科技實作課程發展中教師實務知識建構之個案研究

The Case Study of Construction of a Technology Teacher's Practical Knowledge Through Maker Curriculum Development

10.6384/CIQ.202010_23(4).0002

周淑卿(Shu-ching Chou)；王佩蘭(Pei-lan Wang)

實作課程 ； 教師實務知識 ； 探究教學 ； 科技課程 ； maker curriculum ； teacher practical knowledge ； inquiry teaching ； technology curriculum

課程與教學

23卷4期（2020 / 10 / 01）

27 - 57

繁體中文

十二年國教課綱重視探究與實作，如何在不同領域實施具有探究性的實作課程，備受關注。隨著自造者教育興起，科技實作課程受到中小學重視。然而，小學並無科技領域，既無課程綱要亦無教材，雖有相關理論與可參考的教學案例，但是許多教師尚未能充分理解與轉化這些原理原則。倘若能從某些有經驗的教師身上提鍊出實務知識，將更有助於更多教師理解與實施實作課程。基於此，本研究以一位小學教師為對象進行個案研究，探討其設計與實施科技領域實作課程的歷程，以及在此課程發展過程中形成的實務知識。本研究之主要結論如下：一、依循探究的基本歷程，小學教師可以藉由過程模式發展科技實作課程。二、教師所建構的實務知識高度呼應理論觀點。三、教師的實務知識補充探究與實作的實施原則。

The 12- Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines emphasize inquiry and practice, therefore how to implement inquiry-based practical courses in different subjects has attracted much attention. With the rise of maker education movement, technology making courses have been valued by elementary and secondary schools. However, there are no technology curriculum guideline or teaching materials in the elementary school. Although there are related theories and teaching cases that can be referred to, teachers may not be able to fully understand and transform these principles into practice. If practical knowledge can be extracted from some experienced teachers, it will be more helpful for more teachers to understand and implement maker education in elementary schools. Based on the reason, this research takes an experienced teacher as the subject to conduct a case study to explore the design and implementation of maker curriculum, as well as the practical knowledge formed during the development of this curriculum. The main conclusions of this research were: (1) Following the inquiry learning procedure, elementary school teachers can develop maker curriculum through the ＂process model＂ of curriculum development; (2) The practical knowledge constructed by teachers highly echoed theoretical viewpoints; (3) Teachers' practical knowledge can supplement the principles of inquiry and practice learning.

1. 白佩宜,許瑛玿(2011)。探討不同探究式教學法對高一生科學探究能力與學習環境觀感之影響。課程與教學季刊，14(3)，123-156。
   連結：
2. 張宇樑(2014)。運用專業成長活動促進高職教師探究教學知覺轉變之個案研究。科學教育學刊，22(4)，363-388。
   連結：
3. 陳均伊(2010)。教師專業成長之個案研究：一位國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變。教育科學研究期刊，55(2)，233-264。
   連結：
4. 陳怡芬,林育慈,翁禎苑(2018)。運算思維導向程式設計教學─ 以「動手玩音樂」模組化程式設計為例。中等教育，6，127-141。
   連結：
5. 曾崇賢,段曉林,靳知勤(2011)。探究教學的專業成長歷程─以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊，19(2)，143-168。
   連結：
6. 鄭明長(2005)。教師實務知識與專業成長。教育科學期刊，5(2)，126-137。
   連結：
7. Clandinin, D. J.(1985).Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images.Curriculum Inquiry,15(4),361-385.
8. De Mora, J. C.(2014).Becoming a teacher through practical knowledge.Practical knowledge in teacher education: Approaches to teacher internship programmes,New York, NY:
9. Dewey, J.(1998).How we think.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Company.
10. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1916)
11. Elbaz, F.(1981).The teachers’ "practical knowledge": Report of a case study.Curriculum Inquiry,11(1),43-71.
12. Elbaz, F.(1983).Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge.London, UK:Croom Helm.
13. Gerstein, J.(2016).Becoming a maker educator.Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers,91(7),14-19.
14. Godhe, A.-L.,Lilja, P.,Selwyn, N.(2019).Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools.Technology, Pedagogy & Education,28(3),317-328.
15. Harvard Educational Review Editorial Board(2014).The maker movement in education: Designing, creating, and learning across contexts.Harvard Educational Review,84(4),492-494.
16. Herranen, J.,Kousa, P.,Fooladi, E.,Aksela, M.(2019).Inquiry as a context-based practice – A case study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching.International Journal of Science Education,41(14),1977-1998.
17. Hsu, Y.-C.,Baldwin, S.,Ching, Y.-H.(2017).Learning through making and maker education.TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning,61(6),589-594.
18. Martin, L.(2015).The promise of the maker movement for education.Journal of PreCollege Engineering Education Research,5(1),30-39.
19. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
20. Quigley, C.,Marshall, J. C.,Deaton, C. C. M.,Cook, M. P.,Padilla, M.(2011).Challenges to inquiry teaching and suggestions for how to meet them.Science Educator,20(1),55-61.
21. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
22. Wei, B.,Chen, S.,Chou, B.(2019).An investigation of sources of science teachers’ practical knowledge of teaching with practical work.International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education,17(4),723-738.
23. Zion, M.,Mendelovici, R.(2012).Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits.Science Education International,23(4),383-399.
24. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要（總綱）。臺北市：教育部。
25. 陳國泰(2006)。國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師實務知識的發展之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學學報，19(2)，31-64。

1. 林思騏(2022)。臺灣與廣東職前教師實踐性知識生成與發展－以二地師培大學師資生為例。當代教育研究季刊，30(2)，49-53+55。
2. 游婉琳(2021)。全球化時代教師教學研究、實踐知識與專業發展之初探。教育研究與實踐學刊，68(2)，111-124。
3. (2024)。國小教師素養導向探究教學及其相關因素之研究：以成長心態與知識信念為例。課程與教學，27(3)，1-39。
4. (2024)。探究科技領域課程在實踐上的挑戰：文化歷史活動理論視角。數位學習科技期刊，16(1)，31-55。