直面受苦：人文臨床心理學的心理病理學芻議

Coming Face-to-face with Suffering: Toward a Psychopathology for the Human-science Oriented Clinical Psychology

10.30074/FJMH.201809_31(3).0002

彭榮邦(Rong-Bang Peng,)；翁士恆(Shyh-Heng Wong)

心理病理學 ； DSM ； 部署 ； 直面受苦 ； 人文科學心理學 ； psychopathology ； DSM ； dispositive ； suffering ； human science

中華心理衛生學刊

31卷3期（2018 / 09 / 01）

227 - 251

繁體中文

研究目的：在台灣，心理病理學被視為臨床心理學的三大專業領域之一，不過在教育訓練中，幾乎等同於DSM（Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders）這個精神疾病診斷系統。然而從歷史上來看，DSM做為心理病理學的近乎同義詞，也不過是相當晚近的事情。因此DSM不是一個不能被挑戰的知識系統，也不應該被臨床心理學視為唯一的心理病理學。研究方法：本文是以批判—歷史取向（critical-historical approach）和傅柯式論述分析（Foucauldian discourse analysis）為方法，進行文獻反思與典範對話。研究結果：本文首先從批判歷史的角度描述DSM的發展，並且以Foucault（1980）的「部署」（dispositif）概念，檢視DSM如何在短時間內成為佔據精神醫學核心位置的重要實務手冊，並討論這個歷史轉變對精神醫學臨床工作造成的影響。在這個基礎上，本文接著討論臨床心理學在精神疾病診斷及治療的後DSM-III部署中的位置，並提出以「直面受苦」為核心的心理病理學為回應。研究結論：本文主張：（1）一個「直面受苦」的心理病理學承認受苦經驗在本體論上的不可化約性和屬己性，因此在知識論上會是「人文科學取向」的心理病理學；（2）一個「直面受苦」的心理病理學也涉及了知識與倫理關係的逆轉，它不是一套關於精神疾病的普遍性知識，而是在治療關係中展開、對受苦經驗的殊異性理解；（3）一個「直面受苦」的心理病理學，是向「心理病理學」原初意義的回歸：它是來自精神受苦者的「我說」，於其中他/她的「靈魂」如何「受苦」，得以向我們展現。

Purpose: In Taiwan, psychopathology is considered to be 1 of the 3 professional domains in clinical psychology. However, in educational training it is almost always equated with the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder). Equation of psychopathology with the DSM is recent. However, the DSM is not an unchallengeable system of knowledge, nor should it be treated as completely encompassing all forms of psychopathology in clinical psychology. Methods: We applied a critical-historical approach with a Foucauldian discourse analysis in order to critically reflect on the current status of psychopathology. Results: We first supplied a critical-historical description of the development of the DSM, and then used Foucault's (1980) concept of dispositif to examine how the DSM quickly occupied a core position in the practice of psychiatry, thereby affecting clinical work. On this foundation, we then discussed how clinical psychology should be positioned in the post DSM-III era with regard to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. We proposed a form of psychopathology that situates coming face-to-face with suffering at the core. Conclusions: We propose that a human-science oriented psychopathology is: (1) a psychopathology that comes face-to-face with suffering. It recognizes the ontological status of the suffering experience, its irreducibility and its personal uniqueness. Therefore, it is inherently human science oriented; (2) a psychopathology that also involves reversal of the priority of ethics and knowledge. It is therefore not a system of universal knowledge about mental illness, but a singular understanding of the suffering experience unfolded in the therapeutic relationship; (3) a return to the original meaning of the word psychopathology. It comes from the ＂I say＂ of the sufferer, in which the suffering of the soul is unfolded to the therapist.

1. 余德慧(2005)。華人心性與倫理的複合式療法—華人文化心理治療的探原。本土心理學研究，24，7-48。
   連結：
2. 余德慧(1998)。生活受苦經驗的心理病理：本土文化的探索。本土心理學研究，10，69-115。
   連結：
3. 余德慧、余安邦、李維倫(2010)。人文臨床學的探究。哲學與文化，37(1)，63-84。
   連結：
4. 余德慧、李維倫、林耀盛、余安邦、陳淑惠、許敏桃、石世明(2004)。倫理療癒作為建構臨床心理學本土化的起點。本土心理學研究，22，253-325。
   連結：
5. 宋文里(2014)。療遇時刻：理心術與療癒的多重文化交叉論述。哲學與文化，41(12)，47-74。
   連結：
6. 宋文里(2007)。臨床／本土／文化心理學：尋語路（錄）。應用心理研究，34，75-112。
   連結：
7. 李維倫(2004)。作為倫理行動的心理治療。本土心理學研究，22，359-420。
   連結：
8. 李維倫(2011)。反思臨床心理學訓練：探究美國「科學家─實務者」模式與專業能力學習的本質。中華心理衛生學刊，24(2)，173-207。
   連結：
9. 李維倫、莫少依(2005)。生活世界取向的心理衡鑑：一種本土化的可能性。本土心理學研究，24，85-135。
   連結：
10. 林耀盛(2002)。性別識盲及其不滿：以精神病為論述對象。女學學誌，14，119-171。
    連結：
11. 林耀盛(2011)。本土化、西方化與全球化：本土臨床心理學的研發進程。本土心理學研究，35，145-188。
    連結：
12. 林耀盛(2011)。科學、人文與實務之間：析論臨床心理學的訓練和發展。中華心理衛生學刊，24(2)，279-310。
    連結：
13. 柯永河(2008)。台灣臨床心理學的濫觴、發展與願景。應用心理研究，40，29-58。
    連結：
14. 許秋田、黃創華、鄭志強(2009)。台灣臨床心理師執業與工作現況調查。應用心理研究，41，43-55。
    連結：
15. 許敏桃、余德慧、李維倫(2005)。哀悼傷逝的文化模式：由連結到療癒。本土心理學研究，24，49-84。
    連結：
16. 龍佛衛、呂宜靜、沈孟樺、曾冬勝、顏永杰、高千雅(2006)。精神科專科醫師對訓練學程之意見。臺灣精神醫學，20(3)，192-200。
    連結：
17. American Psychiatric Association(2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5.Washington, D. C.:American Psychiatric Association.
18. Benjamin , L. T. J.(2005).A history of clinical psychology as a profession in America (and a glimpse at its future).Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,1(1),1-30.
19. Brooke, R.(2016).Some common themes of psychology as a human science.The qualitative vision for Psychology: An invitation to a Human Science approach,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania:
20. Brunner, J.(1991).Psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and politics during the First World War.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences,27(4),352-365.
21. Buchanan, R. D.(2003).Legislative warriors: American psychiatrists, psychologists, and competing claims over psychotherapy in the 1950s.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences,39(3),225-249.
22. Frances, A.(2013).Saving normal: An insider's revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life.New York:William Morrow.
23. Gantt, E. E.,Williams, R. N.(2016).Explanation versus understanding in psychology: A human science approach.The qualitative vision for psychology: An invitation to a human science approach,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania:
24. Gordon, C.(Ed.)(1980).Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977.Brighton, Sussex:Harvester Press.
25. Hjørland, B.(2016).The paradox of atheoretical classification.Knowledge Organization,43(5),313-323.
26. Insel, T. (2013). Transforming diagnosis. Retrieved (2018/01/17) from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml
27. Levinas, E.(Ed.),Peperzak, A. T.(Ed.),Critchley, S.(Ed.),Bernasconi, R.(Ed.)(1996).Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
28. Luhrmann, T. M.(2000).Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry.New York:Knopf.
29. Mayes, R.,Horwitz, A. V.(2005).DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness.Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences,41(3),249-267.
30. Mojtabai, R.,Olfson, M.(2008).National trends in psychotherapy by office-based psychiatrists.Archives of General Psychiatry,65(8),962-970.
31. Olfson, M.,Marcus, S. C.(2010).National trends in outpatient psychotherapy.American Journal of Psychiatry,167(12),1456-1463.
32. Olfson, M.,Marcus, S. C.,Druss, B.,Pincus, H. A.(2002).National trends in the use of outpatient psychotherapy.American Journal of Psychiatry,159(11),1914-1920.
33. Olfson, M.,Marcus, S. C.,Pincus, H. A.(1999).Trends in office-based psychiatric practice.American Journal of Psychiatry,156(3),451-457.
34. Paris, J.(Ed.),Phillips, J.(Ed.)(2013).Making the DSM-5.New York, NY:Springer.
35. Reise, M. F.(1988).Are psychiatric educators "losing the mind"?.American Journal of Psychiatry,145(2),148-153.
36. Richards, G.(2010).Putting psychology in its place: Critical historical perspectives.London:Routledge.
37. Schacht, T.,Nathan, P. E.(1977).But is it good for the psychologists? Appraisal and status of DSM-III.American Psychologist,32(12),1017-1025.
38. Shorter, E.(2015).What psychiatry left out of the DSM-5: Historical mental disorders today.New York:Routledge.
39. Sudak, D. M.,Goldberg, D. A.(2012).Trends in psychotherapy training: A national survey of psychiatry residency training.Academic Psychiatry,36(5),369-373.
40. Toombs, S. K.(1992).The meaning of illness: A phenomenological account of the different perspectives of physician and patient.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Vaillant, G. E.(1984).The disadvantages of DSM-III outweigh its advantages.American Journal of Psychiatry,141(4),542-545.
42. Vanheule, S.(2014).Diagnosis and the DSM: A critical review.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Watters, E.(2010).Crazy like us: The globalization of the American psyche.New York:Free Press.
44. Whitaker, R.(2002).Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill.Cambridge, MA:Perseus Pub..
45. Whitaker, R.(2010).Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of mental illness in America.New York:Crown Publishers.
46. Whitaker, R.,Cosgrove, L.(2015).Psychiatry under the influence: Institutional corruption, social injury and prescriptions for reform.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Wilson, M.(1993).DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: A history.American Journal of Psychiatry,150(3),399-410.
48. 台大心理學系季報（2014年）。人物專訪—吳英璋教授。台大心理學系季報，103年10月。擷取（2018/01/14）自http://www.psy.ntu.edu.tw/circulations/201410/interview.Html
49. 張明永(1994)。精神科專科醫師之養成：檢討與瞻望。中華心理衛生學刊，7(1)，51-64。