教師集體課程創新：轉化能動性概念工具的再探究

Reconsidering the Conceptual Tool of Transformative Agency in Teacher Collective Curriculum Innovation

10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0004

張芷瑄(Chih-Hsuan Chang)；陳斐卿(Fei-Ching Chen)

活動理論 ； 轉化能動性 ； 教師集體共備社群 ； 課程創新 ； activity theory ； transformative agency ； teacher collective curriculum making ； curriculum innovation

課程與教學

23卷1期（2020 / 01 / 01）

93 - 116

繁體中文

本文旨在以轉化能動性為概念工具，探究如何有助於對教師社群集體活動之理解。活動理論的轉化能動性，採用六種轉化行動：抵抗、批判、顯化、構想、定案與實際行動，勾勒團體成員在對話中轉化能動性的變動內涵。然而，以「單一發言」為轉化行動的編碼分析單位，會漏看成員相互對話的動態轉變歷程；因此，本研究發展以「事件」為編碼分析單位。研究發現，老師之間看似和諧的社群對話中，隱藏著意見衝突的協商處境，透過事件為分析單位，揭露因內隱衝突而蘊生的轉化策略。本研究對轉化能動性概念工具的再探究有兩個層面的突破：第一、發展更契合對話情境之分析單位「轉化事件」，第二、揭露比轉化行動層級更適切的「轉化策略」層級，展現教師集體轉化能動性的清晰圖像。本文對當前新課綱推動之下，正蓬勃發展之教師社群運作，提供研究面與實務面的具體建議。

This study aims to explore how transformative agency as a conceptual tool is conducive to a better understanding of a teacher-community activity. Based on cultural-historical activity theory, transformative agency in a collective discourse includes six types of agentive action: resisting, criticizing, explicating, envisioning, committing, and taking consequential action. These agentive actions are used to show the transformative agency in a collective discourse. However, using a speaking turn as the unit of analysis suggested in the theory, might overlook the dynamic process of a responsive dialogue among community members. Due to the aforementioned analytical limitation, the present study suggests using a ＂transformative event＂ as the unit to analyze the transformative agency. The research findings reveal that the seeming harmonious dialogical exchanges in the teacher community might involve the process of hidden conflict and negotiation. With the ＂event＂ used, hidden conflict may give rise to transformative strategies, which could be an essential agency in facilitating changes and reform of a community. There are two contributions found in this study: a) the development of ＂transformative event＂ as the unit of analysis to understand the dialogical context of a teacher community; b) the revelation of ＂transformative strategy＂ delineates the collective effort of teachers' transformative agency. With the ongoing reform of the new curriculum and the flourishing development of teacher community, this paper offers concrete suggestions for future research and practice.

1. 張秀美,陳斐卿,曾仁佑(2012)。小組建立假設的合作探究策略—以網路環境為例。科學教育學刊，20(4)，295-317。
   連結：
2. 陳佩英,曾正宜(2011)。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動―AT 取徑。教育研究集刊，57(2)，39-84。
   連結：
3. 陳斐卿,林盈秀,蕭述三(2013)。教師合作設計課程的困難—AT 觀點。教育實踐研究，26(1)，63-94。
   連結：
4. 簡菲莉,陳佩英(2018)。一所高中學校轉型之歷程研究：活動理論取徑。教育研究與發展期刊，14(3)，65-100。
   連結：
5. Bereiter, C.,Scardamalia, M.(2003).Learning to work creatively with knowledge.Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions,Oxford, England:
6. Biesta, G.,Priestley, M.,Robinson, S.(2015).The role of beliefs in teacher agency.Teachers and Teaching,21(6),624-640.
7. Engeström, Y.(2011).From design experiments to formative interventions.Theory & Psychology,21(5),598-628.
8. Engeström, Y.(2015).Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
9. Engeström, Y.(1987).Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Helsinki, Finland:Orienta-Konsultit.
10. Engeström, Y.,Sannino, A.,Virkkunen, J.(2014).On the methodological demands of formative interventions.Mind, Culture, and Activity,21(2),118-128.
11. Engeström, Y.,Virkkunen, J.,Helle, M.,Pihlaja, J.,Poikela, R.(1996).The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work.Lifelong Learning in Europe,1(2),10-17.
12. Englund, C.,Price, L.(2018).Facilitating agency: The change laboratory as an intervention for collaborative sustainable development in higher education.International Journal for Academic Development,23(3),192-205.
13. Guzmán, W. C.(2018).A change laboratory professional development intervention to motivate university teachers to identify and overcome barriers to the integration of ICT.Outlines. Critical Practice Studies,19(1),67-90.
14. Haapasaari, A.,Engeström, Y.,Kerosuo, H.(2014).The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention.Journal of Education and Work,29(2),232-262.
15. Haapasaari, A.,Kerosuo, H.(2015).Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation.Learning, Culture and Social Interaction,4,37-47.
16. Heikkila, H.,Seppänen, L.(2014).Examining developmental dialogue: The emergence of transformative agency.Outlines. Critical Practice Studies,15(2),5-30.
17. Hökkä, P.,Vähäsantanen, K.,Mahlakaarto, S.(2017).Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength.Teaching and Teacher Education,63,36-46.
18. Ketelaar, E.,Beijaard, D.,Boshuizen, H. P.,Den Brok, P. J.(2012).Teachers’ positioning towards an educational innovation in the light of ownership, sense-making and agency.Teaching and Teacher Education,28(2),273-282.
19. Lotz-Sisitka, H.,Mukute, M.,Chikunda, C.,Baloi, A.,Pesanayi, T.(2017).Transgressing the norm: Transformative agency in community-based learning for sustainability in southern African contexts.International Review of Education,63(6),897-914.
20. Paavola, S.,Hakkarainen, K.(2005).The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning.Science & Education,14(6),535-557.
21. Philpott, C.,Oates, C.(2017).Teacher agency and professional learning communities; What can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?.Professional development in education,43(3),318-333.
22. Quinn, R.,Carl, N. M.(2015).Teacher activist organizations and the development of professional agency.Teachers and Teaching,21(6),745-758.
23. Rieber, R. W.(ed.)(1997).The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions.New York, NY:Plenum.
24. Riveros, A.,Newton, P.,Burgess, D.(2012).A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on professional learning communities.Canadian Journal of Education,35(1),202-216.
25. Sannino, A.(2010).Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(4),838-844.
26. Vänninen, I.,Pereira-Querol, M.,Engeström, Y.(2015).Generating transformative agency among horticultural producers: An activity-theoretical approach to transforming Integrated Pest Management.Agricultural Systems,139,38-49.
27. Virkkunen, J.(2006).Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency.Activités revue électronique,3(1),43-66.
28. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
29. Waermö, M.(2016).Broadening rules and aligning actions: Children’s negotiation while playing hide-and-seek during break time.Learning, Culture and Social Interaction,11,19-28.
30. 施雅慧(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
31. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。
32. 教育部成語典（2019）。成語檢索。取自 http://dict.idioms.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cydic/gsweb.cgi?ccd=frnf4v&o=e0&func=diccydicfunc.cydicdispatchpage&init=1&cache=1564726166422