenghuokeji” xuexilingyu zhi kecheng jiqi shishi]。上網日期：2003年9月20日 [Retrieved September 20, 2003]，檢自[from]：http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/doc/new/920908-1.doc
5. American Association of School Librarians (AASL)(2009).Standards for the 21st-century learning in action.Chicago IL:American Library Association.
6. American Association of School Librarians (AASL),Association for EducationalCommunication and Technology (AECT)(1998).Information power: Building partnerships for learning.Chicago IL:American Library Association.
7. Andretta, S.(2005).Information literacy: A practitioner's guide.Oxford:Chandos.
8. Audet, R.(Ed.),Jordan, L.(Ed.)(2005).Integrating inquiry across the curriculum.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
9. Audet, R.,Jordan, L.(2005).Integrating inquiry across the curriculum.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
10. Avery, E. F.(2003).Assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction in academic institutions.Chicago IL:Association of College and Research Libraries.
11. Bredderman, T.(1982).Final report of NSF-RISE Grant SEDFinal report of NSF-RISE Grant SED,未出版
12. Breivik, P. S.,Senn, J. A(1998).Information literacy: Educating children for the 21st century.Washington, DC:NEA Professional Library.
13. Burke, K.(2006).From standards to rubrics in 6 steps: Tools for assessing student learning, K-8.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
14. Burke, K.(2009).How to assess authentic learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
15. Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, D.C:National Academy Press.
16. Chang, C. Y.,Mao, S. L.(1998).The effects of an inquiry-based instructional method on earth science students' achievement.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,San Diego, CA:
17. Cowan, K. W.,Cipriani, S.(2009).Of water troughs and the sun: Developing inquiry through analogy.Young Children,64(6),62-67.
18. Curzon, S.(Ed.),Lampert, L.(Ed.)(2007).Proven strategies for building an information literacy program.New York:Neal-Schuman Publishers.
19. Curzon, S.,Lampert, L.(2007).Proven strategies for building information literacy program.New York:Neal-Schuman.
20. Delisle, R.(1997).How to use problem-based learning in the classroom.Alexandria, VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21. Eisenberg, M. B.,Berkowitz, R.(1999).Teaching information & technology skills: The big6 in elementary schools.Worthington, OH:Linworth.
22. Eisenberg, M. B.,Berkowitz, R. E.(2003).The definitive Big6 workshop handbook.Worthington, OH:Linworth.
23. Eisenberg, M. B.,Robinson, G. A.(2007).The Super3: Information skills for young learners.Worthington, OH:Linworth.
24. Grassian, E.,Kaplowitz, J.(2001).Information literacy instruction: Theory and practice.New York:Neal-Schuman.
25. Harada, V. H.,Yoshina, J. M.(2004).Inquiry learning through librarian-teacher partnerships.Worthington, OH:Linworth.
26. Haury, D. L.(1993).ERIC CSMEED DigestERIC CSMEED Digest,未出版
27. Hung, W.,Jonassen, D.,Liu, R.(2008).Problem-based learning.Handbook of research on educational communications and technology,New York:
28. Hurd, P. D.(1998).Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world.Science Education,82,407-416.
29. Iley, P.(2006).Using literacy to develop thinking skills with children aged 5-7.Abingdon, Oxon:David Fulton.
30. Kuhlthau, C. C.,Maniotes, L. K.,Caspari, A. K.(2007).Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
31. Laase, L.、Clemmons, J.、林心茹(2002)。協助學生做最棒的報告。台北市=Taipei:遠流=Yuan Liou。
32. Lambros, A.(2002).Problem-based learning in K-8 classrooms: A teacher's guide to implementation.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
33. Lewin, L.,Shoemaker, B.(1998).Great performances: Creating classroom-based assessment tasks.Alexandria, VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
34. Lowery, J.(2005).Information literacy and writing: Natural partners in the library media center.Knowledge Quest,34(2),13-15.
35. MacDonell, C.(2007).Project-based inquiry units for young children: First steps to research for grade pre-K-2.Worthington, OH:Linworth.
36. Martin, D. J.(2000).Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
37. Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in education.SanFrancisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
38. NationalResearch Council(1996).The national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
39. NationalResearch Council (NRC)(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
40. Orlich, D.,Harder, R.,Callahan, R.,Gibson, H.(2001).Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction.Boston, TX:Houghton Mifflin.
41. Polman, J.(2000).Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry.New York:Teachers College Press.
42. Ragains, P.(2006).Information literacy instruction that works: A guide to teaching by discipline and student population.New York:Neal-Schuman Publishers.
43. Sapp, G.(2006).Science.Information literacy instruction that works: A guide to teaching by discipline and student population,New York:
44. Shymansky, J. A.,Hedges, L. V.,Woodworth, G.(1990).A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curriculum of the 60s on student performance.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27,127-144.
45. Smith, J. B.(2005).Teaching and testing information literacy skills.Worthington, OH:LinLinworth.
46. Springer, K.(2010).Educational research: A contextual approach.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
47. Thompson, H. M.,Henley, S. A.(2000).Fostering information literacy: Connecting national standards, goals2000, and the SCANS report.Englewood, CO:Libraries Unlimited.
48. Weinstein, T.,Boulanger, F. D.,Walberg, H. J.(1982).Science curriculum effects in high school: A quantitative synthesis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,19(6),511-522.
49. 王美芬(2006)。「自然與生活科技領域」的探究教學策略。教育研究月刊，152，45-55。
50. 林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法，嘉義市=Chiayi:
51. 林美英、熊漢琳、郭迺鋒(2004)。以資訊六大技能強化知識之建構。圖書館學與資訊科學，30(1)，75-84。
52. 林菁、李佳憓(2009)。國小圖書老師與班級教師合作設計資訊素養融入教學。教育資料與圖書館學，47(2)，199-230。
53. 邱孟月(2007)。嘉義縣=Chiayi，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所=Graduate Institute Educational Technology, National Chia Yi University。
54. 張瓊穗、翁婉慈(2005)。以資訊大六之觀點來檢驗國小高年級學童資訊素養之研究：以台北市天母國小為例。國立臺北教育大學學報，18(2)，297-322。
55. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：自然與生活科技學習領域。台北市=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
56. 黃萬居(1999)。九年一貫的自然與科技課程初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，14，3-6。
57. 趙炳詠(2006)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範學院資訊教育研究所=Information & Computer Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
58. 謝佩紋、林菁(2009)。國小教師以CREATER模式推動資訊素養創新課程之歷程。圖書館學與資訊科學，35(1)，70-89。

1. 陳毓彬、林菁(2013)。資訊素養評量之編製與學生表現：以國小二年級為例。教育資料與圖書館學，51(1)，91-129。
2. 郭玫叔、林菁(2012)。國小一年級資訊素養教育課程實施成效之探討。教育資料與圖書館學，50(1)，41-74。
3. 廖本裕、章明哲(2013)。數位媒體素養之研究：以臺東縣高中職校學生使用部落格為例。教育傳播與科技研究，105，21-39。
4. 林菁(2012)。資訊素養融入國小二年級社會學習領域「我們的社區」主題探究：以Super3 模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學，49(3)，1-29。
5. 林菁(2018)。國小探究式資訊素養融入課程之研究：理論與實踐。教育資料與圖書館學，55(2)，103-137。
6. 林菁(2020)。探究式資訊素養融入國中階段課程之追蹤研究。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1)，73-120。
7. 謝欣穎、林菁(2013)。國小三年級學生在資訊素養融入主題探究的科學探究學習態度表現。教育傳播與科技研究，103，1-15。
8. 謝欣穎、林菁(2013)。資訊素養與閱讀策略融入國小四年級「我們的水族箱」主題探究：以Big6模式為例。圖書資訊學刊，11(1)，95-130。
9. 薛招治(2021)。農學院學生專利資訊素養建構：課程設計與實踐。科學教育學刊，29(3)，267-298。
10. 顏仁德、黃財尉、林菁(2014)。探究式資訊素養融入課程成效之四年長期研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51(4)，561-595。
11. 莊盛宇、林菁(2017)。國小探究式資訊素養融入課程與問題解決能力之長期研究。教育傳播與科技研究，116，1-16。
12. (2013)。圖書教師與社會領域教師協作教學之行動研究。區域與社會發展研究期刊，4，3-27。
13. (2014)。資訊素養融入國小三年級自然學習領域「樹朋友」主題探究。圖書資訊學研究，8(2)，57-99。
14. (2015)。應用爭議導向之探究式學習於資訊素養課程：培養國小五年級學生議論能力。圖書資訊學研究，9(2)，67-109。