邁向一個積極對男性倡議的女性主義取徑？以台灣「性別工作平等法」育嬰假之理論與實務為例

Imagining a Men-Inclusive Feminist Approach? An Example of Child Care Leave in the Gender Equality Employment Act of Taiwan

10.6255/JWGS.2015.36.1

陳宜倩(Yi‐Chien Chen)

男子氣概 ； 男性研究 ； 育嬰假 ； 女性主義理論 ； 性別歧視 ； 工作家庭衝突 ； masculinities ； Men's Study ； child care leave ； feminist theory ； gender discrimination ； work-family conflict

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

36期（2015 / 06 / 01）

1 - 47

繁體中文

近百年前，女性主義者為爭取權利或決定自己的生活方式，不論中外皆選擇「單身」，今日社會呢？在婦女解放運動與性別平等議題的倡議中，男性還是缺席嗎？男人究竟能不能成為女性主義思想的主體？女性主義的版圖中包括男性研究嗎？這「男人」與「女人」的分類基礎有實益嗎？從「婦女研究」到「性別研究」或「性／別研究」，「男性」這個類別下的不同樣貌也隨之展現，我們可以重新想像一個跨越國境又在地深耕、包含男性的女性主義取徑嗎？在仔細探究「到底什麼是男人」、分析「男子氣概」後，本文以性別工作平等法關於育嬰假規範之性別政治為例，分析婦女運動、兩性（後更名為性別）工作平等法立法歷程、及其施行後之法律實務與公共政策討論，思索男性與婦女運動的關係，企圖提出一個包含男性並積極對男性倡議之女性主義理論與運動路徑建議。

Some feminists in the US or Taiwan, either to fight for women's rights or to choose the way they want to lead their lives, have opted to stay away from men. What is the situation today? Are men still absent from the women's movement or avoiding advocating gender equality? Can men be the subject in feminist thinking? Does the landscape of feminism include men? Is the separation of women from men really necessary? From women's studies to gender studies/sexuality studies, in the context of Taiwan and in the Chinese-speaking environment, the picture of men has changed over time. Can we re-imagine a men-inclusive feminist approach which grows out of the local context and is valid across borders? After exploring ＂masculinities,＂ this article will use the child care leave gender politics appearing in discussion of the Gender Equality Employment Act of Taiwan as an example, to analyze the related public debates and practices at work, to think of the relations between men and women's movement, and hope to propose a men-inclusive feminist activism approach and related law reform for Taiwan.

1. 王舒芸、余漢儀(1997)。奶爸難為：雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊，8，115-149。
   連結：
2. 李庭欣、王舒芸(2013)。「善爸」干休？「育爸」不能？與照顧若即若離的育嬰假爸爸。台大社工學刊，28，93-136。
   連結：
3. 唐文慧(2011)。為何職業婦女決定辭職？結構限制下的母職認同與實踐。台灣社會研究季刊，85，201-266。
   連結：
4. 陳宜倩(2010)。「姐姐媽媽真偉大！」女性從軍議題之比較法脈絡觀察。女學學誌，26，135-191。
   連結：
5. 陳宜倩(2013)。尊重生命尊嚴、墮胎權與女性人權之論述生產與社會變革：美國最高法院Gonzales v. Carhart一案評析。歐美研究，43(3)，595-635。
   連結：
6. 廖文慧、楊佳羚(2006)。瑞典育嬰休假制度之研究：共同照顧的價值。政大勞動學報，19，75-117。
   連結：
7. 劉毓秀(2012)。北歐普及照顧制度的實踐與變革：從女性主義觀點回顧及批判。女學學誌，31，75-122。
   連結：
8. 95年社會發展趨勢調查網站報告（2006）﹝online﹞.2010/9/16. Available: http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas03/ca/society/index.html
9. 立法院（1999）《立法院公報》，88(33 中): 215。
10. 史倩玲（2012年8月14日）〈性別刻板分工職業婦女三頭燒〉，《台灣立報》。﹝online﹞.2014/2/2. Available: http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-120943
11. 唐文慧、廖珮如（2014年2月4日）〈都是「家暴丈夫」的錯嗎？〉，《蘋果日報》。﹝online﹞.2014/2/4. Available: http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140204/337968/
12. Amato, L., Pilcher, L. D., Forman, R., Weinstein, P., and von Garnier, K. (2004) Iron Jawed Angels (movie). Santa Monica: HBO Films.
13. Hansegard, J. (2012) For paternity leave, Sweden asks if two months is enough. ˆonline‰. 2014/2/1. Available: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390444226904577561100020336384
14. 魏怡嘉、邱燕玲（2007年4月5日）〈勞工育嬰津貼最高87,078元〉，《自由時報》。﹝online﹞.2010/12/9. Available: http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/ 00 /new/apr/ /today-life1.htm
15. 凃秀蕊（1990）〈育嬰大家一起來〉。﹝online﹞.2015/4/30. Available: http://awakening.lib.tku.edu.tw/Default2 _individ.aspx?serial=a4089
16. 婦女婚育與就業調查（2011）。﹝online﹞.2014/2/2. Available: http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=18134&ctNode=662
17. Kazuyo, S. (2010) Cybozu chief takes childcare leave as Japan encourages stay-at-home dads. ˆonline‰. 2015/5/20. Available: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-08-01/cybozu-chief-takes-childcare-leave-as-japan-encourages-stay-at-home-dads
18. 張順祥（2009年3月31日）〈請育嬰假？學者：台灣男性不敢〉，《中央廣播電台》。﹝online﹞.2014/2/2. Available: http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/37648
19. 簡扶育（2014）《女史無國界》（攝影展）。台北：台灣大學圖書館日然廳。﹝online﹞.2015/1/5.Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHzcYPoLliE
20. Abrams, K.(2011).Emotions in the mobilization of rights.Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,46,551-589.
21. Bekkengen, L.(2002).Making choices: Parenthood and parental leave in working life and family life.Stockholm:Liber.
22. Chang, S. S.,Stuckler, D.,Yip, P.,Gunnell, D.(2014).Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: Time trend study in 54 countries.British Medical Journal
23. Chen, Y.(2002).Orientating feminisms in the Taiwanese context-A men-inclusive approach.中原財經法學,9,223-299.
24. Connell, R. W.(1995).Masculinities: Knowledge, power, and social change.Berkeley:University of California Press.
25. Daniels, C. R.(1993).At women's expense: State power and the politics of fetal rights.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
26. Einarsdóttir, P.,Pétursdóttir, G. M.(2004).,Akureyri:Centre for Gender Equality in Iceland.
27. Geisler, E.,Kreyenfeld, M.(2009).,Rostock:Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
28. Gielow, E.(2002).Equality in the workplace: Why family leave does not work.South California Law Review,75,1529-1551.
29. Grill, A. H.(1996).The myth of unpaid family leave: Can the United States implement a paid leave policy based on the Swedish model?.Comparative Labor Law Journal,17,373-397.
30. Haas, L.(1991).Equal parenthood and social policy: Lessons from a study of parental leave in Sweden.Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda,Philadelphia:
31. Hooks, B.(2000).Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics.London:Pluto Press.
32. Iversen, T.,Rosenbluth, F.(2006).The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap.American Journal of Political Science,50(1),1-19.
33. Johansson, E. A.(2010).The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings.Uppsala:The Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation.
34. Karin, M. L.,Onachila, K.(2013).The military's workplace flexibility framework.Labor and Employment Law Forum,3(2),153-196.
35. Kimmel, M. S.(2000).The gendered society.New York:Oxford University Press.
36. Kimmel, M. S.,Messner, M. A.(1995).Men's lives.Ontario:Pearson Education.
37. Kittay, E. F.(1999).Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency.New York:Routledge.
38. Ledwon, L.(1998).Melodrama and law: Feminizing the juridical gaze.Harvard Women's Law Journal,21,141-178.
39. Levit, N.(1996).Feminism for men: Legal ideology and the construction of maleness.UCLA Law Review,43(4),1037-1116.
40. MacKinnon, C. A.(1989).Toward a feminist theory of the state.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
41. MacKinnon, C. A.(1987).Feminism unmodified: Discourse on life and law.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
42. Messner, M. A.(1997).Politics of masculinities: Men in movement.Lanham:Alta Mira Press.
43. Moran, E.(2013).Forgotten fathers: The disparate impact of the FMLA's unpaid parental leave provision.Labor and Employment Law Forum,3,494-521.
44. Pollack, W.(Ed.),Levant, R.(Ed.)(1998).New Psychotherapy for Men.New York:John Wiley & Son.
45. Rosenblum, D.(2012).Unsex mothering: Toward a new culture of parenting.Harvard Journal of Law and Gender,35,57-116.
46. Smith, A. J.(2001).Parental leave: Supporting male parenting? A study using longitudinal data of policy variation across the European Union.The EURESCO Second Demographic Transition in Europe,Bad Herrenalb, Germany:
47. Smith, A. J.(2009).The daddy shift: How stay-at-home dads, breadwinning moms, and shared parenting are transforming the American family.Boston:Beacon Press.
48. Toker, R. L.(1999).Multiple masculinities: A new vision for same-sex harassment law.Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,34,577-603.
49. 尤美女(1990)。婦女與法律把工作權爭回來－男女工作平等法有待制定。婦女新知雜誌，93，19-20。
50. 柯亭安(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學統計學研究所。
51. 洪文龍(2000)。哥哥爸爸真偉大？當兵的男性經驗。兩性平等教育季刊，12，47-50。
52. 張娟芬(2010)。殺戮的艱難。台北:行人。
53. 張瀞心(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學法律系。
54. 陳宜倩(2002)。男性支持女性主義！：以自我發展的自由作為追求性別平等的憲法價值。當代公法新論下（下）：翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集，台北:

1. 陳靜慧(2019)。歐盟母性保護制度之經驗分析。華岡法粹，66，93-142。
2. 陳昭如(2016)。從義務到權利：新舊母性主義下母性保護制度的轉向與重構。臺大法學論叢，45(S)，1095-1162。
3. 劉蕙雯、林東龍(2016)。照顧男子氣概與男性公務人員育嬰留職經驗。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，39，59-109。
4. 鍾道詮,蔡承宏,王舒芸(2022)。性別圖像失衡的社會工作專業教育。東吳社會工作學報，42，1-54。
5. (2023)。在身分與契約之間— 婚姻法規範的引導功能與發展方向。中研院法學期刊，32，207-276。