國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係－應用自我決定理論

Students' Motivational Processes and Their Relationship to Teacher Support in School Physical Education: A Self-Determination Theory Approach

10.6497/BSEPT.20090501_(14).0003

蘇美如(Mei-Zu Su)；黃英哲(Ying-Che Huang)

基本心理需求 ； 動機 ； 體育課 ； Basic psychological needs ； Motivation ； Physical education

臺灣運動心理學報

14期（2009 / 05 / 01）

33 - 50

繁體中文

Purpose: To examine the proposed path model of motivational processes described by self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985): the influence of the PE teachers' autonomy support, competence support and relatedness support on students' motivation in PE is exerted through the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness, which in turn influenced students' concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks. Questionnaires were used to obtained data. Methods: The participant were 595 higher grades students aged 11-14 years from Taipei County。Results: The adequacy of the models tested was analyzed via SEM using Version 7.0 of the statistical program AMOS. Results of the SEM analysis revealed the model was a good fit to the data, χ^2 (262) = 624.70, p＜.001; CN=286; RMR= .05; RMSEA= .05; GFI= .92; AGFI= .90; NFI= .93; CFI= .96, showed that (1) perceived PE teachers' autonomy support and competence support was the predictive variables of autonomy and competence (ß= .51, .46, p＜.05); perceived PE teachers' relatedness support was the predictive variables of relatedness and competence (ß = .38, .20, p＜.05). (2) autonomy, competence and relatedness can predict selfdetermination motivation, competence was the major predictor (ß = .09, .56, .19, p＜.05). (3) self-determination motivation can positively predict concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks (ß = .70, .90, .79, p＜.05). (4) the model showed that students who perceived PE teachers' autonomy support, competence support and relatedness support had greater levels of autonomy, competence and relatedness and facilitated self-determination motivation, furthermore experienced concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks. Conclusion: Physical education teachers in teaching should be used to meet the psychological needs of students of teaching methods in order to enhance self-determination motivation, and have a positive cognitive, affective and behavior.

Purpose: To examine the proposed path model of motivational processes described by self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985): the influence of the PE teachers' autonomy support, competence support and relatedness support on students' motivation in PE is exerted through the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness, which in turn influenced students' concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks. Questionnaires were used to obtained data. Methods: The participant were 595 higher grades students aged 11-14 years from Taipei County。Results: The adequacy of the models tested was analyzed via SEM using Version 7.0 of the statistical program AMOS. Results of the SEM analysis revealed the model was a good fit to the data, χ^2 (262) = 624.70, p＜.001; CN=286; RMR= .05; RMSEA= .05; GFI= .92; AGFI= .90; NFI= .93; CFI= .96, showed that (1) perceived PE teachers' autonomy support and competence support was the predictive variables of autonomy and competence (ß= .51, .46, p＜.05); perceived PE teachers' relatedness support was the predictive variables of relatedness and competence (ß = .38, .20, p＜.05). (2) autonomy, competence and relatedness can predict selfdetermination motivation, competence was the major predictor (ß = .09, .56, .19, p＜.05). (3) self-determination motivation can positively predict concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks (ß = .70, .90, .79, p＜.05). (4) the model showed that students who perceived PE teachers' autonomy support, competence support and relatedness support had greater levels of autonomy, competence and relatedness and facilitated self-determination motivation, furthermore experienced concentration, enjoyment and preference for challenging tasks. Conclusion: Physical education teachers in teaching should be used to meet the psychological needs of students of teaching methods in order to enhance self-determination motivation, and have a positive cognitive, affective and behavior.

1. 周宏室、劉照金(2004)。影響台灣地區學生體育態度之關鍵因素研究。大專體育學刊，6，1-15。
   連結：
2. 劉義群(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
   連結：
3. 謝文娟(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林縣，國立雲林科技大學。
   連結：
4. Clifford, M. M.(1990).Students need challenge, not easy success.Educational Leadership,5,22-26.
5. Cox, A.,Williams, L.(2008).The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students' physical education motivation.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,30,222-239.
6. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determinattion in human behavior.New York:Plenum.
7. Hagger, M. S.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.,Barkoukis, V.,Wang, C. K. J.,Baranowski, J.(2005).Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisuretime physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model.Journal of Educational Psychology,97,376-390.
8. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
9. Marsh, H. W.,Richards, G. E.,Johnson, S.,Roche, L.,Tremayne, P.(1994).Pgysical self-description questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relation to existing instruments.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16,270-305.
10. McAuley, E.,Duncan, T.,Tammen, V. V.(1989).Psychometri properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: Aconfirmatory factor analysis.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,60,48-58.
11. Ntoumanis, N.(2005).A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework.Journal of Education Psychology,97,444-453.
12. Ntoumanis, N.(2001).A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education.British Journal of Education Psychology,71,225-242.
13. Ommundsen, Y.,Kvalø, S. E.(2007).Autonomy-mastery, supportive or performance focused? Different teacher behaviours and pupils' outcomes in physical education.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,51,385-413.
14. Sallis, J. F.,McKenzie, T. L.(1991).Physical education's role in public health.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62,124-137.
15. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2006).Students' motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-determination theory approach.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,77,100-110.
16. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intention.Journal of Educational Psychology,95,97-110.
17. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2005).A test of self-determination theory in school physical education.British Journal of Education Psychology,75,411-433.
18. Vallerand, R. J.,M. P. Zanna (Ed.)(1997).Advances in experimental social psychology.New York:Academic Press.
19. 尤爲立(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
20. 吳明隆(2008)。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用。臺北:五南。
21. 林季燕(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
22. 蔡貞雄(2001)。體育的理念。高雄:復文。
23. 蔡銘仁(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立台灣師範大學。
24. 未出版之統計數據

1. 陳建瑋、季力康、吳克興(2017)。高中職學生體育課心理需求與環境知覺滿意度對自我決定動機及參與意圖之預測。運動教練科學，46，67-80。
2. 陳美華、李晨鐘(2014)。探討動機氣候在大學生體育課中所扮演的角色：中介或是調節？。體育學報，47(1)，47-60。
3. 陳婷婷、王文宜(2015)。體育課無動機量表中文化後的信度與效度：以國小和國中學生為對象。臺灣運動心理學報，15(2)，1-17。
4. 陳婉真、江守峻(2017)。經濟弱勢青少年的教師支持、同儕支持、家庭凝聚力與心理資本之關係：台灣貧窮兒少資料庫分析。當代教育研究季刊，25(4)，11-50。
5. 陳文和(2023)。應用多元智慧理論導入行動學習於大專院校水域活動教學之實證研究—以風浪板運動為例。興大體育學刊，22，177-192。
6. 陳志忠(2013)。專科女學生體育課基本心理需求對知覺自主性支持預測主觀活力之中介效果。臺灣運動教育學報，8(2)，33-50。
7. 戴育宏、陳宥宜、吳志銘、王文宜(2017)。體育課介入不同教師自主支持環境對學童體育課情境動機之差異。臺灣運動教育學報，12(1)，39-56。
8. 黃開成(2019)。高職學生受凌學校因素之研究－身心障礙生與普通生做比較。犯罪學期刊，21(1)，100-138。
9. 李烱煌(2016)。運動動機量表第二版之構念效度。體育學報，49(3)，289-302。
10. 聶喬齡、張嘉旭(2017)。沒有人該被放棄：體育課中的無動機與因應之道。體育學系系刊，16，57-67。
11. 歐正聰,陳志忠,胡瑋庭,李烱煌,丁翠苓(2023)。知覺體育教師行為與體育課樂趣之關係－檢定基本心理需求滿足之中介效果。運動與遊憩研究，17(4)，1-17。
12. 潘敏,徐偉庭,林國華,吳伯龍(2023)。體育課三構面教師自主支持量表中文化與信效度檢驗。臺灣體育運動管理學報，23(2)，357-384。
13. 邱硯雯(2019)。經濟弱勢青少年的教師支持與憂鬱情緒之關係：以自我概念為中介變項。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，15(2)，95-112。
14. 葉麗琴、葉麗珠(2010)。健身運動心理需求滿足感量表修訂之研究。臺灣運動心理學報，16，21-40。
15. 葉麗琴、葉麗珠(2012)。自我決定理論在健身運動領域之驗證。大專體育學刊，14(2)，188-196。
16. 葉素汝、陳美華(2017)。社會體型焦慮、基本心理需求與體育課動機關係之研究—以有氧舞蹈課為例。臺灣體育學術研究，63，95-110。
17. 鄭志富、詹俊成、陳素青(2013)。臺北市高中體育教師領導風格與班級氣氛對體育課學習動機之影響。體育學報，46(3)，257-272。