题名

以方法目的鏈探討獵人學校傳統生態知識之價值建構

并列篇名

Value Construction of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Indigenous Hunting Schools Using a Means-End Approach

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2016.2402.02

作者

林慧年(Hui-Nien Lin);王俊秀(Chin-Shou Wang);台邦‧撒沙勒(Sasala Taiban)

关键词

方法目的鏈 ; 傳統生態知識 ; 環境教育 ; 環境解說 ; 獵人學校 ; Means-End ; Traditional Ecological Knowledge ; Environment Education ; Interpretation ; Indigenous Hunting Schools

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷2期(2016 / 06 / 01)

页次

139 - 165

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

聯合國多項公約皆明言原住民傳統生態知識(Traditional Ecological Knowledge, TEK)與永續發展的高度關聯性,面對TEK在原民社會的流失與瓦解,獵人學校的崛起肩負著TEK傳承的角色,在國際科聯所明列的五大永續發展研究之優先項目,其中一項就是強調「永續發展架構下的行為、文化及價值觀探討」,因此本研究旨在運用方法目的鏈的理論與分析,來瞭解原住民耆老對於獵人學校TEK的價值建構,運用立意取樣以及滾雪球抽樣法,總共訪談32位原住民耆老獵人,結果發現受訪者認為獵人學校所傳授的TEK,反映出五項價值,包含「生存」、「祖靈」、「分享」、「英雄」和「倫理」,進一步探索這些價值與永續實踐的關聯,發現除了過去文獻所強調的靈性價值之外,社會資本(social capital)也是關鍵之一,最後進一步討論本研究結果於環境教育及解說的應用。

英文摘要

According to the United Nations, Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is highly relevant to indigenous societies for resource management. Hunting schools in Taiwan play an important role to transmit TEK across generations to combat the forces of cultural erosion. One of the five research priorities of sustainable development suggested by International Council for Science (2005) was to understand the role of behavior, culture and values under the framework of sustainability. Based on this recommendation, a study was designed to explore a range of values associated with TEK which are taught in indigenous hunting schools using a meansend technique. A total of 32 elders were interviewed using purposive and snowball sampling procedures. Results indicated that hunting practices were based on five core values, including "survival," "ancestral beings," "sharing," "heroism" and "ethics." These themes revealed, in addition to spiritual worldviews highlighted by previous studies, that social capital was an important way to promote sustainability using TEK. Applications of this study extend to environmental education and interpretation, especially for discussions on sustainability.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 包正豪(2009)。原住民部落觀光發展的困境與策略─宜蘭縣南澳鄉金洋及武塔部落個案研究。台灣原住民族研究季刊,2(4),87-109。
    連結:
  2. 何致中(2011)。社會資本與原住民部落觀光的發展:一個泰雅部落的個案研究。華岡地理學報,28,19-30。
    連結:
  3. 林益仁(2003)。原住民狩獵文化與動物解放運動可能結盟嗎?─一個土地倫理學的觀點。中外文學,32(2),73-102。
    連結:
  4. 陳彥君、陳瑩世(2014)。獵人學校中的形塑文化─以台東鸞山、拉勞藍部落、花蓮水璉部落為例。台灣原住民族研究季刊,7(3),39-81。
    連結:
  5. 傅仰止(2001)。網路人口的樣本特性:比較網頁調查追蹤方法與個人網絡抽樣方法。調查研究,9,35-72。
    連結:
  6. United Nations. (1992b). Agenda 21. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/Agenda21.pdf
  7. United Nations. (1992a). Rio declaration on environment and development. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm
  8. Castetter, E. F. (1944). The domain of ethnobiology. The American Naturalist, 78(775), 158-170
  9. United Nations. (1992c). Convention on biological biodiversity. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://www.cbd.int/convention/convention.shtml
  10. Adger, W. N.(2003).Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change.Economic Geography,79(4),387-404.
  11. Altieri, M. A.(1995).Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  12. Bagozzi, R. P.,Dabholkar, P. A.(1994).Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis.Psychology & Marketing,11(4),313-340.
  13. Berkes, F.(1999).Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management.Philadelphia, PA:Taylor & Francis.
  14. Berkes, F.(Ed.),Folke, C.(Ed.)(1998).Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience.Cambridge, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  15. Berkes, F.,Colding, J.,Folke, C.(2000).Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management.Ecological Applications,10(5),1251-1262.
  16. Boillat, S.,Berkes, F.(2013).Perception and interpretation of climate change among Quechua farmers of Bolivia: Indigenous knowledge as a resource for adaptive capacity.Ecology and Society,18(4)
  17. Boissière, M.,Locatelli, B.,Sheil, D.,Padmanaba, M.,Sadjudin, E.(2013).Local perceptions of climate variability and change in tropical forests of Papua, Indonesia.Ecology and Society,18(4)
  18. Carter, L.(2004).Thinking differently about cultural diversity: Using postcolonial theory to (re)read science education.Science Education,88(6),819-836.
  19. Cobern, W. W.,Loving, C. C.(2001).Defining "science" in a multicultural world: Implications for science education.Science Education,85(1),50-67.
  20. Conklin, C. H.(1975).Hanunoo agriculture: A report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines.Northford, CT:Elliot's Books.
  21. Evans-Pritchard, E. E.(1963).The comparative method in social anthropology.London, UK:Athlone Press.
  22. Fang, W.-T.,Hu, H.-W.,Lee, C.-S.(2016).Atayal's identification of sustainability: Traditional ecological knowledge and indigenous science of a hunting culture.Sustainability Science,11(1),33-43.
  23. Fanon, F.(1967).Black skin white masks.New York, NY:Grove Press.
  24. Folke, C.(2006).Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses.Global Environmental Change,16(3),253-267.
  25. Fraser, B. J.(Ed.),Tobin, K.(Ed.),McRobbie, C. J.(Ed.)(2011).Second international handbook of science education.New York, NY:Springer.
  26. Frauman, E.,Norman, W.,Klenosky, D. B.(1998).Using means-end theory to understand visitors within a nature-based interpretive setting: A comparison of two methods.Tourism Analysis,2,161-174.
  27. Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  28. Geertz, C.(1983).Local knowledge: Future essays in interpretive anthropology.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  29. Gengler, C. E.,Klenosky, D. B.,Mulvey, M. S.(1995).Improving the graphic representation of means-end results.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12(3),245-256.
  30. Goldenberg, M. A.,Klenosky, D. B.,O'Leary, J. T.,Templin, T. J.(2000).A means-end investigation of rope course experiences.Journal of Leisure Research,32(2),208-224.
  31. Gómez-Baggethun, E.,Corbera, E.,Reyes-García, V.(2013).Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: Research findings and policy implications.Ecology and Society,18(4)
  32. Gómez-Baggethun, E.,Reyes-García, V.,Olsson, P.,Montes, C.(2012).Traditional ecologicalknowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain.Global Environmental Change,22(3),640-650.
  33. Grenier, L.(1998).Working with indigenous knowledge: A guide for researcher.Ottawa, CA:International Development Research Centre.
  34. Grunert, K. G.,Grunert, S. C.(1995).Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical consideration and methodological problems.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12(3),209-225.
  35. Gutman, J.(1982).A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes.Journal of Marketing,46(2),60-72.
  36. Haras, K.,Bunting, C. J.,Witt, P. A.(2006).Meaningful involvement opportunities in ropes course programs.Journal of Leisure Research,38(3),339-362.
  37. International Council for Science(2002).Science, traditional knowledge and sustainable development.
  38. International Council for Science(2005).Harnessing science, technology and innovation for sustainable development.
  39. International Union for Conservation of Nature(1970).,Gland, CH:International Union for Conservation of Nature.
  40. Klaus, P.,Maklan, S.(2011).Bridging the gap for destination extreme sports: A model of sports tourism customer experience.Journal of Marketing Management,27(13-14),1341-1365.
  41. Klenosky, D. B.(2002).The "pull" of tourism destinations: A means-end investigation.Journal of Travel Research,40(4),385-395.
  42. Klenosky, D. B.,Gengler, C. E.,Mulvey, M. S.(1993).Understanding the factors influencing ski destination choice: A means-end analytic approach.Journal of Leisure Research,25(4),62-379.
  43. Larsen, D. L.(Ed.)(2003).Meaningful interpretation: How to connect hearts and minds to places, objects, and other resources.Fort Washington, PA:Eastern National.
  44. Lévi-Strauss, C.,Weightman, J.(Trans.),Weightman, D.(Trans.)(1983).The raw and the cooked.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  45. Lin, H.-N.,Morgan, M.,Coble, T.(2013).Remember the Alamo: A cross-cultural analysis of visitor meanings.Journal of Travel Research,52(1),42-55.
  46. López-Mosquera, N.,Sánchez, M.(2011).The influence of personal values in the economicuse valuation of peri-urban green spaces: An application of the means-end chain theory.Tourism Management,32(4),875-889.
  47. Martinez-Alier, J.(Ed.),Muradian, R.(Ed.)(2015).Handbook of ecological economics.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
  48. McCarter, J.,Gavin, M. C.(2014).Local perception of changes in traditional ecological knowledge: A case study from Malekula Island, Vanuatu.Ambio,43(3),288-296.
  49. Nazarea, V. D.(Ed.)(1999).Ethnoecology: Situated knowledge/located lives.Tucson, AZ:University of Arizona Press.
  50. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  51. Overby, J. W.,Gardial, S. F.,Woodruff, R. B.(2004).French versus American consumers' attachment of value to a product in a common consumption context: A cross-national comparison.Journal of Academy of Marketing Science,32(4),437-460.
  52. Park, C. W.,Jaworski, B. J.,MacInnis, D. J.(1986).Strategic brand concept/ image management.Journal of Marketing,50(4),135-145.
  53. Pearce, T.,Ford, J.,Willox, A. C.,Smit, B.(2015).Inuit traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) subsistence hunting and adaptation to climate change in the Canadian Arctic.Arctic,68(2),233-245.
  54. Perreault, T.(2003).Social capital, development, and indigenous politics in Ecuadorian Amazonia.Geographical Review,93(3),328-349.
  55. Pichón, F. J.(Ed.),Uquillas, J. E.(Ed.),Frechione, J.(Ed.)(1999).Traditional and modern natural resource management in Latin America.Pittsburg, PA:University of Pittsburg Press.
  56. Pretty, J. N.,Ward, H.(2001).Social capital and the environment.World Development,29(2),209-227.
  57. Pretty, J.,Smith, D.(2004).Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management.Conservation Biology,18(3),631-638.
  58. Reynolds, T. J.,Gutman, J.(1988).Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation.Journal of Advertising Research,28(1),11-31.
  59. Ruiz-Mallén, I.,Corbera, E.(2013).Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge: Implications for social-ecological resilience.Ecology & Society,18(4)
  60. Rust, R. T.(Ed.),Oliver, R. L.(Ed.)(1994).Service quality: New directions in theory and practice.Thousand Oak, CA:Sage.
  61. Said, E. W.(1978).Orientalism.New York, NY:Vintage Books.
  62. Sheth, J. N.,Newman, B. I.,Gross, B. L.(1991).Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications.Cincinnati, OH:South-Western.
  63. Silverman, L. H.(1997).Personalizing the past: A review of literature with implications for historical interpretation.Journal of Interpretation Research,2(1),1-12.
  64. Snively, G.,Corsiglia, J.(2001).Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education.Science Education,85(1),6-34.
  65. Stanley, W. B.,Brickhouse, N. W.(2001).Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited.Science Education,85(1),35-49.
  66. Takano, T.,Higgins, P.,McLaughlin, P.(2009).Connecting with place: Implications of integrating cultural values into the school curriculum in Alaska.Environmental Education Research,15(3),343-370.
  67. Thomas, K.(1983).Man and the natural world: A history of the modern sensibility.New York, NY:Pantheon Books.
  68. Tilbury, D.(1995).Environmental Education for Sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s.Environmental Education Research,1(2),195-212.
  69. Tilden, F.(1957).Interpreting our heritage: Principles and practices for visitor services in parks, museums, and historic places.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
  70. Usher, P. J.(2000).Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management.Arctic,53(2),183-193.
  71. Valette-Florence, P.,Rapacchi, B.(1991).Improvements in means-end chain analysis.Journal of Advertising Research,31,30-45.
  72. Watkins, L. J.,Gnoth, J.(2011).Japanese tourism values: A means-end investigation.Journal of Travel Research,50(6),654-668.
  73. 王俊秀(2001)。環境社會學的想像。臺北市:巨流。
  74. 王俊秀(1999)。全球變遷與變遷全球─環境社會學的視野。臺北市:巨流。
  75. 台邦‧撒沙勒、劉炯錫、劉子銘(2010)。狩獵文化的持續與變遷:藉由GIS在好茶(Kucapungane)的觀察與發現。原住民自然人文期刊,2,121-154。
  76. 李英明(2003)。全球化下的後殖民省思。臺北市:生智。
  77. 亞榮隆‧撒可努(1998)。山豬‧飛鼠‧撒可努。臺北市:耶魯。
  78. 亞榮隆‧撒可努(2003)。拉勞蘭部落青年會─獵人會所。原住民教育季刊,31,93-120。
  79. 林益仁、禇縈瑩(2006)。原住民「學習型部落」的理論與實踐:一個生態學的觀點。舞動民族教育精靈─台灣原住民族教育論叢‧部落教育,臺北市:
  80. 柯亞璇(2009)。新北市,淡江大學建築學系研究所。
  81. 盧道杰、吳雯菁、裴家騏、台邦‧撒沙勒(2006)。建構社區保育、原住民狩獵與野生動物經營管理間的連結。地理學報,46,1-29。
被引用次数
  1. 許世璋、林佳靜(2017)。地方本位環境教育課程的實踐—以東臺灣一個原住民小學為例。科學教育學刊,25(4),301-330。
  2. 賴昱年,張凱智(2022)。來!去!後山過日子!-探索花、東地區生活風格移居者的價值意涵。地理學報,102,3-36。
  3. 林正士(2021)。老兵不死-以方法目的鏈探討老兵戰地懷舊觀光之異質性與價值內涵。戶外遊憩研究,34(2),33-80。
  4. 顏芝芸,陳佳利,江懿德,方偉達(2023)。應用「方法目的鏈」探究高雄兒童美術館「圖案,真奇妙!」特展之錄影分析。藝術教育研究,45,35-70。
  5. (2019)。實踐里海環境教育:綠色休閒漁場發展環境教育課程方案之行動研究。環境教育學刊,17,35-59。
  6. (2020)。歸根結柢:以傳統永績森林智慧作為永續發展教育的根。教育學刊,54,1-42。