家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量

A Triad Model of Paternalistic Leadership: Constructs and Measurement

鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng)；周麗芳(Li-Fang Chou)；樊景立(Jiing-Lih Farh)

仁慈領導 ； 威權領導 ； 家長式領導 ； 德行領導 ； 確認性因素分析 ； Paternalistic leadership ； authoritarian leadership ； benevolent leadership ； moral leadership ； confirmatory factor analysis

本土心理學研究

14期（2000 / 12 / 01）

3 - 64

繁體中文

家長式領導是華人社會特有的領導型態之一，其特色是在一種人治的氛圍下，彰顯父親般的仁慈與威嚴，並具有道德的無私典範。針對此一現象，目前已有文化根源的分析與概念的探討，可惜仍未有量化的實徵性研究，理由是欠缺具一定信、效度的工具，來測量此一概念。本文的目的即在過去的研究基礎上，補足此一缺口，根據家長式領導的三種組成要素：威權、仁慈及德行，來編製家長式領導量表(Paternalistic Leadership Scale, PLS)，並以確認性因素分析(confirmatory factor analysis)來檢驗其概念建構。結果顯示，在台灣企業組織與教育組織的樣本中，證明了此量表具有不錯的內部一致性信度，且不論是仁慈、德行及威權分量表，或整個家長式領導三元模式的確認性因素分析，皆現出不錯的建構效度。最後，討論了本研究的結果及家長式領導的未來研究方向。

Paternalistic leadership, an indigenous leadership style in Chinese societies, is characterized by revealing fatherly benevolence and authoritarianism with moral integrity in a ”personalistic” atmosphere. Using this definition, a triad model of paternalistic leadership was theoretically built and traced to Chinese cultural origins. However, up to the present, there is no quantitative empirical research in this domain. This study was designed to complement this defect. According to the three constituent elements of paternalistic leadership (PL), namely, authoritarianism, benevolence, and morality, we constructed the Paternalistic Leadership Scale (PLS) and employed confirmatory factor analysis to examine its factorial composition. Within the samples from business organizations and education institutions in Taiwan, this scale was shown to have adequate internal consistency and clear factorial structure. Moreover, the PLS correlated with several related measures in a predictable manner. We concluded with discussion of our research findings, limitations, and implications for future research on paternalistic leadership.

1. 樊景立 Farh, Jiing-Lih、 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析 A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organization。本土心理學研究 Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies，13
   連結：
2. 樊景立 Farh, Jiing-Lih, 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(2000).Management and organizations in the Chinese context.London:Macmillan.
   連結：
3. Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3)
4. Bass, B. M.(1985).Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations.New York:The Free Press.
5. Bellah, R. N.(1970).Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post-traditional world.New York:Harper and Row.
6. Birnbaum, P. J., Wong, G. Y. Y.(1985).Cultural values of managers in the people's republic of China and Hong Kong.American Academy of Management Meetings,San Diego:
7. Boisot, Max, Child, John(1996).From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order.Administrative Science Quarterly,41(4)
8. Bowers, D. G., Seashore, S. E.(1966).Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership.Administrative Science Quarterly,11(2)
9. Chan, W. S.(1963).A Source book in Chinese philosophy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
10. Chemers, M. M.(1993).Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions.New York:Academic Press.
11. Chong, L. E., Cragin, J. P., Scherling, S. A.(1983).Manager work-related values in a Chinese corporation.Academy of International Business Annual Meeting,San Francisco:
12. DeVellis, R. F.(1991).Scale development: Theory and applications.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
13. Fleishman, E. A.(1953).The description of supervisory behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,37
14. Gorsuch, R. L.(1997).Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis.Journal of Personality Assessment,68
15. Hamilton, G. G.(1990).Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: A comparison of China and Western Europe.British Journal of Sociology,41(1)
16. Hamilton, G. G.(1997).The economic organization of East Asian capitalism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
17. Hofstede, G. H.(1980).Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.London and Beverly Hill:Sage.
18. Hofstede, G. H., Bond, M. H.(1988).The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth.Organizational Dynamics,16(4)
19. House, R. J.(2001).Dynamics of charismatic leadership: A process theory, simulation model, and tests.Leadership Quarterly,12
20. House, R. J., Mitchell, T. R.(1974).Path-goal theory of leadership.Journal of Contemporary Business,3
21. House, R. J., Wright, N. S., Aditya, R. N.(1997).New Perspectives on international industrial/ organizational psychology.
22. Kelloway, E. K.(1995).Structural equation modeling in perspective.Journal of Organizational Behavior,16
23. Lai, T., Lam, Y.(1986).A study on work-related values of managers in the People's Republic of China.The Hong Kong Manager,Feb/ Mar
24. Lai, T., Lam, Y.(1986).A study on work-related values of managers in the People's Republic of China.The Hong Kong Manager,Apr/ May
25. Lai, T., Lam, Y.(1986).A study on work-related values of managers in the People's Republic of China.The Hong Kong Manager,Dec/ Jan
26. Marsh, H., Grayson, D.(1994).Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: Common, time-specific, item-specific, and residual-error components of variance.Structural Equation Modeling,1
27. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
28. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Bommer, W. H.(1996).Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership As Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.Journal of Management,22(2)
29. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., Fetter, R.(1990).Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors.The Leadership Quarterly,1(2)
30. Pye, L. W.(1985).Asia Power and Politics.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
31. Pye, Lucian W.(1981).The Dynamics of Chinese Politics.Cambridge, Mass.:Oelgeschlager, Gunn ＆ Hain.
32. Redding, S. G.(1990).The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism.Berlin; New York:Walter de Gruyter.
33. Silin, R. H.(1976).Leadership and values: the Organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises.Cambridge, MA:East Asian Research Center, Harvard University Press.
34. Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H.(1993).Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives.Needham, MA:Allyn ＆ Bacon.
35. Smith, R. J.(1994).China's cultural heritage: The Qing dynasty, 1644-1912.Colorado:Westview Press.
36. Stogdill, R. M.(1974).Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of the Literature.New York, NY:Free Press.
37. Westwood, R. I.(1997).Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for 'paternalistic headship' among the overseas Chinese.Organization Studies,18(3)
38. Westwood, R. I., Chan, A.(1992).Organizational behavior: A Southeast Asian perspective.Hong Kong:Longman Group.
39. Whitley, R. D.(1992).Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies.London:Sage Publications.
40. Yukl, G. A.(1998).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
41. 三隅二不二 Misumi, J., Petterson, M. F.(1985).The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of Japanese research program.Administrative Science Quarterly,30
42. 何友暉 Ho, D. Y. F.(1994).Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies.Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs,120
43. 余英時 Yu, Ying-Shih(1976)。史學與傳統。台北:時報出版公司。
44. 凌文輇 Ling, Wen-Quan(1991)。中國人．中國心：人格與社會篇。台北:遠流出版公司。
45. 凌文輇 Ling, Wen-Quan、 陳龍 、 王登(1987)。領導行為評價量表的建構。心理學報，19
46. 徐聯倉(1989).Advances in organizational psychology.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
47. 楊國樞 Yang, Kuo-Shu(1995)。家族化歷程、泛家族主義及組織管理 Familization, pan-familism, and organizational management。台灣與大陸的企業文化及人力資源管理研討會論文集 Proceedings of the Conference on Taiwan's and China Mainland's Organizational Culture and Manpower Management, Vol. 1，台北:
48. 楊聯陞(1957).Chinese thought and institutions.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
49. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1996)。家長權威與領導行為之關係探討（二）家長權威與領導行為之關係探討（二）,行政院國家科學委員會。
50. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1995)。不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係：台灣民營企業的實徵研究不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係：台灣民營企業的實徵研究,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
51. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個臺灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica，79
52. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為 Chaxu geju (concentric relational configuration) and Chinese organizational behavior。本土心理學研究 Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies，3
53. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan(1990)。領導與情境－互動心理學研究途徑。台北:大洋出版社。
54. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan、 莊仲仁 Chuang, Chong-Jen(1981)。基層軍事幹部有效領導行為之因素分析：領導績效、領導角色與領導行為之關係。中華心理學刊 Chinese Journal of Psychology，23(2)
55. 鄭伯壎 Cheng, Bor-Shiuan、 樊景立 Farh, Jiing-Lih(2001)。初探華人社會的社會取向：台灣與大陸之比較研究 Social Orientation in Chinese Societies: A Comparison of Employees from Taiwan and Chinese Mainland。中華心理學刊 Chinese Journal of Psychology，43(2)

1. 簡玉庭(2016)。空軍後勤單位家長式領導對組織承諾影響之研究─信任干擾效果之驗證。長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班（EMBA）學位論文。2016。1-83。