公民行動取向之資訊素養課程：以國小六年級「台美生態學校夥伴計畫」為例

Civic Action-oriented Information Literacy Curriculum: An Example of Sixth-grade ＂US-Taiwan Eco-campus Partnership Program＂

10.6120/JoEMLS.2016.532/0005.RS.CM

林菁(Lin Ching Chen)；沈桂枝(Kui-Chi Shen)；賴秀珍(Hsiu-Chen Lai)

公民行動 ； 資訊素養 ； 國際理解 ； 生態學校 ； Civic action ； Information literacy ； International understanding ； Eco-campus

教育資料與圖書館學

53卷2期（2016 / 04 / 01）

211 - 244

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究公民行動取向之資訊素養課程方案的可行性，包括方案之分析、設計與發展及評估三個階段。此課程以台美生態學校為主題，引導學生發現學校環境問題，以研擬和展開公民行動，並與美國夥伴交流及評估成效。研究者與教授資訊素養、自然與生活科技，和英語領域的三位老師合作，進行兩個循環協同行動研究。研究現場是一個國小六年級班級，本研究以多元方法蒐集質化和量化資料，研究結果發現在國小六年級推動公民行動取向的資訊素養課程是一可行方案。過程中藉由資訊素養課程的循序教導、老師的協同教學、學校整體的行政支持，及資訊科技的融入等策略，使得公民行動能順利進行，提升學生問題解決和理性參與公共事務之能力，並增進跨文化理解。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a civic actionoriented information literacy plan within an elementary school, including the stages of analysis, design, development and evaluation. The plan topic was the US-Taiwan Eco-Campus Partnership Program. Students first identified environmental problems of the school; they then developed and implemented a civic action plan based on their collected information, exchanged dialogue to communicate with their American partners, and finally evaluated the overall effectiveness of the plan. The researchers collaborated with three teachers who teach information literacy, science and English respectively. The civic action lasted for ten months with two cycles. This study was conducted in an elementary school in the area of Chiayi. The data was gathered through participant observations, tests, surveys, interviews, and document analyses. The results showed that it is feasible to promote civic action-oriented information literacy curriculum in sixth grade. Students' problem solving skills, rational participation in public actions, and intercultural understanding improved via the following strategies. These strategies included progressive information literacy curriculum, collaboration among teachers, the support of school administration, and integration of information technology.

1. 林菁(2012)。資訊素養融入國小二年級社會學習領域「我們的社區」主題探究：以Super3模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學，49(3)，447-478。
   連結：
2. 林菁、顏仁德、黃財尉(2014)。探究式資訊素養融入課程成效之四年長期研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51(4)，561-595。
   連結：
3. 陳麗華(2011)。公民行動取向全球議題課程設計模式與實踐案例。台灣民主季刊，8(1)，47-82。
   連結：
4. American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Retrieved from http://umanitoba.ca/libraries/units/education/media/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf
5. American Association of School Librarians. (2007). Standards for the 21st-century learning: Standards and indicators. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_Learning_Standards_2007.pdf
6. 薛人華（2011）。國際公民教育與素養調查研究（ICCS2009）介紹。教育研究與評鑑中心電子報，45。檢索自http://epaper.cere.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=520【Hsueh, Jen-Hua (2011). Guoji gongmin jiaoyu yu suyang diaocha yanjiu (ICCS2009) jie shao. Center for Education Research and Evaluation, 45. Retrieved from http://epaper.cere.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=520 (in Chinese)】
7. Agarwal-Rangnath, R.(2013).Social studies, literacy, and social justice in the common core classroom: A guide for teachers.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
8. Birmingham, D.,Barton, A. C.(2014).Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,51(3),286-314.
9. Bruce, C.(2008).Informed learning.Chicago, IL:Association of College and Research Libraries.
10. Bundy, A.(2004).Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: Principles, standards and practice.Adelaide, Australia:ANZIIL.
11. Checkley, K.(2008).The essentials of social studies, grades K-8: Effective curriculum, instruction, and assessment.Alexandria, VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Crockett, L.,Jukes, I.,Churches, A.(2011).Literacy in not enough: 21st-century fluencies for the digital age.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
13. Green, C.,Medina-Jerez, W.(2012).Project citizen: Promoting action-oriented citizen science in the classroom.The Science Teacher,79(9),58-63.
14. Kuhlthau, C. C.,Maniotes, L. K.,Caspari, A. K.(2012).Guided inquiry design: A framework for inquiry in your school.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
15. Kuhlthau, C. C.,Maniotes, L. K.,Caspari, A. K.(2015).Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
16. Lee, K.-Y.(2012).Teaching intercultural English learning/teaching in world Englishes: Some classroom activities in South Korea.English Teaching: Practice and Critique,11(4),190-205.
17. Lloyd, A.(2010).Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory.Journal of Documentation,66(2),245-258.
18. McNiff, J.,Whitehead, J.(2002).Action research: Principles and practice.London, UK:Routledge Falmer.
19. National Council for the Social Studies(2013).The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history.Silver Spring, MD:Author.
20. New York City Department of Education(2010).Information fluency continuum: Benchmark skills for grades K-12 assessment.New York, NY:Author.
21. Newton, J.,Yates, E.,Shearn, S.,Nowitzki, W.(2009).Intercultural communicative language teaching: Implications for effective teaching and learning: A literature review and an evidence-based framework for effective teaching.Wellington, New Zealand:Victoria University of Wellington.
22. Qu, Y.(2010).Culture understanding in foreign language teaching.English Language Teaching,3(4),58-61.
23. Reason, P.,Bradbury, H.(2008).Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice.Los Angeles, CA:SAGE.
24. Serriere, S. C.(2014).The role of the elementary teacher in fostering civic efficacy.The Social Studies,105,45-56.
25. Youssef, H. Z. M.(2009).,未出版
26. 林菁(2001)。資訊素養融入國小一年級「校園生物大搜索」主題探究：以Super3 模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學，48(4)，539-570。
27. 林菁、陳耀輝(2015)。應用爭議導向之探究式學習於資訊素養課程：培養國小五年級學生議論能力。圖書資訊學研究，9(2)，67-109。
28. 林菁、謝欣穎、謝文峰(2014)。資訊素養融入國小三年級自然學習領域「樹朋友」主題探究。圖書資訊學研究，8(2)，57-99。
29. 張秀雄編、鄧毓浩編(2006)。多元文化與民主公民教育。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:韋伯文化=Weber Publication International。
30. 教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域（英語）。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Author。
31. 教育部(2012)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Author。
32. 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Author。
33. 陳麗華、田耐青、宋佩芬、彭增龍、陳盈丹、邱卿雲、江文芳(2011)。打造世界公民的12個方案：全球教育理論與實踐。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Edubook。
34. 廖曉青(2006)。英語教育學。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。

1. 林菁(2018)。國小探究式資訊素養融入課程之研究：理論與實踐。教育資料與圖書館學，55(2)，103-137。
2. 林菁(2020)。探究式資訊素養融入國中階段課程之追蹤研究。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1)，73-120。
3. 林沛君(2022)。「有意義」的兒少參與：以我國地方兒少代表制度為例。臺大社會工作學刊，45，1-44。
4. 莊盛宇、林菁(2017)。國小探究式資訊素養融入課程與問題解決能力之長期研究。教育傳播與科技研究，116，1-16。