應用差異化教學策略實施國小跨年級自然教學之研究

A Study on Differentiated Teaching Strategy Applied to Multi-grade Science in Elementary Schools

10.6384/CIQ.202201_25(1).0004

陳文正(Wen-Chen Chen)；古智雄(Chih-Hsiung Ku)

協同教學 ； 差異化教學 ； 國小自然 ； 跨年級教學 ； Collaborative teaching ； Differentiated instruction ； Natural science for elementary school ； Multi-grade teaching

課程與教學

25卷1期（2022 / 01 / 01）

99 - 134

繁體中文

近年來的少子化現象，讓臺灣小型學校數逐年增加，班級人數過少，除了影響學生與同儕互動的機會，也限制教師教學策略的選用，跨年級教學是學校面對這種挑戰的對策之一。本文以一所在高年級自然領域實施跨年級教學的小學為研究對象，透過課室觀察、教師訪談和文件分析，探討國小跨年級自然教學實施差異化教學的行動歷程，並分析授課教師的協同合作方式。研究結論為：（一）在跨年級自然教學採取多層次的分組學習活動是差異化教學的可行策略；（二）提供教學鷹架可協助學生完成自主學習活動並培養自調學習能力；（三）採取教師協同教學模式有助於跨年級自然領域實施差異化教學。最後，依據研究結果，提出三項研究建議。

Recently, due to the declining birthrate, the number of mini-schools in Taiwan increases every year. Comparing to past classes, now both the chances for students interacting with peers and the options for teachers' teaching strategies have been largely restricted due to fewer students in a class. As a result, the multi-grade teaching becomes one of the major strategies for these mini-schools in coping with such a challenge. This study, adopting a set of measures of classroom observation, interviews with teachers, and document analysis, explores the journey how a differentiated teaching has been applied to multi-grade science taught in an elementary school, with a further analysis on what patterns of collaboration conducted among the teachers. The participants include two teachers and 11 upper graders in a remote school. Three conclusions found are: (1) adopting the multiple-group learning activity in multi-grade science teaching is a practical teaching strategy for differentiated teaching; (2) providing a teaching scaffold can support students in completing self-learning activities and cultivating self-regulated learning ability; (3) adopting a collaborative teaching model could contribute to differentiated teaching in a multi-grade science teaching. Based on these results, three research implications are further suggested.

1. 李松濤,林煥祥,洪振方(2010)。探究式教學對學童科學論證能力影響之探究。科學教育學判，18(3)，177-203。
   連結：
2. 林吟霞(2018)。運用德國「工作站學習法」促進學生自主學習的教學策略。課程與教學季刊，21(2)，1-32。
   連結：
3. 林欣毅,鄭章華,廖素嫻(2016)。混齡教學於國中小學階之實施方式與支持措施：多重個案研究。教育實踐與研究，29(2)，1-32。
   連結：
4. 莊惠如,王菀詩,吳怡慧(2014)。同異質分組並行之差異化教學。中等教育，65(3)，117-131。
   連結：
5. 陳黎娟(2018)。非主科混齡教學實施現況之研究─以一所實驗小學為例。學校行政雙月刊，113，119-138。
   連結：
6. 黃于真,陳美如(2018)。差異化教學對國中學生數學學習成效影響之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，11(1)，91-122。
   連結：
7. 楊秀停,王國華(2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(4)，439-459。
   連結：
8. 詹寶菁(2021)。當跨年級遇上適性教與學：國小社會領域跨年級課程規劃與實施之探究。課程與教學季刊，24(1)，61-92。
   連結：
9. 劉世雄(2021)。國小教師採合作探究理念進行觀課、議課之個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，17(1)，1-29。
   連結：
10. 鄭立婷,林煥祥,洪振方(2020)。透過科學營探討弱勢學生之探究能力表現。科學教育學刊，28(3)，197-221。
    連結：
11. 謝志偉(2003)。自我調節學習理論之探究。課程與教學，6(3)，147-168。
    連結：
12. 顏惠君(2016)。提升國中生國文閱讀理解能力之差異化教學方案的設計與實踐。中等教育，67(4)，112-130。
    連結：
13. Abd-El-Khalick, F.,BouJaoude, S.,Duschl, R.,Lederman, N.G.,Mamlok-Naaman, R.,Hofstein A.,Niaz M.,Treagust, D.,Tuan, H.(2004).Inquiry in science education: International perspectives.Science Education,88(3),397-419.
14. Anderson, R. D.(2002).Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry.Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(1),1-12.
15. Baeten, M.,Simons, M.(2016).Student teachers’ team teaching: How do learners in the classroom experience team-taught lessons by student teachers?.Journal of Education for Teaching,42(1),93-105.
16. Bevins, S.,Price, G.(2016).Reconceptualising inquiry in science education.International Journal of Science Education,38(1),17-29.
17. Bogdan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2007).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods.Pearson.
18. Carrier, W.,Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming critical: Knowing through action research.Falmer.
19. Cohen, D.,Raudenbush, S.,Ball, D.(2003).Resource, instruction, and research.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,25(2),119-142.
20. De Borja, J.M.A.,Sigua, E.M. S.,Marasigan, A. C.(2020).Pedagogical practices of multigrade teachers in conducting science learning activities.IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal,2(3),219-228.
21. Dollard, M. W.,Mahoney, K.(2010).How effective is the Jigsaw method when used to introduce new science curricula in middle school science?.Ontario Action Reacher,10(3),1-55.
22. Duschl, R.,Osborne, J.(2002).Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education.Journal of Studies in Science Education,38,39-72.
23. Engin, G.(2018).The opinions of multigrade classroom teachers on multigrade class teaching practices (multiple case analysis: Netherlands-Turkey example).International Journal of Progressive Education,14(1),177-200.
24. Erden, H.(2020).Teaching and learning in multi-graded classrooms: is it sustainable?.International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction,14(1),177-200.
25. Hall, T.(2002).Differentiated instruction.Wakefield, MA:National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
26. Hall, T.,Strangman, N.,Meyer, A.(2003).Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation.Wakefield, MA:National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
27. Hargreaves, E. A.,Montero, C.,Chau, N.,Sibli, M.,Thanh, T.(2001).Multigrade teaching in Peru, Sri Lanka and Vietnam: An overview.International Journal of Educational Development,21,499-520.
28. Hegarty-Hazel, E.(1986).Lab work.set: Research information for teachers,1
29. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic Inquiry.Sage.
30. Little, A. W.(2001).Multi-grade teaching: Towards an international research and policy agenda.International Journal of Educational Development,21,481-497.
31. McDonald, L.(2009).Teacher change: A dynamic interactive approach.International Journal of Learning,16(10),623-636.
32. Naparan, N. B.,Alinsug, V. G.(2021).Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers.Social Sciences & Humanities Open,3(1),1-13.
33. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards.National Academy Press.
34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD (2013). Science framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf
35. Quail, A.,Smyth, E.(2014).Multigrade teaching and age composition of the class: The influence on academic and social outcomes among students.Teaching and Teacher Education,43,80-90.
36. Robinson, B.,Schaible, R. M.(1995).Collaborative teaching: Reaping the benefits.College Teaching,43(2),57-59.
37. Shareefa, M.(2020).Using differentiated instruction in multigrade classes: a case of a small school.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,41(1),167-181.
38. Sirkko, R.,Takala, M.,Wickman, K.(2018).Co-teaching in northern rural Finnish schools.Education in the North,25(1-2),217-237.
39. Smit, R.,Humpert, W.(2012).Differentiated instruction in small school.Teaching and Teacher Education,28,1152-1162.
40. Song, L.,Hill, J. R.(2007).A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning online.Journal of Interactive Online Learning,6(1),27-42.
41. Tomlinson, C. A.(2014).The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.ASCD.
42. Tomlinson, C. A.(2001).How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classroom.ASCD.
43. Tomlinson, C. A.,Brighton, C.,Hertberg, H.,Hertberg, C. M.,Moon, T. R.,Brimijoin, K.,Conover, L. A.,Reynolds, T.(2003).Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,2/3,119-145.
44. UNESCO(2013).Practical tips for teaching multigrade class.Bangkok Office, Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
45. Veenman, S.(1995).Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best evidence synthesis.Review of Education Research,65(4),319-381.
46. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes.Harvard Education Press.
47. 李新鄉,黃文宏,李茂能,盧姿里(2015)。採用 STS 教學對於自我調整學習能力不同的國小自然與生活科技低成就學童之影響。南台人文社會學報，13，1-44。
48. 林玉環,張綺蕊(2002)。協同教學法在社會科教學上的應用。社會科科學學報，1，99-110。
49. 林吟霞(2009)。德國適性教育實務篇：中小學自主學習取向教學法之運用。教師天地，159，16-23。
50. 林思吟(2016)。淺談差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(3)，118-123。
51. 徐慧中,徐偉民(2019)。以差異化教學實施國小混齡數學補救教學之行動研究。臺灣數學教師，40(2)，1-28。
52. 涂家綸,掌慶維(2020)。國中體育課實施差異化教學之行動研究以游泳教學為例。東海體育學報，4，1-11。
53. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校-自然科學領域。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/27883/82357.pdf
54. 教育部統計處（2021）。108學年度國小校數分布。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=01
55. 梁雲霞（編）,陳淑麗（編）(2018).跨年級教學實務手冊.教育部國民及學前教育署.
56. 梁雲霞（編）,詹寶菁（編）(2021).跨年級教學－領域教學設計與案例.五南.
57. 陳文正(2021)。跨年級教學的課程與教學設計。跨年級教學專業知能初階研習
58. 陳文正,劉俊億(2019)。一所偏鄉國小推動跨年級教學之研究。跨年級教學的實踐與眺望─小校教學創新
59. 陳向明(2004).社會科學質的研究.五南.
60. 黃永和,莊淑琴(2004)。協同教學的回顧與展望。教育研究月刊，117，64-77。
61. 劉世雄(2018)。差異化教學的同質性分組協同學習模式之探究。教師專業研究期刊，16，25-51。
62. 劉欣華(2018)。探究差異化教學於國小教學之實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(3)，116-123。
63. 鄭同僚(2015)。,未出版
64. 鄭博真(2002).協同教學：基本概念、實務和研究.復文.