運用同儕學習策略提升國小學生閱讀能力成效之研究

Effects of Peer-assisted Learning Strategies on Reading Literacy for Sixth Graders

10.6502/SEF.201906_(26).0001

石明玉(Ming-Yu Shih)；孔淑萱(Shu-Hsuan Kung)

同儕學習策略 ； 閱讀理解 ； 朗讀流暢度 ； Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) ； Reading comprehension ； reading fluency

特教論壇

26期（2019 / 06 / 01）

1 - 23

繁體中文

本研究目的在探討同儕學習協助策略對提升國小高年級普通班學生語文能力之情形，作為教師在選取證據本位教學（evidence-based instruction）之參考。研究方法採準實驗設計（quasi-experimental design）之不等組時間系列設計，對象為兩班六年級共57位普通班學生，隨機分派為實驗組與對照組。實驗組接受每週兩堂課，為期八週的同儕學習協助策略教學，控制組則維持原班教學。參與學生於教學前、中、後分別接受三次的閱讀理解成長測驗及朗讀流暢度測驗，並對實驗組學生進行八次依據PIRLS閱讀理解四層次向度自編之閱讀理解形成性評量，最後輔以問卷調查。資料分別採二因子重複量數變異數分析、單因子重複量數變異數分析及百分比統計方式進行，結果顯示：一、兩組學生在「閱讀理解成長測驗」的表現無顯著差異。二、實驗組於朗讀流暢度進步幅度顯著優於對照組，η^2效果值.26，屬於高度關聯強度。三、實驗組於自編閱讀理解形成性評量成績呈現明顯上升趨勢，達到顯著差異，η^2效果值.73，屬於高度關聯強度。四、實驗組學生對同儕學習策略課程接受度高，其中最喜愛輪流指導任務和預測下文的活動，學生表示在該課程中上課的參與感及同儕互動情形均有提升。最後，根據研究結果提出對未來研究與教學實務之建議。

This study aims to examine the effects of Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) for elementary school students in regular classes. Fifty-seven 6^(th) graders participated the study and randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The experimental group implemented PALS reading instruction for 10 weeks. The control group stayed with their original instruction. Data were analyzed through two-way repeated measured ANOVA. The results showed that the experimental group outperformed those in the control group in terms of reading comprehension and oral reading fluency (η^2 = .26 and .73, respectively). The results indicated the evidence of the effectiveness of PALS reading instruction for Chinese-speaking students. Based on the results, more discussions and suggestions were provided.

1. 洪月女,楊雅斯(2014)。讀報結合閱讀理解策略教學對國小四年級學童學習成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，59(4)，1-26。
   連結：
2. 崔夢萍(2006)。運用同儕協助學習策略於國小融合教育國語文學習之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，30，27-52。
   連結：
3. 陳奕卉,孔淑萱(2016)。同儕協助學習策略對提升國小學習障礙學生閱讀理解成效之研究。特教論壇，21，1-25。
   連結：
4. 陳惠琴,楊憲明(2008)。國小學童文本朗讀速度之分析研究。特殊教育與復健學報，18，1-30。
   連結：
5. 蘇宜芬,張祐瑄,李孟峰,黃鈺茜(2016)。國小二至六年級朗讀流暢度篩檢準確度及切截點分析。教育科學研究期刊，61(4)，33-57。
   連結：
6. Campbell, F. A.,Ramey, C. T.,Pungello, E.,Sparlin, H.,Johnson, S. M.(2002).Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes for the abecedarian project.Applied Developmental Science,6(1),42-57.
7. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Eribaum.
8. Delquadri, J.,Greenwood, C. R.,Whorton, D.,Carta, J. J.,Hall, R. V.(1986).Class wide peer tutoring.Exceptional Children,52,535-542.
9. Dole, J. A.,Duffy, G. G.,Roehler, L. R.,Pearson, P. D.(1991).Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Educational Research,61(2),239-264.
10. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(1996).Research on peer-assisted learning strategies:The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction.Reading & Writing Quarterly,22(1),5-25.
11. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2005).Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children.The Journal of Special Education,39(1),34-44.
12. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(1999).Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems.Remedial and Special Education,20(5),309-328.
13. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Hamlett, C. L.,Karns, K.,Dutka, S.(1997).Enhancing students’ helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations.The Elementary School Journal,97(3),223-249.
14. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.,Thompson, E. S.,Yen, L.,Otaiba, S. A.,Yang, N.,McMaster, K. N.,Prentice, K.,Kazdan, S.,Saenz, L.(2001).Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school.Remedial and Special Education,22(1),15-21.
15. Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L.,Burish, P.(2000).Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,15(2),85-91.
16. Fuchs, D.,Hendricks, E.,Walsh, M.,Fuchs, L.,Gilbert, J.(2018).Evaluating a multidimensional reading comprehension program and reconsidering the lowly reputation of tests of near-transfer.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,33(1),11-23.
17. Gadke, C. A.(2001).Kent State University.
18. Gagné, E. D.,Yekovich, C. W.,Yekovich, F. R.(1993).The cognitive psychology of school learning.New York:Happer Collins.
19. Hallahan, D. P.,Lloyd, J. W.,Kauffman, J. M.,Weiss, M. P.,Martinez, E. A.(2005).Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching.Boston, MA:Pearson Education.
20. Jimerson, S. R.(Ed.),Burns, M. K.(Ed.),VanDerHeyden, A. M.(Ed.)(2016).Handbook of Response to Intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support.New York, NY:Springer.
21. Mathes, P. G.,Howard, J. K.,Allen, S. H.,Fuchs, D.(1998).Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners.Reading Research Quarterly,33(1),62-94.
22. McMaster, K. L.(2007).Promises and Limitations of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Reading.A Contemporary Journal,5(2),97-112.
23. McMaster, K. L.,Fuchs, D.,Fuchs, L. S.(2006).Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction.Reading & Writing Quarterly,22,5-25.
24. McMaster, K.,Kung, S.H.,Han, I.,Cao, M.(2008).Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: A "Tier 1" Approach to Promoting English Learners’ Response to Intervention.Exceptional Children,74(2),194-214.
25. Miller, D.,Topping, K.,Thurston, A.(2010).Peer tutoring in reading: The effects of role and organization on two dimensions of self-esteem.The British of Educational Psychology,80,417-433.
26. Patterson, L. J.(2013).northern Michigan university.
27. Rafdal, B. H.,McMaster, K. L.,McConnell, S. R.(2011).The effectiveness of Kindergarten Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for students with disabilities.Exceptional Children,77(3),299-316.
28. Salvin, R. E.(1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
29. Topping, K. J.(Ed.),Ehly, S.(Ed.)(1998).Peerassisted learning.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Torgesen, J. K.(2000).Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problems of treatment resisters.Learning Disabilities Research and Practices,15(1),55-64.
31. Utley, C. A.(2001).Introduction to the special series: Advances in peer-mediated instruction and interventions in the 21st century.Remedial and Special Education,22(1),2-3.
32. Zarei, A. A.,Naamaei, F.(2014).The effect of pre-task activity types (SRE, PALS, and CSR) on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary recognition and recall.Proscenia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,98,1996-2003.
33. 吳孟儒,王文伶(2014)。國小普通班與資源班教師應用同儕中介教學策略之調查研究：融合教育的觀點。東臺灣特殊教育學報，16，1-30。
34. 呂敏慧(2007)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
35. 李嘉倩(2012)。臺中市，國立臺中教育大學。
36. 李咏吟（編）(1995).學習輔導：學習心理學的應用.臺北:心理.
37. 林欣蔓(2007)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
38. 林素貞(2013)。差異化教學與成功學習。教育研究月刊，233，49-60。
39. 柯華葳,張郁雯,詹益綾,丘嘉慧(2017)。,桃園市:國立中央大學。
40. 柯華葳,詹益綾(2006)。柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民小學閱讀理解篩選測驗。
41. 張玉茹(2001)。如何看得更清楚─談閱讀教學。教育研究資訊雙月刊，9(3)，32-51。
42. 教育部(2013)。教育部(2013 )。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。行政院102年3月1日院臺教揆字第1010079097號函核定。
43. 許雲景(2013)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學。
44. 連瑞琦,劉振中,陳欣希,李治國(2013).挑戰閱讀理解力（二）.新北:螢火蟲.
45. 陳欣希,劉振中,許育健,連瑞琦(2013).挑戰閱讀理解力（一）.新北:螢火蟲.
46. 黃凣瑄(2014)。臺北市，臺北市立大學。
47. 葉淑欣(2014)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
48. 蔡辰北,陳靜紋(2013)。淺談差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，78，157-182。
49. 謝文英(2014)。中小學教師差異化教學策略。教師天地，190，51-57。
50. 蘇宜芬,洪儷瑜,陳心怡,陳柏熹(2015).閱讀理解成長測驗.臺北:中華行為科學社.

1. (2023)。改善學生課堂參與度之熱門選項即時反饋系統設計與實例探討。教育學報，51(2)，77-99。