家長教育程度、文化資本、自我抱負、學習興趣與數學成就之關係研究

The Relation among Parents' Education, Cultural Capital, Self-Aspiration, Students' Interesting and Mathematics Achievement

10.7037/JNTUE.201106.0029

張芳全(Fang-Chung Chang)

文化資本 ； 自我抱負 ； 學習興趣 ； 數學成就 ； The Cultural Capital ； Self-Aspiration ； Learning Interesting ； Mathematics Achievement

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

25卷1期（2011 / 06 / 01）

29 - 56

繁體中文

本研究以臺灣國二生參加TIMSS 2007年資料探討影響數學成就之因素，在可分析樣本3,289位，以家長教育程度爲自變項，文化資本、自我抱負、學習興趣爲中介變項，以數學成就爲依變項。運用結構方程式模型檢定發現，評估模式適配度指標獲得支持，其結論如下：1.子女雙親的教育程度愈高，家庭文化資本愈豐富；家長教育程度愈高，家庭學習資源較多，自我抱負愈高，數學成就有正向影響。2.文化資本正向影響學生學習興趣，學習興趣正向顯著影響自我抱負；文化資本、學生自我抱負與學習興趣分別對數學成就都有明顯的正向影響。3.影響學生數學成就的中介變項存在，即家長教育程度會透過文化資本、學習興趣正向顯著影響數學成就之外，也透過學生自我抱負正向顯著影響數學成就。

Data from the Trend International Mathematics and Science Survey of 2007 (TIMSS 2007) were used to investigate variables that analyzed the impacted factors on mathematics achievement in grade in Taiwan. There were 3,289 samples in this study. It regarded the parents' education degree as independent variable, the cultural capital, students' self-aspiration, interesting in mathematics as intermediary variables, and students' mathematics achievement as dependent variables. The study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test model and use some index to test, and it found that the model was fitted better. The meaning of model was as followings: 1. Parental education level was high, and they had more the cultural capital. Parents' education degree were high, they had more the learning resources and more self-aspiration. 2. The cultural capital was positively significant on students' interesting in mathematics and self-aspiration was influenced by interesting in mathematics, in addition, cultural capital, self-aspiration and learning interesting in mathematics were significantly influenced on mathematics achievement respectively. 3. The intermediary variables affected mathematics achievement, that meant the parents' education degree could influence on achievement by the cultural capital, besides, it also could influence on achievement by students' self-aspiration and cultural capital respectively.

1. 林淑敏、黃毅志(2009)。原漢族群、補習教育與學業成績關聯之研究—以臺東地區國中二年級生為例。當代教育研究，17(3)，41-81。
   連結：
2. 張芳全(2006)。社經地位、文化資本與教育期望對學業成就影響之結構方程模式檢定。測驗學刊，51(2)，171-195。
   連結：
3. 張芳全(2006)。影響數學成就因素探討：以臺灣在TIMSS 00年的樣本為例。課程與教學季刊，9(3)，139-167。
   連結：
4. 謝孟穎(2003)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊，49(2)，255-287。
   連結：
5. 簡晉龍、任宗浩、張淑婷(2008)。跨學科間自我概念與學業成就路徑模式之檢驗─整合模式在數學何科學領域的適用性。教育心理學報，40(1)，107-126。
   連結：
6. 蘇船利、黃毅志(2009)。文化資本透過學校社會資本對臺東縣國二學生學業成績之影響。教育研究集刊，55(3)，99-129。
   連結：
7. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1998).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
8. Baker, D.,Goesling, B.,Letender, G. K.(2002).Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the Heyneman-Loxley effect on mathematics and science achievement.Comparative Education Review,46(3),291-312.
9. Bentler, P. M.(1982).Confirmatory factor analysis via non-iterative estimation: A fast inexpensive method.Journal of Marketing Research,19,417-424.
10. Bentler, P. M.,Bonett, D. G.(1980).Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin,88,588-606.
11. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equation modeling with latent variables.New York:John Wiley.
12. Bos, K.,Kuiper, W.,Plomp, T.(2001).TIMSS results of Dutch grade 8 students on international perspective: Performance assessment and written test.Studies in Educational Evaluation,25,123-135.
13. Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
14. Broeck, A. Van den.,Opdenakker, M. C.,Hermans, D.,Damme, Jan Van(2003).Socioeconomic status and student achievement in a multilevel model of Flemish TIMSS- data: The importance of a parent questoinnaire.Studies in Educational Evaluation,29,177-190.
15. Cheng, S.,Starks, B.(2002).Racial difference in the effects of significant others on students' educational expectations.Sociology of Education,75(4),306-327.
16. Cheung, S. Y.,Andersen, R.(2003).Time to read: Family resources and educational outcomes in Britain.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,34(3),413-437.
17. De Graaf, N. D.,De Graaf, P. M.,Kraaykamp, G.(2000).Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective.Sociology of Education,73(2),92-111.
18. De Graaf, P. M.(1986).The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands.Sociology of Education,59,237-246.
19. DiMaggio, P.,Mohr, J.(1985).Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection.American Journal of Sociology,90,1231-1261.
20. Downey, D. B.(1995).When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance.American Sociological Review,60(5),746-761.
21. Driessen, G. W. J. M.(2001).Ethnicity, forms of capital, and educational achievement.International Review of Education,47(6),513-538.
22. Dumais, S. A.(2002).Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus.Sociology of Education,75,44-68.
23. Eitle, T. M.,Eitle, D. J.(2002).Race, cultural capital, and the educational effects of participation in sports.Sociology of Education,75(1),123-146.
24. Fan, X. T.,Chen, M.(2001).Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Educational Psychology Review,13,122.
25. Finn, J. D.(1972).Expectations and the educational environment.Review of Educational Research,42(3),387-410.
26. Gillian, H-T.,Pong, S-L.(2005).Does family policy environment moderate the effect of single-parenthood on children's academic achievement? A study of European countries.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,36(2),227-248.
27. Greene, B. A.,Miller, R. B.,Crowson, H. M.,Duke, B. L.,Akey, K. L.(2004).Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29,462-482.
28. Hofferth, S. L.,Boisjoly.,Duncan, G.. J.(1998).Parents' extrafamilial resources and children's school attainment.Sociology of Education,71(3),246-268.
29. House, J. D.(2000).Relationships between self-beliefs, academic background, and achievement of undergraduate students in health sciences majors.International Journal of Instructional Media,27,427-438.
30. House, J. D.(2004).Cognitive-motivational characteristics and science achievement of adolescent students: Results from the TIMSS 1995 and TIMSS 1999 assessment.International Journal of Instructional Media,31(4),411-424.
31. House, J. D.(2000).Academic background and self-beliefs as predictors of student grade performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.International Journal of Instructional Media,27,207-220.
32. House, J. D.(1993).Cognitive-motivational predictors of science achievement.International Journal of Instructional Media,20,155-162.
33. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Hillsdale:Scientific Software International.
34. Kalmijn, M.,Kraaykamp, G.(1996).Race, culture capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States.Sociology of Education,69,22-34.
35. Karabel,K J.(ed.),Halsey, A. H.(ed.)(1977).Power and ideology in education.New York:Oxford University.
36. Katsillis, J.,Rubinsion, R.(1990).Cultural capital student achievement and educational reproduction: The case of Greece.American Sociological Review,55,270-279.
37. Khattab, N.(2002).Social capital, students' perceptions and educational aspirations among Palestinian students in Israel.Research in Education,68,77-88.
38. King, V. T.,Nguyen, P. A.,Minh, N. H.(2008).Professional middle class youth in postreform Vietnam: Identity, continuity and change.Modern Asian Studies,42(4),783-812.
39. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Presws.
40. Koller, O.(2001).Mathematical world views and achievement in advanced mathematics in Germany: Findings from TIMSS population 3.Studies in Educational Evaluation,27,65-78.
41. Lareau, A.(2002).Invisible inequality: Social class and child reading in black families and white families.American Sociological Review,67,747-776.
42. Lee, T. Y.(1987).Ohio State University.
43. Ma, X.(2005).Early acceleration of students in mathematics: Does it promote growth and stability of growth in achievement across mathematical areas?.Contemporary Educational Psychology,30,439-460.
44. Ma, X.(2001).Participation in advanced mathematics: Do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter?.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26,132-146.
45. Marsh, H. W.,Hocevar, D.(1985).A new more powerful method of multitrait-multimethod analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,73,107-117.
46. Martin, M. O.(Ed.)(2007).TIMSS 2007 user guide for the international database.Boston:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
47. Martin, M. O.,Mullis, I.V. S.,Foy, P.(2008).TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eight grades.Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College.
48. McDonald, R. P.,Marsh, H. M.(1990).Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit.Psychological Bulletin,107,247-255.
49. Mulaik, S. A.,James, L. R.,Van Altine, J.,Bennett, N.,Stilwell, C. D.(1989).Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin,105,430-445.
50. Mullen, A. L.,Goyette, K. A.,Soares, J. A.(2003).Who goes to graduate school? Social and academic correlates of educational continuation after college.Sociology of Education,76(2),143-169.
51. Mullis, I.V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Smith, T. A.,Garden., R. O.,Gregory, K. O.(2007).TIMSS assessment frameworks and specifications 2007.Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College.
52. NCES(2007).Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science study(TIMSS) 2007.USA Department and Education.
53. NCES(2007).TIMSS 2007 user guide for the international database.USA Department and Education.
54. Richardson, J. G.(Ed)(1986).Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education.Connecticut:greenwood.
55. Robataile, D. F.(Ed.),Beaton, A. E.(Ed.)(2002).Secondary analysis of the TIMSS data.Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. Roscigno, V. J.,Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W.(1999).Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns.Sociology of Education,72(3),158-178.
57. Scott, J.(2004).Family, gender, and educational attainment in Britain: A longitudinal study.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,35(4),565-589.
58. Sewell, W. H.,Haller, A. O.,Portes, A.(1969).The educational and early occupational attainment process.American Sociological Review,34,82-92.
59. Steinberg, L.(1996).Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do.New York:Touchstone Books.
60. Teachman, J. D.(1987).Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment.American Sociological Review,52,548-557.
61. Teachman, J. D.,Paasch, K.,Carver, K.(1996).Social capital and dropping out of school early.Journal of Marriage and the Family,58(3),773-783.
62. Trusty, J.(2000).High education expectations and low achievement: Stability of education goals across adolescence.The Journal of Educational Research,93(6),356-365.
63. van de Werfhorst, H. G.,Kraaykamp, G.(2001).Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption, and sociopolitical orientation.Sociology of Education,74,296-317.
64. Wentzel, K.R.,Wigfield, A.(1998).Academic and social motivation influences on student's academic performance.Education Psychology Review,10,155-174.
65. Whang, P. A.,Hancock, G. R.(1994).Motivation and mathematics achievement. Comparisons between Asian-American and Non-Asian Students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,19,302-332.
66. White, K.(1982).The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin,91,461-481.
67. Wilkins, J. L. M.(2004).Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation.The Journal of Experimental Education,72(4),331-346.
68. Yamamoto, Y.,Brinton, M. C.(2010).Cultural capital in east Asian educational systems: The case of Japan.Sociology of Education,83,67-83.
69. Zimmerman, B. J.,Bandura, A.,Martinez-Pons, M.(1992).Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting.American Educational Research Journal,29(3),663-676.
70. 何瑞珠(1999)。家長參與子女的教育：文化資本與社會資本的闡釋。香港中文大學院教育學報，27(1)，233-261。
71. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
72. 余民寧、趙珮晴、許嘉家(2009)。影響國中小女學生學業成就與學習興趣因素─以臺灣國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查（TIMSS）資料為例。教育資料與研究，89，79-104。
73. 吳琪玉(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
74. 巫有鎰(1999)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制─以臺北市與臺東縣做比較。教育研究集刊，43，212-243。
75. 李文益、黃毅志(2004)。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究─以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報，15(2)，23-58。
76. 李敦仁、余民寧(2005)。社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證：以TEPS 資料庫資料為例。臺灣教育社會學研究，5(2)，1-47。
77. 林淑玲、馬信行(1983)。家庭社經背景對學前教育機會的影響及學前教育對小學學業成績的影響。教育與心理研究，6，19-39。
78. 邱天助(1998)。布爾迪厄文化再製理論。臺北市:桂冠。
79. 洪泉湖主編、吳學燕主編(1999)。臺灣原住民教育。臺北市:師大書苑。
80. 孫清山、黃毅志(1994)。社會資源、文化資本與地位取得。東海大學學報，35，127-150。
81. 馬信行(1985)。家庭文化背景與學業成績的關係。政治大學學報，51，139-65。
82. 張芳全(2009)。家長教育程度與科學成就之關係：文化資本、補習時間與學習興趣為中介的分析。教育研究與發展期刊，5(4)，39-77。
83. 張芳全(2010)。以SEM檢定影響數學成就因素：亞洲四小龍國二生參與TIMSS 2003的資料為例。教育行政論壇，2(2)，1-33。
84. 張芳全(2010)。影響新移民與本國籍子女數學成就因素之研究：臺灣參加TIMSS 2007資料為例。新移民子女課程與教學研討會
85. 張芳全(2010)。多層次模型在學習成就之研究。臺北市:心理。
86. 陳麗妃(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立新竹師範學院進修部課程與教學碩士班。
87. 黃文俊(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。
88. 黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學─結構方程式模型。臺北市:五南。
89. 黃毅志(1996)。臺灣地區民眾地位取得之因果機制—共變結構分析。東吳社會學報，5，213-248。
90. 黃毅志、陳怡靖(2005)。臺灣的升學問題：理論與研究之檢討。臺灣教育社會學研究，5(1)，77-118。
91. 羅珮華(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。

1. 張仁明(2017)。5E學習環在七年級植物的養分與能量單元的科學興趣與認知診斷。中原大學教育研究所學位論文。2017。1-137。