影響台中縣市公立國小數學領域初任教師效能感發展因素之個案研究

A Case Study on Factors Influencing the Development of Beginning Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Efficacy-An Example in Taichung

10.6173/CJSE.2009.1701.02

張宇樑(Yu-Liang Chang)；吳樎椒(Su-Chiao Wu)

初任教師 ； 教師效能感 ； 國小數學 ； 效能感發展 ； Beginning Teacher ； Teacher Efficacy ； Elementary Mathematics ； Efficacy Development

科學教育學刊

17卷1期（2009 / 02 / 01）

27 - 48

繁體中文

本研究旨在以多重個案整體設計，探究在任教第一年間影響國小數學領域初任教師效能感發展之因素。研究者以數學教師效能感量表篩選出六位台中縣市國小數學領域初任教師作為個案，並進行觀察、訪談、及相關文件等資料之蒐集，再藉由編輯分析式之策略進行資料分析。研究發現：數學領域初任教師效能感之發展受內在條件「教師專業（含數學領域背景知識與經驗、教師教學理念）」與外在條件「同儕互動及行政支援（含同儕互動、學校行政及資源之協助）」之影響。其中，由內在條件衍生之精熟經驗對國小數學領域初任教師效能感之發展影響最鉅；而源自外在條件之替代經驗與生理激勵則是效能感發展的重要來源。最後，根據研究結果與討論，提出對提升國小數學領域初任教師效能感的具體建議。

The purpose of this research was to explore factors influencing the development of beginning elementary mathematics teachers' efficacy during the first year of teaching. A multiple-case study design was employed in this study. Cases were six beginning elementary mathematics teachers in the Taichung area, selected based on their efficacy ratings on the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument. Targeted factors that would influence beginning teacher efficacy were identified by the editing analytic techniques through the data collected from interviews, recordings, observations, and both researchers' and beginning teachers’ reflections. According to the data analysis, findings were reported as follows: First, beginning elementary mathematics teacher efficacy was mainly influenced by ”internal condition” and ”external condition” factors, which were ”teachers' professional background and beliefs” and ”peer-interaction and administrative support”respectively. In addition, beginning teachers' mastery experiences generated from the internal condition factor had a great deal of influence on their efficacy development. Vicarious experiences and physiological arousal cues originating from the external condition factor became relatively important sources of their efficacy development. Based on these findings, concrete recommendations are proposed for the improvement of beginning elementary mathematics teachers' efficacy.

1. 靳知勤(2008)。台灣STS教育領域學位論文之發展回顧與評析。科學教育學刊，16(4)，1-23。
   連結：
2. Aikenhead, G.,J. Solomon,G. Aikenhead(Eds.)(1994).STS education: International perspectives on reform.New York:Teachers College Press.
3. Aikenhead, G.,R. Cross (Ed.)(2003).A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter Fensham.New York:Routledge Falmer.
4. Alters, S. J.(1997).Nature of science: a diversity or uniformity of ideas.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(10),1105-1108.
5. Alters, S. J.(1997).Whose nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(1),39-55.
6. Bloor, D.(1976).Knowledge and social imagery.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7. Bowden, G.,S. J. Jasanoff,G. E. Markle,J. C. Petersen,T. Pinch(Eds.)(1995).Coming of age in STS.Handbook of science and technology studies,64-79.
8. Bybee, R. W.(Ed.)(1985).Science-technology-society: 1985 NSTA yearbook.Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association.
9. Cheek, D. W.,D. D. Kumar,D. E. Chu-bin(Eds.)(2000).Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice.New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
10. Duschl, R.,Erduran, S.,Grandy, R.,Rudolph, J.(2006).Guest editorial: Science studies and science education call for papers.Science Education,90(6),961-964.
11. Edge, D.,S. J. Jasanoff,G. E. Markle,J. C. Petersen,T. Pinch(Eds.)(1995).Handbook of science and technology studies.
12. Fensham, P. J.(1988).Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education.International Journal of Science Education,10,346-56.
13. Fensham, P. J.,P. W. Jackson(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum.New York:Macmillan.
14. Hackett, E. J.,Amsterdamska, O.,Lynch, M.,Wajcman, J.,E. J. Hackett,O. Amsterdamska,M. Lynch,J. Wajcman(Eds.)(2008).The handbook of science and technology studies.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
15. Hall, W. C.(1982).Science/technology/society education: Reasons for current interest and problems to overcome.Paper presented to The 2nd IOSTE symposium,Nottingham, UK:
16. Harm, N. C.(1977).A proposal prepared for the National Science Foundation.Boudler:University of Colorado.
17. Hess, D. J.(1997).Science studies: An advanced introduction.New York:New York University.
18. Holford, D.(1982).Training science teachers for science-technology-society roles.Paper presented to the 2nd IOSTE symposium,Nottingham, UK:
19. Hurd, P. DeH.(1975).Science, technology, and society: New goals for interdisciplinary science teaching.Science Teacher,42(2),27-30.
20. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
21. Kuhn, T. S.(1977).The essential tension-selected studies in scientific tradition and change.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
22. Latour, B.(1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
23. Lochhead, J.,Yager, R. E.,R. E. Yager (Ed)(1996).Science/technology/society as reform in science education.NY:State University of New York Press.
24. Marylin, L.(1985).Science-technology-society in the science curriculum. ERIC/SMEAC Special Digest No. 2. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED274513.Columbus, OH:SMEAC: Information Reference Center.
25. McCormack, A. J.(1992).Science curriculum resource handbook: A practical guide for k-12 science curriculum.NY:Kraus International Publisher.
26. McGinn, R. E.(1991).Science, Technology, and Society.Englewood Cliffs:Prentice Hall.
27. Merton, R. K.(1999).十七世紀英格蘭的科學、技術與社會.北京:商務印書館.
28. Merton, R. K.(1938).Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England.Bruges:St. Catherines Press.
29. Merton, R. K.,R. K. Merton(Ed.)(1979).The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
30. Nakayama, S.(2001).Paper presented in Asian STS workshop.South Korea:Seoul.
31. John Ziman: Physicist who was concerned with the social significance of science
32. Restivo, S.,S. J. Jasanoff,G. E. Markle,J. C. Petersen,T. Pinch(Eds.)(1995).Handbook of science and technology studies.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
33. Roth, W.-M.,Tobin, K.(2006).Announcing cultural studies of science education.Cultural Studies of Science Education,1(1),1-5.
34. Sadler, T. D.(2004).Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(5),513-536.
35. SISCON-in-schools, (Science in a Social Context)(1983).United Kingdom Basil Blackwell and the Association for Science Education.
36. Sismondo, S.(2004).An introduction to science and technology studies.Oxford:Blackwell.
37. Sismondo, S.,E. J. Hackett,O. Amsterdamska,M. Lynch,J. Wajcman(Eds.)(2008).The handbook of science and technology studies.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
38. Smit, W. A.,S. J. Jasanoff,G. E. Markle,J. C. Petersen,T. Pinch(Eds.)(1995).Handbook of science and technology studies.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
39. Smith, M. U.,Lederman, N. G.,Bell, R. L.,McComas, W. F.,Clough, M. P.(1997).How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(10),1101-1103.
40. Snow, C. P.(1959).The two cultures and a second look.London:Cambridge University Press.
41. Solomon, J.(1993).teaching science, technology and society.Buckingham:Open University Press.
42. Solomon, J.(2006).John Michael Ziman, FRS-16 May 1925-2 January 2005.Journal of Consciousness Studies,13(5),5-7.
43. Solomon, J.(1993).Teaching science, technology and society.Buckingham:Open University Press.
44. Solomon, J.,Aikenhead, G.,J. Solomon,G. Aikenhead(Eds.)(1994).STS education: International perspectives on reform.New York:Teachers College Press.
45. Solomon, J.,R. E. Yager(Ed.)(1996).Science/technology/society as reform in science education.NY:State University of New York Press.
46. Yager, R. E.(1990).The science/technology/society movement in the United States: Its origin, evolution, and rationale.Social Education,54,198-201.
47. Yager, R. E.,R. E. Yager (Ed.)(1996).Science/technology/society as reform in science education.NY:State University of New York Press.
48. Yager, R. E.,R. E. Yager(Ed.)(1996).Science/technology/society as reform in science education.NY:State University of New York Press.
49. Zeidler, D. L.,Sadler, T. D.,Simmons, M. L.,Howes, E. V.(2005).Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education.Science Education,89,357-377.
50. Ziman, J.(1978).Reliable knowledge: an exploration of the grounds for belief in science.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
51. Ziman, J.(1976).The force of knowledge: the scientific dimension of society.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
52. Ziman, J.(2000).Real science: What it is, and what it means.Cambridge::Cambridge University Press.
53. Ziman, J.(1980).Teaching and learning about science and society.London:Cambridge University Press.
54. Ziman, J.(1984).An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology.London:Cambridge University Press.
55. 王澄霞(1995)。STS活動中之「學」與「教」。科學教育學刊，3(1)，115-137。
56. 吳璧純(2001)。科學－科技－社會(STS)教育思潮及教學取向。教育研究月刊，92，69-76。
57. 李國秀(2000)。科學的社會視角。合肥:安徽人民出版社。
58. 佘曉清(1994)。各國STS課程教材評介（四）－美國的科學－技術－社會(STS)教育。科學教育月刊，171，12-17。
59. 林志忠(1998)。STS/科技素養教育的現況與發展。中學教育學報，5，129-142。
60. 林崇熙(2000)。從兩種文化到「科技與社會」。通識教育季刊，7(4)，39-58。
61. 林崇熙、傅大為(1995)。歷史中的台灣科學－關於「台灣科學史」研究的回顧與檢討。新史學，6(4)，165-198。
62. 林顯輝(1991)。科學、技學和社會三者相結合的科學教育理念。國教天地，87，24-32。
63. 邱美虹(1994)。科學課程革新－評介Project2061，SS&C和STS理念。科學教育月刊，174，2-14。
64. 范岱年(1999)。十七世紀英格蘭的科學、技術與社會。北京:商務印書館。
65. 祝平一(1999)。展望台灣的科技與醫療史研究：一個當代台灣知識社群的分析。台灣史研究，4(2)，157-174。
66. 郭俊立(2007)。巴黎學派的行動者網絡理論及其哲學意蘊評析。自然辯證法研究，23(2)，104-108。
67. 陳文典(1997)。STS教學教師所需之專業準備。科學教育學刊，5(2)，167-189。
68. 陳瑞麟(2007)。展望二十一世紀的「科技、醫療與社會」：本刊簡史與宗旨。科技、醫療與社會，4，5-12。
69. 傅大為、吳嘉苓主編(2004)。科技渴望性別。台北:群學出版社。
70. 黃俊儒、楊文金(1997)。中華民國科學教育前瞻與回顧研討會彙編。台北:師範大學。
71. 黃達三(1992)。科學技學∕社會(STS)和小學科學教育。國教月刊，38(1.2)，30-39。
72. 黃鴻博(1995)。當代科學教育改革運動（上）。國教輔導，34(1)，18-23。
73. 楊榮祥(1995)。建構論STS和實際教學－西澳的實驗學校一例。科學教育月刊，176，4-17。
74. 雷祥麟、吳嘉苓主編(2004)。科技渴望社會。
75. 魏明通(1998)。科學－技術－社會(STS)教育簡介。台灣教育，575，2-9。
76. 蘇育任(1997)。運用模組開發活動培育STS教師之可行性研究。科學教育學刊，5(2)，245-266。

1. 羅寶鳳,陳麒(2020)。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，37-71。
2. 彭文萱、陳景期、林容妃(2012)。國小優質科學教師教學專業發展指標及權重分配系統之建置：科學教師社群之觀點。教育實踐與研究，25(2)，131-162。
3. 張宇樑(2011)。國小五年級學生數學自我效能感之調查研究。科學教育學刊，19(6)，507-530。
4. (2011)。從教師效能感之循環發展理論談如何提升教師效能感。教育研究月刊，206，93-104。