課室目標結構知覺量表之修訂與信、效度之衡鑑

The Revision of Perceived Classroom Goal Structure Scale and the Evaluation of Its Reliability and Validity

吳中勤(Chung-Chin Wu)

成就目標理論 ； 測量 ； 複核效度 ； 課室目標結構知覺 ； achievement goal theory ； cross-validation ； measurement ； perceived classroom goal structure

教育實踐與研究

28卷2期（2015 / 12 / 01）

89 - 116

繁體中文

受到成就目標理論的影響，當前課室目標結構知覺的測量主張學習者能夠知覺到教師形塑的情境目標。然而，成就目標在測量內涵與理論再概念化等問題上，至今仍未有相關研究探討植基於成就目標理論發展的課室目標結構知覺觀點，在測量上是否有修正的實益。因此，本研究主要目的在於：(1)參考成就目標測量內涵上的問題與六向度理論再概念化的主張，修訂課室目標結構知覺量表；(2)檢驗六向度課室目標結構知覺模式適於解釋觀察資料的程度；(3)瞭解理論模式的測量穩定性。為達研究目的，本研究進行三階段抽樣，分別以377位、740位與767位國中八年級學生進行量表預試、模式驗證及複核效度的檢驗。研究結果發現，(1)六向度課室目標結構知覺模式具有良好的內外在品質，但潛在變項間相關偏高，顯示出在六個一階因素之上分別有課室精熟目標與課室表現目標兩個二階因素；(2)課室目標結構知覺量表具有良好的複核效度，顯示出課室目標結構知覺的測量具有相當程度的穩定性。教學實務工作者可從學習任務（task）、教師專業（authority）、認同（recognition）、分組（grouping）、評量（evaluation）與時間安排（time）（T.A.R.G.E.T）等六個層面來形塑精熟的課室情境。

The measurement of perceptions of classroom goal structure, rooted in achievement goal theory, argued that students could perceive contextual goals shaped by their teachers. Currently, achievement goal has suffered critics on the issues of measurement and theoretical re-conceptualization. However, the revisions of perceived classroom goal structure based on achievement goal theory were rarely investigated in terms of their utility in classroom settings. The purposes of the present study are to: (1) Revise the scale of perceived classroom goal structure according to the problems highlighted by achievement goal researchers; (2) Examine the extent to which the revised model fit the data; (3) Investigate the measurement stability of the theoretical model. In order to achieve the purposes, the present study adopted a three-step sampling procedure, which involved 373, 740, and 767 eighth graders in the pilot study, model verification, and cross-validitation test, respectively. Results showed: (1) The perception of classroom goal structure with six dimensions hold good internal and external validity. However, high correlations among six first-order factors indicated that there were two second-order factors, classroom mastery goal and classroom performance goal, behind the first-order ones. (2) The perceived classroom goal structure scale was good in cross- validation. It indicated that the measurement of classroom goal was fairly stable. In practice, the six aspects composed of task, authority, recognition, grouping, evaluation, and time could be adopted to form a mastery oriented classroom.

1. 吳中勤(2014)。以多群組結構方程模式檢驗成就目標理論模式的測量恆等性。科學教育研究期刊，59(3)，59-95。
   連結：
2. 李宜玫(2012)。數學低成就學習動機之類型與區別分析：中小學弱勢學生與一般學生之比較。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，39-71。
   連結：
3. 林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報，39(2)，173-194。
   連結：
4. 許崇憲(2012)。目標結構之絕對成就目標取向、學業表現、及學習策略的預測力：期刊文獻的後設分析研究。教育心理學報，45(1)，63-82。
   連結：
5. 彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報：教育類，50(2)，69-95。
   連結：
6. 程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，15-40。
   連結：
7. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Joumal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
8. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom students' learning strategies and motivation processes.Joumal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
9. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
10. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
11. Bong, M.(2005).Within-grade changes in Korean girls' motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(4),656-672.
12. Chen, F. F.,Sousa, K. H.,West, S. G.(2005).Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models.Structural Equation Modeling,12(3),471-492.
13. Cheng, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9,233-255.
14. Conroy, D. E.,Elliot, A. J.,Hofer, S. M.(2003).A 2 x 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,25,456-476.
15. Dweck, C. S.(1986).Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist,41(10),1040-1048.
16. Eccles, J. S.,Midgley, C.,Wigfield, A.,Buchanan, C. M.,Reuman, D.,Flanagan, C.,Maciver, D.(1993).Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents experiences in schools and in families.American Psychologist,48(2),90-101.
17. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
18. Elliot, A. J.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(1996).Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70(3),461-475.
19. Elliot, A. J.,McGregor, H. A.(2001).A 2×2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(3),501-519.
20. Elliot, A. J.,Murayama, K.(2008).On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(3),613-628.
21. Elliot, A. J.,Murayama, K.,Pekrun, R.(2011).A 3×2 achievement goal model.Journal of Educational Psychology,103(3),632-648.
22. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
23. Hair, J. F.,William, C. B.,Babin, B. J.,Rolph, E. A.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
24. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
25. Huang, C.(2012).Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1),48-73.
26. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
27. Kaplan, A.,Gheen, M.,Midgley, C.(2002).Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour.British Journal of Educational Psychology,72,191-211.
28. Kaplan, D.(2009).Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions.Los Angeles, CA:Sage.
29. Lau, S.,Nie, Y.(2008).Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(1),15-29.
30. Linnenbrink, E. A.(2005).The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(2),197-213.
31. Luo, W. S.,Hogan, D.,Paris, S. G.(2011).Predicting Singapore students' achievement goals in their English study: Self-construal and classroom goal structure.Learning and Individual Differences,21(5),526-535.
32. Meece, J. L.,Anderman, E. M.,Anderman, L. H.(2006).Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement.Annual Review of Psychology,57,487-503.
33. Murayama, K.,Elliot, A. J.(2009).The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(2),432-447.
34. Nicholls, J. G.(1984).Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.Psychological Review,91(3),328-346.
35. Pintrich, P. R.(2000).An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),92-104.
36. Roeser, R. W.,Midgley, C.,Urdan, T. C.(1996).Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging.Journal of Educational Psychology,88(3),408-422.
37. Rolland, R. G.(2012).Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review.Review of Educational Research,82(4),396-435.
38. Schmid, J.,Leiman, J. M.(1957).The development of hierarchical factor solutions.Psychometrika,22(1),53-61.
39. Schunk, D. H.,Pintrich, P. R.,Meece, J. L.(2008).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
40. Shim, S. S.,Cho, Y.,Wang, C.(2013).Classroom goal structures, social achievement goals, and adjustment in middle school.Learning and Instruction,23,69-77.
41. Torkzadeh, G.,Koufteros, X.,Pflughoeft, K.(2003).Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy.Structural Equation Modeling,10(2),263-275.
42. Urdan, T.(2004).Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(2),251-264.
43. Urdan, T.,Midgley, C.(2003).Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence.Contemporary Educational Psychology,28(4),524-551.
44. Witkow, M. R.,Fuligni, A. J.(2007).Achievement goals and daily school experiences among adolescents with Asian, Latino, and European American backgrounds.Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3),584-596.
45. Wolters, C. A.(2004).Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(2),236-250.
46. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北市=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Booking Gallery。