解放研究：障礙研究主導權之轉移

Emancipatory Research: The Power Transformation in Disability Research

10.6502/SEF.2012.13.69-79

吳啟誠(Chi-Cheng Wu)；張俊紳(Chun-Sheng Chang)

批判理論 ； 社會障礙模式 ； 解放研究 ； 障礙研究 ； critical theory ； disability research ； emancipatory research ； social model of disability

特教論壇

13期（2012 / 12 / 01）

69 - 79

繁體中文

本文旨在介紹「解放研究」之理論基礎、實施過程及其限制。解放研究以批判理論及社會障礙模式為理論基礎，強調：社會障礙乃是主流文化依據社會、文化、經濟等價值並透過政治與權力運作的過程所賦予；以及障礙人士面臨的各層級社會參與之限制，源自於有問題的社會機制而非肇因於個體身體的損傷。因此，障礙研究旨在從研究過程中提昇障礙人士的知識與能力，並與他們共同消弭主流社會對障礙人士所形成的各種限制與壓迫。其方法是將障礙人士變成知識的生產者，並以他們的切身經驗做為檢討與改善社會機制的基礎。基於這樣的理念，從事障礙研究時，障礙人士從研究議題、研究問題、研究方法、資料收集與分析、報告撰寫與呈現，都必須擁有其主導權。國內方面，解放研究的精神反映在部分研究與社會運動，他們透過具體的行動方案提升障礙人士的自我倡導、自我決策與相關服務之品質。不過，為了進一步確保障礙人士的生活品質，未來必須再強化他們對自我生活的掌控權以及決策時提供他們必要的資訊。

The paper is to introduce emancipatory research which is grounded on critical theory and the social model of disability. It is argued that the meaning of disability is constructed against social, economic as well as cultural conditions in a specific society by mainstream people. Also, societal restriction is seen as the cause inhibiting the participation of people with disabilities in social activities rather than their body's impairments. Therefore, in doing disability research people with disabilities should have control over the research process and their 'disability' experiences are valued as a basis for reducing or eliminating social restriction on them. These relevant threads are embodied into several Taiwanese studies that attempt to enhance self-determination, self-advocacy and life quality of people with disabilities. Furthermore, it is suggested that people with disabilities should have more control over their lives and access to sufficient information for assuring an independent and quality life.

1. 周月清、李婉萍、張意才(2007)。住民社區居住與生活參與、選擇與自主：以台灣六個團體家庭成年智障礙者為例。東吳社會工作學報，16，37-78。
   連結：
2. 邱惠姿、李建承(2009)。身心障礙者自我決策與轉型實務之探究。特教論壇，7，34-41。
   連結：
3. 邱滿艷、韓福榮、張千惠、余月霞(2010)。從福利服務使用者觀點，探討參訓身心障礙者的自我決策。特殊教育季刊，116，1-10。
   連結：
4. 張偉珊(2009)。輕度智能障礙者生涯諮商經驗之行動研究。身心障礙研究季刊，7(4)，247-259。
   連結：
5. 黃志雄、陳明聰(2008)。阿明的電腦夢：重度障礙學生輔助溝通介入行動研究。特殊教育學報，27，129-156。
   連結：
6. 黃淑婷(2011)。身心障礙學生參與個別化教育計畫在增進自我決策能力的應用。國小特殊教育，52，96-103。
   連結：
7. 趙本強(2009)。自我決策課程對國小高年級資源班學生教學成效之研究。特殊教育學報，29，111-136。
   連結：
8. Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (2006, August). Disability Politics and the Disability Movement in Britain: Where Did It All Go Wrong? Coalition, 8-13. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/Coalition%20disability%20politics%20paper.pdf
9. Barnes, C.(2003).What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing 'emancipatory' disability research.Disability & Society,18(1),3-17.
10. Barnes, C.(1990).Cabbage Syndrome: The Social Construction of Dependence.Lewes:Falmer Press.
11. Barnes, C.(Ed.),Mercer, G.(Ed.)(1997).Doing Disability Research.Leeds:Disability Press.
12. Barnes, L.(Ed.),Oliver, M.(Ed.),Barton, L.(Ed.)(2002).Disability Studies Today.Cambridge:Polity Press.
13. Barton, L.(2005).Emancipatory research and disabled people: Some observations and questions.Educational Review,57(3),317-327.
14. Bury, M.(2000).A comment on the ICIDH2.Disability & Society,15(7),1073-1077.
15. Crotty, M.(1998).The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process.Sydney:Allen & Unwin.
16. Danieli, A.,Woodhams, C.(2005).Emancipatory research Methodology and Disability: A Critique.International Journal of Social Research Methodology,8(4),281-296.
17. Dewsbury, G.,Clarke, K.,Randall, D.,Rouncefield, M.,Sommerville, I.(2004).The anti-social model of disability.Disability & Society,19(2),145-158.
18. Fulcher, G.(1989).Disabling Policies? A Comparative Approach to Education Policy.London:Falmer Press.
19. Hunt, P.(1981).Settling Accounts with the Parasite People, a Critique of Life Apart by Miller and Gwynne.London:UPIAS.
20. Johnson, L.(2009).No Longer Researching About Us Without Us: a researcher' s reflection on rights and inclusive research in Ireland.British Journal of Learning Disabilities,37,250-256.
21. Mertens, D. M.(2005).Research and evaluation in education and psychology.CA:Sage.
22. Morris, J.(1989).Able lives: women's experience of paralysis.London:Women's Press.
23. Oliver, M.(1992).Changing social relations of research production.Disability, Handicap and Society,7(2),101-14.
24. Oliver, M.,Zare, G.,Silver, J.,Moore, M.,Sainseury, V.(1988).Walking into Darkness.London:Macmillan.
25. Priestley, M.,Waddington, L.,Bessozi, C.(2010).Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: learning from disabled people's organisations.Disability & Society,25(6),731-746.
26. Reindal, S.(2009).Disability, capability, and special education: towards a capability-based theory.European Journal of Special Needs Education,24(2),155-168.
27. Singal, N.(2010).Doing disability research in a Southern context: challenges and possibilities.Disability & Society,25(4),415-426.
28. Stevenson, M.(2010).Flexible and Responsive Research: Developing Rights-Based Emancipatory Disability Research Methodology in Collaboration with Young Adults with Down Syndrome.Australian Social Work,63(1),35-50.
29. Terzi, L.(2004).The social model of disability: A philosophical critique.Journal of Applied Philosophy,21(2),141-157.
30. Tuffrey-Wijne, I.,Butler, G.(2009).Co-researching with people with learning disabilities: an experience of involvement in qualitative data analysis.Health Expectations,13(2),174-184.
31. Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation(1976).Fundamental Principles of Disability.London:UPIAS.
32. Walmsley, J.(2001).Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability.Disability and Society,16,187-205.
33. World Health Organization(1980).The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps.Geneva:WHO.
34. World Health Organization(2001).International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.Geneva:WHO.
35. Zarb, G.(1992).On the Road to Damascus: first steps towards changing the relations of disability research production.Disability, Handicap and Society,7(2),125-138.
36. 周月清(2004)。障礙者獨立生活運動緣起與意涵－美加英文參考文獻探討。社區發展季刊，106，331-345。
37. 邱滿艷、韓福榮(2007)。從使用者與提供者觀點探討我國身心障礙者職務再設計措施之研究。復健諮商，1，47-64。

1. Wu, Chi-cheng(2013).A Critique on Discourse and Research regarding Inclusive Education: Taiwan as a case example.特教論壇,15,20-32.
2. (2023)。輪椅使用者與運動的距離──缺乏興趣？還是缺乏可近性？。社區發展季刊，184，209-224。