學校領導成員交換關係對教師幸福感影響之探討

The Impact of School Leader-Member Exchange on Teachers' Well-being

10.6423/HHHC.202105_(133).0002

林致楨(Chih-Cheng Lin)；謝傳崇(Chuan-Chung Hsieh)

領導成員交換關係 ； 教師幸福感 ； 學校領導 ； Leader-member exchange ； teacher well-being ； school leadership

學校行政

133期（2021 / 05 / 16）

27 - 39

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解學校領導成員交換關係與教師幸福感的現況，並探討兩者間的相關情形。領導成員交換關係意指在同一工作單位裡，領導者跟部屬之間存在不同且垂直的關係品質，可分成兩類，亦即高品質與低品質的交換關係，在高品質的交換關係中，部屬將被視為「圈內人」，主管將會給予員工高程度的信任以及較多資源分配。在低品質的交換關係中，部屬將被視為「圈外人」，主管將會給予員工較低程度的信任以及相對較少的獎酬。本研究旨在介紹領導成員交換關係以及其在學校場域對於教師幸福感之影響，從研究中除了能瞭解到善用領導成員交換關係，能使關係中的圈內人共同努力，並獲得幸福感，其中包括探討其意義、內涵以及如何透過LMX提升教師幸福感之策略等，期能對後續研究有所助益。

This research aims to understand the current situation of school leaders' exchange relationships and teachers' well-being.The exchange relationship between leaders and members means that in the same work unit, there are different and vertical relationship qualities between the leader and subordinates, which can be divided into two categories, namely high-quality and low-quality exchange relationships. In high-quality exchange relationships, Subordinates will be regarded as ＂in-group members＂, and the supervisor will give employees a high degree of trust and more resource allocation. In low-quality exchange relationships, subordinates will be regarded as ＂out-group members ,＂ and supervisors will give employees a lower degree of trust and relatively little rewards. From the research, it can be understood that the good use of the exchange relationship between leaders and members can enable people in the relationship to work together and obtain the well-being , Which includes exploring its meaning, essence, and strategies for improving teachers' well-being through LMX, and hopes to be helpful to follow-up research.

1. 施智婷,林鉦棽(2012)。領導成員交換關係、心理契約滿足與組織公民行為理論模型驗證：資源配置與社會資本觀點。管理學報，29(1)，1-16。
   連結：
2. 陳春希,高瑞新(2010)。工作壓力與工作適應：探討不同工作特性基層警察人員組織承諾的調節效果。人力資源管理學報，10(4)，1-31。
   連結：
3. 謝傳崇(2021)。認定領導的意涵與發展。學校行政，131，106-117。
   連結：
4. Achor, S.(2010).The happiness advantage: The seven principles of positive psychology that fuel success and performance at work.New York, NY:Crown Business.
5. Barnard, C.I. (1938), The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bass, B. M.(1990).Handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications.New York:The Free Press.
7. Bass, B. M.(1985).Leadership: Good, better, best.Organizational dynamics,13(3),26-40.
8. Blau, P. M.(1964).Justice in social exchange.Sociological inquiry,34(2),193-206.
9. Brown, O.,Paz-Aparicio, C.,Revilla, A. J.(2019).Leader’s communication style, LMX and organizational commitment.Leadership & Organization Development Journal
10. Carnevale, J. B.,Huang, L.,Uhl‐Bien, M.,Harris, S.(2020).Feeling obligated yet hesitant to speak up: Investigating the curvilinear relationship between LMX and employee promotive voice.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,93(3),505-529.
11. Carr, A.(2011).Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths.Routledge.
12. Chang, C.S.,Chang, H.C.(2009).Perceptions of internal marketing and organizational commitment by nurses.Journal of Advanced Nursing,65(1),92-100.
13. Cropanzano R.,Mitchell, M.(2005).Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review.Journal of Management,31(6),874-900.
14. Dansereau, F., Jr,Graen, G.,Haga, W. J.(1975).A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process.Organizational behavior and human performance,13(1),46-78.
15. Diener, E.,Seligman, M. E.(2002).Very happy people.Psychological science,13(1),81-84.
16. Dienesch, R. M.,Liden, R. C.(1986).Leader－member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development.Academy of management review,11(3),618-634.
17. Farzad, A.,Nahavandi, N.,Caruana, A.(2008).The effect of internal marketing on organizational.commitment in Iranian banks.
18. Graen, G. B.,M. D. Dunnette (Ed.)(1976).Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology.Chicago:Rand-NcNally.
19. Graen, G. B.,Scandura, T. A.(1987).Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.Research in organizational behavior.
20. Graen, G. B.,Uhl-Bien, M.(1995).Development of leader－member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi－level multi－domain perspective.Leadership Quarterly,6(2),219-247.
21. Graen, G.,Novak, M. A.,Sommerkamp, P.(1982).The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model.Organizational behavior and human performance,30(1),109-131.
22. House, B. R.,Silk, J. B.,Henrich, J.,Barrett, H. C.,Scelza, B. A.,Boyette, A. H.,Laurence, S.(2013).Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,110(36),14586-14591.
23. Janssen O.,Gao, L.(2013).Supervisory responsiveness and employee self－perceived status and voice behavior.Journal of Management,1-19.
24. Jesús, C. F.,Yolanda, P. R.(2008).Long－term orientation of the supply function in the SME context.International Small Business Journal,26(5),619-646.
25. Martin, R.,Guillaume, Y.,Thomas, G.,Lee, A.,Epitropaki, O.(2016).Leader– member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review.Personnel psychology,69(1),67-121.
26. Martin, R.,Thomas, G.,Legood, A.,Dello Russo, S.(2018).Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review.Journal of Organizational Behavior,39(2),151-168.
27. Rowley Mayfield, J.,Mayfield, M. R.,Kopf, J.(1998).The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration.The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management,37(3?4),235-248.
28. Scandura, T. A.,Graen, G. B.,Novak, M. A.(1986).When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence.Journal of applied psychology,71(4),579.
29. Sparrowe, R. T.,Liden, R. C.(1997).Process and structure in leader－member exchange.Academy of management Review,22(2),522-552.
30. Su, Q.,Song, Y. T.,Li, Z.,Dang, J. X.(2008).The impact of supply chain relationship quality on cooperative strategy.Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,14(4),263-272.
31. Taris, T. W.,Schreurs, P. J.(2009).Well－being and organizational performance: An organizational－level test of the happy－productive worker hypothesis.Work & Stress,23(2),120-136.
32. Uhl-Bien, M.,Maslyn, J. M.(2003).Reciprocity in manager－subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes.Journal of management,29(4),511-532.
33. Wakefield, J. R. H.,Sani, F.,Madhok, V.,Norbury, M.,Dugard, P.,Gabbanelli, C.,Poggesi, F.(2017).The relationship between group identification and satisfaction with life in a cross－cultural community sample.Journal of Happiness Studies,18(3),785-807.
34. Wayne, S. J.,Shore, L. M.,Liden, R. C.(1997).Perceived organizational support and leader－member exchange: A social exchange perspective.Academy of Management Journal,40,82-111.
35. Wrzesniewski, A.(2003).Finding positive meaning in work.Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline,296-308.
36. Yammarino, F. J.,Dionne, S. D.,Chun, J. U.,Dansereau, F.(2005).Leadership and levels of analysis: A state－of－the－science review.The leadership quarterly,16(6),879-919.
37. 李金泉,孫苡甄(2013)。校長僕人領導對國小教職員幸福感影響之研究－以組織公平為中介變項。工業科技教育學刊，6，37-44。
38. 林耀榮,廖婉如(2015)。領導成員交換理論在校長領導之啟示。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(7)，57-61。
39. 陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8(1)，115-137。
40. 劉廷揚,陳世通,杜怡潔(2017)。員工組織承諾對主管領導風格和工作績效之中介作用兼論員工幸福感之調節效果。經營管理學刊，12&13，1-20。