题名

偏遠地區泰雅族與漢族中學生中文識讀能力之分析

并列篇名

Chinese Reading Literacy in Atayal and Han Junior High School Students in a Remote Area of Taiwan

DOI

10.6151/CERQ.2012.2002.04

作者

孔淑萱(Shu-Hsuan Kung);白芸凌(Yun-Ling Pai);蘇宜芬(Yi-Fen Su);吳昭容(Chao-Jung Wu)

关键词

社經地位 ; 泰雅族學生 ; 閱讀理解 ; 識字量 ; 聽覺理解 ; Atayal students ; Chinese character size ; listening comprehension ; reading comprehension ; socioeconomic status

期刊名称

當代教育研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

20卷2期(2012 / 06 / 30)

页次

135 - 169

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

識讀能力意指理解與使用書面語言的能力,其主要成分包括閱讀理解、聽覺理解, 以及識字量。為了探討單一偏遠地區泰雅族與漢族學生在中文識讀能力的表現與差異,並分析相關因素(例如族群、社經地位、性別,以及日常閱讀經驗)對閱讀理解的預測力,本研究以北部偏遠地區中學七年級的66名泰雅族學生及76名漢族學生為對象,受測學生均屬社經地位最低等級,兩族群沒有顯著差異。測驗結果發現,泰雅族學生在聽覺理解的表現不僅低於全國常模,更顯著低於漢族學生,其閱讀理解表現則僅低於全國常模,而與背景相近的偏遠漢族學生相當,其識字量不僅與偏遠漢族學生相當,也與常模無差。細究測驗的子成分顯示,泰雅族學生相較於漢族學生,其主要的困難在於高階的統整與推理能力。在迴歸分析中,識字量及聽覺理解表現能顯著預測閱讀理解能力,至於族群、背景因素與日常閱讀經驗等變現對閱讀理解多半不具預測力,顯示在選取區域鄰近的施測對象下,降低了社經地位等因素的差異,致使族群對閱讀理解就不具預測力。此一結果指出,以往識讀能力的族群差異可能與社經地位有關,但宜留意原住民學生較弱的聽覺理解對學習的影響,而偏遠地區中學生中文識讀的教學重點,應著眼在高層次的推理能力上。

英文摘要

Literacy typically involves the ability to comprehend and manage text language. This study investigated Chinese reading literacy in Atayal and Han students from a single remote area in Taiwan by analyzing possible factors (i.e., ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, and daily reading experiences) associated with reading comprehension. A total of 66 Atayal and 76 Han seventh grade students, from the same remote, low socioeconomic status area of northern Taiwan. The results revealed that the listening comprehension performance of the Atayal students was significantly worse than both the national norm and the performance of Han students who participated in this study. Regarding reading comprehension, Atayal students performed significantly worse than the national norm but at the same level as their Han peers. However, Atayal students remained highly similar to both the national norm and their Han peers in terms of the performance of Chinese character size. A further analysis showed that compared to Han students, the main difficulty of Atayal students was advanced reading tasks such as integrating and inferring. Moreover, regression analysis revealed that Chinese character size and listening comprehension were significantly associated with student performance in reading comprehension. After controlling for socioeconomic status by examining the performance of students from adjacent areas, no association was found between literacy and ethnicity, family background, and daily reading experience. The findings suggest that the difference in literacy abilities between ethnicities may be related to socioeconomic status; yet, listening comprehension also plays a vital role in Atayal students' literacy learning. Consequently, literacy teaching of junior high school students in remote areas should emphasize higher-level abilities, for example, integration and inference.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2008)。一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報,39(4),555-568。
    連結:
  2. 吳宜貞(2002)。家庭環境因素對兒童閱讀能力影響之探討。教育心理學報,34(1),1-20。
    連結:
  3. 吳宜貞、戴麗觀(2007)。重複聆聽、故事難度和識字能力對聽力理解的影響。教育心理學報,38(3),251-270。
    連結:
  4. 李佩嬛、黃毅志(2011)。原漢族群、家庭背景與高中職入學考試基測成績、教育分流:以台東縣為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),193-226。
    連結:
  5. 柯華葳、陳冠銘(2004)。文章結構標示與閱讀理解─以低年級學生為例。教育心理學報,36(2),185-200。
    連結:
  6. 洪碧霞、邱上真、葉千綺、林素微(2000)。國小學童國語文能力成長組型之探討。測驗年刊,47(1),1-25。
    連結:
  7. 徐靜嫻(2006)。多元識讀與動畫敘事課程在國語文領域統整中的應用─一個國語文領域統只課程發展之經驗分享。師大學報:人文與社會類,51(1&2),55-57。
    連結:
  8. 陳美芳、吳怡潔(2008)。中小學學童生活口語理解評量工具建構與效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊,33(3),77-93。
    連結:
  9. 陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(2006)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報:教育類,51(2),147-171。
    連結:
  10. 曾彥翰、蔡昆瀛(2007)。文章結構教學對增進國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(2),67-91。
    連結:
  11. 劉沛琳(2008)。概念構圖理解策略在大學英文閱讀教學之成效。課程與教學季刊,11(4),137-162。
    連結:
  12. 簡淑真(2010)。三種早期閱讀介入方案對社經弱勢幼兒教學效果研究。台東大學教育學報,21(1),93-123。
    連結:
  13. Wren, S. (2000). Reading framework. Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory. Retrieved March 3, 2012, from http://www.sedl.org/reading /framework/
  14. (2007)。陳美芳(2007)。聽覺理解測驗指導手冊。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。[Chen, M.-F. (2007). Language comprehension test. Taipei: Special Education Unit, Ministry of Education.]。
  15. Statistics Canada (2006). Aboriginal peoples in Canada in 2006: Inuit, Métis and first nations, 2006 Census (No. 97-558). Ottawa, Statistics Canada.
  16. 柯華葳、詹益綾(2007)。國民小學閱讀理解篩選測驗指導手冊。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。[Ko, H.-W., & Chan, Y.-L. (2007). The Manual of Reading Comprehension Screening Test. Taipei, Taiwan: Special Education Unit, Ministry of Education.。
  17. Aaron, P. G.,Joshi, R. M.(1992).Reading problems: Consultation and remediation.New York:The Guilford Press.
  18. Artiles, A. J.,Trent, S. C.(1994).Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate.Journal of Special Education,27,410-437.
  19. Balota, D. A.(Ed.),Flores d''Arcais, G. B.(Ed.),Rayner, K.(Ed.)(1990).Comprehension processes in reading.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
  20. Bernstein, B.(2003).Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language.London:Rougledge.
  21. Campbell, J. R.,Kelly, D. L.,Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Sainsbury, M.(2001).Framework and specifications for PIRLS assessment 2001.Chestnut Hill, MA:Baston College.
  22. Chiu, M. M.,McBride-Chang, C.(2006).Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries.Scientific Studies of Reading,10(4),331-362.
  23. de Bortoli, L.,Creswell, J.(2004).Australia's Indigenous Students in PISA 2000: Results from an International Study.
  24. de Jong, P. F.,van der Leij, A.(2002).Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,6(1),51-77.
  25. Freeman, L.,Bochner, S.(2008).Bridging the Gap: Improving the literacy outcomes for Aboriginal students.Australian Journal of Early Childhood,33(4),9-16.
  26. García, G. E.(1991).Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish speaking Hispanic children.Reading Research Quarterly,26,371-392.
  27. Garris, J, L.(Ed.),Kamhi, A. G.(Ed.),Polock, K. E.(Ed.)(2001).Literacy in African American communities.Mahwah, NJ:Hampton Press.
  28. Gough, P. B.,Tunmer, W. E.(1986).Decoding, reading and reading disability.Remedial and Special Education,7(1),6-10.
  29. Hagie, M. U.,Gallipo, P. L.,Svien, L.(2003).Traditional culture versus traditional assessment for American Indian students: An investigation of potential test item bias.Assessment for effective intervention,29(1),15-25.
  30. Hannon, B.,Daneman, M.(2001).A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,93,103-128.
  31. Hart, B.,Risley, T. R.(1992).American parenting of language-learning children: Persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments.Developmental Psychology,28,1096-1105.
  32. Heward, W. L.(2003).Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (7th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  33. Hoff, E.(2003).The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech.Child Development,74(5),1368-1378.
  34. Hoover, W. A.,Gough, P. B.(1990).The simple view of reading.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,2,127-160.
  35. Hosp, J. L.,Reschley, D. J.(2004).Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education academic, demographic, and economic predictors.Exceptional Children,70(2),185-199.
  36. Jimenez, R.,Garcia, G. E.,Pearson, P. D.(1996).The reading strategies of Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles.Reading Research Quarterly,31,90-112.
  37. Mace-Matluck, B. J.,Dominguez, D.(1981).Teaching reading to bilingual children: Effects of interaction of learner characteristics and type of reading instruction on the reading achievement of bilingual children.NCBE Forum,4,3-4.
  38. Marjoribanks, K.(1987).Ability and attitude correlates of academic achievement: Family-group differences.Journal of Educational Psychology,79,171-178.
  39. Pan, B. A.,Rowe, M. L.,Singer, J. D.,Snow, C. E.(2005).Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families.Child Development,76(4),763-782.
  40. Perfetti, C.(2007).Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension.Scientific Studies of Reading,11(4),357-383.
  41. Reynolds, C. R.(Ed.),Fletcher-Jantzen, E.(Ed.)(2000).Encyclopedia of Special Education.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  42. Samuels, S. J.(1985).Reading and listening to expository text.Journal of Reading Behavior,17(3),185-198.
  43. Smith, D. D.(2001).Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of opportunity (4th ed.).Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  44. Taylor, B. M.(Ed.),Graves, M. F.(Ed.),van den Broek, P.(Ed.)(2000).Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades.DE, Newark:International Reading Association.
  45. Timm, J. T.(1996).Four perspectives in multicultural education.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
  46. 孔淑萱、洪儷瑜、吳昭容(2011)。影響不同弱勢族群學生識讀能力相關因素之研究:以偏遠地區漢族與泰雅族國中生為對象。「2011年弱勢學生增能教育學術研討會暨工作坊」論文集,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
  47. 吳宜貞、黃秀霜(1998)。家庭環境變項、認字、語意區辨及閱讀理解能力之關係分析。教育與心理研究,21(下=2),357-380。
  48. 巫有鎰(1999)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制─以台北市和台東縣作比較。教育研究集刊,43,213-242。
  49. 巫有鎰、黃毅志(2009)。山地原住民的成績比平地原住民差嗎?可能影響臺東縣原住民各族與漢人國小學生學業成績差異的因素機制。臺灣教育社會學研究,9(1),41-89。
  50. 林生傳(2005)。教育社會學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:巨流=ChuLiu。
  51. 林清山、程炳林(1996)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-57。
  52. 柯華葳(1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,46(2),1-11。
  53. 柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。,未出版
  54. 洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2006)。識字量評估測驗。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  55. 張春興(1994)。教育心理學─三化取向的理論與實踐。台北=Taipei:東華書局=Tunghua Press。
  56. 陳美芳(1997)。國小學童聽覺理解與聽覺記憶能力之研究─不同國語文程度學生的比較。特殊教育研究學刊,15,293-305。
  57. 戴維揚(2003)。多元智慧與英語文教學─認知、建構、創新導向。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=Shtabook。
  58. 譚光鼎編、王麗雲編(2006)。教育社會學:人物與思想。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
  59. 譚光鼎(1996)。探討少數民族教育成就的理論模式。花師學院學報,6,25-72。
  60. 譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(2008)。多元文化教育。臺北市=Taipei:高等教育=Higher Education。
  61. 蘇宜芬、林清山(1992)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。教育心理學報,25,245-267。
被引用次数
  1. 林淑君,王麗斐(2022)。愛在流轉:某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效。教育心理學報,54(2),385-410。
  2. 陸怡琮(2021)。課文本位閱讀策略教學對原住民國小學童閱讀理解與詞彙理解的影響。課程與教學,24(3),25-53。
  3. 施淑娟(2019)。蒙特梭利語文教育對部落與非部落原住民幼兒語文能力影響之研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類,50(1),25-43。
  4. (2013)。訪談課程對泰雅族國中生訊息溝通能力與文化認同之影響。臺東大學教育學報,24(1),1-23。
  5. (2017)。借鏡加拿大觀點之原住民閱讀素養教育分析。中正教育研究,16(1),123-162。
  6. (2021)。在文化中學習自主閱讀科學文本:「回應排灣文化的科學閱讀課程」之設計與發展。教育研究月刊,331,76-95。
  7. (2024)。建構與驗證影響幼兒語言及社會情緒能力之家庭因素。測驗學刊,71(2),175-198。
  8. (2024)。中文詞素覺識訓練軟體對台灣南部偏遠地區國小四年級弱讀生詞彙知識成效之影響。教育學報,52(1),61-83。