题名

工作偏私與情感偏私：雙構面差序式領導的區分效果

并列篇名

Favoritism Behavior with Work-Related and Affect-Related Resources: The Differential Effects of Two-Dimensional Differential Leadership

DOI

10.6254/IPRCS.202012_(54).0001

作者

謝佩儒(Pei-Ju Hsieh)；鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng)；周婉茹(Wan-Ju Chou)

关键词

上下關係認定 ； 工作績效 ； 主管忠誠 ； 差序式領導 ； 資源理論 ； differential leadership ； job performance ； loyalty to supervisor ； resource theory ； vertical relational identity

期刊名称

本土心理學研究

卷期/出版年月

54期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

3 - 62

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

差序式領導是華人組織中相當特殊的領導風格，領導者會依據部屬與自己的親疏遠近，給予不同的對待方式。然而，過去相關研究卻顯示其對部屬效能的作用並不一致。為了解答此一矛盾的現象，本研究以資源理論為基礎，主張差序式領導可區分為兩個構面：其一為在經濟或工作相關資源上，進行偏私分配的工作型差序式領導；其二為在情感相關資源上，進行偏私分配的情感型差序式領導。其後，更進一步探討雙構面差序式領導對部屬工作績效與主管忠誠的預測效果，並根據「認定配對原則」檢驗部屬上下關係認定的調節作用。本研究先蒐集314筆企業員工樣本，隨機分成兩筆進行因素分析，確認了差序式領導的雙構面模式與區分效度。接著，再蒐集251對同事對偶樣本，以結構方程模型進行檢驗，並發現僅工作型差序式領導對工作績效、主管忠誠具有正向效果，且對工作績效的正向效果較強，支持了資源對應的競爭效果；其次，部屬的情感性上下關係認定會強化情感型差序式領導與主管忠誠的關係，呼應認定配對原則的觀點。
英文摘要

Differential leadership (DL) is a unique leadership style within organizations in the Chinese Confucian culture in which leaders treat ingroup subordinates more favorably than outgroup subordinates. However, past studies have shown inconsistent results with respect to the effect of DL on subordinates' performance. To address this issue, we proposed a two-dimensional model of DL based on resource theory (Foa & Foa, 1974): favoritism with economic and work-related resources (i.e., work-based DL), and favoritism with affect-related resources (i.e., affect-based DL). The aim of this study is to explore the dual dimensions of DL and to examine their differential effects on job performance and loyalty to the supervisor. According to social exchange theory (Blau, 1964), ingroup subordinates who receive more resources from their leaders reciprocate by showing more devotion and loyalty. Outgroup subordinates display behaviors expected by the leader through vicarious learning (姜定宇、鄭伯壎，2014；鄭伯壎，2005). However, the central principle of social exchange is that individuals are most likely to exchange resources with those who possess the same type of resources (Brinberg & Castell, 1982). Accordingly, the impact of work-based DL on job performance should be greater than on loyalty to the supervisor. In contrast, affect-based DL should trigger more loyalty to the supervisor than job performance. In the view of the identity-matching principle (Ullrich, Wieseke, Christ, Schulze, & van Dick, 2007), we also examined the moderating role of the subordinate's vertical relational identity (RI). RI can be divided into instrumental RI and expressive RI. Instrumental RI refers to the subordinate's relational identity encompassing rational calculation and benefit exchange in the vertical dyad, whereas expressive RI refers to the subordinate's relational identity encompassing mutual consideration and the sharing of emotions in the vertical dyad. The former is information and cognition based, and the latter is normative and affect based. Past studies have shown that leadership effectiveness is stronger when the subordinate's self-identity matches the leader's behavior (Hogg & Martin, 2003; Lord & Brown, 2004); if the subordinate's self-identity does not match the leader's behavior, leadership effectiveness is reduced (Ullrich et al., 2007). Since the content of economic and work-related resources is consistent with the connotation of instrumental RI, the relationship between work-based DL and job performance and loyalty to the supervisor should be stronger when the subordinate's instrumental RI is high. Furthermore, as work-based DL motivates more job performance than loyalty to the supervisor, the moderating effect of instrumental RI should be stronger on the relationship between work-based DL and job performance. In the same vein, since the content of affect-related resources is consistent with the connotation of expressive RI, the relationship between affect-based DL and job performance and loyalty to the supervisor should be stronger when the subordinate's expressive RI is high. As affect-based DL inspires more loyalty to the supervisor than job performance, the moderating effect of expressive RI should be stronger on the relationship between affect-based DL and loyalty to the supervisor. We first revised the original scale items developed by Jiang and Cheng (姜定宇、鄭伯壎，2014), and also designed some new items based on resource theory. After evaluating content validity, 21 items were retained for factor analysis. Data collected from 341 employees were randomly split into two groups for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The results supported the dual-factor model of DL and its discriminant validity. Another data set containing 251 colleague dyads was collected and tested with structural equation modeling. The results showed that work-based DL is positively related to job performance and loyalty to the supervisor. The former relationship had a stronger effect than the latter, indicating that corresponding resources will have stronger effects. Furthermore, the subordinate's expressive RI positively moderated the effect of affect-based DL on loyalty to the supervisor, which echoes the identity-matching principle. We proposed applying resource theory as the theoretical basis for differentiating the construct domain of DL, and examined its factor structure. We confirmed that the differential effects of the two-dimensional model of DL are in alignment with the identity-matching principle.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. 吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，30，3-63。
    連結：
  2. 林家五,張國義,劉貞妤,林裘緒,陳筱華(2009)。差序對待知覺與同事間信任對公平態度與政治行為之影響。本土心理學研究，31，143-175。
    連結：
  3. 姜定宇(2009)。華人企業主管知覺部屬效忠。中華心理學刊，51(1)，27-45。
    連結：
  4. 姜定宇,張菀真(2010)。華人差序式領導與部屬效能。本土心理學研究，33，109-177。
    連結：
  5. 姜定宇,鄭伯壎(2014)。華人差序式領導的本質與影響歷程。本土心理學研究，42，285-357。
    連結：
  6. 姜定宇,鄭伯壎,鄭紀瑩,周麗芳(2007)。華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構。中華心理學刊，49(4)，407-432。
    連結：
  7. 徐瑋伶,鄭伯壎,黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究，18，51-94。
    連結：
  8. 許金田,廖紘億,胡秀華,游謦銘(2013)。部屬親信關係知覺對其行為的影響：正義知覺的中介角色。臺大管理論叢，23(2)，297-326。
    連結：
  9. 蔡松純,鄭伯壎,周麗芳,姜定宇,鄭弘岳(2009)。領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行為：權力距離之調節效果。中華心理學刊，51(1)，121-138。
    連結：
  10. 諸承明(2000)。親信關係與員工績效評估之關聯性研究─從差序格局探討主管對部屬的評估偏差。管理評論，19(3)，125-147。
    連結：
  11. 鄭伯壎(2004)。本土文化與組織領導：由現象描述到理論驗證。本土心理學研究，22，195-254。
    連結：
  12. 鄭伯壎,姜定宇(2000)。華人組織中的主管忠誠：主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果。本土心理學研究，14，65-113。
    連結：
  13. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.(1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  14. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1991).Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities.Journal of Applied Psychology,76(5),732-740.
  15. Atkinson, S.(2004).Senior management relationships and trust: An exploratory study.Journal of Managerial Psychology,19(6),571-587.
  16. Avery, D. R.,McKay, P. F.,Wilson, D. C.(2007).Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement.Journal of Applied Psychology,92(6),1542-1556.
  17. Bagozzi, R. P.,Edwards, J. R.(1998).A general approach to representing constructs in organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,1(1),45-87.
  18. Bagozzi, R.,Healtherton, T.(1994).A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem.Structural Equation Modeling,1(1),35-67.
  19. Baldwin, M. W.(1992).Relational schemas and the processing of social information.Psychological Bulletin,112(3),461-484.
  20. Baldwin, M. W.,Carrell, S. E.,Lopez, D. F.(1990).Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,26(5),435-454.
  21. Blau, P. M.(1964).Exchange and power in social life.New York:Wiley.
  22. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York:Wiley.
  23. Bollen, K. A.(Ed.),Scott, L. J.(Ed.)(1993).Alternative ways of assessing model fit Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  24. Bollen, K. A.,Harden, J. J.,Ray, S.,Zavisca, J.(2014).BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models.Structural Equation Modeling,21(1),1-19.
  25. Brewer, M. B.,Gardner, W.(1996).Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(1),83-93.
  26. Brinberg, D.,Castell, P.(1982).A resource exchange theory approach to interpersonal interactions: A test of Foa’s theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43(2),260-269.
  27. Chen, C. C.(1995).New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S.comparison.Academy of Management Journal,38(2),408-428.
  28. Cheng、 B. S.,Farh, J. L.,Chang, H. F., Hsu, W.L.(2002).Guanxi, zhongcheng, competence, and managerial behavior in the Chinese context.Journal of Chinese Psychology,44(2),151-162.
  29. Chiu、 C. Y.,Yang C. F.(1987).Chinese subjects’ dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales.Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society,18,39-50.
  30. Coenders, G.,Batista-Foguet, J. M.,Saris, W. E.(2006).Simple, efficient and distribution-free approach to interaction effects in complex structural equation models.Quality & Quantity,42(3),369-396.
  31. Conlon, D. E.,Porter, C. O.,Parks, J. M.(2004).The fairness of decision rules.Journal of Management,30(3),329-349.
  32. Dansereau, F.(Ed.),Yammarino, F. J.(Ed.)(1995).Leadership: The multiple-level approaches.Stamford, CT:JAI Press.
  33. Dansereau, F.,Graen, G.,Haga, W. J.(1975).A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13(1),46-78.
  34. Donnenwerth, G. V.,Foa, U. G.(1974).Effect of resource class on retaliation to injustice in interpersonal exchange.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,29(6),785-793.
  35. Edwards, M. R.,Ewen, A. J.(1996).360°feedback: The powerful new model for employee assessment & performance improvement.New York:Amacom.
  36. Flynn, F. J.(2005).Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations.Academy of Management Review,30(4),737-750.
  37. Foa, U. G.(1971).Interpersonal and economic resources.Science,171,345-351.
  38. Foa, U. G.,Converse, J.,Tomblom, K.,Foa, E. B.(1993).Resource theory: Explorations and applications.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  39. Foa, U. G.,Foa, E. B.(1974).Societal structures of the mind.Springfield, IL:Charles C. Thomas.
  40. Gerstner, C. R.,Day, D. V.(1997).Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.Journal of Applied Psychology,82(6),827-844.
  41. Graen, G. B.,Uhl-Bien, M.(1995).Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.The Leadership Quarterly,6(2),219-247.
  42. Griesinger, D. W.(1990).The human side of economic organization.Academy of Management Review,15(3),478-499.
  43. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R.,Black, W. C.(1995).Multivariate data analysis with readings.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  44. Haslam, S. A.(Ed.),van Knippenberg, D.(Ed.),Platow, M.(Ed.),Ellemers, N.(Ed.)(2003).Social identity analysis of leader-member relations: Reconciling self-categorization and leader-member exchange theories of leadership.New York:Psychology Press.
  45. Hinkin, T. R.(1998).A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires.Organizational Research Methods,1(1),104-121.
  46. Hinkin, T. R.(1995).A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations.Journal of Management,21(5),967-988.
  47. Hinkin, T. R.,Schriesheim, C. A.(1989).The development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power.Journal of Applied Psychology,74(4),561-567.
  48. Hogg, M. A.(Ed.),Cooper, J.(Ed.)(2003).The Sage handbook of social psychology.London:Sage.
  49. Hu、 H. H.,Hsu, W. L.,Cheng, B. S(2004).The reward allocation decision of the Chinese manager: Influences of employee categorization and allocation situation.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7(2),221-232.
  50. Hu, L. T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
  51. Hwang、 K. K.(1987).Face and favor: The Chinese power game.American Journal of Sociology,92(4),945-974.
  52. Hwang、 K. K.(1999).Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2(1),163-183.
  53. Ingram, P.,Zou, X.(2008).Business friendships.Research in Organizational Behavior,28,167-184.
  54. Jiang、 D. Y.,Cheng, B. S.(2008).Affect- and role-based loyalty to supervisors in Chinese organizations.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,11(3),214-221.
  55. Kark, R.,Shamir, B.,Chen, G.(2003).The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(2),246-255.
  56. Kline, R. B.(2004).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Press.
  57. Landis, R. S.,Beal, D. J.,Tesluk, P. E.(2000).A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models.Organizational Research Methods,3(2),186-207.
  58. Leary, M. R.,Tangney, J. P.(2003).Handbook of self and identity.New York:The Guilford Press.
  59. Li、 J. T.(Ed.),Tsui, A. S.(Ed.),Weldon, E.(Ed.)(2000).Management and organizations in the Chinese context.London:Macmillan.
  60. Liden, R. C.,Sparrowe, R. T.,Wayne, S. J.(1997).Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,15,47-120.
  61. Lin、 L. C.,Huang, P. H.,Weng, L. J.(2017).Selecting path models in SEM: A comparison of model selection criteria.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,24(6),855-869.
  62. Little, T. D.,Cunningham, W. A.,Shahar, G.,Widaman, K. F.(2002).To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,9(2),151-173.
  63. Lord, R. G.,Brown, D. J.(2004).Leadership processes and follower identity.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  64. MacCallum, R. C.,Browne, M. W.,Sugawara, H. M.(1996).Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.Psychological Methods,1(2),130-149.
  65. MacKenzie, S. B.,Podsakoff, P. M.,Fetter, R.(1991).Organizational citizenship and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons’ performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(1),123-150.
  66. Markus, H.,Kitayama, S.(1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review,98(2),224-253.
  67. Marsh、 H. W.,Hau, K. -T.,Wen, Z.(2004).In search of golden rules.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,11(3),320-341.
  68. Martin, J.,Harder, J. W.(1994).Bread and roses: Justice and the distribution of financial and socioemotional rewards in organizations.Social Justice Research,7(3),241-264.
  69. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
  70. Podsakoff, P. M.,Todor, W. M.,Skov, R.(1982).Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction.Academy of Management Journal,25(4),810-821.
  71. Redding, S. G.(1990).The spirit of Chinese capitalism.New York:Walter de Gruyter.
  72. Schwab, D. P.(1980).Construct validity in organizational behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior,2,3-43.
  73. Sedikides, C.,Brewer, M. B.(2001).Individual self, relational self, collective self.Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press.
  74. Seers, A.,Wilkerson, J. M.,Grubb, W. L.(2006).Toward measurement of social exchange resources: Reciprocal contributions and receipts.Psychological Reports,98(2),508-510.
  75. Sivo, S. A.,Fan, X.,Witta, E. L.,Willse, J. T.(2006).The search for “optimal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling.The Journal of Experimental Education,74(3),267-288.
  76. Staw, B. M.(1975).Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organization.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13(3),414-432.
  77. Staw, B. M.(Ed.),Cummings, L. L.(Ed.)(1987).Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  78. Sutton, R. I.,Hargadon, A.(1996).Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm.Administrative Science Quarterly,41(4),685-718.
  79. Ullrich, J.,Wieseke, J.,Christ, O.,Schulze, M.,van Dick, R.(2007).The identity matching principle: Corporate and organizational identification in a franchising system.British Journal of Management,18(s1),S29-S44.
  80. van Breukelen, W.,van der Leeden, R.,Wesselius, W.,Hoes, M.(2012).Differential treatment within sports teams, leader-member (coach-player) exchange quality, team atmosphere, and team performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(1),43-63.
  81. van Knippenberg, D.,van Knippenberg, B.,De Cremer, D.,Hogg, M. A.(2004).Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda.The Leadership Quarterly,15(6),825-856.
  82. Walumbwa, F. O.,Wu, C.,Orwa, B.(2008).Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength.The Leadership Quarterly,19(3),251-265.
  83. Westwood, R. I.(1997).Harmony and patriarchy: The culture basis for “paternalistic leadership” among the overseas Chinese.Organization Studies,18(3),445-480.
  84. Wieseke, J.,Ullrich, J.,Christ, O.,van Dick, R.(2007).Organizational identification as a determinant of customer orientation in service organizations.Marketing Letters,18(4),265-278.
  85. Wilson, K. S.,Sin, H. P.,Conlon, D. E.(2010).What about the leader in leader-member exchange? The impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader.Academy of Management Review,35(3),358-372.
  86. Wu、 T. Y.,Hu, C.,Jiang, D. Y.(2012).Is subordinate’s loyalty a precondition of supervisor’s benevolent leadership? The moderating effects of supervisor’s altruistic personality and perceived organizational support.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,15(3),145-155.
  87. Yukl, G.(2013).Leadership in organizations.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  88. 李亦園（編）,楊國樞（編）,文崇一（編）(1985)。人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。現代化與中國化論集，台北:
  89. 林坤池(1987)。解剖台上的家族企業：培育第二代的類型分析。現代管理月刊，126，34-36。
  90. 林明村(2001)。中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
  91. 姜定宇(2012)。國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
  92. 徐瑋伶(2004)。臺灣大學心理學研究所。
  93. 張裕隆,劉岡憬(2001)。360 度回饋與傳統上司評鑑對領導效能預測力之比較。應用心理研究，10，167-197。
  94. 陳芊銨(2014)。逢甲大學國際經營管理學研究所。
  95. 陳獻喜(2014)。逢甲大學企業管理學研究所。
  96. 費孝通（1948）：《鄉土中國與鄉土重建》。上海：觀察社。
  97. 黃光國（編）(1988).中國人的權力遊戲.台北:巨流圖書公司.
  98. 黃國展(2013)。中正大學心理學研究所。
  99. 楊中芳（編）(2001).中國人的人際關係、情感與信任.台北:遠流出版公司.
  100. 楊國樞（編）,余安邦（編）(1993).中國人的心理與行為─理念及方法篇.台北:桂冠圖書公司.
  101. 楊國樞（編）,黃光國（編）,楊中芳（編）(2005).華人本土心理學.台北:遠流出版公司.
  102. 樊景立,鄭伯壎(1997)。華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差：題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響。中華心理學刊，39(2)，103-118。
  103. 鄭伯壎(2005).華人領導：理論與實際.台北:桂冠圖書公司.
  104. 鄭伯壎(1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。
  105. 鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。
  106. 鄭伯壎（編）,姜定宇（編）(2006).華人組織行為：議題、作法及出版.台北:華泰文化.
  107. 鐘筱涵(2011)。中正大學心理學研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 鄭伯壎(2023)。從引進到引領：台灣組織行為研究的創造性轉化。中華心理學刊，65(4)，277-297。
  2. (2024)。華人組織中的人際關係：回顧與展望。中華心理學刊，66(1)，153-193。
print cancel