弱勢學生的生涯促進：融入差異化概念發展同儕支持生涯服務方案與實施

Career Advancement for Disadvantaged Students: Integrating the Concept of Differentiation into a Peer Support Career Service Program Development and Implementation

10.53106/172851862023010066003

吳淑禎(Shu-Chen Wu)

生涯服務 ； 同儕支持 ； 差異化 ； 弱勢學生 ； Career service ； differentiation ； disadvantaged students ； peer support

中華輔導與諮商學報

66期（2023 / 01 / 01）

81 - 122

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在發展適用生涯發展不利弱勢學生之同儕支持生涯服務方案並評估其實施成效。研究採行動研究法，根據訪談及參考生涯、差異化教學與同儕支持概念，發展方案，計有14個單元，包含：相見歡、成長回顧、自我探索、讀書與學習策略、優勢整合、生涯資源蒐集應用、科系探索、職業探索、未來目標、生涯抉擇、履歷製作、時間管理、行動計畫，以及回顧與祝福等單元。本研究與二個非營利組織合作，共有25位青少年參與配對服務，每週進行一次，每次一小時，並得依參與者需求提供彈性的差異化服務，平均每人使用服務次數為10.76次。經重複測量，發現方案介入可以顯著改善參與者的生涯自我效能及其五個因素包括：目標選擇、自我評估、解決問題、作出計畫、蒐集資料以及生涯適應及其生涯關注、生涯好奇二個因素，惟生涯控制與生涯信心雖有進步但未達顯著。結案追蹤訪談，發現參與者對此方案皆抱持肯定態度，認為方案有助其瞭解自我、認識科系與職業及找到未來方向。依量尺技術評分，其平均滿意度高達90.64。另外，參與者也表達同儕陪伴像朋友之間的支持，更容易接近彼此。研究並根據結果提出建議。

Many studies support the idea that the gap in income achievement between high- and low-income families can have direct and indirect influences on children's academic achievement and social opportunities. Considering disadvantaged students' career development pathways, as a result of low economic resources, poor living environment, and poor physical and mental health conditions, disadvantaged students tend to show low self-esteem, autonomy, and control, and experience more helplessness, hesitation, and anxiety about career choices and career adaptation. In addition, for disadvantaged students, economy is often the primary factor of consideration for career choice rather than their "interest." These reasons make it difficult for these students to practice career tasks, or avail necessary social support when encountering career difficulties. Two deficiencies are concluded in disadvantaged students' career dilemma: lack of knowledge about career planning, and not knowing how to plan their own career. From the perspective of social justice, every student, especially those with disadvantaged career development, should have equal opportunities to use career services suitable for them, so as to strengthen their ability to reduce the negative impact of social inequality and develop their own life stories. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a peer support career service program for underprivileged youth with career difficulties. This is an action research study that uses both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The career service program has 14 units, including meet and greet, growth review, self-exploration, reading and learning strategies, strengths integration, data search and application, major department and career exploration, goal setting, decision-making, resume production, time management, action plan, and blessings. The design of this study combines the teaching nature of career education with the counseling nature of career guidance. In terms of career education, pre-service teachers play the role of experts who guide and explain the concept and method of career planning, and design teaching plans based on the needs of disadvantaged students to enhance their career planning knowledge. In the guidance aspect, emphasis is placed on personal career obstacles. Pre-service teachers act as catalysts and guides who accompany disadvantaged students in self-exploration and development of career planning skills. This study adopted an amoeba-style design, emphasizing adjusting the proportion and method of career education and career guidance according to the needs and reactions of each student. Working with two non-profit organizations, 25 participants were included in-person in a one-on-one service. The average time for which each participant used the service was 10.76 hours (1 hour per session). The data were analyzed through repeated measures analysis. The results showed significant differences in goal selection, self-evaluation, problem solving, planning, data collection, career self-efficacy, career concern, career curiosity, and career adaptability domains. However, there was no significant difference in career control and career confidence, although there was an improvement. In addition, the results of the follow-up interviews showed that participants held a positive attitude (90.64 on a 0–100 scale) toward the program and considered that the program helped them understand themselves, their department and work, and to find their future direction. In addition, participants also stated that peer support was similar to friend-to-friend support, making it easier for them to build relationships with each other. Research recommendations include promoting and extending the peer support career service mode to more disadvantaged youths, continuing to develop differentiated career service strategies and skills, forming a career service community in cooperation with universities and institutions, exploring the influence of pre-service teachers in helping disadvantaged students in their career planning, and observing the impact on disadvantaged students' future education and employment. In addition, it is also recommended to compare the effectiveness of using peer support career services with that of taking career courses in senior high schools.

1. 王麗菱, L. L.,許惠評, H. P.(2005)。大學校院餐旅管理系學生生涯自我效能與生涯阻礙之關係研究。餐旅暨家政學刊，2(1)，33-50。
   連結：
2. 朱惠瓊, H. C.(2009)。高中生涯規劃課程實施成效調查研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊 Journal of Family Education and Counseling，7，1-22。
   連結：
3. 吳淑禎, S. C.(2011)。師資職前教育的生涯課程發展暨輔導效果研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，31，1-32。
   連結：
4. 呂晶晶, C. C.(2008)。從M型社會談台灣教育之社會正義。學校行政，57，90-109。
   連結：
5. 李崗, K.,徐美雲, M. Y.(2016)。「說故事」學英語：實施差異化教學對偏鄉國中學生的影響。課程與教學季刊，19(4)，159-189。
   連結：
6. 林月仙, Y. H.,何明珠, M. C.(2013)。大專校院資源教室輔導經驗分享—以國立虎尾科技大學為例。特殊教育季刊，128，11-18。
   連結：
7. 林翠玲, T. L.,劉智忠, C. C.(2009)。從雙文化脈絡的研究來看台灣弱勢族群的學校教育問題。學校行政，59，76-95。
   連結：
8. 莊育達, Y. D.(2016)。淺談「鷹架理論」應用在生涯規劃教學之探討。中等教育，67(4)，163-172。
   連結：
9. 彭滋萍, T. P.,,張高賓, K. P.(2010)。高中職生家庭環境、生涯自我概念與生涯自我效能之研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，9，33-60。
   連結：
10. 曾柏瑜, P. Y.,陳淑麗, S. L.(2010)。初任補救教學大專生的專業成長研究。特殊教育研究學刊，35(1)，39-61。
    連結：
11. 游自達, T. T.,林素卿, S. C.(2014)。整合學習共同體於差異化教學的改革。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，7(1)，23-45。
    連結：
12. 黃于真, Y. C.,陳美如, M. J.(2018)。差異化教學對國中學生數學學習成效影響之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，11(1)，91-122。
    連結：
13. 黃筑筠, C. Y.,周台傑, T. J.(2019)。中部地區技專校院學習障礙學生生涯輔導需求之研究。特殊教育學報，50，31-64。
    連結：
14. 楊育儀, Y. Y.,陳秀芬, S. F(2018)。從自我決定理論探究社經弱勢大學生之生涯決定。當代教育研究季刊，26(3)，1-33。
    連結：
15. 楊淑涵, S. H.,田秀蘭, H. C.,吳欣倫, H. L.,朱惠瓊, H. L.(2015)。職場工作者生涯自我效能、生涯適應力與工作適應之因素模式驗證。輔導與諮商學報，37(1)，21-42。
    連結：
16. 葉寶玲, P. L.(2016)。多元文化諮商的核心：社會正義諮商。輔導季刊，52(2)，13-21。
    連結：
17. 簡君倫, C. L.(2010)。國立新竹教育大學=National Hsinchu University of Education。
    連結：
18. 關永馨, Y. H.(2012)。大學生生涯自我效能與生涯阻隔因素之探討—以國立中興大學為例。教育科學期刊，11(2)，93-117。
    連結：
19. Barker, S. L.,Maguire, N.,Bishop, F. L.,Stopa, L.(2018).Peer support critical elementsand experiences in supporting the homeless: A qualitative study.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,28(4),213-229.
20. Betz, N. E.,Hackett, G.(1981).The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men.Journal of Counseling Psychology,28(5),399-410.
21. Bridgstock, R.(2009).The graduate attributes we've overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills.Higher Education Research & Development,28(1),31-44.
22. Brock, M. E.,Huber, H. B.(2017).Are peer support arrangements an evidence-basedpractice? A systematic review.The Journal of Special Education,51(3),150-163.
23. Carter, E. W.,Asmus, J. M.,Moss, C. K.(2014).Peer support interventions to support inclusive education.Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice
24. Carter, E. W.,Cushing, L. S.,Kennedy, C. H.(2009).Peer support strategies for improving all students' social lives and learning.Brookes.
25. Carter, E. W.,Moss, C. K.,Asmus, J.,Fesperman, E.,Cooney, M.,Brock, M. E.,Lyons, G.,Huber, H. B.,Vincent, L. B.(2015).Promoting inclusion, social connections, andlearning through peer support arrangements.Teaching Exceptional Children,48(1),9-18.
26. Erikson, E. H.(1968).Identity: Youth and crisis.W. W. Norton & Company.
27. Fickling, M. J.,Lancaster, C.,Neal, A. V.(2018).Social justice in career services:Perspectives of university career center directors.The Career Development Quarterly,66,64-76.
28. Garver, M. S.,Divine, R. L.,Spralls, S. A., III(2009).Need-based segmentation analysis of university career services: Implications for increasing student participation.Research in Higher Education Journal,3,99-123.
29. Greenbank, P.,Hepworth, S.(2008).Improving the career decision-making behaviour of working class students: Do economic barriers stand in the way?.Journal of EuropeanIndustrial Training,32(7),492-509.
30. Guan, S. S. A.,Fuligni, A. J.(2016).Changes in parent, sibling, and peer support during thetransition to young adulthood.Journal of Research on Adolescence,26(2),286-299.
31. Hinkelman, J. M.,Luzzo, D. A.(2007).Mental health and career development of collegestudents.Journal of Counseling & Development,85(2),143-147.
32. Hipolito-Delgado, C. P.,Lee, C. C.(2007).Empowerment theory for the professionalschool counselor: A manifesto for what really matters.Professional School Counseling,10(4),327-332.
33. Hirschi, A.(2018).The fourth industrial revolution: Issues and implications for careerresearch and practice.The Career Development Quarterly,66,192-204.
34. Kiuru, N.,Koivisto, P.,Mutanen, P.,Vuori, J.,Nurmi, J. F.(2010).How do efforts toenhance career preparation affect peer groups.Journal of Research on Adolescence,21(3),677-690.
35. Koen, J.,Klehe, U. C.,Van vianen, A. E.(2012).Training career adaptability to facilitate asuccessful school-to-work.Journal of Vocational Behavior,81(3),395-408.
36. Lent, R. W.,Brown, S. D.,Hackett, G.(1994).Toward a unifying social cognitive theory ofcareer and academic interest, choice, and performance.Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1),79-122.
37. Mancini, M. A.(2018).An exploration of factors that effect the implementation of peersupport services in community mental health settings.Community Mental HealthJournal,54,127-137.
38. Miller, A. D.,Rottinghaus, P. J.(2014).Career indecision, meaning in life, and anxiety: Anexistential framework.Jouranl of Career Assessment,22(2),233-247.
39. Murphy, J. J.(2008).Solution-focused counseling in schools.American Counseling Association.
40. Murrell, A. J.(2018).The power of peer mentoring: Peer mentors are especially important for building diverse workforces, but their potential remains largely untapped.BizEd,17(2),52-53.
41. National Career Development Association(2015).National Career Development Association (2015).2015 NCDA code of ethics. NCDA..
42. Rogers, M. E.,Creed, P. A.(2011).A longitudinal examination of adolescent careerplanning and exploration using a social cognitive career theory framework.Journal of Adolescence,34(1),163-172.
43. Savickas, M. L.(1997).Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-spacetheory.The Career Development Quarterly,45(3),247-259.
44. Swain, R.(1984).Easing the transition: A career planning course for college students.The Personnel and Guidance Journal,62(9),529-532.
45. Swanson, J. L.,Woitke, M. B.(1997).Theory into practice in career assessment forwomen: Assessment and interventions regarding perceived career barriers.Journal of Career Assessment,5(4),443-462.
46. Taylor, K. M.,Betz, N. E.(1983).Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision.Journal of Vocational Behavior,22(1),63-81.
47. Tomlinson, C. A.(1999).The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
48. Willoughby, W. (1900).Social justice: A critical essay. Macmillan.
49. Yalom, I. D.(2002).The gift of therapy: An open letter to a new generation of therapists and their patents.Harpercollins.
50. Zhang, H.,Huang, H.(2018).Decision-making self-efficacy mediates the peer supportcareer exploration relationship.Social Behavior and Personality,46(3),485-498.
51. 王文秀, W. H.(1987)。高中同儕輔導員訓練及同儕團體輔導之應用效果研究。教育心理學報，20，205-227。
52. 王金國, J. G.(2015)。師資培育機構推動服務學習之行動與省思：以靜宜大學師資培育中心為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(1)，41-47。
53. 王麗雲, L. Y.(2014)。基本能力的雙峰現象及其因應建議。教育人力與專業發展，31(1)，1-4。
54. 丘愛鈴, A. L.(2013)。成就每一個學生：差異化教學之理念與教學策略。教育研究月刊，231，18-33。
55. 吳怡融, Y. J.(2020)。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
56. 吳淑琬, S.W.,王以仁, Y. R.,王聲偉, S. W.,王聲柔, S. G.(2013).大學生生涯適應力量表.心理=Psychological Publishing.
57. 吳淑禎, S. C.(2018)。教育部青年發展署委託成果報告教育部青年發展署委託成果報告,教育部青年發展署=Youth Development Administration, MOE。
58. 宋湘玲, X. L.,林幸台, X. T.,鄭熙彥, X. Y.,謝麗紅, L. H.(2006).學校輔導工作的理論與實施.品高圖書=Pingo Books.
59. 李詠秋, Y. Q.(2002)。原住民大學生生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能與其生涯阻礙因素之關係研究。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集，7，178-205。
60. 周仁尹, J. Y.,曾春榮, C. R.(2006)。從弱勢族群的類型談教育選擇權及教育財政革新。教育研究與發展期刊，2(3)，93-122。
61. 林幸台, H. T.,田秀蘭, H. L.,張小鳳, X. F.,張德聰, T. C.(2010).生涯輔導.心理=Psychological Publishing.
62. 林思吟, S.Y.(2016)。淺談差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(3)，118-123。
63. 夏允中, Y. Z.,張淑慧, S. H.(2008)。同儕輔導方案效果研究－以彰化高中為例。中華輔導學報，8，111-140。
64. 張怡雯, Y. W.(2019)。國立臺中教育大學=National Taichung University of Education。
65. 莊勝義, S. Y.(2009)。從多元文化觀點省思「弱勢者」的教育「問題」與「對策」。教育與多元文化研究期刊，1，17-56。
66. 陳金彌, J. M.(2009)。行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫研究成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
67. 陳德嫺, D.X.(2009)。青少年同儕影響力之理論探討。諮商與輔導，282，2-5。
68. 黃筱惠, X. H.(2016)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal Universtiy。
69. 黃儒傑, J. C.(2012)。弱勢學生師生關係、社會支持及其學習任務價值之相關研究。臺東大學教育學報，23(2)，1-26。
70. 劉淑慧, S. H.(2016)。科技部專題計畫科技部專題計畫,科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
71. 劉淑慧, S. H.(2016).變易的力量：e時代的生涯籌劃.張老師=Living Psychology.
72. 劉淑慧, S. H.,陳斐娟, F. C.,吳淑禎, S. C.(2014)。劉淑慧、陳斐娟、吳淑禎（2014）：知識經濟時代的大專學生之學習目標與生涯發展任務。國立彰化師範大學華人生涯研究中心。[Liu, S. H., Chen, F. C., & Wu, S. C.(2014).College students' learning goals and career development tasks in the knowledge based economy era. National Changhua University of Education Chinese Career Research Center.]。
73. 蔡清田, C. T.(2000).教育行動研究.五南=Wu-Nan.
74. 鄭勝耀, S. Y.,黃瀞瑩, C. Y.(2014)。我國弱勢教育政策與社會公平之相關研究。教育研究月刊，242，5-16。