题名

逆強論:隨創式的資源建構過程

并列篇名

Inversing the Powerful: The Process of Resource Construction through Bricolage

DOI

10.6226/NTUMR.2017.MAR.A103-016

作者

蕭瑞麟(Ruey-Lin Hsiao);歐素華(Su-Hua Ou);蘇筠(Yun Su)

关键词

隨創理論 ; 資源建構 ; 逆強 ; bricolage ; resource construction ; power-inversing

期刊名称

臺大管理論叢

卷期/出版年月

27卷4期(2017 / 12 / 01)

页次

43 - 73

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

弱肉強食是企業生存的真實處境。強勢者勝,弱勢者敗,被奉為競爭下的常態。不過,隨創(Bricolage)文獻卻充滿希望地指出,如果弱勢者懂得槓桿身旁資源,仍有可能於劣勢中創新。本研究以隨創理論為基礎,探索弱勢者如何能重新建構資源以回應強勢者所施加的制約。本研究分析研華科技如何回應德國競爭者於中國工業電腦市場的優勢地位。本案例觀察弱勢者如何逆轉強勢者的優勢,萃取其脆弱之處,進而以此弱點建構手邊的資源,逐步改變劣勢地位。在學理上,本文提出「逆強」的資源建構模式,找出「強者必弱」之原則,讓隨創理論更加豐富多元。於實務上,本研究所提出之逆機而動、逆敵而取、逆勢而行的三項劣勢創新原則,可以提供企業以小搏大的借鏡。若能反向思考,將強勢者的阻力逆向變成其助力,改變企業競爭之法則將不再是不可能。

英文摘要

"The weak are the prey of the strong" seems to be the reality of business jungle. High-power actors win and low-power actors fail. This research employs bricolage as a theoretical basis, and explores how low-power actors could reconstruct resources to respond to constraints imposed by high-power actors. This study examines the case of Advantech's response to its German high-power competitor in the industrial computer market in Mainland China. This case study observes how the low-power actor inversed the high-power actor's advantage into fragileness while constructing resources to change its relative power position. Theoretically, this article proposes a "power-inversing" model for resource construction, which recognizes the inevitable weakness of the high-power actors and enriches the diversity of bricolage theory. Practically, our research suggests three principles of bricolage: recognizing weakness from the strongest, converting foes into friends (so as to obtain resources), and shifting the power dynamics. By reversing the high-power actor's stumbling blocks into stepping stones, it might not be impossible to change the law of competition.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 洪世章、周婉婷(2010)。整合式服務創新:台灣企業之比較個案研究。科技管理學刊,15(1),49-76。
    連結:
  2. 陳意文、吳思華、項維欣(2010)。資源基礎觀點下之資源拼湊與價值創造:以台灣翅帆開發創新產品為例。科技管理學刊,15(2),1-19。
    連結:
  3. Alvarez, S. A.,Busenitz, L. W.(2001).The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory.Journal of Management,27(6),755-775.
  4. Ambos, T. C.,Andersson, U.,Birkinshaw, J.(2010).What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries?.Journal of International Business Studies,41(7),1099-1118.
  5. Andersson, U.,Forsgren, M.,Holm, U.(2007).Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view.Journal of International Business Studies,38(5),802-818.
  6. Ardichvili, A.,Cardozo, R.,Ray, S.(2003).A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development.Journal of Business Venturing,18(1),105-123.
  7. Baker, T.,Miner, A. S.,Eesley, D. T.(2003).Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process.Research Policy,32(2),255-276.
  8. Baker, T.,Nelson, R. E.(2005).Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(3),329-366.
  9. Balogun, J.,Jarzabkowski, P.,Vaara, E.(2011).Selling, resistance and reconciliation: A critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs.Journal of International Business Studies,42(6),765-786.
  10. Baron, R. A.,Ensley, M. D.(2006).Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs.Management Science,52(9),1331-1344.
  11. Bechky, B. A.,Okhuysen, G. A.(2011).Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises.Academy of Management Journal,54(2),239-261.
  12. Berger, P. L.,Luckmann, T.(1966).The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.Garden City, NY:Anchor Books.
  13. Birkinshaw, J.(2003).The paradox of corporate entrepreneurship.Strategy and Business,30(30),46-57.
  14. Bouquet, C.,Birkinshaw, J.(2008).Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence.Journal of Management,34(3),477-508.
  15. Brannen, M. Y.(2004).When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness.Academy of Management Review,29(4),593-616.
  16. Brush, C. G.,Greene, P. G.,Hart, M. M.(2001).From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base.Academy of Management Perspectives,15(1),64-78.
  17. Casciaro, T.,Piskorski, M. J.(2005).Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(2),167-199.
  18. Di Domenico, M. L.,Haugh, H.,Tracey, P.(2010).Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,34(4),681-703.
  19. Dörrenbächer, C.,Geppert, M.(2006).Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: Current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue.Journal of International Management,12(3),251-265.
  20. Dutton, J. E.,Ashford, S. J.,O'Neill, R. M.,Lawrence, K. A.(2001).Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change.Academy of Management Journal,44(4),716-736.
  21. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Schoonhoven, C. B.(1996).Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms.Organization Science,7(2),136-150.
  22. Garud, R.,Karnøe, P.(2003).Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship.Research Policy,32(2),277-300.
  23. Guillén, M. F.(Ed.),Collins, R.(Ed.),England, P.(Ed.),Meyer, M.(Ed.)(2001).New Directions in Economic Sociology.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
  24. Hargadon, A. B.,Douglas, Y.(2001).When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light.Administrative Science Quarterly,46(3),476-501.
  25. Hargadon, A.,Sutton, R. I.(1997).Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm.Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),716-749.
  26. Kirzner, I. M.(1997).Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach.Journal of Economic Literature,35(1),60-85.
  27. Larsson, R.,Finkelstein, S.(1999).Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization.Organization Science,10(1),1-26.
  28. Lee, T. W.,Mitchell, T. R.,Sablynski, C. J.(1999).Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979-1999.Journal of Vocational Behavior,55(2),161-187.
  29. Lévi-Strauss, C.(1968).The Savage Mind.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  30. Lounsbury, M.,Glynn, M. A.(2001).Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources.Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),545-564.
  31. Mahnke, V.,Venzin, M.,Zahra, S. A.(2007).Governing entrepreneurial opportunity recognition in MNEs: Aligning interests and cognition under uncertainty.Journal of Management Studies,44(7),1278-1298.
  32. Minniti, M.(2004).Entrepreneurial alertness and asymmetric information in a spin-glass model.Journal of Business Venturing,19(5),637-658.
  33. Oliver, C.(1991).Strategic responses to institutional processes.Academy of Management Review,16(1),145-179.
  34. Orlikowski, W. J.(2000).Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations.Organization Science,11(4),404-428.
  35. Peltokorpi, V.,Vaara, E.(2012).Language policies and practices in wholly owned foreign subsidiaries: A recontextualization perspective.Journal of International Business Studies,43(9),808-833.
  36. Pfeffer, J.(1992).Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  37. Schön, D. A.,Rein, M.(1994).Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  38. Shane, S.(2000).Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities.Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
  39. Tang, J.,Kacmar, K. M.,Busenitz, L.(2012).Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities.Journal of Business Venturing,27(1),77-94.
  40. Vaghely, I. P.,Julien, P. A.(2010).Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification.Journal of Business Venturing,25(1),73-86.
  41. Walsham, G.(1995).The emergence of interpretivism in IS research.Information Systems Research,6(4),376-394.
  42. Wernerfelt, B.(1995).The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after.Strategic Management Journal,16(3),171-174.
  43. Yin, R. K.(1994).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
被引用次数
  1. 蔡敦浩,游銘仁,李慶芳,吳靜吉(2023)。情急智生:探索口罩國家隊急興拼創的歷程。管理學報,40(3),245-276。
  2. 曾介宏,呂怡青(2023)。應用諮商概念設計與執行臺北市地方文化館營運輔導機制。科技博物,27(3),5-33。
  3. 歐素華(2021)。劣勢者的優勢連結:由資源交換重塑社會地位。中山管理評論,29(2),245-283。
  4. 蕭瑞麟,歐素華,陳煥宏(2019)。負負得正:隨創時相依性如何促成負資源轉換。組織與管理,12(1),127-171。
  5. 蕭瑞麟,徐嘉黛(2020)。境隨心轉:服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換。組織與管理,13(2),1-51。
  6. 趙雨潔,廖翊翔(2021)。集體隨創與展演共創:185農夫市集生態系統。中山管理評論,29(3),515-550。
  7. 鄭耿翔、黃俊儒、喬友慶、丁瑞彥(2017)。追隨廠商如何回應領導廠商之競爭性行動?多重市場接觸的調節效果。管理學報,34(4),659-682。