綜整學生、教師與教學情境考量的遠距教學預測模型

Integrating Considerations of Students, Teachers, and Instructional Contexts in a Predictive Model of Distance Education

10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.521/0631.RS.CM

岳修平(Hsiu-Ping Yueh)；梁朝雲(Chao-Yun Liang)

同步遠距教學 ； 線上教材 ； 學生自評學習效益 ； 學生評量教學成效 ； 學習能力 ； 學習策略 ； Synchronism distance-instruction ； Online materials ； Studentperceived learning outcome ； Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness ； Learning ability ； Learning strategy

教育資料與圖書館學

52卷1期（2015 / 01 / 01）

33 - 57+ii

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討於遠距教學情境中，學生學習能力和學習策略、學生評量教學成效、同步遠距教學，與線上教材對學生自評學習效益的影響；並分析學生評量教學成效和同步遠距教學的交互作用，以及線上教材的中介效果。本研究結果顯示，學生評量教學成效與同步遠距教學之交互作用會影響線上教材與學生自評學習效益。對遠距教學評價高的學生，該交互作用的影響會比評價低的學生更為明顯。本研究亦發現，學生評量教學成效、線上教材，及同步遠距教學的品質掌控，是決定遠距教學學習效益的關鍵。其中，線上教材能在多數學生評量教學成效面向之間發揮顯著的中介效果，以促動學生自評的學習效益。

This study examined the effects of learning ability, learning strategy, synchronism distance teaching, teaching effectiveness, and online-materials on the learning outcomes of engineering majors. The interaction between distance teaching and teaching effectiveness, as well as the mediating effects of online-materials were tested. The results indicated that the interaction between synchronism distance teaching and student evaluation of teaching effectiveness influenced online materials and student-perceived learning outcomes. The interaction effects of the group that highly valued distance instruction increased more in response to student evaluation of teaching effectiveness than did the effects of the group that valued distance instruction less. In addition, the results revealed that the quality of synchronism distance instruction, student evaluation of teaching effectiveness, and online materials are the keys to successful distance instruction. Among these critical factors, online materials played a mediating role in the relationship between the variables involved and student-perceived learning outcomes.

1. Chen, M.,Sun, J. Y.-F.(2011).A path to enhance students' ability and willingness to communicate in English.Languages, Literary Studies and International Studies: An International Journal,8,105-129.
   連結：
2. 于第(2011)。運用教育部「圖書資訊應用」通識課程數位學習教材於非同步遠距課程教學設計與教學成效之研究。圖書與資訊學刊，79，12-30。
   連結：
3. 岳修平(2000)。即時群播遠距教學之班級經營。課程與教學，3(2)，63-74。
   連結：
4. 張基成、徐郁昇(2011)。高職學生電工機械混成式數位學習效果。科學教育學刊，19(6)，549-579。
   連結：
5. 張瓊穗、陳宜欣(2003)。大學同步遠距課程互動問題之探討：以淡江大學為例。教育資料與圖書館學，40(4)，525-533。
   連結：
6. 陳寶山(2007)。落實教學評鑑保障學生學習成效。學校行政，50，103-127。
   連結：
7. 程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報，33(2)，79-102。
   連結：
8. 葉連祺、董娟娟、楊世英、陳仁海、蕭芳華(2005)。大學學生評鑑教師教學量表之編製。測驗學刊，52(1)，59-82。
   連結：
9. 劉玉玲、薛岳(2013)。國中生數學學業自我概念及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究—自我提升模式觀點。課程與教學季刊，16(1)，179-208。
   連結：
10. 鄭英耀、葉麗貞、劉昆夏、莫慕貞(2011)。大學生基本能力指標之建構。測驗學刊，58(3)，531-558。
    連結：
11. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
12. Bong, M.(2004).Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs.The Journal of Educational Research,97(6),287-298.
13. Bourne, J.(Ed.),Moore, J. C.(Ed.)(2004).Elements of quality online education into the mainstream.Needham, MA:Sloan Center for Online Education.
14. Braskamp, L. A.,Ory, J. C.(1994).Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and instructional performance.San Francisco, LA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Cassady, J. C.(1998).Student and instructor perceptions of the efficacy of computer-aided lectures in undergraduate university courses.Journal of Educational Computing Research,19(2),175-189.
16. Centra, J. A.,Gaubatz, N. B.(2000).Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching?.Journal of Higher Education,71(1),17-33.
17. Cohen, J.,Cohen, P.,West, S. G.,Aiken, L. S.(2003).Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral science.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Crawford-Ferre, H. G.,Wiest, L. R.(2012).Effective online instruction in higher education.The Quarterly Review of Distance Education,13(1),11-14.
19. Dalgarno, B.,Bishop, A. G.,Adlong, W.,Bedgood, D. R., Jr(2009).Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students.Computers & Education,53(3),853-865.
20. Eilam, B.,Zeinder, M.,Aharon, I.(2009).Student conscientiousness self-regulated learning, and science achievement: An explorative study.Psychology in the Schools,46(5),420-432.
21. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
22. Frazier, P. A.,Tix, A. P.,Barron, K. E.(2004).Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.Journal of Counseling Psychology,51(1),115-134.
23. Frey, B. A.,Birnbaum, D. J.(2002).,未出版
24. Guri-Rosenblit, S.(1999).Distance and campus universities: Tensions and interactions: A comparative study of five countries.Oxford, UK:International Association of Universities.
25. Hair, J. F.,Black, B.,Babin, B.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2005).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
26. Hayes, A. F.,Matthes, J.(2009).Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations.Behavior Research Methods,41(3),924-936.
27. Heckert, T. M.,Latier, A.,Ringwald, A.,Silvey, B.(2006).Relation of course, instructor, and student characteristics to dimensions of student ratings of teaching effectiveness.College Student Journal,40(1),195-203.
28. Hewitt, J.(2003).How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads.Journal of Educational Computing Research,28(1),31-45.
29. Hu, L.-T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
30. Jackson, D. L.,Teal, C. R.,Raines, S. J.,Nansel, T. R.,Force, R. C.,Burdsal, C. A.(1999).The dimensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness.Educational and Psychological Measurement,59(4),580-596.
31. Khan, B. H.(Ed.)(1997).Web-based instruction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
32. Latchem, C.(Ed.),Lockwood, F.(Ed.)(1998).Staff development in open and flexible learning.New York, NY:Routledge.
33. Lattuca, L. R.,Knight, D.,Bergom, I.(2013).Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence.International Journal of Engineering Education,29(3),726-739.
34. Lin, W.,Yueh, H.-P.,Minoh, M.(2009).A case study of advancing international distance education between Taiwanese and Japanese universities.Asia-Pacific Collaborative Education Journal,5(1),1-12.
35. Mackey, K. R. M.,Freyberg, D. L.(2010).The effect of social presence on affective and cognitive learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning.Journal of Engineering Education,99(1),23-34.
36. Marsh, H. W.(1980).The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching.American Educational Research Journal,17(2),219-237.
37. Marsh, H. W.,Roche, L. A.(2000).Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders?.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(1),202-228.
38. Marsh, H. W.,Roche, L. A.(1997).Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias and utility.American Psychologist,52(11),1187-1197.
39. Palmer, S.(2007).An evaluation of streaming digital video resources in on- and offcampus engineering management education.Computers & Education,49(2),297-308.
40. Pintrich, P. R.(2004).A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.Educational Psychology Review,16(4),385-407.
41. Saba, T.(2012).Implications of e-learning systems and self-efficiency on students outcomes: A model approach.Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences,2(6)
42. Shotsberger, P. G.(2000).The human touch: Synchronous communication in web-based learning.Educational Technology,40(1),53-56.
43. Singh, H.(2003).Building effective blended learning programs.Educational Technology,43(6),51-54.
44. Steif, P. S.,Dollár, A.(2009).Study of usage patterns and learning gains in a web-based interactive static course.Journal of Engineering Education,98(4),321-333.
45. The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges(2012).Guide to evaluating distance education and correspondence education.Novato, CA:Author.
46. The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business(2007).Quality issues in distance education.Tempa, FL:Author.
47. Yang, Y.,Cornelious, L. F.(2005).Preparing instructors for quality online instruction.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration,8(1)
48. Yueh, H.-P.,Chen, T.-L.,Chiu, L.-A.,Lee, S.-L.,Wang, A.-B.(2012).Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness of a national innovative education program on image display technology.IEEE Transactions on Education,55(3),365-369.
49. Yueh, H.-P.,Chen, T.-L.,Lin, W.,Sheen, H.-J.(2014).Developing digital courseware for a virtual nano-biotechnology laboratory: A design-based research approach.Educational Technology and Society,17(2),158-168.
50. 王保進(2009)。掌握系所評鑑的重點—系所評鑑之精神與認可要素。評鑑雙月刊，21，9-13。
51. 石文傑、江宗霖(2012)。數位學習課程之製作與教學策略之應用—以「機電整合與控制」為例。資訊科技國際期刊，6(2)，146-154。
52. 李鴻亮、廖惠君(2009)。利用線上影音課程對國小英語學習低成就學生進行補救教學之研究：「混成增強策略」之實施與成效。教學科技與媒體，89(3)，20-38。
53. 岳修平(2005)。課程與教學評量量表：遠距課程版。台北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學=National Taiwan University。
54. 彭森明(2008)。將學生學習成果納入大學評鑑指標項目之必要性與可行性。評鑑雙月刊，15，9-14。
55. 黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式：理論與應用（四版）。台北市=Taipei:五南=Wunan。
56. 溫嘉榮、張建原(2014)。通識教育採用遠距教學成效及滿意度之研究：以計算機概論為例。樹德科技大學學報，16(1)，133-145。
57. 蒯光武、陳浚卿(2010)。影音部落格於網路教學應用之關鍵成功因素初探。教學科技與媒體，94，40-59。
58. 黎玨岑、洪佳玟(2013)。關鍵學習力—培養學生具備自我調整學習能力。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(5)，27-29。

1. 黃文定、陳立楀(2016)。跨國線上課輔教師教學行為之研究：以「韓國僑鄉線上課輔服務計畫」為例。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，30(2)，1-24。
2. 羅偉誠、廖信、柯亭羽(2018)。開放式課程對學生電子書製作之專業實務技能分析研究。教育傳播與科技研究，119，15-31。
3. 楊雅婷、陳奕樺(2016)。臺灣國小行動學習計畫的學生自評學習效益影響因素探討。教育科學研究期刊，61(3)，99-129。
4. 張艾琦,王梅玲(2019)。數位學習碩士在職專班研究生線上學習、圖書館使用與學生自評學習成效之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，45(1)，36-64。
5. 張國蕾(2021)。使用微軟MS Teams軟體遠距法語教學與學習之省思：以大一法語閱讀習作及文法課為例。語文與國際研究，25，55-86。
6. 鄭琨鴻,黃筠珊,黃雅玲,黃仙惠,莊昀蒨,李雅筑,李佳宇,石謙慧(2021)。以系統性內容分析探究2015－2019年圖書資訊TSSCI期刊之研究趨勢。圖資與檔案學刊，99，147-177。