题名

孰優、孰弱？臺灣學生學習成就軌跡之異質性分析

并列篇名

WHO'S SUPERIOR AND WHO’S INFERIOR? STUDY OF HETEROGENEITY OF STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT TRAJECTORIES IN TAIWAN

DOI

10.6151/CERQ.2016.2401.02

作者

邱皓政(Haw-Jeng Chiou)；林碧芳(Pi-Fang Lin)

关键词

教育機會均等 ； 弱勢族群 ； 混合成長模式 ； 馬太效應 ； 臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫 ； equality of educational opportunity ； disadvantaged minority ； growth mixture modeling ； Matthew effects ； Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS)

期刊名称

當代教育研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

页次

33 - 79

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

學習優弱勢族群的辨識是重要的學術課題，也是教育政策決策與支持體系規劃的主要依據，更需要實徵資料提供證據支持。本研究利用臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（Taiwan Education Panel Survey,TEPS）的貫時性資料，以潛在成長模式與混合成長模式估計學生學習成就軌跡，藉以辨識優弱勢異質族群，並探討相關影響因素。TEPS資料庫中2,806位學生的學習成就四波調查的潛在成長模式分析結果發現，臺灣中學階段學生的學習成就成長軌跡呈現非線性的遞增漸緩的成長曲線。混合成長模式分析則得到三個異質族群：正常成長族群呈現能力遞增的成長曲線，兩個相對弱勢的族群則呈現起點低落或成長有限的變動曲線。進一步分析發現，教育分流與區位因素是區辨異質族群的主要原因，而負向文化資本亦有顯著的預測力，由不同族群者的起點與成長型態呈現扇形擴展，顯示潛在分群下的異質群體軌跡差異呈現馬太效應（Matthew effects）。本研究除了對於異質族群的內涵意義與相關影響因素進行分析與解釋之外，並對本文的方法學意義與研究限制進行討論。
英文摘要

Identifying superior and inferior groups of academic achievements is not only the major concern of academic researchers but also the foundation of policy-making and supplementary system design, all relying on the support of empirical evidences. In this study, data of 2,806 students selected from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) in four consecutive time periods are adapted to identify the latent clusters of superiority and inferiority in the students' achievement. The heterogeneity of the achievement trajectories is identified by the growth mixture modeling. The results show that the nonlinear model has the best fit for the observed data. An analysis of the mixture modeling indicates three heterogeneous classes on the trajectories, of which the typical-growth class has a gradually improved achievement curve. On the other hand, the two relatively inferior groups have a lower starting level or a decreased trend at the later waves of achievement measures. Furthermore, the inferior classes are identified by the differential schooling sectors and the location conditions with high level of negative culture capital. In contrast, the typical-growth class is improving relatively smoothly in the different learning stages in both the public and the normal schools. The fan-shaped pattern of trajectories supports the phenomenon of the Matthew effects. In addition to illustrating the heterogeneous trajectory and its influential factors, this study discusses the implications and limitations of several methodological issues.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、陳秀芬(2007)。低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究－馬太效應之可能表現。特殊教育研究學刊，32(3)，1-16。
    連結：
  2. 李旻樺、林清文(2003)。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習任務價值與動機調整策略之研究。中華輔導學報，14，117-145。
    連結：
  3. 李敦義(2011)。綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響：以TEPS 資料分析為例。教育科學研究期刊，56(2)，107-135。
    連結：
  4. 陳婉琪(2005)。族群、性別與階級：再探教育成就的省籍差異。臺灣社會學，10，1-40。
    連結：
  5. 曾明基、邱皓政(2015)。研究生評鑑教師教學的結果真的可以與大學生一起比較嗎？多群組混合MIMIC-DIF 分析。測驗學刊，62(1)，1-24。
    連結：
  6. 程炳林(2002)。學習工作、動機問題與大學生自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報，33(2)，79-102。
    連結：
  7. 詹秀雯、張芳全(2014)。影響國中生學習成就因素之研究。國立臺中教育大學學報，28(1)，49-76。
    連結：
  8. 駱明慶(2002)。誰是臺大學生？性別、省籍與城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊，30(1)，113-147。
    連結：
  9. 蘇船利、黃毅志(2009)。文化資本透過學校社會資本對臺東縣國二學生學業成績之影響。教育研究集刊，55(3)，99-129。
    連結：
  10. 吳羿葶（2014 年10 月28 日）。國立頂尖大學區域化趨勢逐漸成形。新新聞。取自 http://www.new7.com.tw/。[Wu, Y. T. (2014, October 28). Regionalization of the national top university. The Journalist. Retrieved from http://www.new7.com.tw/]
  11. 陳智華（2013 年8 月7 日）。指考放榜：臺大新生還是明星高中天下。聯合新聞網。取自http://udn.com/news/index。[Chen, C.-H. (2013, August 7). Announcement of Advanced Subjects Test: The world of NTU or the star high schools. United Daily News. Retrieved from http://udn.com/news/index]
  12. Aunola, K.,Leskinen, E.,Nurmi, J.-E.(2006).Developmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teacher's goals during the transition to primary school.British Journal of Educational Psychology,76,21-40.
  13. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  14. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.Psychological Review,84(2),191-215.
  15. Berlin, K. S.,Williams, N. A.,Parra, G. R.(2014).An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Cross sectional latent class and latent profile analyses.Journal of Pediatric Psychology,39(2),174-187.
  16. Blake, J.(1989).Family size and achievement.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  17. Blake, J.(1981).Family size and the quality of children.Demography,18(4),421-42.
  18. Boström, L.,Lassen, L. M.(2006).Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and meta-cognition.Education & Training,48(2),178-189.
  19. Bourdieu, P.(1977).Reproduction in education, society, culture.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  20. Chamot, A.(2005).Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,25,112-130.
  21. Coleman, J. S.(1966).Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC:U. S. Office of Education.
  22. Collins, L. M.,Fidler, P. L.,Wugalter, S. E.,Long, J. D.(1993).Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,28,375-389.
  23. Covington, M. V.(2000).Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement.Annual Review of Psychology,51,171-200.
  24. De Graaf, P. M.(1986).The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands.Sociology of Education,59,237-246.
  25. Elliot, D.(1985).National Youth Survey 1976-1980: Wave I-V.Ann Arbor, MI:Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
  26. Fan, X.,Chen, M.(1999).Academic achievement of rural school students: A multi-year comparison with their peers in suburban and urban schools.Journal of Research in Rural Education,15(1),31-46.
  27. Farkas, G.,Grobe, R. P.,Sheehan, D.,Shuan, Y.(1990).Cultural resources and school success: Gender ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban school district.American Sociological Review,55(1),127-142.
  28. Farrington, D. P.,West, D. J.(1993).Criminal, penal and life histories of chronic offenders: Risk and protective factors and early identification.Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health,3,492-523.
  29. Fitzmaurice, G.(Ed.),Davidian, M.(Ed.),Verbeke, G.(Ed.),Molenberghs, G.(Ed.)(2008).Longitudinal data analysis.Boca Raton, FL:Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
  30. Fraine, B. D.,van Damme, J.,Onghena, P.(2007).A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate latent growth approach.Contemporary Educational Psychology,32(1),132-150.
  31. Garg, R.,Kauppi, C.,Lewko, J.,Urajnik, D.(2002).A structural model of educational aspirations.Journal of Career Development,29(2),87-108.
  32. Gladwell, M.、廖月娟譯(2009)。異數：超凡與平凡的界線在哪裡？。臺北市:時報文化。
  33. Hagenaars, J.(Ed.),McCutcheon, A.(Ed.)(2002).Applied latent class analysis models..New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  34. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
  35. Hancock, G. R.(Ed.)(2007).Mixture models in latent variable research.Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
  36. Hancock, G. R.(Ed.),Samuelsen, K. M.(Ed.)(2007).Advances in latent variable mixture models.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
  37. Jung, T.,Wickrama, K. A. S.(2007).An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling.Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2,302-317.
  38. Kanazawa, S.(2012).Intelligence, birth order and family size.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,38(9),1157-1164.
  39. Kao, G.,Thompson, J. S.(2003).Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment.Annual Review of Sociology,29,417-44.
  40. Kaplan, D.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  41. Lee, J. K.(2009).The effects of self-regulated learning strategies and system satisfaction regarding learner's performance in e-learning environment.Journal of Instructional Pedagogies,1,30-45.
  42. Lo, Y.,Mendell, N.,Rubin, D.(2001).Testing the number of components in a normal mixture.Biometrika,88(3),767-778.
  43. Marcoulides, G. A.(Ed.),Schumacker, R. E.(Ed.)(2001).New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  44. McCoach, D. B.,O'Connell, A. A.,Reis, S. M.,Levitt, H. A.(2006).Growing readers: A hierarchical linear model of children's reading growth during the first 2 years of school.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),14-28.
  45. McLachlan, G.,Peel, D.(2000).Finite mixture models.New York, NY:John Wiley.
  46. Merton, R. K.(1988).The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property.Isis,79(4),606-623.
  47. Merton, R. K.(1968).The Matthew effect in science.Science,159(3810),56-63.
  48. Morgan, S. L.,Todd, J. J.(2008).A diagnostic routine for the detection of consequential heterogeneity of causal effects.Sociological Methodology,38(1),231-281.
  49. Muthén, B.,Brown, C. H.,Masyn, K.,Jo, B.,Khoo, S. T.,Yang, C. C.,Liao, J.(2002).General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions.Biostatistics,3(4),459-475.
  50. Muthén, B.,Kao, C.-F.,Burstein, L.(1991).Instructional sensitivity in mathematics achievement test items: Applications of a new IRT-based detection technique.Journal of Educational Measurement,28,1-22.
  51. Muthén, B.,Khoo, S. T.(1998).Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using latent variable modeling.Learning and Individual Differences,10(2),73-101.
  52. Muthén, B.,Lehman. J.(1985).Multiple-group IRT modeling: Applications to item bias analysis.Journal of Educational Statistics,10,133-142.
  53. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(1998).Mplus user's guide.Los Angeles, CA:Muthen & Muthen.
  54. Nieuwbeerta, P.,Blokland, A.(2003).Criminal careers in adult Dutch offenders.Leiden, Netherlands:NCSR.
  55. Nylund, K. L.,Asparouhov, T.,Muthén, B.(2007).Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study.Structural Equation Modeling,14(4),535-569.
  56. Ogbu, J. U.(1987).Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,18(4),312-334.
  57. Petersen, A. M.,Jung, W.-S.,Yang, J.-S.,Stanley, H. E.(2011).Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108(1),18-23.
  58. Protopapas, A.,Sideridis, G. D.,Mouzaki, A.,Simos, P. G.(2011).Matthew effects in reading comprehension: Myth or reality?.Journal of Learning Disabilties,44(5),402-420.
  59. Ram, N.,Grimm, K. J.(2009).Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying difference in longitudinal change among unobserved groups.International Journal of Behavioral Development,33(6),565-576.
  60. Reeves, E. B.,Bylund, R. A.(2005).Are rural schools inferior to urban schools? A multilevel analysis of school accountability trends in Kentucky.Rural Sociology,70(3),360-386.
  61. Richardson, J.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education.New York, NY:Greenwood Press.
  62. Roeder, K.,Lynch, K. G.,Nagin, D. S.(1999).Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: A case study in criminology.Journal of the American Statistical Association,94,766-776.
  63. Roscigno, V. J.,Ainsworth-Darnel, J. W.(1999).Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns.Sociology of Education,72(3),158-178.
  64. Roscigno, V. J.,Crowley, M. L.(2001).Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment.Rural Sociology,66(2),268-292.
  65. Saha, L. J.(Ed.)(1997).International encyclopedia of the sociology of education.Oxford, England:Elsevier Science.
  66. Schwartz, G.(1978).Estimating the dimension of a model.The Annals of Statistics,6(2),461-464.
  67. Stanovich, K. E.(1986).Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21(4),360-407.
  68. Tracy, P.,Wolfgang, M. E.,Figlio, R. M.(1990).Delinquency careers in two birth cohorts.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
  69. Trueba, H. T.(1988).Culturally based explanations of minority students' academic achievement.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,19(3),270-287.
  70. Walberg, H. J.,Tsai, S. L.(1983).Matthew effects in education.American Educational Research Journal,20(3),359-373.
  71. Wang, M.,Bodner, T. E.(2007).Growth mixture modeling: Identifying and predicting unobserved subpopulations with longitudinal data.Organizational Research Methods,10(4),635-656.
  72. Wilson, P. M.,Wilson, J. R.(1992).Environmental influences on adolescent educational aspirations: A logistic transform model.Youth and Society,24(1),52-70.
  73. Wright, A. G. C.,Hallquist, M. N.(2014).Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality part II: Longitudinal models.Journal of Personality Assessment,96(3),269-282.
  74. Zajonc, R. B.,Mullally, P. R.(1997).Birth order: Reconciling conflicting effects.American Psychologist,52(7),685-699.
  75. 王郁琮(2012)。從異質性分析探討國中生霸凌危機與憂鬱情緒之關係：多層次迴歸混合模式。教育與心理研究，35(1)，127-153。
  76. 王郁琮、溫福星(2011)。混合因素分析對群體異質性之探索：以國中生學業困擾二元資料為例。教育與心理研究，34(3)，37-63。
  77. 甘鳳琴(2006)。國小兒童學業成績馬太效應現象：一個長期的觀察。雲嘉特教，4，68-75。
  78. 余民寧(2006)。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究雙月刊，73，11-24。
  79. 李敦仁(2010)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
  80. 李敦仁、余民寧(2005)。社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證：以TEPS 資料庫資料為例。臺灣教育社會學研究期刊，5(2)，1-48。
  81. 周家宏(2014)。嘉義縣=Chia-Yi, Taiwan，南華大學=Nan-Hwang University。
  82. 周新富(2005)。布爾迪厄論學校教育與文化再製。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
  83. 林大森(2002)。高中／高職的公立／私立分流對地位取得之影響。教育與心理研究，22，35-62。
  84. 林碧芳(2011)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
  85. 張春興(2006)。現代心理學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:東華=Tung Hua Book。
  86. 教育部(2004)。教育政策白皮書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
  87. 許宏儒(2004)。新竹市=Hsin-Chu, Taiwan，國立新竹教育大學=National Hsin-Chu University of Education。
  88. 章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位：兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院教育改革審議委員會=The Education Reform Committee of the Executive Yuan Collect。
  89. 游錦雲、陳敏瑜、曾秋華、李慧純(2009)。臺灣學生在TEPS 的數學表現及其啟示。研究資訊，26(6)，97-106。
  90. 楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄(2003)。心理計量報告：TEPS 2001 分析能力測驗。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:中央研究院調查研究專題中心=Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica。
  91. 趙珮晴(2009)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
  92. 蔡毓智(2007)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
被引用次数
  1. 許籐繼,林子廉(2021)。基隆市國小學生學習責任、課堂紀律與學習成就及其關係之研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，52(2)，55-78。
  2. 簡瑋成,謝傳崇(2023)。偏遠地區國中小畢業生跨區升學、家長教育期望、參與學校教育及學校選擇因素之探究。教育科學研究期刊，68(3)，61-93。
  3. 林淑君,王麗斐(2022)。愛在流轉：某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效。教育心理學報，54(2)，385-410。
  4. 林淑君、王麗斐(2017)。偏鄉青少年完成高中職學業的促進因素研究：以某偏鄉國中畢業生為例。當代教育研究季刊，25(4)，127-171。
  5. 謝進昌,蔡明學,陳敏瑜(2019)。低成就學生之國語文成長軌跡分析及其影響因素研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，42，27-65。
  6. 謝曼盈,張景媛(2019)。家長參與、科學學習動機與偏鄉地區國中生科學學習成就。教育心理學報，51(1)，1-22。
  7. 薛智暉,余民寧(2021)。不同類型暑假活動對學習成長之潛在影響－TEPS之縱貫資料分析。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，51，1-23。
  8. 詹慧珊,黃美玲,周利娜(2021)。國中教育會考國文成績延遞至高中職階段之學習成效研究。弘光學報，88，89-98。
  9. 張芳全(2022)。臺灣的國中數學表現弱勢與優勢生影響因素之探討：以TIMSS 2011為例。學校行政，138，1-28。
  10. (2018)。探索軍事院校學生生活管教網絡：發現與關懷弱勢者。臺東大學教育學報，29(1)，1-30。
  11. (2022)。臺灣教育的城鄉差距：偏鄉學校實徵研究的分析。教育研究月刊，334，4-19。
  12. (2023)。「社經文化地位不利」國中資優生之「不利」、韌性與機會。臺灣教育社會學研究，23(2)，1-48。
  13. (2024)。補習對數學成就馬太效應的影響：傾向值成長混合模型分析。調查研究-方法與應用，52，1-26。
print cancel