题名

大學生對PM_(2.5)空氣污染的態度與認知之研究

并列篇名

Undergraduate Students' Attitudes towards and Knowledge of Air Pollution

DOI

10.6555/JEER.14.2.057

作者

謝百淇(Paichi Pat Shein);曾靜雯(Ching-Wen Tseng);陳繼成(Chi-Chen Chen);吳景達(Ching-Ta Wu)

关键词

自然連結性 ; 空氣污染 ; 風險論點 ; 細懸浮微粒 ; 環境議題 ; connectedness to nature ; air pollution ; risk argument ; particulate matter 2.5 ; environmental issues

期刊名称

環境教育研究

卷期/出版年月

14卷2期(2018 / 12 / 01)

页次

57 - 90

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近年來,細懸浮微粒(PM_(2.5))空氣污染已成為全球關注的環境議題之一。本文目的為探討PM_(2.5)空氣污染的議題中,不同性別、健康狀況、自然連結性及幸福感的大學生,其「對PM_(2.5)的風險論點」、「對空氣污染防治的支持度」與「對PM_(2.5)的認知」是否有所不同。研究針對臺灣三所大學共六個科系發放233份問卷,利用獨立樣本t檢定進行統計分析,茲將研究結果重點如下:(一)男性大學生對「風險不大」的論點平均得分比女性大學生較高。(二)自然連結性較高的大學生在「預防優先」與「利弊權衡」的論點上得分較高,反之較低的大學生則是在「相對風險」與「風險不大」的論點上得分較高。(三)自然連結性較高的大學生,普遍在「對空氣污染防治的支持度」上得分較高。(四)不同幸福感的學生在態度與認知上沒有明顯的差異存在。研究結果發現女性較男性大學生在意PM_(2.5)的風險,自然連結性較高的大學生較重視空氣品質,並支持空氣污染預防優先和防治的態度。本研究的發現可提供給以環境議題為題材的大學環境教育之參考。

英文摘要

Air pollution has become an important environmental issue globally. This study aimed to investigate how factors such as gender, health condition, connectedness to nature and well-being relate to risk argument, support for air pollution intervention measures and knowledge of PM_(2.5). The survey data were collected from 233 undergraduate students from various academic disciplines and analyzed using t-test analysis. The findings showed that male students are more likely to take on the "precautionary" argument than female students. Students with more connection to nature tend to take on the "precautionary" and the "pros and cons" arguments, and are more supportive of air pollution intervention measures. Those with less connection tend to take on the "relative risk" and "the small risk" arguments. The significant relationship found between risk arguments and connectedness to nature urge researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers in education and environmental policy to consider nature relatedness as means to cultivate particular orientations of risk argument towards socio-scientific issues related to the environment.

主题分类 工程學 > 市政與環境工程
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 任孟淵、許世璋(2015)。大學環境通識課群之教學內涵與成效分析。環境教育研究,11(2),107-146。
    連結:
  2. 周少凱、許舒婷(2010)。大學生環境認知、環境態度與環境行為之研究。嶺東學報,27,85-113。
    連結:
  3. 周儒、潘淑蘭、吳忠宏、(2013)。大學生面對全球暖化議題採取行動之影響因子研究。環境教育研究,10(1),1-34。
    連結:
  4. 洪榮昭、傅惠筠(2012)。大專校院學生節能減碳行為意圖之研究。教育心理學報,44(2),373-388。
    連結:
  5. 許世璋(2003)。大學環境教育課程對於環境行動與其它環境素養變項之成效分析。科學教育學刊,11(1),97-119。
    連結:
  6. 許世璋、任孟淵(2014)。培養環境公民行動的大學環境教育課程-整合理性、情感、與終極關懷的學習模式。科學教育學刊,22(2),211-236。
    連結:
  7. 潘淑蘭、周儒、吳景達(2017)。探究臺灣大學生環境素養與影響環境行動之因子。環境教育研究,13(1),35-66。
    連結:
  8. Bickerstaff, K.(2004).Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution.Environment International,30(6),827-840.
  9. Bickerstaff, K.,Walker, G.(2001).Public understandings of air pollution: the 'localisation' of environmental risk.Global Environmental Change,11(2),133-145.
  10. Brink, P. T.,Mutafoglu, K.,Schweitzer, J. P.,Kettunen, M.,Clare, T. R.,Baker, J.,Ojala, A.(2016).IEEP ReportIEEP Report,未出版
  11. Brook, R. D.,Franklin, B.,Cascio, W.,Hong, Y.,Howard, G.,Lipsett, M.,Tager, I.(2004).Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the expert panel on population and prevention science of the American Heart Association.Circulation,109(21),2655-2671.
  12. Brook, R. D.,Rajagopalan, S.,Pope, C. A.,Brook, J. R.,Bhatnagar, A.,Diez-Roux, A. V.,Peters, A.(2010).Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation,121(21),2331-2378.
  13. Burek, K.(2012).USA,University of South Florida.
  14. Carta, S.(Ed.)(2002).Psychology, Volume Ⅲ, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems.Oxford, UK:Eolss Publisher.
  15. Chawla, L.(1999).Life paths into effective environmental action.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(1),15-26.
  16. Chou, W. C.,Hsu, C. Y.,Ho, C. C.,Hsieh, J. H.,Chiang, H. C.,Tsou, T. C.,Lin, P.(2017).Development of an in vitro-based risk assessment framework for predicting ambient particulate matter-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonactivated toxicity pathways.Environmental Science & Technology,51,14262-14272.
  17. Davis, J. L.,Green, J. D.,Reed, A.(2009).Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior.Journal of Environmental Psychology,29(2),173-180.
  18. Diener, E. D.,Emmons, R. A.,Larsen, R. J.,Griffin, S.(1985).The satisfaction with life scale.Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1),71-75.
  19. Dutcher, D. D.,Finley, J. C.,Luloff, A. E.,Johnson, J. B.(2007).Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values.Environment and Behavior,39(4),474-493.
  20. Ferreira, J. G.,Venter, E.(2016).The interconnectedness between well-being and the natural environment.Applied Environmental Education & Communication,15(4),291-300.
  21. Gauderman, W. J.,Urman, R.,Avol, E.,Berhane, K.,McConnell, R.,Rappaport, E.,Gilliland, F.(2015).Association of improved air quality with lung development in children.New England Journal of Medicine,372(10),905-913.
  22. Health Effects Institute (2017). A special report on global exposure to air pollution and its disease burden (State of Global Air/2017). Retrieved from https://www.stateofglobalair.org/
  23. Hines, J. M.,Hungerford, H. R.,Tomera, A. N.(1987).Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,18(2),1-8.
  24. Hsu, C.Y.,Chiang, H. C.,Chuang, C. Y.,Tsen, C. M.,Fang, G. C.,Tsai, Y. I.,Chen, Y. C.(2017).Ambient PM2.5 in the residential area near industrial complexes: spatiotemporal variation, source apportionment, and health impact.Science of The Total Environment,590-591,204-214.
  25. Hungerford, H. R.,Volk, T. L.(1990).Changing learner behavior through environmental education.Journal of Environmental Education,21(3),8-21.
  26. Institute for European Environmental Policy (2017). Nature for health and equity. Retrieved from https://www.foeeurope.org/publications/
  27. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2013, October 17). IARC: Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths. Retrieved from https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/pr221_E.pdf
  28. Kals, E.,Schumacher, D.,Montada, L.(1999).Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature.Environment and Behavior,31(2),178-202.
  29. Kardan, O.,Gozdyra, P.,Misic, B.,Moola, F.,Palmer, L. J.,Paus, T.,Berman, M. G.(2015).Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center.Scientific Reports,5(1),11610.
  30. Kollmuss, A.,Agyeman, J.(2002).Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior.Environmental Education Research,8(3),239-260.
  31. Kolstø, S. D.(2006).Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk‐focused socio‐scientific issue.International Journal of Science Education,28(14),1689-1716.
  32. Landrigan, P. J.,Fuller, R.,Acosta, N. J.,Adeyi, O.,Arnold, R.,Baldé, A. B.,Chiles, T.(2018).The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.The Lancet,391(10119),462-512.
  33. Liu, X.,Zhu, H.,Hu, Y.,Feng, S.,Chu, Y.,Wu, Y.,Lu, Y.(2016).Public's health risk awareness on urban air pollution in Chinese megacities: The cases of Shanghai, Wuhan and Nanchang.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,13(9),845.
  34. Mayer, F. S.,Frantz, C. M.(2004).The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature.Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(4),503-515.
  35. Miller, D.(ed.),Morrice, J.(ed.)(2014).GreenHealth: Contribution of green and open space to public health and wellbeing.Aberdeen, UK:James Hutton Institute.
  36. Nisbet, E. K. L.,Zelenski, J. M.,Murphy, S. A.(2009).The Nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour.Environment and Behavior,41(5),715-740.
  37. Nisbet, E. K.,Zelenski, J. M.(2013).The NR-6: A new brief new measure of nature relatedness.Frontiers in Psychology,4,813.
  38. Ole, R. N.,Zorana, J. A.,Rob, B.,Evangelia, S.,Massimo, S.,Gudrun, W.,Gerard, H.(2013).Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE).The Lancet Oncology,14(9),813-822.
  39. Omanga, E.,Ulmer, L.,Berhane, Z.,Gatari, M.(2014).Industrial air pollution in rural Kenya: community awareness, risk perception and associations between risk variables.BMC Public Health,14(1),377.
  40. Palmer, J. A.,Suggate, J.(1996).Influences and experiences affecting the proenvironmental behaviour of educators.Environmental Education Research,2(1),109-121.
  41. Pluhar, Z. F.,Piko, B. F.,Kovacs, S.,Uzzoli, A.(2009)."Air pollution is bad for my health": Hungarian children's knowledge of the role of environment in health and disease.Health & Place,15(1),239-246.
  42. Russell, J. A.,Pratt, G.(1980).A description of the affective quality attributed to environments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38(2),311-322.
  43. Schultz, P. W.(2002).Inclusion with nature: Understanding human-nature interactions.Psychology of Sustainable Development
  44. Seligman, M. E.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Special issue on happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning.American Psychologist,55(1),5-183.
  45. Tanner, T.(1980).Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education.The Journal of Environmental Education,11(4),20-24.
  46. World Health Organization=WHO(2009).Global health risk: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks.
  47. Wright, B. D.,Masters, G. N.(1982).Rating scale analysis.Chicago, IL:MESA Press.
  48. Zelenski, J. M.,Nisbet, E. K.(2014).Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness.Environment and Behavior,46(1),3-23.
  49. 王瑞庚 (2014) 。細懸浮微粒(PM2.5) : 風險治理新挑戰。取自:http://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/air-pollution.html【Wang, R. G. (2014). Suspended particulates (PM2.5): new challenges in risk management. Retrieved from http://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m01-3/air-pollution.html】
  50. 行政院環保署(2018)。相關詞彙及定義。取自:https://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0205.aspx【Environmental Protection Administration, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2018). Related glossary and definition. Retrieved from https://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0205.aspx】
  51. 余民寧(2015)。幸福心理學:從幽谷邁向巔峰之路。臺北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing。
  52. 沈廣城(2002)。屏東=Pingtung,國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Pingtung University of Education。
  53. 兒童福利聯盟(2018)。2018 台灣家長空汙認知與兒童影響狀況調查報告。取自:https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/70/1330【Child Welfare League Foundation, R.O.C. (Taiwan). (2018). 2018 Investigation report on the awareness of children's air pollution and the influence of children in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/70/1330】
  54. 周桂田、杜文苓、王瑞庚、林怡均、王瑋彤(2016)。公共政策與法律研究中心研究計畫案期末報告公共政策與法律研究中心研究計畫案期末報告,臺北市:國立臺灣大學公共政策與法律研究中心。
  55. 洪蘭譯、Kahneman, Daniel(2012)。快思慢想。台北市=Taipei:天下文化=Commonwealth Publishing Group。
  56. 香港健康空氣行動(2010)。問卷調查。取自:http://hongkongcan.org/eng/wpcontent/uploads/2010/10/SSP-Questionnaire_chi.pdf【 Clean Air Network of Hong Kong(2010). Questionnaire survey. Retrieved from http://hongkongcan.org/eng/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/SSP-Questionnaire_chi.pdf】
  57. 梁世武、劉湘瑤、蔡慧敏、方偉達(2013)。行政院環保署專案研究計畫成果報告行政院環保署專案研究計畫成果報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院環保署=Environmental Protection Administration。
  58. 莊秉潔(2011)。行政院環境保護署/國家科學委員會空污防制科研合作計畫成果報告行政院環境保護署/國家科學委員會空污防制科研合作計畫成果報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
  59. 莊英慧、熊召弟、耿筱曾、甘漢銧(2007)。臺北縣國小六年級學童水的知識理解、水資源保育態度與行為之相關研究。環境教育學刊,7,55-79。
  60. 郭維倫、陳韻如、蕭暐婷(2013)。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告期末報告科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告期末報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
  61. 陳康興(2005)。行政院環境保護署/國家科學委員會空污防制科研合作計畫成果報告行政院環境保護署/國家科學委員會空污防制科研合作計畫成果報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
  62. 陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵,測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
  63. 章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2010)。,臺北市=Taipei:中央研究院社會學研究所=Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica。
  64. 曾宇良、佐藤宣子(2012)。日本推動森林療育基地之過程與現況之研究─以九州為例。林業研究季刊,34(2),161-172。
  65. 黃政傑(1988)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
  66. 黃臺珠編(2014)。2012 年臺灣公民科學素養概況。高雄市=Kaohsiung:國立中山大學通識教育中心公民素養推動研究中心=National Sun Yat-sen University Center for General Education。
  67. 楊倍華(2008)。臺北市=Taipei,國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Environmental Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
  68. 謝瑞豪、李睿桓、詹長權、(2016)。台灣大氣中PM2.5 污染濃度和汙染源的時空分布。臺灣醫學,20(4),367-376。
被引用次数
  1. 蘇靖雅,譚躍(2023)。臺灣報紙中空污風險的新聞框架:跨時的演變及其內涵。新聞學研究,154,55-112。
  2. 謝百淇,陳美智,姜幸鐘(2020)。教師永續發展態度、空汙風險論點與空汙防治行為之關係研究。科學教育學刊,28(2),169-195。
  3. 謝百淇,項文雄,陳繼成,郭哲凱(2021)。臺灣南部某國立大學學生對空氣汙染防制政策支持度之研究。科學教育學刊,29(2),83-112。
  4. 謝百淇,楊筑鈞(2022)。國家公園解說志工的生態認同之初探。科學教育學刊,30(2),171-192。
  5. 顏瓊芬,劉品君,楊登順,許彩梁(2021)。專題反思教學應用於PM_(2.5)空汙環境行動課程之學習成效研究。科學教育學刊,29(S),491-516。
  6. 葉國樑,邱莉菱(2020)。細懸浮微粒(PM_(2.5))防治動畫教育介入研究-以臺北市某高中為例。學校衛生,74,85-113。
  7. (2024)。呼吸中的覺醒:空氣品質感知與環境意識能否點燃大學生的購買意願?。管理資訊計算,13(特刊1),58-65。