國中智能障礙學生自我決策能力現況暨影響因素及支持情形之調查研究

Investigation of the Self-Determination Competency and Its Associated Contributing Factors and Supportive Status for Junior High School Students with Intellectual Disabilities

10.6457/BSER.201106.0081

陳韻婷(Yun-Ting Chen)；趙本強(Pen-Chiang Chao)

國中智能障礙學生 ； 自我決策 ； 調查研究 ； junior high school students with intellectual disabilities ； self-determination ； survey research

特殊教育與復健學報

24期（2011 / 06 / 01）

81 - 105

繁體中文

本研究旨在調查國中智能障礙學生之自我決策能力現況及影響其能力高低之因素，另亦評估教師與家長對學生能力發展所提供之支持情形，及此支持與學生能力之相關及對能力之預測情形。研究以立意取樣方式從北部某縣11所國中選取不同障礙程度之智能障礙學生(n=100)、普通班非身心障礙學生(n=100)、特教教師(n=50)及智能障礙學生家長(n=100)共350名為研究對象。參與者按其身份填寫本研究自編之「國中學生自我決策量表」學生、教師或家長版以評估智能障礙學生在自我瞭解、心理賦權、自我調整及獨立自主等四個向度及整體的自我決策能力。使用的資料分析方法包括描述統計、相關分析、變異數分析及迴歸分析。研究結果顯示，國中智能障礙學生的自我決策程度不高，且顯著低於其非身心障礙同儕。智能障礙學生的自我決策程度主要受其性別、障礙程度、目前安置型態、國小安置型態、父母社經地位、家庭結構、居住型態及教養態度等因素影響。雖然教師背景變項並不影響學生的自我決策程度，但其與家長所提供的支持卻與學生能力呈高度相關。但令人失望的是，學生僅從此兩者獲得中間程度的支持。此外，教師及家長的支持能有效預測學生的能力。研究最後針對結果提出具體教學、教養及研究建議。

The major purposes of this study were to (a) investigate the level of self-determination competency of junior high school students with intellectual disabilities (ID), (b) identify factors that affect the development of student competency, (c) examine the level of support provided by teachers and parents, (d) analyze the correlation between the level of self-determination competency and level of support received, and (e) examine how well the level of support received in predicting self-determination competency. Subjects included students with ID (n=100), students without disabilities (n=100), special education teachers (n=100), and parents (n=50) of students with ID. Students were recruited from eleven public junior high schools. All participants were required to complete a self-determination scale including three versions designed for students, teachers and, parents respectively. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, analyses of variance, and regression. Findings showed that students with ID in junior high school demonstrated the medium level of self-determination competency and scored significantly lower than their peers without disabilities. The factors that affect the level of the self-determination competency of students with ID included student gender, severity of disability, current placement status, placement status in elementary school, socioeconomic status, family structure, family living style, and parental rearing philosophy. Although the background experiences and demographic factors associated with teachers did not affect the self-determination competency of students with ID, there was a highly positive correlation between the level of student competency and the level of support provided by teachers. However, students with ID merely received medium level of support from their teachers as well as parents. Additionally, teacher and parent support is a good predictor of students' self-determination competency. Suggestions were further provided for special education teachers, parents, as well as prospective researchers.

1. 林宏熾、林巾凱(2003)。高中職階段身心障礙青年生涯自我概念之研究。特殊教育學報，17，63-94。
   連結：
2. 董冀輝、林宏熾(2005)。特殊教育學校高職部教師對智能障礙學生自我決策素養之研究。特殊教育學報，22，145-178。
   連結：
3. 趙本強(2009)。自我決策課程對國小高年級資源班學生教學成效之研究。特殊教育學報，29，111-136。
   連結：
4. 劉佩嘉、林宏熾(2004)。高中職特教班智能障礙學生自我決策之研究。特殊教育學報，19，123-156。
   連結：
5. 劉佩嘉、林宏熾(2004)。高中職特教班智能障礙學生自我決策之研究。特殊教育學報，19，123-156。
   連結：
6. 鄭淳智、林惠芬(2008)。特殊教育學校高職部智能障礙學生家長倡議子女自我決策之研究。特殊教育學報，28，155-190。
   連結：
7. Agran, M.,Cavin, M.,Wehmeyer, M. L.,Palmer, S.(2006).Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: the effects of the self-determination learning model of instruction.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,31,230-241.
8. Burstein, K.,Bryan, T.,Chao, P. C.(2005).Promoting self-determination skills among youth with special health needs using participatory action research.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,17,185-201.
9. Duvdevany, I.,Ben-Zur, H.,Ambar, A.(2002).Self-determination and mental retardation: Is there an association with living arrangement and lifestyle satisfaction?.Mental Retardation,40,379-389.
10. Field, S.,Hoffman, A.(1997).Self-determination during adolescence.Remedial and Special Education,18,285-294.
11. Field, S.,Hoffman, A.(2002).Lessons learned from implementing the steps to self-determination curriculum.Remedial and Special Education,23,90-98.
12. Field, S.,Martin, J.,Miller, R.,Ward, M.,Wehmeyer, M. L.(1998).Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on career development and transition.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,21,113-128.
13. Fowler, C. H.,Konrad, M.,Walker, A. R.,Test, D. W.,Wood, W. M.(2007).Self-determination intervention's effects on the academic performance of students with developmental disabilities.Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,42,270-285.
14. Green, S. B.,Salkind, N. J.,Akey, T. M.(2005).Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
15. Grigal, M.,Neubert, D. A.,Moon, M. S.,Graham, S.(2003).Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers.Exceptional Children,70,97-112.
16. Gumpel, T. P.,Tappe, P.,Araki, C.(2000).Comparison of social problem-solving abilities among adults with and without developmental disabilities.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities,35,259-268.
17. Jones, M.(2006).Self-determination: Empower teachers, empower students.Teaching Exceptional Children,39,12-17.
18. Loon, J. V.,Hove, G. V.(2001).Emancipation and self-determination of people with learning disabilities and down-sizing institutional care.Disability and Society,16,233-254.
19. Malian, I.,Nevin, A.(2002).A review of self-determination literature: Implications for practices.Remedial and Special Education,23,68-74.
20. Nota, L.,Ferrari, L.,Soresi, S.,Wehmeyer, M.(2007).Selfdetermination, social abilities, and the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,51,850-865.
21. Palmer, S. B.,Wehmeyer, M. L.(2003).Promoting self-determination in early elementary school: Teaching self-regulated problem-solving and goal-setting skills.Remedial and Special Education,24,115-126.
22. Palmer, S. B.,Wehmeyer, M. L.(1998).Students' expectations of the future: Hopelessness as a barrier to self-determination.Mental Retardation,36,128-136.
23. Palmer, S. B.,Wehmeyer, M. L.,Gipson, K.,Agran, M.(2004).Promoting Access to the General Curriculum by Teaching Self-Determination Skills.Council for Exceptional Children,70,427-439.
24. Powers, L. E.,Ellison, R.,Matuszewski, J.,Wilson, R.,Phillips, A.,Rein, C.(2001).TAKE CHARGE field test: A multicomponent intervention to promote adolescent self-determination.Journal of Rehabilitation,67,13-19.
25. Robertson, J.,Emerson, E.,Hatton, C.,Gregory, N.,Kessissoglou, S.,Hallam, A.,Walsh, P. N.(2001).Environmental opportunities and supports for exercising self-determination in community-based residential settings.Research in Developmental Disabilities,22,487-502.
26. Shogren, K. A.,Wehmeyer, M. L.,Palmer, S. B.,Soukup, J. H.,Little, T. D.,Garner, N.(2007).Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities.Exceptional Children,73,488-509.
27. Thoma, C. A.,Nathanson, R.,Baker, S. R.,Tamura, R.(2002).Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?.Remedial and Special Education,23,242-247.
28. Ward, M. J.(1991).Self-determination revisited: Going beyond expectations.Transition Summary,7,2-4+12.
29. Wehmeyer, M. L.(2005).Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,30,113-120.
30. Wehmeyer, M. L.(1994).Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescent with mental retardation.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,29,9-21.
31. Wehmeyer, M. L.(1999).A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,14,53-61.
32. Wehmeyer, M. L.(Ed.),Abery, B. H.(Ed.),Mithaug, D. E.(Ed.),Powers, L. E.(Ed.),Stancliffe, R. J.(Ed.)(2003).Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice.Springfield. IL:Charles C. Thomas.
33. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Agran, M.,Hughes, C.(2000).A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning.The Journal of Special Education,2,58-68.
34. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Baker, D. J.,Blumberg, R.,Harrison, R.(2004).Self-determination and student involvement infunctional assessment: Innovative practice.Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention,6,29-35.
35. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Bolding, N.(1999).Self-determination across living and working environments: A matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation.Mental Retardation,37,353-363.
36. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Kelchner, K.(1995).The ARC's self-determination scale.Arlington, TX:The ARC National Headquarters.
37. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Kelchner, K.(1995).Measuring the autonomy of adolescents and adults with mental retardation: A self-report form of the autonomous functioning checklist.Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,18,3-20.
38. Wehmeyer, M. L.,Palmer, S. B.(2003).Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination.Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,38,131-144.
39. Zhang, D.(2005).Parent practices in facilitating self-determination skills: The influences of culture, socioeconomic status, and children's special education status.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,30,154-162.
40. 王明泉(2003)。高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力相關影響因素之研究。東台灣特殊教育學報，5，47-72。
41. 王明泉(2003)。高職階段智能障礙學生自我決策能力教學方案成效之研究。台東師院學報，14，139-168。
42. 李俊甫、邱妤芳、張瓊文、林千惠(2009)。自我決策訓練對提升高職綜合職能科學生IEP參與效果之研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，107-137。
43. 林宏熾(1999)。身心障礙者自我決策與自我擁護─障礙者社會福利與特殊教育新議題與趨勢。社會福利，140，25-41。
44. 林宏熾(2000)。身心障礙青年社區生活品質狀況之分析。特殊教育研究學刊，20，1-21。
45. 林宏熾、丘思平、江佩珊、吳季樺、林佩蓁(2003)。高職輕度智能障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。東台灣特殊教育學報，5，25-46。
46. 林宏熾、江佩珊、吳季樺、丘思平、林佩蓁(2004)。高中職中重度多重障礙學生自我決策狀況之分析。特殊教育研究學刊，27，161-182。
47. 林佩蓁、林宏熾、洪啟川、許佩雯(2004)。高職階段多重障礙學生自我決策能力之研究─以國立彰化仁愛實驗學校為例。東台灣特殊教育學報，6，133-160。
48. 陳麗如(2004)。特殊教育論題與趨勢。臺北市:心理。
49. 鈕文英、陳靜江(1999)。台灣地區智能障礙青年「心理生活素質」之研究。特殊教育學報，13，1-32。
50. 劉佩嘉(2004)。誰才是真正的作決定者：自我決策對重度障礙者之重要性。特殊教育季刊，92，32-36。
51. 鄭淑芬、林宏熾(1999)。國中特教技藝班學生生涯自我概？相關因素之研究。特殊教育學報，13，61-95。
52. 謝怡如(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。

1. 趙本強(2011)。學齡階段身心障礙學生自我決策量表之編製。特殊教育學報，34，101-134。
2. 趙本強(2013)。高中職以下身心障礙學生自我決策能力之探究─跨性別、教育階段及障礙類別之分析研究。特殊教育學報，37，113-148。
3. 朱晴瑀、朱思穎(2015)。特教教師對特殊幼兒入小一自我決策與學校生活適應看法：問卷量表編製之研究。身心障礙研究，13(3)，170-187。